It gets better.CaptainChewbacca wrote:Good Lord. At this point, there's really no distinguishing BP from a Captain Planet villain.
Times-Picayune link
And there's more. Really, there is more. Just look the headlines from July 20th, I don't know what else to say.Hearings: BP did not suspend drilling operations after report of leaking blowout preventer
Published: Tuesday, July 20, 2010, 9:13 AM Updated: Tuesday, July 20, 2010, 11:26 AM
David Hammer, The Times-Picayune David Hammer, The Times-Picayune
This is an update from the joint hearings by the Coast Guard and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement investigating the causes of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion on April 20.
The Deepwater Horizon's blowout preventer -- the key device for shutting off a wild oil well -- had a leak in the days before it failed to operate, which may have required BP to suspend operations under a federal regulation, a BP company man testified Tuesday.
Well site leader Ronald Sepulvado told a Marine Board investigative panel in Kenner that before he wrapped up his stint as BP's top man on the rig four days before the April 20 accident, he reported that one of the control pods on the blowout preventer, or BOP, had a leak.
He said he told his supervisor in Houston, BP team leader John Guide, and assumed that Guide would notify federal regulators at the Minerals Management Service. According to investigators, that never happened.
Federal Regulation 250.451(d) states that if someone drilling in federal waters encounters "a BOP control station or pod that does not function properly" the rig must "suspend further drilling operations until that station or pod is operable."
Asked if that was done, Sepulvado said it wasn't.
"I assumed everything was OK because I reported it to the team leader and he should have reported it to MMS," Sepulvado said.
Sepulvado said he didn't consider the leaking BOP pod a "critical function of the BOP stack" and said the whole device "didn't lose functionality."
The BOP has become a major focus of the investigation into what went wrong on Deepwater Horizon when the well 5,000 feet below blew out, set off explosions that killed 11 people onboard and eventually created the largest oil leak in U.S. history. The BOP is a 450-ton stack of steel valves and pistons, operated with hydraulics to close over the well if oil or natural gas threatened to kick up and out of the hole.
The Deepwater Horizon appeared to be out of compliance with another federal regulation requiring independent inspection of a rig's blowout preventer every three to five years.
Investigators have said they had no record of an inspection after the year 2000. Jason Mathews, a member of the Marine Board panel, said the rig was "way past" the inspection requirement in Section 250.446(a) of the code.
Oh yeah, and the Chinese connection, from the country which brought us poisoned food, lead tainted toys and drywall with extra formaldehyde, they now (allegedly) give us the gift of faulty blowout preventers and oil spews.
Guardian link
BP oil spill: failed safety device on Deepwater Horizon rig was modified in China
Blow-out preventer was sent to Far East at BP's request rather than overhauled in US
* Tim Webb
* The Observer, Sunday 18 July 2010
BP ordered the owner of the Deepwater Horizon rig, whose explosion led to the worst environmental disaster in US history, to overhaul a crucial piece of the rig's safety equipment in China, the Observer has learnt. The blow-out preventer – the last line of defence against an out-of-control well – subsequently failed to activate and is at the centre of investigations into what caused the disaster.
Experts say that the practice of having such engineering work carried out in China, rather than the US, saves money and is common in the industry.
This weekend BP remained cautiously optimistic that the cap placed on top of the Gulf of Mexico well on Thursday night would continue to hold back the torrent of oil. It is the first time the flow has been stopped since the accident happened almost three months ago. But BP said that the pressure readings from the Macondo well were not as high as it had hoped, which could indicate that it has ruptured and that oil could be leaking out somewhere else.
There is no evidence that the significant modifications to the blowout preventer (BOP), which were carried out in China in 2005, caused the equipment to fail. But industry lawyers said BP could be made liable for any mistakes that a Chinese subcontractor made carrying out the work. It would be almost impossible to secure damages in China, where international law is barely recognised.
It is understood that lawyers for Cameron International, the manufacturer of the BOP, will argue the device was so significantly modified in China that it no longer resembled the original component, and that Cameron should therefore not be held liable.
Transocean, the owner of the Deepwater Horizon, which bought the BOP from Cameron, has already told congressional hearings into the disaster that the modifications were carried out at BP's request and "under its direction" as the lessee of the rig. BP and Cameron declined to comment this weekend.
Responding to the latest developments in the Gulf, President Obama said that it was too early to say if the well had been permanently fixed. "We're moving in that direction, but I don't want us to get too far ahead of ourselves," he said.
BP has been monitoring the pressure inside the well since Thursday. Thad Allen, the retired Coast Guard admiral overseeing the response effort, said that pressure of about 7,500 pounds per square inch would show the well was intact, while pressure that lingered below 6,000 psi would indicate it had been damaged and could be leaking. The pressure on Friday night remained at about 6,700 psi and was rising only fractionally.
Allen has told BP to step up monitoring for any seabed breaches and gather additional seismological data to detect any pockets of oil in the layers of rock and sediment around the well.
This week David Cameron will travel to the US to meet Obama and other politicians where he will stress the importance of BP to the UK economy. Business figures such as Lord Jones, the UK trade ambassador and former CBI boss, criticised Cameron for not being sufficiently supportive of the company last month after he said that he "understood the US government's frustrations" over BP's failed attempts to stop the leak.
A government adviser said that Cameron and Obama shared common interests over the crisis, and that both wanted BP to survive the incident. BP accounts for over a tenth of all share dividends paid by UK companies, and pension funds rely on the income it generates. Politicians in the US want BP to make enough profits to pay potentially billions of dollars in compensation and damages arising from the spill.