American Middle Class Disappearing

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
Stravo
Official SD.Net Teller of Tales
Posts: 12806
Joined: 2002-07-08 12:06pm
Location: NYC

American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Stravo »

here

The Middle Class in America Is Radically Shrinking. Here Are the Stats to Prove itPosted Jul 15, 2010 02:25pm EDT by Michael Snyder in Recession
Related: ^DJI, ^GSPC, SPY, MCD, WMT, XRT, DIA
ShareretweetEmailPrint
From The Business Insider

Editor's note: Michael Snyder is editor of theeconomiccollapseblog.com

The 22 statistics detailed here prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence in America.

The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer at a staggering rate. Once upon a time, the United States had the largest and most prosperous middle class in the history of the world, but now that is changing at a blinding pace.

So why are we witnessing such fundamental changes? Well, the globalism and "free trade" that our politicians and business leaders insisted would be so good for us have had some rather nasty side effects. It turns out that they didn't tell us that the "global economy" would mean that middle class American workers would eventually have to directly compete for jobs with people on the other side of the world where there is no minimum wage and very few regulations. The big global corporations have greatly benefited by exploiting third world labor pools over the last several decades, but middle class American workers have increasingly found things to be very tough.

Here are the statistics to prove it:

• 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are in the hands of 1 percent of the people.
• 61 percent of Americans "always or usually" live paycheck to paycheck, which was up from 49 percent in 2008 and 43 percent in 2007.
• 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans.
• 36 percent of Americans say that they don't contribute anything to retirement savings.
• A staggering 43 percent of Americans have less than $10,000 saved up for retirement.
• 24 percent of American workers say that they have postponed their planned retirement age in the past year.
• Over 1.4 million Americans filed for personal bankruptcy in 2009, which represented a 32 percent increase over 2008.
• Only the top 5 percent of U.S. households have earned enough additional income to match the rise in housing costs since 1975.
• For the first time in U.S. history, banks own a greater share of residential housing net worth in the United States than all individual Americans put together.
• In 1950, the ratio of the average executive's paycheck to the average worker's paycheck was about 30 to 1. Since the year 2000, that ratio has exploded to between 300 to 500 to one.
• As of 2007, the bottom 80 percent of American households held about 7% of the liquid financial assets.
• The bottom 50 percent of income earners in the United States now collectively own less than 1 percent of the nation’s wealth.
• Average Wall Street bonuses for 2009 were up 17 percent when compared with 2008.
• In the United States, the average federal worker now earns 60% MORE than the average worker in the private sector.
• The top 1 percent of U.S. households own nearly twice as much of America's corporate wealth as they did just 15 years ago.
• In America today, the average time needed to find a job has risen to a record 35.2 weeks.
• More than 40 percent of Americans who actually are employed are now working in service jobs, which are often very low paying.
• or the first time in U.S. history, more than 40 million Americans are on food stamps, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture projects that number will go up to 43 million Americans in 2011.
• This is what American workers now must compete against: in China a garment worker makes approximately 86 cents an hour and in Cambodia a garment worker makes approximately 22 cents an hour.
• Approximately 21 percent of all children in the United States are living below the poverty line in 2010 - the highest rate in 20 years.
• Despite the financial crisis, the number of millionaires in the United States rose a whopping 16 percent to 7.8 million in 2009.
• The top 10 percent of Americans now earn around 50 percent of our national income.

Giant Sucking Sound

The reality is that no matter how smart, how strong, how educated or how hard working American workers are, they just cannot compete with people who are desperate to put in 10 to 12 hour days at less than a dollar an hour on the other side of the world. After all, what corporation in their right mind is going to pay an American worker 10 times more (plus benefits) to do the same job? The world is fundamentally changing. Wealth and power are rapidly becoming concentrated at the top and the big global corporations are making massive amounts of money. Meanwhile, the American middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence as U.S. workers are slowly being merged into the new "global" labor pool.

What do most Americans have to offer in the marketplace other than their labor? Not much. The truth is that most Americans are absolutely dependent on someone else giving them a job. But today, U.S. workers are "less attractive" than ever. Compared to the rest of the world, American workers are extremely expensive, and the government keeps passing more rules and regulations seemingly on a monthly basis that makes it even more difficult to conduct business in the United States.

So corporations are moving operations out of the U.S. at breathtaking speed. Since the U.S. government does not penalize them for doing so, there really is no incentive for them to stay.

What has developed is a situation where the people at the top are doing quite well, while most Americans are finding it increasingly difficult to make it. There are now about six unemployed Americans for every new job opening in the United States, and the number of "chronically unemployed" is absolutely soaring. There simply are not nearly enough jobs for everyone.

Many of those who are able to get jobs are finding that they are making less money than they used to. In fact, an increasingly large percentage of Americans are working at low wage retail and service jobs.

But you can't raise a family on what you make flipping burgers at McDonald's or on what you bring in from greeting customers down at the local Wal-Mart.

The truth is that the middle class in America is dying -- and once it is gone it will be incredibly difficult to rebuild.
OK, aside from the sheer horror that some of these stats are bringing out in me what I found most offensive and disgusting was not the concentration of wealth going on here, the systematic dismantling of a middle class, etc. It's the comments from other readers on Yahoo at the bottom of the article. Please click the link and share in my disgust at comments like "If things are so bad why are millions trying to get in?" "Why do Mexicans still come if it's that bad" "This is the result of the Federal Reserve and bad fiscal policies by the government" "What we need is LESS REGULATION (Not my capitalization)"

These are the people who are voting for Palin and the teabaggers. People who can look at these stats and somehow think this is not a bad thing. It's all a big conspiracy. One of my favorites was the comment "How do we know the middle class isn't moving up? Why do we assume they are moving into the lower classes - people just might be getting richer?"

America - we deserve everything we get for breeding people like this.
Wherever you go, there you are.

Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
Image
User avatar
The Spartan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4406
Joined: 2005-03-12 05:56pm
Location: Houston

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by The Spartan »

Stravo, the "tickers" part of the address mucks up the link.

Here's a fixed one: Link
The Gentleman from Texas abstains. Discourteously.
Image
PRFYNAFBTFC-Vice Admiral: MFS Masturbating Walrus :: Omine subtilite Odobenus rosmarus masturbari
Soy un perdedor.
"WHO POOPED IN A NORMAL ROOM?!"-Commander William T. Riker
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Hey, didn't you hear? Neo-feudalism is a crock, right? It's totally not like all the power and wealth is draining away from those wage slaves we have today, stuck in debt.
User avatar
Big Phil
BANNED
Posts: 4555
Joined: 2004-10-15 02:18pm

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Big Phil »

There are a lot of things in here that sound truly horrible, but I wonder how they fit into a historical context. For example:
• 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are in the hands of 1 percent of the people.
• 61 percent of Americans "always or usually" live paycheck to paycheck, which was up from 49 percent in 2008 and 43 percent in 2007.
• 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans.
• 36 percent of Americans say that they don't contribute anything to retirement savings.


Is this better or worse than the historical average?
For the first time in U.S. history, more than 40 million Americans are on food stamps, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture projects that number will go up to 43 million Americans in 2011.
This one might be misleading... that's 13% of the population on food assistance. Has it always been 10-15% needing food assistance, or was it 5% historically and now it's really up? They seem to switch between percentages and real numbers to make the situation look worse, but 50 years ago there weren't 300 million Americans...
• Despite the financial crisis, the number of millionaires in the United States rose a whopping 16 percent to 7.8 million in 2009.
This one irks me a bit... is the article suggesting that millionaires are not middle class? My parents can be defined as millionaires (given their total assets, not annual income), but while we're definitely upper middle class, they're not exactly eating caviar every day.
In Brazil they say that Pele was the best, but Garrincha was better
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

I'm sure the food stamps deal is an anomaly now, that is, highest since the '29 bust. I'll see if I can find some historical charts on that, I seem to recall seeing them somewhere.
User avatar
Lagmonster
Master Control Program
Master Control Program
Posts: 7719
Joined: 2002-07-04 09:53am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Lagmonster »

I would like both his sources and an elaboration on how he made his connections. I don't necessarily have any contradictory evidence, mind you, but the writer for 'the economic collapse' blog spawns in me just the teeniest bit of natural skepticism.
Note: I'm semi-retired from the board, so if you need something, please be patient.
User avatar
Big Phil
BANNED
Posts: 4555
Joined: 2004-10-15 02:18pm

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Big Phil »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:I'm sure the food stamps deal is an anomaly now, that is, highest since the '29 bust. I'll see if I can find some historical charts on that, I seem to recall seeing them somewhere.
I know it's an anomaly (up from 27 million just two years ago), but it seems like there could be multiple causes. For instance, are people using food stamps today who weren't eligible five years ago? The government expanding access isn't the same as the requirements staying the same but numbers going up.

Part of my skepticism here is that welfare numbers are down (currently) from their historical highs (as a proportion of population). That's not because millions of people became wealthier in the 90's and 2000's, it's because the government forcibly removed people from the rolls. Looking at that food stamp number in isolation, without looking at the causes or the access, is as questionable as saying "welfare numbers are down, therefore the economy is improving!"
In Brazil they say that Pele was the best, but Garrincha was better
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22465
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Mr Bean »

SancheztheWhaler wrote:
• Despite the financial crisis, the number of millionaires in the United States rose a whopping 16 percent to 7.8 million in 2009.
This one irks me a bit... is the article suggesting that millionaires are not middle class? My parents can be defined as millionaires (given their total assets, not annual income), but while we're definitely upper middle class, they're not exactly eating caviar every day.
During an economic crisis you expect a over-all downward trend among all wealth classes. To take it to an extreme, we expect Bill Gates to get poorer during an economic downturn we do not expect two new Bill Gates to be minted during a crisis.

When everything is going in the shit it's a indicator if one class (Upper middle class) in large numbers starts jumping the divide over into "rich"
Once you are into the "rich" grouping it's quite possible via investment for example to simply stop working and live off your returns. If I have fifty I can't make fifty cents without some effort. But if I have five million dollars 250,000 without all that much effort and I get more wealthy. Switching from "upper middle class" to "rich" is the divide at which you can if you so desire stop working and simply manage your money to make more money. So during this big old economic crisis we should not expect to see lots of people making that jump. But instead we do.

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Ritterin Sophia
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5496
Joined: 2006-07-25 09:32am

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Ritterin Sophia »

SancheztheWhaler wrote:This one irks me a bit... is the article suggesting that millionaires are not middle class? My parents can be defined as millionaires (given their total assets, not annual income), but while we're definitely upper middle class, they're not exactly eating caviar every day.
The term millionaire is for annual income, not total assets.
A Certain Clique, HAB, The Chroniclers
User avatar
Big Phil
BANNED
Posts: 4555
Joined: 2004-10-15 02:18pm

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Big Phil »

General Schatten wrote:
SancheztheWhaler wrote:This one irks me a bit... is the article suggesting that millionaires are not middle class? My parents can be defined as millionaires (given their total assets, not annual income), but while we're definitely upper middle class, they're not exactly eating caviar every day.
The term millionaire is for annual income, not total assets.
According to who? The term "Microsoft millionaire" doesn't mean shitloads of Microsofties are making millions of dollars each year... it means that their assets and net worth are worth millions.
In Brazil they say that Pele was the best, but Garrincha was better
Alphawolf55
Jedi Knight
Posts: 715
Joined: 2010-04-01 12:59am

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Alphawolf55 »

SancheztheWhaler wrote:
Admiral Valdemar wrote:I'm sure the food stamps deal is an anomaly now, that is, highest since the '29 bust. I'll see if I can find some historical charts on that, I seem to recall seeing them somewhere.
I know it's an anomaly (up from 27 million just two years ago), but it seems like there could be multiple causes. For instance, are people using food stamps today who weren't eligible five years ago? The government expanding access isn't the same as the requirements staying the same but numbers going up.

Part of my skepticism here is that welfare numbers are down (currently) from their historical highs (as a proportion of population). That's not because millions of people became wealthier in the 90's and 2000's, it's because the government forcibly removed people from the rolls. Looking at that food stamp number in isolation, without looking at the causes or the access, is as questionable as saying "welfare numbers are down, therefore the economy is improving!"
Honestly when it comes to Food Stamps, I too wouldn't be surprised if its gone up due to availability. For example in NYC, tons of people are on food stamps even if they dont absolutely need it, because they're so easy to get (just bring in some ID, some bank statements and a low check along with a rent recepit and you'll get them). It was even the Governor's stated policy to expand the program to make sure more people the never are getting them.
User avatar
Iosef Cross
Village Idiot
Posts: 541
Joined: 2010-03-01 10:04pm

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Iosef Cross »

The inequality of income is increasing in the US, but that doesn't mean that the middle class is disappearing. The article is mostly sensationalism.

In the US the middle class is actually much stronger today than in the 1950's, when the living standards of the middle class in those days would be considered middle class only in India today (if you classify the bulk of the US population in the 1950's into the middle class). In the US a middle class family of 1950 would be a poor family of 2010 (today to be poor you need to have a income of 22,000 for a family of 4, considering that US per capita income in 1950 was only 13,000, most families of those days couldn't reach the poverty bracket).
User avatar
J
Kaye Elle Emenopey
Posts: 5836
Joined: 2002-12-14 02:23pm

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by J »

Iosef Cross wrote:In the US the middle class is actually much stronger today than in the 1950's, when the living standards of the middle class in those days would be considered middle class only in India today (if you classify the bulk of the US population in the 1950's into the middle class). In the US a middle class family of 1950 would be a poor family of 2010 (today to be poor you need to have a income of 22,000 for a family of 4, considering that US per capita income in 1950 was only 13,000, most families of those days couldn't reach the poverty bracket).
In this post, our Village Idiot demonstrates why he is a failed high school. There's this thing called inflation and cost of living. Or why the average price of a car was $1500 back then.
This post is a 100% natural organic product.
The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects


I'm not sure why people choose 'To Love is to Bury' as their wedding song...It's about a murder-suicide
- Margo Timmins


When it becomes serious, you have to lie
- Jean-Claude Juncker
User avatar
Iosef Cross
Village Idiot
Posts: 541
Joined: 2010-03-01 10:04pm

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Iosef Cross »

J wrote:
Iosef Cross wrote:In the US the middle class is actually much stronger today than in the 1950's, when the living standards of the middle class in those days would be considered middle class only in India today (if you classify the bulk of the US population in the 1950's into the middle class). In the US a middle class family of 1950 would be a poor family of 2010 (today to be poor you need to have a income of 22,000 for a family of 4, considering that US per capita income in 1950 was only 13,000, most families of those days couldn't reach the poverty bracket).
In this post, our Village Idiot demonstrates why he is a failed high school. There's this thing called inflation and cost of living. Or why the average price of a car was $1500 back then.

I used real per capita income for 1950 not nominal, retard.


Nominal per capita incomes in 1950 was 1,937. Today it is 46,364.

Real per capita incomes in 1950 were 13,225, today Mexico's real per capita income is 14,337. Comparable to the US's per capita income in 1950. US real per capita income in 2005 dollars is 42,238 today (2009), nearly 4 times higher than in 1950.

The US in 1950 was a third world country by 2010 standards.

See:
http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/Tab ... Box=no#Mid

That's the problem with the village idiot label: people react as if I were saying stupid stuff without even considering it.
Samuel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4750
Joined: 2008-10-23 11:36am

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Samuel »

No, J just thinks you are an idiot even without the label.

The obvious problem is middle class is defined by education, social status and relative wealth, not absolute wealth.
User avatar
J
Kaye Elle Emenopey
Posts: 5836
Joined: 2002-12-14 02:23pm

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by J »

Iosef Cross wrote:
I used real per capita income for 1950 not nominal, retard.


Nominal per capita incomes in 1950 was 1,937. Today it is 46,364.

Real per capita incomes in 1950 were 13,225, today Mexico's real per capita income is 14,337. Comparable to the US's per capita income in 1950. US real per capita income in 2005 dollars is 42,238 today (2009), nearly 4 times higher than in 1950.

The US in 1950 was a third world country by 2010 standards.

See:
http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/Tab ... Box=no#Mid

That's the problem with the village idiot label: people react as if I were saying stupid stuff without even considering it.
Ah. Great. So you're even dumber than I thought. You're using per capita GDP which has very little to do with income and standards of living. I hope I don't have to explain why. The correct measure is to find the median income from the actual data on wages, then compare it to the average cost of living. In other words, we find out what it costs for a family to own car, pay a mortgage on their home and raise 2.2 kids and see what fraction of their income it consumes. Then we do the same for 2009.
This post is a 100% natural organic product.
The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects


I'm not sure why people choose 'To Love is to Bury' as their wedding song...It's about a murder-suicide
- Margo Timmins


When it becomes serious, you have to lie
- Jean-Claude Juncker
User avatar
Alyrium Denryle
Minister of Sin
Posts: 22224
Joined: 2002-07-11 08:34pm
Location: The Deep Desert
Contact:

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Alyrium Denryle »

Iosef Cross wrote:
J wrote:
Iosef Cross wrote:In the US the middle class is actually much stronger today than in the 1950's, when the living standards of the middle class in those days would be considered middle class only in India today (if you classify the bulk of the US population in the 1950's into the middle class). In the US a middle class family of 1950 would be a poor family of 2010 (today to be poor you need to have a income of 22,000 for a family of 4, considering that US per capita income in 1950 was only 13,000, most families of those days couldn't reach the poverty bracket).
In this post, our Village Idiot demonstrates why he is a failed high school. There's this thing called inflation and cost of living. Or why the average price of a car was $1500 back then.

I used real per capita income for 1950 not nominal, retard.


Nominal per capita incomes in 1950 was 1,937. Today it is 46,364.

Real per capita incomes in 1950 were 13,225, today Mexico's real per capita income is 14,337. Comparable to the US's per capita income in 1950. US real per capita income in 2005 dollars is 42,238 today (2009), nearly 4 times higher than in 1950.

The US in 1950 was a third world country by 2010 standards.

See:
http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/Tab ... Box=no#Mid

That's the problem with the village idiot label: people react as if I were saying stupid stuff without even considering it.
No moron. When income becomes more unequal, the distribution becomes more right-shifted. This leads to an increase in average or mean income (which is measured by per capita income), while a decrease in the median income (the demarcation of the 50th percentile). At the same time this happens, the economy grows. Wealth is being generated. That wealth is going somewhere in the distribution. If it was equally distributed as it was being generated, the curve would simply move to the right. This is not happening. The wealth being generated is being unevenly distributed in favor of those who are already on the right tail of the distribution. This extends the right tail (the wealthy side), further increasing mean income while causing the median income to continue to drop relative to said mean.

As a result, the cost of living goes up, because the rich can afford to pay exorbitant prices for goods and services, and inflation occurs. This leads to a drop in the purchasing power of those who are not wealthy and a drop in standard of living for the poor over and above what occurs due to inflation. This leads to the destruction of the middle class. Since the 1950s income inequality in the US has increased. Do the math.
GALE Force Biological Agent/
BOTM/Great Dolphin Conspiracy/
Entomology and Evolutionary Biology Subdirector:SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences


There is Grandeur in the View of Life; it fills me with a Deep Wonder, and Intense Cynicism.

Factio republicanum delenda est
User avatar
Iosef Cross
Village Idiot
Posts: 541
Joined: 2010-03-01 10:04pm

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Iosef Cross »

J wrote:Ah. Great. So you're even dumber than I thought. You're using per capita GDP which has very little to do with income and standards of living. I hope I don't have to explain why. The correct measure is to find the median income from the actual data on wages, then compare it to the average cost of living. In other words, we find out what it costs for a family to own car, pay a mortgage on their home and raise 2.2 kids and see what fraction of their income it consumes. Then we do the same for 2009.
Read that:

http://myslu.stlawu.edu/~shorwitz/Good/myths.htm

The number of labor hours needed to purchase goods in 1950 compared to 1997 (by 2010 it will be even higher).

There is a very strong correlation between per capita income and standards of living, that's why they measure it.
User avatar
Iosef Cross
Village Idiot
Posts: 541
Joined: 2010-03-01 10:04pm

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Iosef Cross »

Alyrium Denryle wrote:As a result, the cost of living goes up, because the rich can afford to pay exorbitant prices for goods and services, and inflation occurs. This leads to a drop in the purchasing power of those who are not wealthy and a drop in standard of living for the poor over and above what occurs due to inflation. This leads to the destruction of the middle class. Since the 1950s income inequality in the US has increased. Do the math.
Yes, inequality is increasing. But that doesn't mean that the poor is getting poorer. Today the US's poor consumes more consumer goods than the middle class in 1950.

What is happening is that the rich is getting richer at a faster pace than the poor is getting richer. This means the end of the middle class?

If you start a society with 10 people and each makes 10,000. Then, after some years, you have 5 people making 40,000 and 5 people making, 20,000, average per capita income increased to 30,000, but some people have incomes only twice as high as they were, clearly: The middle class disappeared and it is a very bad thing. :banghead:

I prefer the society without middle class than the first, where everybody makes 10,000, only those that suffer from severe cases of envy would prefer the first society.
Last edited by Iosef Cross on 2010-07-27 01:23am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Iosef Cross
Village Idiot
Posts: 541
Joined: 2010-03-01 10:04pm

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Iosef Cross »

Samuel wrote:The obvious problem is middle class is defined by education, social status and relative wealth, not absolute wealth.
Good. Moving the angle of attack as I deflected the initial moves: First tried to use the argument that I didn't correct for inflation, them I show that I did. Then they said that I was even "dumber than they though", with is absurd considering the facts.

Them argue that per capita income don't measure anything, that middle class is a relative concept and that average is different than median. Good.

Only rule counts: Never agree, no matter what.
Samuel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4750
Joined: 2008-10-23 11:36am

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Samuel »

The link is interesting. Assuming the methodology is accurate...

The price of milk halved every 30 years until after the 80 where it has been almost constant.
About the same with bread although the slow down happened earlier.
Same with air travel.
Same with chicken although the origional decline was even larger.
Same with electricity.
Gas prices continue to decline :D
Levis actually became more expensive.
The only things that showed continued increases are computing power and phone calls due to technological progress for the most part.

Since I hold the view that the stasis set in during the 80s, this isn't really a surprise. The US was really poor during the 20s. Of course, part of the reason is that consumers are idiots and continue to increase spending using debt even though real income has stopped improving and the gains they get are entirely from technological progress.

Iosef you forget an important component- power. Most of the people who are making more money are spending it, but the people at the top, even after spending have some left over which goes into making more money. Or influencing the government in ways to make more money. If inequality increases it gets more and more dramatic.
Them argue that per capita income don't measure anything, that middle class is a relative concept and that average is different than median. Good.
Well, if you want to argue that the middle class didn't exist before the 19th century, be my guest, but I'm pretty sure that middle class is relative. otherwise in a couple decades everyone in Sweden will be upper class.
User avatar
Alyrium Denryle
Minister of Sin
Posts: 22224
Joined: 2002-07-11 08:34pm
Location: The Deep Desert
Contact:

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Alyrium Denryle »

Yes, inequality is increasing. But that doesn't mean that the poor is getting poorer. Today the US's poor consumes more consumer goods than the middle class in 1950.
That is because there are more consumer goods to consume moron. The CPI has been skyrocketing in this country since the 1950s, indicating a massive increase in the cost of living. In real dollars, cars cost more, houses cost more, so does fuel, food. We have had a culture shift toward consumerism and this has largely been paid for by household debt.
What is happening is that the rich is getting richer at a faster pace than the poor is getting richer. This means the end of the middle class?
Yes. Because it alters the income distribution in such a way that the middle class is mathematically erased. What determines classification as middle class is purchasing power. How much a person can buy with their income. If the price of certain goods, like a car, a house, or services such as education increases faster than the wages of those in the supposed middle class then those who are in the middle class find it more difficult to stay there. They will start having to live paycheck to paycheck, cars get repo'ed, the kids cant go to school etc. This can be subsidized with credit for a while... until it creates a credit bubble and credit markets collap... oh wait...
GALE Force Biological Agent/
BOTM/Great Dolphin Conspiracy/
Entomology and Evolutionary Biology Subdirector:SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences


There is Grandeur in the View of Life; it fills me with a Deep Wonder, and Intense Cynicism.

Factio republicanum delenda est
User avatar
K. A. Pital
Glamorous Commie
Posts: 20813
Joined: 2003-02-26 11:39am
Location: Elysium

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by K. A. Pital »

Iosef Cross wrote:Read that:
http://myslu.stlawu.edu/~shorwitz/Good/myths.htm
The number of labor hours needed to purchase goods in 1950 compared to 1997 (by 2010 it will be even higher)
Strangely enough it shows almost no real progress between 1980 and 1997, as opposed to the massive progress in prior times. Low base - high base, obviously - super-industrialized economies of the First World are hitting limits of growth, it seems.

It's pretty obvious, however, that the life standard has massively risen since the 1950s (not just there, but everywhere) and to think otherwise is... strange. :wtf:
Article wrote:The US economy grew substantially between 1975 and 1991, and the average income of those in the bottom quintile did rise in real terms ($207 on average), albeit not by very much. So even though the relative share of the poor fell, their absolute income rose.
So this means that the real income of the bottom quintile almost stood flat, whereas the incomes of the rich rose substantially. In absolute terms, the poor got dick, and in relative terms, they got poorer compared to the rich. *shrugs*

Oh, I actually found a graph to show it quite good:
Image
It's actually amazing, since the 1980 the income of the lowest 10%, lowest 20% and lowest 50% was almost flat. The last-ditch rise, fuelled by mass consumer credit and other methods in the 1990s, seems to have been wiped out in the last crisis.

It would be cool to see where this graph leads to in 2010. :angelic:
Lì ci sono chiese, macerie, moschee e questure, lì frontiere, prezzi inaccessibile e freddure
Lì paludi, minacce, cecchini coi fucili, documenti, file notturne e clandestini
Qui incontri, lotte, passi sincronizzati, colori, capannelli non autorizzati,
Uccelli migratori, reti, informazioni, piazze di Tutti i like pazze di passioni...

...La tranquillità è importante ma la libertà è tutto!
Assalti Frontali
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by Patrick Degan »

Iosef Cross wrote:Them argue that per capita income don't measure anything, that middle class is a relative concept and that average is different than median. Good.
Average is different than median. Average, or arithmetic mean, is a basic measure of total value divided by number of units. The median however is a benchmark measure defining the exact middle value and is far more useful as an indicator when a range of values is defined by extremes. To give a simple example: the average value of 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, 300, 600, 1800 is 363.75. The median value, however, is the one which lies between 50 and 100: 75.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
LaCroix
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5196
Joined: 2004-12-21 12:14pm
Location: Sopron District, Hungary, Europe, Terra

Re: American Middle Class Disappearing

Post by LaCroix »

Article wrote:The US economy grew substantially between 1975 and 1991, and the average income of those in the bottom quintile did rise in real terms ($207 on average), albeit not by very much. So even though the relative share of the poor fell, their absolute income rose.
And just to put this into proper perspective. The last sentence in the article is the bombshell Josef is ignoring blatantly.

Which is ecogarblespeak for "They got poorer, but we won't admit it. Look! Shiny!" No honest economist(they do exist, I hear) would ever use the term absolute income when talking about income development. In fact, the relative share fell from 4.4 to 3.6 which means their relative wealth decreased by 18%.
A minute's thought suggests that the very idea of this is stupid. A more detailed examination raises the possibility that it might be an answer to the question "how could the Germans win the war after the US gets involved?" - Captain Seafort, in a thread proposing a 1942 'D-Day' in Quiberon Bay

I do archery skeet. With a Trebuchet.
Post Reply