Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Military
Moderator: Vympel
- DatBurnTho11
- Youngling
- Posts: 107
- Joined: 2010-07-08 05:41pm
Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Military
Hello SD.net This is my first post and I look forward to hearing from all of you.
I've starting watching some episodes from the CGI Star Wars Clone Wars TV series, and noted that the behavior exhibited by the Republic and Separatists military forces differs greatly from the projected Imperial strengths on Mr. Wong's website. I am treading lightly on this topic because I noted that the frequently posted topics section of this forum indicated that the question of whether this TV series is canon is... a frequently posted topic, but I have a slightly different question than that.
Given that this series is given a degree of canon status since George Lucas was directly involved in its production (though of course it is overridden by the episodes) and the frequent statement on SD.net that the level of technology in the SW universe changed little between the Clone Wars era and the Imperial era, I wanted to ask if you think that some shortcomings in tactics/technology demonstrated in the Clone Wars series could cast doubts to the effectiveness of later Imperial technology. I do have some concrete examples, but thought I might hear back from the forum first in case this question has already been asked or I am simply an idiot for posing this topic in the first place.
I've starting watching some episodes from the CGI Star Wars Clone Wars TV series, and noted that the behavior exhibited by the Republic and Separatists military forces differs greatly from the projected Imperial strengths on Mr. Wong's website. I am treading lightly on this topic because I noted that the frequently posted topics section of this forum indicated that the question of whether this TV series is canon is... a frequently posted topic, but I have a slightly different question than that.
Given that this series is given a degree of canon status since George Lucas was directly involved in its production (though of course it is overridden by the episodes) and the frequent statement on SD.net that the level of technology in the SW universe changed little between the Clone Wars era and the Imperial era, I wanted to ask if you think that some shortcomings in tactics/technology demonstrated in the Clone Wars series could cast doubts to the effectiveness of later Imperial technology. I do have some concrete examples, but thought I might hear back from the forum first in case this question has already been asked or I am simply an idiot for posing this topic in the first place.
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Would you mind explaining more?
"No, no, no, no! Light speed's too slow! Yes, we're gonna have to go right to... Ludicrous speed!"
- DatBurnTho11
- Youngling
- Posts: 107
- Joined: 2010-07-08 05:41pm
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Yeah. I'll get into more detail if people are interested, but here is a list of some instances I noted from the series (I'll go back and cite them correctly later):
Space Combat
> Bombers alone being able to disable Republic and Separatist cruisers
> Physical collisions (starfighters ramming into cruisers) causing significant damage in space battles
> Emphasis on close-range starship combat
> Lack of specialized anti-personnel weaponry to defend against boarding parties (E-Web)
> Ability to completely destroy Republic cruiser by insurgent firing at reactor with rifle or planting bombs on reactor
Ground Combat
> Clonetrooper armor penetrated by spears
> Blasters searing clean hole through armor, flesh, etc. instead of causing blast effect
> Tables/Cargo containers used as cover in firefights
> Clonetrooper armor penetrable by biological weapons
> etc.
I'm just wondering if some of these things that I noticed in the Clone Wars series might represent how the Empire would later act. I might be wrong, but Mr. Wong's site seemed to paint a very different picture of Imperial tactical capabilities.
Space Combat
> Bombers alone being able to disable Republic and Separatist cruisers
> Physical collisions (starfighters ramming into cruisers) causing significant damage in space battles
> Emphasis on close-range starship combat
> Lack of specialized anti-personnel weaponry to defend against boarding parties (E-Web)
> Ability to completely destroy Republic cruiser by insurgent firing at reactor with rifle or planting bombs on reactor
Ground Combat
> Clonetrooper armor penetrated by spears
> Blasters searing clean hole through armor, flesh, etc. instead of causing blast effect
> Tables/Cargo containers used as cover in firefights
> Clonetrooper armor penetrable by biological weapons
> etc.
I'm just wondering if some of these things that I noticed in the Clone Wars series might represent how the Empire would later act. I might be wrong, but Mr. Wong's site seemed to paint a very different picture of Imperial tactical capabilities.
- DatBurnTho11
- Youngling
- Posts: 107
- Joined: 2010-07-08 05:41pm
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Here are some of the notable examples from several episodes of the 2008 Star Wars Clone Wars TV Series that stood out to me. This might help give you a better idea of what I meant. Again this is all based on the premise that was demonstrated repeatedly on Mr. Wong's website that it is likely that there was little technological development since the Clone Wars era and the Imperial era. I guess if that is in doubt though, the entire topic is moot..
Shadow of Malevolence (S1, Ep3)
- One squadron of Y-Wing bombers (less than a dozen) sent to destroy Separatist flagship’s bridge
Cloak of Darkness (S1, Ep9)
- Boarding ships, use only their wedge shape to boar through the hull of Republic cruisers with ease and release troops
- Thermal charges on cruisers generators completely disable ship
Lair of Grievous (S1, Ep10)
- Grievous’ pistol cleanly slices holes in Jedi Nahdar Vebb, no other thermal damage
Trespass (S1, Ep15)
- Clonetrooper armor penetrated by hand-thrown spears
Blue Shadow Virus (S1, Ep17)
- Clone troopers infected by Blue Shadow virus despite wearing helmets, they later remove helmets possibly indicating helmets have no effect at screening viruses
Storm over Ryloth (S1, Ep19)
- Republic cruisers heavily damaged by droid fighters ramming them
- Admiral Yularen desperately calls for fighter support during combat, indicating that the fighters are a significant threat
- Republic strategy is heavily reliant of bombers, not cruiser mounted turbo-laser guns – Marg Sabl closure maneuver
Brain Invaders (S2, Ep 8 )
- Table used as cover for blasterfire from clonetroopers
Grievous Intrigue (S2, Ep9)
- Numerous boarding procedures are shown, at airlocks, however only hand weapons were used, no specialized anti-personnel stations, etc.
Death Trap (S2, Ep20)
- Shots fired from a blaster stolen from a clonetrooper at a reactor command console lead to the destruction of a Republic cruiser
There were a few that I just can’t place right now. I will look into it more:
- Clonetrooper’s standard weapons (not only Grievous’s pistol) blowing clean hole in flesh/armor, no thermal damage
- I seem to recall ALL space combat being performed at, by the standards posted on Mr. Wong’s site, would be close range. But then again, I’m not sure if I have a discerning enough eye to make this judgment.
Some of these are obviously nitpicks and directly contradicted by canon, like the stormtrooper’s weapons having thermal effects and penetrating a table as was clearly demonstrated by the “slight blaster malfunction” in the Ep4 detention center and I’ll concede that the space combat range is contradicted by the dialogue/visuals in the Endor space battle in Ep6. Also, there are somethings that really don't seem to fit with the general 'theme' of SW that I'd be willing to dismiss out of hand like Boba Fett's single-handed destruction of the Republic cruiser by shooting a console (gosh, even the Enterprise wasn't that bad). But I am wondering whether some of these episodes might contradict some conclusions about Imperial military efficacy as demonstrated on Mr. Wong’s website, specifically:
Clonetrooper armor --> Stormtrooper armor
- Vulnerable to spear, unlike described on website
- Does not have self-contained life support system, vulnerable to biological weapons
Republic/Separatist cruisers --> Imperial Star Destroyers
- Vulnerable to weapons fire from bombers, some battles depend primarily upon fighter/bombers
- Can sustain damage from physical impacts: ramming, boarding vessels, etc.
- Not normally using specialized anti-personnel weapons (E-Web) to defend against boarding parties
The real reason I’m posting is to ask you guys basically what you think of all this not to be confrontational. I’m open to criticism, corrections, opinions, etc.
Shadow of Malevolence (S1, Ep3)
- One squadron of Y-Wing bombers (less than a dozen) sent to destroy Separatist flagship’s bridge
Cloak of Darkness (S1, Ep9)
- Boarding ships, use only their wedge shape to boar through the hull of Republic cruisers with ease and release troops
- Thermal charges on cruisers generators completely disable ship
Lair of Grievous (S1, Ep10)
- Grievous’ pistol cleanly slices holes in Jedi Nahdar Vebb, no other thermal damage
Trespass (S1, Ep15)
- Clonetrooper armor penetrated by hand-thrown spears
Blue Shadow Virus (S1, Ep17)
- Clone troopers infected by Blue Shadow virus despite wearing helmets, they later remove helmets possibly indicating helmets have no effect at screening viruses
Storm over Ryloth (S1, Ep19)
- Republic cruisers heavily damaged by droid fighters ramming them
- Admiral Yularen desperately calls for fighter support during combat, indicating that the fighters are a significant threat
- Republic strategy is heavily reliant of bombers, not cruiser mounted turbo-laser guns – Marg Sabl closure maneuver
Brain Invaders (S2, Ep 8 )
- Table used as cover for blasterfire from clonetroopers
Grievous Intrigue (S2, Ep9)
- Numerous boarding procedures are shown, at airlocks, however only hand weapons were used, no specialized anti-personnel stations, etc.
Death Trap (S2, Ep20)
- Shots fired from a blaster stolen from a clonetrooper at a reactor command console lead to the destruction of a Republic cruiser
There were a few that I just can’t place right now. I will look into it more:
- Clonetrooper’s standard weapons (not only Grievous’s pistol) blowing clean hole in flesh/armor, no thermal damage
- I seem to recall ALL space combat being performed at, by the standards posted on Mr. Wong’s site, would be close range. But then again, I’m not sure if I have a discerning enough eye to make this judgment.
Some of these are obviously nitpicks and directly contradicted by canon, like the stormtrooper’s weapons having thermal effects and penetrating a table as was clearly demonstrated by the “slight blaster malfunction” in the Ep4 detention center and I’ll concede that the space combat range is contradicted by the dialogue/visuals in the Endor space battle in Ep6. Also, there are somethings that really don't seem to fit with the general 'theme' of SW that I'd be willing to dismiss out of hand like Boba Fett's single-handed destruction of the Republic cruiser by shooting a console (gosh, even the Enterprise wasn't that bad). But I am wondering whether some of these episodes might contradict some conclusions about Imperial military efficacy as demonstrated on Mr. Wong’s website, specifically:
Clonetrooper armor --> Stormtrooper armor
- Vulnerable to spear, unlike described on website
- Does not have self-contained life support system, vulnerable to biological weapons
Republic/Separatist cruisers --> Imperial Star Destroyers
- Vulnerable to weapons fire from bombers, some battles depend primarily upon fighter/bombers
- Can sustain damage from physical impacts: ramming, boarding vessels, etc.
- Not normally using specialized anti-personnel weapons (E-Web) to defend against boarding parties
The real reason I’m posting is to ask you guys basically what you think of all this not to be confrontational. I’m open to criticism, corrections, opinions, etc.
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
What's to explain? He doesn't think that the new information he has gathered from the TV show matches up with the ridiculous numbers that Mike talks about on the main page. He thinks that whatever firepower is 'demonstrated' by the Empire in the movies is not supported by the firepower 'demonstrated' in the series and is confused because, the completely accepted theory of technology stagnation, then doesn't make any sense.
In other words: If technology is stagnant in the SW Universe, then why don't the Republic and ICS demonstrate the same level of firepower as the Empire, a mere 20 years earlier? The shows are G canon as Lucas is directly involved with making them so how do you reconcile which one is correct?
It seems like a pretty valid question as I'm guessing the show gives hours of evidence where the movies actually give very little in comparison. He is just trying to say it in a nice as way as possible so he doesn't get dog-piled, flamed to shit and then banned.
In other words: If technology is stagnant in the SW Universe, then why don't the Republic and ICS demonstrate the same level of firepower as the Empire, a mere 20 years earlier? The shows are G canon as Lucas is directly involved with making them so how do you reconcile which one is correct?
It seems like a pretty valid question as I'm guessing the show gives hours of evidence where the movies actually give very little in comparison. He is just trying to say it in a nice as way as possible so he doesn't get dog-piled, flamed to shit and then banned.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
What concrete examples? Spaceship combat? Land battles?dave98472 wrote:the projected Imperial strengths on Mr. Wong's website.
In the movies, a warship blows up spectacularly, in the series they do that as well. In the movies, there's giant walkers that take a lot of hits and smaller ones that don't. Same in the series. In the movies, fighters score hits on unshielded parts of a spaceship, same in the show.
- DatBurnTho11
- Youngling
- Posts: 107
- Joined: 2010-07-08 05:41pm
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
For some reason my response was put directly after Srelex's request for me to explain more. What do you guys think?
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
No, the shows are not G-canon, they're explicitly T-canon, and explicitly below the films. They're also, obviously- cartoons, and expecting them to have the same level of authority as a photo-realistic movie is ridiculous.Havok wrote: In other words: If technology is stagnant in the SW Universe, then why don't the Republic and ICS demonstrate the same level of firepower as the Empire, a mere 20 years earlier? The shows are G canon as Lucas is directly involved with making them so how do you reconcile which one is correct?
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Starfighters don't disable capital ships by themselves in the films. Which is what the webpage, which hasn't been updated since 2004, is focused on.dave98472 wrote:Yeah. I'll get into more detail if people are interested, but here is a list of some instances I noted from the series (I'll go back and cite them correctly later):
Space Combat
> Bombers alone being able to disable Republic and Separatist cruisers
And yet a Star Destroyer is struck by an asteroid with many times the mass and speed in TESB, with said asteroid vaporizing against its bow shields- no effect is evident. Further, we see in the cartoon itself that a Munificent takes a massive asteroid hit - two of them in succession - on its shields with no damage.> Physical collisions (starfighters ramming into cruisers) causing significant damage in space battles
Clearly, the cartoon is not to be trusted on this matter - it is not even consistent with itself, and we see Star Destroyers are far hardier than this in the films.
I don't see how that's any different from the movies.> Emphasis on close-range starship combat
I don't see what implications this has for the Empire whatsoever, given the Empire obviously has these weapons.> Lack of specialized anti-personnel weaponry to defend against boarding parties (E-Web)
That's not what happened. The control panel was fired on and bombs were planted on some structure in the room. The reactor failed, there was a series of explosions, and the ship crashed, it wasn't "completely destroyed" as a result of that sabotage.> Ability to completely destroy Republic cruiser by insurgent firing at reactor with rifle or planting bombs on reactor
You do realise that the cartoon does not magically delete the effects clearly seen in the films, yes? Clearly, the effects can vary- though I find that it odd that it never occurred to you how wrongheaded it is to hold up the effects of the cartoon over the actual films as you seem to be doing.Ground Combat
> Clonetrooper armor penetrated by spears
> Blasters searing clean hole through armor, flesh, etc. instead of causing blast effect
So what? The same cartoon shows blasters shattering rock. How is this an issue?> Tables/Cargo containers used as cover in firefights
That weapon was either a: probably designed to defeat Clonetrooper armor, which we know is a completely sealed unit because in the same cartoon we see them operating in a vacuum, or b: the Clonetroopers didn't have their armors sealed.> Clonetrooper armor penetrable by biological weapons
I think you need to look at your methodology a bit harder. The difference isn't terribly significant, and where it is, the films win.I'm just wondering if some of these things that I noticed in the Clone Wars series might represent how the Empire would later act. I might be wrong, but Mr. Wong's site seemed to paint a very different picture of Imperial tactical capabilities.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- DatBurnTho11
- Youngling
- Posts: 107
- Joined: 2010-07-08 05:41pm
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Thanks for the swift response Vympel. You make really good points, I guess you are right that I need to look over the episodes and the films in more detail.
I never intended to say that the TV series contradicted with the films just with some conclusions on the website, but it seems that I did not do enough research on all the different demonstrations of Imperial technology in the films. I guess the series is fun to watch, but probably not upheld to significant enough standards to be used to judge anything about the SW universe in the Imperial era.
I never intended to say that the TV series contradicted with the films just with some conclusions on the website, but it seems that I did not do enough research on all the different demonstrations of Imperial technology in the films. I guess the series is fun to watch, but probably not upheld to significant enough standards to be used to judge anything about the SW universe in the Imperial era.
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
That's no problem. You'll see above I edited my post slightly, to note that Mike hasn't even updated his main page since 2004- he's a lot busier nowadays. Don't get me wrong, there are definitely stuff in the cartoons that contradicts some of Mike's page, but that's just the nature of canon.dave98472 wrote:Thanks for the swift response Vympel. You make really good points, I guess you are right that I need to look over the episodes and the films in more detail.
I never intended to say that the TV series contradicted with the films just with some conclusions on the website, but it seems that I did not do enough research on all the different demonstrations of Imperial technology in the films. I guess the series is fun to watch, but probably not upheld to significant enough standards to be used to judge anything about the SW universe in the Imperial era.
EDIT: Also a lot of the stuff Mike has on his page, where not derived from the films, is derived from the EU. But yeah, there's stuff in the cartoons that overrides it.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Fine, I'll accept that they are a lower level of canon, however why do cartoons have less validity than 'photo-realistic' movies, that the creator himself has admitted LIMITED his vision? Cartoons require EVERYTHING to be created where as the movies have built in limitations. George is free to make exactly what he sees in his mind with the cartoons, so your assertion that the movies are somehow a better example of what George wanted is asinine. I mean if what you say was true, he wouldn't go back to the movies and add... CG... effects... oh wait.Vympel wrote:No, the shows are not G-canon, they're explicitly T-canon, and explicitly below the films. They're also, obviously- cartoons, and expecting them to have the same level of authority as a photo-realistic movie is ridiculous.Havok wrote: In other words: If technology is stagnant in the SW Universe, then why don't the Republic and ICS demonstrate the same level of firepower as the Empire, a mere 20 years earlier? The shows are G canon as Lucas is directly involved with making them so how do you reconcile which one is correct?
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Not that this matters, given what I'm about to say under the next quote, George Lucas doesn't make jack in the cartoons, he merely oversees them and offers some small input into details like what accent Aayla Secura has, he's not writing or directing. Its not G-canon in any way, whether practically or officially.Havok wrote: Fine, I'll accept that they are a lower level of canon, however why do cartoons have less validity than 'photo-realistic' movies, that the creator himself has admitted LIMITED his vision? Cartoons require EVERYTHING to be created where as the movies have built in limitations. George is free to make exactly what he sees in his mind with the cartoons
Also, the cartoons have a (by comparison) very limited budget. It shows. They don't have an ounce of the freedom to show things the way they can in the movies. Just look at the battles. They collapse upon anything other than cursory examination- they're replete with obvious short-cuts and kludges because they don't have the ability to make it look as interesting as live actors (whether motion-captured CGI or not, i.e. prequel or OT).
Your strawman is asinine. I never made this about some nonsense about what 'George wanted', I'm talking about analysing evidence.so your assertion that the movies are somehow a better example of what George wanted is asinine.
So you see no difference between the skinny obvious CGI caricatures of the clones in the cartoon vs the actual clones in AotC and RotS, for example?I mean if what you say was true, he wouldn't go back to the movies and add... CG... effects... oh wait.
The point I'm making is the cartoon is clearly stylized caricature. Much as we read a Star Wars book and treat it as inferior to direct observation because it isn't, quite clearly a cartoon cannot be held to be as good evidence, visually speaking, as the films.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
You're not talking about the one which got the bridge hit, are you? It was pretty obviously destroyed, or at least the bridge is.And yet a Star Destroyer is struck by an asteroid with many times the mass and speed in TESB, with said asteroid vaporizing against its bow shields- no effect is evident. Further, we see in the cartoon itself that a Munificent takes a massive asteroid hit - two of them in succession - on its shields with no damage.
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
This isn't a big a deal as folks seem to think it is. The virus could be specifically designed to defeat the filters, they could have been unsealed or the filters where simply designed to defeat a wide range of threats but can't protect against everything. For example there are chemical weapons today that will render your mask filter ineffective in under ten minutes.dave98472 wrote:
Blue Shadow Virus (S1, Ep17)
- Clone troopers infected by Blue Shadow virus despite wearing helmets, they later remove helmets possibly indicating helmets have no effect at screening viruses
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
No, I'm talking about the same scene where the ISD is blasting incoming asteroids. A smaller asteroid (perhaps two, its hard to tell if the second one strikes or is blasted before it strikes) strikes its bow shields (thats why I'm obviously not talking about the bridge, which is nowhere near the bow ) and nothing happens. Its a far more hardcore hit than anything tiny fighters could manage by a kamikaze run, even if the asteroid was only about 10m wide. And then of course you've got to consider they would've taken multiple hits from these (and larger) over the course of days.You're not talking about the one which got the bridge hit, are you? It was pretty obviously destroyed, or at least the bridge is
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- Darksider
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: 2002-12-13 02:56pm
- Location: America's decaying industrial armpit.
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
I'm thinking that either the Clone Trooper uniforms were unsealed, or the virus was specifically designed to breach CT armor.Aaron wrote:
This isn't a big a deal as folks seem to think it is. The virus could be specifically designed to defeat the filters, they could have been unsealed or the filters where simply designed to defeat a wide range of threats but can't protect against everything. For example there are chemical weapons today that will render your mask filter ineffective in under ten minutes.
Remember that earlier in the series troopers were shown to operate in a vacuum. There's more than just air filters going on there.
Did the asteroid actually destroy the bridge tower outright, or did it just punch through the window and kill the bridge crew? IIRC we never see the explosion fadeAMT wrote:
You're not talking about the one which got the bridge hit, are you? It was pretty obviously destroyed, or at least the bridge is.
And this is why you don't watch anything produced by Ronald D. Moore after he had his brain surgically removed and replaced with a bag of elephant semen.-Gramzamber, on why Caprica sucks
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
The hilarious bit about that is that there's no evidence of physical damage when the fighters hit. When they hit, they don't even so much as scratch the paint. Yet when they cut away to long distance shots, suddenly the Venators are in flames (no fighters visible, naturally) and one spontaneously breaks into pieces. I suspect this goes back to the budget issue you raised, since I suspect it'd cost too much to bother making a battle-damaged Venator mode when you can just cover it over with random explosions and smoke.Vympel wrote:And yet a Star Destroyer is struck by an asteroid with many times the mass and speed in TESB, with said asteroid vaporizing against its bow shields- no effect is evident. Further, we see in the cartoon itself that a Munificent takes a massive asteroid hit - two of them in succession - on its shields with no damage.
It's up there with the clone that's shooting the same spot in the wall next to the advancing super battledroids over and over again, the blaster bolts flying over their heads, or a pair of clones jogging to Obi-Wan's downed ship (several kilometers away, mind you) in a couple seconds.
We never do get to see the full aftermath, but the edges of the bridge tower are still visible if you slow it down. It actually looks like the whole tower just vanishes, as if they swapped between a regular model and an ISD model. So either the pylon was sheered off or deformed in some way (due to lack of debris).Darksider wrote:Did the asteroid actually destroy the bridge tower outright, or did it just punch through the window and kill the bridge crew? IIRC we never see the explosion fade
"He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot."
"Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero."
"Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero."
- Azron_Stoma
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 353
- Joined: 2008-10-18 08:37am
- Location: HIMS Korthox III, Assertor Class Star Dreadnought
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
If memory serves the Clone Wars cartoon is based on two main concepts,
1. It's based on Thunderbirds and Captain Scarlet in terms of style minus the strings.
2. It's in universe role is supposed to be that of a series of propaganda films the republic air on the holonet rather than a direct window into the Star Wars universe, hence the newsreel style opening narrations.
1. It's based on Thunderbirds and Captain Scarlet in terms of style minus the strings.
2. It's in universe role is supposed to be that of a series of propaganda films the republic air on the holonet rather than a direct window into the Star Wars universe, hence the newsreel style opening narrations.
- DatBurnTho11
- Youngling
- Posts: 107
- Joined: 2010-07-08 05:41pm
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Yeah I guess we really all need to keep in mind that its just a children's show at heart.Azron_Stoma wrote:1. It's based on Thunderbirds and Captain Scarlet in terms of style minus the strings.
That's really interesting! Do you have the source article where that idea was mentioned? I'm not saying this because I think you're making it up or anything, but I've always wanted to read official material that places the Clone Wars TV shows in the SW universe as a whole. Now we're going off topic a little, but I would think if it would be propaganda films they wouldn't always portray the Jedi as heroes?Azron_Stoma wrote:2. It's in universe role is supposed to be that of a series of propaganda films the republic air on the holonet rather than a direct window into the Star Wars universe, hence the newsreel style opening narrations.
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Okay, I'll hit all the examples:
And thermal charges on generators or part of the reactor system? how is that problematic? If you fuck up the systems on a reactor (say the power routing, storage, or the cooling systems.) it is probably going to do Bad Things to the reactor. Again, how is this contradictory since energy just does not magically disappear.
Nevermind blasters can have more than one kind of potential damage mechanism at work to improve lethality.
Besides even if we accept this sa true, so what? That just tells us clonetrooper armor plating is perhaps modular. Either different size/thickness of plates (trading protection for mobility and light weight) or armor can be optimized against different kinds of attacks (better against projectiles instead of blasters, or maybe explosions/shrapnel rather than high momentum attacks like a knife thrust, etc.)
Besides I'm pretty sure on the Malevolence arc we saw clonetroopers operating in vaccuum (escape pod and shit)
2nd and 3rd - This is hardly new, since we saw the same things in the movies. The matter is never whether "fighters are useless" or "fighters are useful", its the degree and manner of danger they represent. The fact that fighters and capital ships are used equally (including battleships) indicates while attack craft can be a useful component, they are not by themselves decisive in the same sense that aircraft and missiles rendered battleships and other large warships obsolete.
Besides, we've seen blaster fire do considerable explosive damage (blowing apart droid heads in a single shot, like in the episode where the renegade trooper/farmer is attacked by droids.)
The second one I can recall (Grievous boarding Obi-Wan's ship) had Obi-Wan wanting to hold grievous as a diversion, so they want him to board rathre than trying to keep him off.
In any event we know canonically that such defenses exist. We've seen internal guns inside Tradfed battleships (inside the hanger - TPM), we've seen sections of the deathstar that had automated defenses (ANH), and we know that gas attacks and forcefield defenses will be used (TPM and ROTS). I really don't see what this is supposed to "prove".
Besides as I noted above with the table, thermal effects aren't the only (or neccesarily most desirable) damage mechanism (blasters blowing things apart without neccesarily melting them.)
And? Destroying the bridge = destroying ship? If you're thinking shields, recall we've seen numerous examples of canon and official shield piercing technologies.dave98472 wrote: Shadow of Malevolence (S1, Ep3)
- One squadron of Y-Wing bombers (less than a dozen) sent to destroy Separatist flagship’s bridge
How does a ship deliberately designed for hull penetration invalidate anything on the website? You do realize ships hulls aren't uniformly armored, right?Cloak of Darkness (S1, Ep9)
- Boarding ships, use only their wedge shape to boar through the hull of Republic cruisers with ease and release troops
- Thermal charges on cruisers generators completely disable ship
And thermal charges on generators or part of the reactor system? how is that problematic? If you fuck up the systems on a reactor (say the power routing, storage, or the cooling systems.) it is probably going to do Bad Things to the reactor. Again, how is this contradictory since energy just does not magically disappear.
Which is what some kinds of bullets do forms some pistols. How is this neccesarily a problem? And how many holes?Lair of Grievous (S1, Ep10)
- Grievous’ pistol cleanly slices holes in Jedi Nahdar Vebb, no other thermal damage
Nevermind blasters can have more than one kind of potential damage mechanism at work to improve lethality.
composition and momentum of the spears? What kind of head?Trespass (S1, Ep15)
- Clonetrooper armor penetrated by hand-thrown spears
Besides even if we accept this sa true, so what? That just tells us clonetrooper armor plating is perhaps modular. Either different size/thickness of plates (trading protection for mobility and light weight) or armor can be optimized against different kinds of attacks (better against projectiles instead of blasters, or maybe explosions/shrapnel rather than high momentum attacks like a knife thrust, etc.)
You mean that magical virus that seemed able to move around in a non-gaseous manner under its own power?Blue Shadow Virus (S1, Ep17)
- Clone troopers infected by Blue Shadow virus despite wearing helmets, they later remove helmets possibly indicating helmets have no effect at screening viruses
Besides I'm pretty sure on the Malevolence arc we saw clonetroopers operating in vaccuum (escape pod and shit)
1st - we don't know how many fighters hit, what they may release on detonation (they exploded on impact), or even if they had been deliberately rigged as kamikaze ships (warheads, etc.)Storm over Ryloth (S1, Ep19)
- Republic cruisers heavily damaged by droid fighters ramming them
- Admiral Yularen desperately calls for fighter support during combat, indicating that the fighters are a significant threat
- Republic strategy is heavily reliant of bombers, not cruiser mounted turbo-laser guns – Marg Sabl closure maneuver
2nd and 3rd - This is hardly new, since we saw the same things in the movies. The matter is never whether "fighters are useless" or "fighters are useful", its the degree and manner of danger they represent. The fact that fighters and capital ships are used equally (including battleships) indicates while attack craft can be a useful component, they are not by themselves decisive in the same sense that aircraft and missiles rendered battleships and other large warships obsolete.
A table that is a good 2-3 inches thick and made of unknown material but presumably metal (due to sparks). Melting or vaping it could require hundreds of kilojoules, but a great deal of that depends on setting and firing mode (is it more thermal, or is it going for mechanical/explosive damage like a grenade? The latter can do considerable damage for very little energy, and won't necceasarily react the same way to all materials.)Brain Invaders (S2, Ep 8 )
- Table used as cover for blasterfire from clonetroopers
Besides, we've seen blaster fire do considerable explosive damage (blowing apart droid heads in a single shot, like in the episode where the renegade trooper/farmer is attacked by droids.)
Um, well the first example was a Jedi ordering his troops to the escape pods to deal with Grievous personally, and we didnt even see much of that either or the circumstances since it happeneda t the very beginning and was a few minutes. I don't see how you can make sweeping generalizations there.Grievous Intrigue (S2, Ep9)
- Numerous boarding procedures are shown, at airlocks, however only hand weapons were used, no specialized anti-personnel stations, etc.
The second one I can recall (Grievous boarding Obi-Wan's ship) had Obi-Wan wanting to hold grievous as a diversion, so they want him to board rathre than trying to keep him off.
In any event we know canonically that such defenses exist. We've seen internal guns inside Tradfed battleships (inside the hanger - TPM), we've seen sections of the deathstar that had automated defenses (ANH), and we know that gas attacks and forcefield defenses will be used (TPM and ROTS). I really don't see what this is supposed to "prove".
Um what does the command console control exactly? If it was for the cooling system that very well may have fucked up the settings, which may lead to all sorts of Bad Things happening in the reactor (What happens if the cooling system is operating at less than optimal levels? What if there's a sudden spike or surge in the reactor or increase in power and the cooling system can't compensate? Etc etc..)Death Trap (S2, Ep20)
- Shots fired from a blaster stolen from a clonetrooper at a reactor command console lead to the destruction of a Republic cruiser
There's no blood. That suggests cauterization happens with the flesh. I don't know what "thermal damage" you expect.There were a few that I just can’t place right now. I will look into it more:
- Clonetrooper’s standard weapons (not only Grievous’s pistol) blowing clean hole in flesh/armor, no thermal damage
Besides as I noted above with the table, thermal effects aren't the only (or neccesarily most desirable) damage mechanism (blasters blowing things apart without neccesarily melting them.)
What does range matter? The nature of battle (often fighting around fixed territory like planets) as well as the nature fo technology (hyperdrive) means that combat can occur at virtually any arbitrary range chosen. We know hyperdrives can excute INSANELY precise jumps into battle.- I seem to recall ALL space combat being performed at, by the standards posted on Mr. Wong’s site, would be close range. But then again, I’m not sure if I have a discerning enough eye to make this judgment.
What contradictions? We dont go by specific examples, we go by the bulk of the evidence, modified by the hierarchy of sources. One example, even a higher source, does not neccesarily or automatically invalidate the bulk of evidence existing. SW canon has long made it a policy of retconning even seeming contradictions without completely tossing away the source.Some of these are obviously nitpicks and directly contradicted by canon, like the stormtrooper’s weapons having thermal effects and penetrating a table as was clearly demonstrated by the “slight blaster malfunction” in the Ep4 detention center and I’ll concede that the space combat range is contradicted by the dialogue/visuals in the Endor space battle in Ep6. Also, there are somethings that really don't seem to fit with the general 'theme' of SW that I'd be willing to dismiss out of hand like Boba Fett's single-handed destruction of the Republic cruiser by shooting a console (gosh, even the Enterprise wasn't that bad). But I am wondering whether some of these episodes might contradict some conclusions about Imperial military efficacy as demonstrated on Mr. Wong’s website, specifically:
Actually ST armor has shown weaknesses to spears before in comics, and other sources. That just tells us something we knew already - like RL body armor, you can customize it to different levels of protection and/or mobility depending on circumstance. Hardly shocking. While you always want to have the best possible protection, any soldier can tell you that carrying a heavy load in combat, especially for prolonged periods, is damn uncomfortable or even painful. Armour is a big part of that weight in modern combat gear.Clonetrooper armor --> Stormtrooper armor
- Vulnerable to spear, unlike described on website
- Does not have self-contained life support system, vulnerable to biological weapons
Imperial STar destroyers aren't totally immune from fighter attacks either. It depends wholly on circumstance and the nature of "vulnerability". Being able to be threatend by a ship does not mean they can singlehandedly destroy it.Republic/Separatist cruisers --> Imperial Star Destroyers
- Vulnerable to weapons fire from bombers, some battles depend primarily upon fighter/bombers
Big deal. Imperial ships can too. Depends entirely on where hit, quantity of attacks, and so on. Not that either boarding attacks or the droid kamikaze's neccesarily rely on pure KE/momentum to achieve their ends.- Can sustain damage from physical impacts: ramming, boarding vessels, etc.
The example you cited had two examples where the invading force was deliberately allowed inside without much if any resistance, independent of any other considerations. I don't see what this proves.- Not normally using specialized anti-personnel weapons (E-Web) to defend against boarding parties.
I dont see that thi sis a big deal. I know that certian folks make a huge deal about the "contradictions" imposed by the Clone Wars series, but those sorts really don't give a damn about consistency anyhow - they'll twist anything around into an excuse to suit their ends.The real reason I’m posting is to ask you guys basically what you think of all this not to be confrontational. I’m open to criticism, corrections, opinions, etc.
- DatBurnTho11
- Youngling
- Posts: 107
- Joined: 2010-07-08 05:41pm
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Thank you Connor for addressing all of the points I brought up from my viewing of the SW Clone Wars series. I just wanted to respond to two things:
2) A lot of the points that you responded to depended (in some way) upon a very interesting answer you gave to my first point. Perhaps I should start a separate thread on this issue of Imperial shields, if it hasn't already been done to death on this forum:
As far as I remember, here are the instances of canon shield penetration that would be relevant for this discussion:
TPM
- Gungan 'hydrostatic shield' and Gungan 'battle shield' both selectively permeable and resisting efforts to pass through them
- Queen's starship commented as being exceptionally vulnerable without deflector shields to Trade Fed blockade
- Trade Fed Control Ship when in combat with Naboo fighters: "Nothing can get through our shields" - except for a fighter physically entering the hangar
AoTC
- Jango Fett comments that he is close to destroying Obi Wan once his fighter's deflectors are down from the dogfight
- (I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from the Clone battle...)
RotS
- Obi Wan seems very concerned that Anikan didn't drop the shields around the hangar that they were about to enter
- (I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from the Rep-Sep battle over Coruscant)
ANH
- Alderaan's planetary shield penetrated/overwhelmed by Death Star superlaser
- Dialogue indicates attacking squadron's slowed down then sped up again when approaching Death Star
- Proton torpedo penetrated/overwhelmed shield or no shield protected the exhaust port
TESB
- Asteroid field: ISD and SSD can weather numerous asteroid impacts, Millennium Falcon survives asteroid impact
- Han lands Millennium Falcon close to/directly on ISD
- Hoth shield: capable of withstanding any bombardment from Vader's fleet
RotJ
- Endor shield: Rebel fighters seemed to fear collision with shield, made Death Star 2 invulnerable to Rebel fleet
- Fighter destroying/heavily damaging bridge tower of SSD when the bridge deflectors were down
- SSD impacts Death Star, destroying SSD, not visibly damaging Death Star
- ISDs survive prolonged (>30 min) battle with Mon Calamari starships
- (I'm not sure if this was just in the novelization) Rebel admiral pointing out that the fighters would be useful if they could knock out the capital ship's shields
I probably missed a bunch of examples, if so please point them out. But from the accumulation of evidence (which includes all the cases on the SD.net page about SW Shields), it seems to me that the Clone Wars TV series DOES paint a different picture of shield technologies than the movies (I have conceded that it wouldn't override the movies though).
I'm not sure how Connor would justify the idea of a squadron of bombers penetrating the shields of the Sep flagship. What canon shield piercing technique(s) (seen in movies) would explain this? I'm not trying to say the bombers are worthless either, there are definitely circumstances that they can be effective in (DS exhaust port comes to mind). But it seems that canon sources depict fighters/bombers as not being fully capable of penetrating the shields of larger vessels (Mr. Wong even alluded directly to this point I believe).
Furthermore, in the TV series, the Sep boarding ships need to bore through the hull to be effective. I'll grant that there might be weaknesses in armor that would allow this, but wouldn't you think that the deflector shields would block this physical impact like they would block the asteroids? Later with the droid starfighters ramming them, I'll grant that they could be loaded with bombs and have more KE than the asteroids, but that still paints a pretty wimpy picture of Republic shield tech. A few kamikazes and some light bombardment and a ship is (in this case I think I am justified to say) destroyed! Compare that to the ISDs sustaining prolonged combat in RotJ. Though that case didn't involve kamikazes, I think trying to argue that turbolaser blasts would pose less risk to SW ships than kamikazes would brings up the issue of why missiles with explosive payloads aren't used instead of turbolasers? It seems a reasonable conclusion that SW ships use turbolasers as they are more effective against SW deflectors.
Again, I'm no longer arguing that this would influence the canon power of the Imperial military, just that these seem to be discrepancies between the TV series and the episodes that I cannot seem to justify other than by saying they are contradicted by the movies. Since I'm a relative newbie on these forums, I'm not claiming that I'm absolutely correct in my statements, I'm just expressing what I consider to be a reasonable conclusion and look forward to hearing new information so that I can revise my conclusions. More comments are welcomed
1) Though I posed a question wondering how some points I noticed from the SW TV series might affect later Imperial policy, I did not intend to present an argument as "an excuse" to my own "end". I'm starting to think that having '8472' in my screen name is making my guilty by association with some of the rabid Trekkies that flame this forum. Be assured that 98472 comes from a button mash and I'm thinking of starting a new account just because of this issue.Connor MacLeod wrote:I dont see that thi sis a big deal. I know that certian folks make a huge deal about the "contradictions" imposed by the Clone Wars series, but those sorts really don't give a damn about consistency anyhow - they'll twist anything around into an excuse to suit their ends.
2) A lot of the points that you responded to depended (in some way) upon a very interesting answer you gave to my first point. Perhaps I should start a separate thread on this issue of Imperial shields, if it hasn't already been done to death on this forum:
Many of the points that I thought of as inconsistencies dealt primarily with this issue of the shield being breached in a manner that seemed unusual to me considering the episodes. Again, I already conceded to Vympel that anything in canon episodes immediately overrides anything from the SW Clone Wars TV series. But I don't understand Connor's dismissal of points regarding cases of shield penetration being significant at all.Connor MacLeod wrote:If you're thinking shields, recall we've seen numerous examples of canon and official shield piercing technologies.
As far as I remember, here are the instances of canon shield penetration that would be relevant for this discussion:
TPM
- Gungan 'hydrostatic shield' and Gungan 'battle shield' both selectively permeable and resisting efforts to pass through them
- Queen's starship commented as being exceptionally vulnerable without deflector shields to Trade Fed blockade
- Trade Fed Control Ship when in combat with Naboo fighters: "Nothing can get through our shields" - except for a fighter physically entering the hangar
AoTC
- Jango Fett comments that he is close to destroying Obi Wan once his fighter's deflectors are down from the dogfight
- (I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from the Clone battle...)
RotS
- Obi Wan seems very concerned that Anikan didn't drop the shields around the hangar that they were about to enter
- (I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from the Rep-Sep battle over Coruscant)
ANH
- Alderaan's planetary shield penetrated/overwhelmed by Death Star superlaser
- Dialogue indicates attacking squadron's slowed down then sped up again when approaching Death Star
- Proton torpedo penetrated/overwhelmed shield or no shield protected the exhaust port
TESB
- Asteroid field: ISD and SSD can weather numerous asteroid impacts, Millennium Falcon survives asteroid impact
- Han lands Millennium Falcon close to/directly on ISD
- Hoth shield: capable of withstanding any bombardment from Vader's fleet
RotJ
- Endor shield: Rebel fighters seemed to fear collision with shield, made Death Star 2 invulnerable to Rebel fleet
- Fighter destroying/heavily damaging bridge tower of SSD when the bridge deflectors were down
- SSD impacts Death Star, destroying SSD, not visibly damaging Death Star
- ISDs survive prolonged (>30 min) battle with Mon Calamari starships
- (I'm not sure if this was just in the novelization) Rebel admiral pointing out that the fighters would be useful if they could knock out the capital ship's shields
I probably missed a bunch of examples, if so please point them out. But from the accumulation of evidence (which includes all the cases on the SD.net page about SW Shields), it seems to me that the Clone Wars TV series DOES paint a different picture of shield technologies than the movies (I have conceded that it wouldn't override the movies though).
I'm not sure how Connor would justify the idea of a squadron of bombers penetrating the shields of the Sep flagship. What canon shield piercing technique(s) (seen in movies) would explain this? I'm not trying to say the bombers are worthless either, there are definitely circumstances that they can be effective in (DS exhaust port comes to mind). But it seems that canon sources depict fighters/bombers as not being fully capable of penetrating the shields of larger vessels (Mr. Wong even alluded directly to this point I believe).
Furthermore, in the TV series, the Sep boarding ships need to bore through the hull to be effective. I'll grant that there might be weaknesses in armor that would allow this, but wouldn't you think that the deflector shields would block this physical impact like they would block the asteroids? Later with the droid starfighters ramming them, I'll grant that they could be loaded with bombs and have more KE than the asteroids, but that still paints a pretty wimpy picture of Republic shield tech. A few kamikazes and some light bombardment and a ship is (in this case I think I am justified to say) destroyed! Compare that to the ISDs sustaining prolonged combat in RotJ. Though that case didn't involve kamikazes, I think trying to argue that turbolaser blasts would pose less risk to SW ships than kamikazes would brings up the issue of why missiles with explosive payloads aren't used instead of turbolasers? It seems a reasonable conclusion that SW ships use turbolasers as they are more effective against SW deflectors.
Again, I'm no longer arguing that this would influence the canon power of the Imperial military, just that these seem to be discrepancies between the TV series and the episodes that I cannot seem to justify other than by saying they are contradicted by the movies. Since I'm a relative newbie on these forums, I'm not claiming that I'm absolutely correct in my statements, I'm just expressing what I consider to be a reasonable conclusion and look forward to hearing new information so that I can revise my conclusions. More comments are welcomed
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
You can clearly see four Vulture droids leaving the hangar as Anakin's ship enters. He was lucky in the timing, he didn't just fly right through a raised shield.- Trade Fed Control Ship when in combat with Naboo fighters: "Nothing can get through our shields" - except for a fighter physically entering the hangar
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- DatBurnTho11
- Youngling
- Posts: 107
- Joined: 2010-07-08 05:41pm
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Granted. You have a very impressive memory Vympel!
But still, the Trade Fed was obviously unimpressed by the incoming Naboo fighters. Not that an attack force from a pacifist and environmentalist planet would be much of a threat of course...
EDIT: If anything that would strengthen the depiction of the Trade Fed shields.
But still, the Trade Fed was obviously unimpressed by the incoming Naboo fighters. Not that an attack force from a pacifist and environmentalist planet would be much of a threat of course...
EDIT: If anything that would strengthen the depiction of the Trade Fed shields.
Re: Star Wars Clone Wars TV - Implications for Imperial Mili
Heh, thanks
Its not so much an impressive memory, its just that this sort of stuff comes up often and so I have it on my memory speed dial.
Its not so much an impressive memory, its just that this sort of stuff comes up often and so I have it on my memory speed dial.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/