An attempt at a straw man, smooth. No where did I say that either extreme is the only way to go. I did say that the prior extreme is used much more frequently than the latter, and in that way this story is different and interesting. Of course there concepts that would fall in between, and some would say that those concepts have been used to some extent here, but even neglecting that, the original point stands that the story is interesting (in my and many others opinion) because it goes against standard "end of the world" type scenarios.Ryan Thunder wrote: Right, because it has to be either we get totally fucked over, or they get totally fucked over. Good to know that there's nothing in between.
You're certainly entitle to your opinion, as dim witted as it may be. Though you should realize that to many readers, there have been appropriately climactic scenes; your opinion is not fact. Further more, I feel bad for you if the only stories you find interesting are the ones where everything is an action movie and climax follows climax, but there is value in being subtle, in using symbolism, in using a myriad of other literary techniques to make a good story.Ryan Thunder wrote: ... Honestly? No, not really. Almost everything that had potential has been handled in the most anticlimactic manner possible. The angel of death comes to mind. Oh, and the red tide..
Calling me irrelevant is the surest sign to date of your self-importance and pompus nature. You're obviously commenting to my benefit now, as we are the only ones arguing in this thread. I simply expressed entertainment in being able to easily refute your ridiculous attacks against a story that I find interesting and entertaining, as well as the simplicity of coaxing you into an argument (with someone you find "irrelevant") in which you have done nothing but make yourself look foolish and arrogant.Ryan Thunder wrote: What, you think I commented for your benefit, you irrelevant sack of shit?
Please, continue. For the entertainment of the masses.