Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
Cycloneman
Padawan Learner
Posts: 155
Joined: 2007-09-13 09:02pm

Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by Cycloneman »

Fourteen examples of systemic racism in the U.S. criminal justice system
By: Bill Quigley
African Americans are directly targeted and punished more aggressively

The author is legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights and a law professor at Loyola University New Orleans. He can be reached at quigley77@gmail.com

The biggest crime in the U.S. criminal justice system is that it is a race-based institution where African Americans are directly targeted and punished in a much more aggressive way than white people.

Saying the U.S. criminal system is racist may be politically controversial in some circles. But the facts are overwhelming. No real debate about that. Below I set out numerous examples of these facts.

The question is—are these facts the mistakes of an otherwise good system, or are they evidence that the racist criminal justice system is working exactly as intended? Is the U.S. criminal justice system operated to marginalize and control millions of African Americans?

Information on race is available for each step of the criminal justice system—from the use of drugs, police stops, arrests, getting out on bail, legal representation, jury selection, trial, sentencing, prison, parole and freedom. Look what these facts show.

One. The U.S. has seen a surge in arrests and putting people in jail over the last four decades. Most of the reason is the war on drugs. Yet whites and Blacks engage in drug offenses, possession and sales, at roughly comparable rates—according to a report on race and drug enforcement published by Human Rights Watch in May 2008. While African Americans comprise 13 percent of the U.S. population and 14 percent of monthly drug users, they are 37 percent of the people arrested for drug offenses—according to 2009 congressional testimony by Marc Mauer of The Sentencing Project.

Two. The police stop Blacks and Latinos at rates that are much higher than whites. In New York City, where people of color make up about half of the population, 80 percent of the NYPD stops were of Blacks and Latinos. When whites were stopped, only 8 percent were frisked. When Blacks and Latinos are stopped, 85 percent were frisked, according to information provided by the NYPD. The same is true most other places as well. In a California study, the ACLU found Blacks are three times more likely to be stopped than whites.

Three. Since 1970, drug arrests have skyrocketed, rising from 320,000 to close to 1.6 million, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics of the U.S. Department of Justice.

African Americans are arrested for drug offenses at rates two to 11 times higher than the rate for whites—according to a May 2009 report on disparity in drug arrests by Human Rights Watch.

Four. Once arrested, Blacks are more likely to remain in prison awaiting trial than whites. For example, the New York State Division of Criminal Justice did a 1995 review of disparities in processing felony arrests and found that in some parts of New York Blacks are 33 percent more likely to be detained awaiting felony trials than whites facing felony trials.

Five. Once arrested, 80 percent of the people in the criminal justice system get a public defender for their lawyer. Race plays a big role here as well. Stop in any urban courtroom and look at the color of the people who are waiting for public defenders. Despite often heroic efforts by public defenders, the system gives them much more work and much less money than the prosecution. The American Bar Association, not a radical bunch, reviewed the U.S. public defender system in 2004 and concluded: "The fundamental right to a lawyer that Americans assume appl[ies] to everyone accused of criminal conduct effectively does not exist in practice for countless people across the United States. All too often, defendants plead guilty, even if they are innocent, without really understanding their legal rights."

Six. African Americans are frequently illegally excluded from criminal jury service, according to a June 2010 study released by the Equal Justice Initiative. For example, in Houston County, Ala., eight out of 10 African Americans qualified for jury service have been struck by prosecutors from serving on death penalty cases.

Seven. Trials are rare. Only 3 to 5 percent of criminal cases go to trial—the rest are plea-bargained. Most African Americans defendants never get a trial. Most plea bargains consist of a promise of a longer sentence if a person exercises their constitutional right to trial. As a result, people caught up in the system, as the American Bar Association points out, plead guilty even when innocent. Why? As one young man told me recently, "Who wouldn' rather do three years for a crime they didn't commit than risk 25 years for a crime they didn't do?"

Eight. The U.S. Sentencing Commission reported in March 2010 that in the federal system Black offenders receive sentences that are 10 percent longer than white offenders for the same crimes. Marc Mauer of the Sentencing Project reports African Americans are 21 percent more likely to receive mandatory minimum sentences than white defendants and 20 percent more likely to be sentenced to prison than white drug defendants.

Nine. The longer the sentence, the more likely it is that non-white people will be the ones getting it. A July 2009 report by the Sentencing Project found that two-thirds of the people in the U.S. with life sentences are non-white. In New York, it is 83 percent.

Ten. As a result, African Americans, who are 13 percent of the population and 14 percent of drug users, are not only 37 percent of the people arrested for drugs but also 56 percent of the people in state prisons for drug offenses. (Marc Mauer, May 2009 Congressional Testimony for The Sentencing Project)

Eleven. The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics concludes that the chance of a Black male born in 2001 going to jail is 32 percent, or one in three. Latino males have a 17 percent chance and white males have a 6 percent chance. Thus Black boys are five times and Latino boys nearly three times as likely as white boys to go to jail.

Twelve. So, while African American juvenile youth are but 16 percent of the population, they are 28 percent of juvenile arrests, 37 percent of the youth in juvenile jails and 58 percent of the youth sent to adult prisons. (2009 Criminal Justice Primer, The Sentencing Project)

Thirteen. Remember that the U.S. leads the world in putting our own people into jail and prison. The New York Times reported in 2008 that the U.S. has 5 percent of the world's population but a quarter of the world's prisoners, over 2.3 million people behind bars, dwarfing other nations. The U.S. rate of incarceration is five to eight times higher than other highly developed countries and Black males are the largest percentage of inmates, according to ABC News.

Fourteen. Even when released from prison, race continues to dominate. A study by Professor Devah Pager of the University of Wisconsin found that 17 percent of white job applicants with criminal records received callbacks from employers, while only 5 percent of Black job applicants with criminal records received callbacks. Race is so prominent in that study that whites with criminal records actually received better treatment than Blacks without criminal records!

So, what conclusions do these facts lead to? The criminal justice system, from start to finish, is seriously racist.

Professor Michelle Alexander concludes that it is no coincidence that the criminal justice system ramped up its processing of African Americans just as the Jim Crow laws enforced since the age of slavery ended. Her book, "The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness," sees these facts as evidence of the new way the U.S. has decided to control African Americans—a racialized system of social control. The stigma of criminality functions in much the same way as Jim Crow—creating legal boundaries between them and us, allowing legal discrimination against them, removing the right to vote from millions, and essentially warehousing a disposable population of unwanted people. She calls it a new caste system.

Poor whites and people of other ethnicity are also subjected to this system of social control. Because if poor whites or others get out of line, they will be given the worst possible treatment, they will be treated just like poor Blacks.

Other critics like Professor Dylan Rodriguez see the criminal justice system as a key part of what he calls the domestic war on the marginalized. Because of globalization, he argues in his book "Forced Passages," there is an excess of people in the U.S. and elsewhere. "These people," whether they are in Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib or U.S. jails and prisons, are not productive, are not needed, are not wanted and are not really entitled to the same human rights as the productive ones. They must be controlled and dominated for the safety of the productive. They must be intimidated into accepting their inferiority or they must be removed from the society of the productive.

This domestic war relies on the same technology that the U.S. uses internationally. More and more we see the militarization of this country's police. Likewise, the goals of the U.S. justice system are the same as the U.S. war on terror—domination and control by capture, immobilization, punishment and liquidation.

What to do?

Martin Luther King Jr. said we, as a nation, must undergo a radical revolution of values. A radical approach to the U.S. criminal justice system means we must go to the root of the problem. Not reform. Not better beds in better prisons. We are not called to only trim the leaves or prune the branches, but rip up this unjust system by its roots.

We are all entitled to safety. That is a human right everyone has a right to expect. But do we really think that continuing with a deeply racist system leading the world in incarcerating our children is making us safer?

It is time for every person interested in justice and safety to join in and dismantle this racist system. Should the U.S. decriminalize drugs like marijuana? Should prisons be abolished? Should we expand the use of restorative justice? Can we create fair educational, medical and employment systems? All these questions and many more have to be seriously explored. Join a group like INCITE, Critical Resistance, the Center for Community Alternatives, Thousand Kites, or the California Prison Moratorium and work on it. As Professor Alexander says, "Nothing short of a major social movement can dismantle this new caste system."
For the more right-wing posters here, before I get ye olde "institutional poverty, not institutional racism," I'd like to point out that there are about twice as many whites living below the poverty line as there are blacks. There are ~17,109,000 non-Hispanic whites living below poverty line and ~9,065,000 blacks living below poverty line. See here and here.
User avatar
Jalinth
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: 2004-01-09 05:51pm
Location: The Wet coast of Canada

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by Jalinth »

The economist has had a series of articles about the US prison system. A couple of samples arehttp://www.economist.com/node/16636027? ... d=16636027 and http://www.economist.com/node/16640389? ... d=16640389.

They don't directly allege racism but do go into the fact that the US has a massive number of prisons, prison sentences for things that shouldn't even be crimes, and how prosecutors have massive amounts of freedom to pressure anyone to cop to pleas by overcharging - making it very risky to be innocent. Good example is the old stand-by of "wire fraud" - if you sent out 200 emails during the course of your "crime", you'd be charged with 200 counts of wire fraud and get a choice of pleading guilty or risk multiple consecutive sentences. For drug charges, the US has this "crack is 100 times worse than cocaine" fixation, which just happens to be a black/white split.

Obama unfortunately has done little to help as I was hoping. He hasn't even given out a single pardon, so now is either 3rd or 4th on the all time slowest pardoning list - and you need to exclude the 1st president on the list - Washington - because how many federal crimes exists back in his day compared to today? Was it even 0.1%?
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

Jalinth wrote:Obama unfortunately has done little to help as I was hoping. He hasn't even given out a single pardon, so now is either 3rd or 4th on the all time slowest pardoning list - and you need to exclude the 1st president on the list - Washington - because how many federal crimes exists back in his day compared to today? Was it even 0.1%?
Well, one can take some small solace in the fact that Congress has, at least, cut the disparity between crack and cocaine to merely 18 to 1.
User avatar
Big Phil
BANNED
Posts: 4555
Joined: 2004-10-15 02:18pm

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by Big Phil »

I heard an author interviewed on the radio a while back talking about disparity in the death penalty. Her argument was that you can see the greatest disparity not in the race of people on death row, but in the race of the victims. In other words, if a victim is black, the murderer is much less likely to receive the death penalty than if the victim is white. She had statistics to back this up, and had written a couple of books about it, but I don't remember them off the top of my head. In any case, the point being that you have to be a special sort of blind idiot to not acknowledge that the US justice system is producing some fucked up results.
In Brazil they say that Pele was the best, but Garrincha was better
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

It would be interesting to see what happened to the criminal justice system if it were made a legal requirement that the public defenders' services in a state receive the same amount of money as the district attorney's offices, and that no government agency can fund its district attorney's branch more than it funds its public defender's office.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by Master of Ossus »

The Duchess of Zeon wrote:It would be interesting to see what happened to the criminal justice system if it were made a legal requirement that the public defenders' services in a state receive the same amount of money as the district attorney's offices, and that no government agency can fund its district attorney's branch more than it funds its public defender's office.
That simply wouldn't make sense at all. Prosecutors have a much larger case-load than public defenders. They have to examine cases that will never be tried or prosecuted, cases that will be handled without any defense counsel, and not all defendants are indigent and entitled to public defenders.

Federal defenders are typically very well-funded and resourced, though, so it would make more sense just to look at their experience.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
Stravo
Official SD.Net Teller of Tales
Posts: 12806
Joined: 2002-07-08 12:06pm
Location: NYC

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by Stravo »

On the crack v. cocaine thing I do have to say speaking as someone who grew up in one of the neighborhoods hardest hit by the crack epidemic of the 80's (Washington Heights) what crack did to neighborehoods in a matter of just a year was nothing less than apocalyptic. Where before you had just the cocaine and heroin trade the junkies were tolerable and the dealing was far less in your face when crack came along it was like a tsunami of crime and violence that no one was expecting. Dealers openly out on every corner (literrally) and younger and younger kids being dragged into that life, families torn apart by a new kind of junkie, the crack head, that just put the F in Fiend.

Part of the sentencing disparity is in recognition of the disproportionate impact the drug has on neighborhoods and crime in general. Yes, race factors in when the large number of users are in minority neighborhoods in the first place but Jesus it was a scary time and as usual legislators went overboard.

Of course now that the crack wars are over and things have settled down these drug laws really need to be looked at more closely especially in light of trends like the ones listed in the OP.

In any event I still firmly believe this is largely at it's heart a poverty thing too. I know it's impacting poor blacks worse than it is poor whites but in sum the ones really getting it are the poor period. Our justice system is the best money can buy and we watched OJ Simpson turn that into a farce years ago and he was a rich African American. In the end money cuts through all demographic limitations.
Wherever you go, there you are.

Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
Image
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by Kanastrous »

I recall hearing talk that the harsher measures taken against crack were at least in part at the urging of some 'black community leaders.' Although I have yet to find linkage. Anyone remember that...?
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by RedImperator »

Kanastrous wrote:I recall hearing talk that the harsher measures taken against crack were at least in part at the urging of some 'black community leaders.' Although I have yet to find linkage. Anyone remember that...?
I wouldn't be surprised. Crack hit black neighborhoods like a bomb; throwing dealers in prison forever must have been a tempting solution for them.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Jalinth
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: 2004-01-09 05:51pm
Location: The Wet coast of Canada

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by Jalinth »

I'll agree with Stravo that crack hit the black community very hard. But all that locking the minor league pushers away for years and years did was increase the pool of virtually unemployable black men - as blacks always have had a more difficult employment situation to start with and many companies increased their existing policies of criminal background checks, so furthering increasing black men's unemployment rate. Read Freakonomics - it actually has a chapter on why most drug dealers live with their mothers. The pay of the average gang member is tiny and they were asking the sociologist who was studying them for a "good" job - "good" in the gang member's parlance meaning janitor If anything, the US needs a more viable parole and expungement system covering many crimes so that those who've done their time and turned their life (this is where a strong parole system is needed - along with support programs) around get a clean record and avoid having unemployment or crime being the only options.
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12269
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by Surlethe »

For the more right-wing posters here, before I get ye olde "institutional poverty, not institutional racism," I'd like to point out that there are about twice as many whites living below the poverty line as there are blacks. There are ~17,109,000 non-Hispanic whites living below poverty line and ~9,065,000 blacks living below poverty line. See here and here.
Does this distinguish between urban and rural poverty? (Mind, institutional poverty is an example of institutional racism anyway.)
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Alyrium Denryle
Minister of Sin
Posts: 22224
Joined: 2002-07-11 08:34pm
Location: The Deep Desert
Contact:

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by Alyrium Denryle »

Master of Ossus wrote:
The Duchess of Zeon wrote:It would be interesting to see what happened to the criminal justice system if it were made a legal requirement that the public defenders' services in a state receive the same amount of money as the district attorney's offices, and that no government agency can fund its district attorney's branch more than it funds its public defender's office.
That simply wouldn't make sense at all. Prosecutors have a much larger case-load than public defenders. They have to examine cases that will never be tried or prosecuted, cases that will be handled without any defense counsel, and not all defendants are indigent and entitled to public defenders.

Federal defenders are typically very well-funded and resourced, though, so it would make more sense just to look at their experience.
Then correct for case load. It is a very simple matter really. Categorize different sorts of cases and the median amount of money spent on said different types, and multiply by the median number of cases in a year with a bit of leeway in case they have more--combined of course with the ability to roll over money from year to year.

Do this for both the public defenders office and the DA's office and you have yourself a more or less fair system.

Minor nitpick: One does not have to be indigent to need a public defender. With the amount defense attorneys cost, you just have to not be extremely well off.
GALE Force Biological Agent/
BOTM/Great Dolphin Conspiracy/
Entomology and Evolutionary Biology Subdirector:SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences


There is Grandeur in the View of Life; it fills me with a Deep Wonder, and Intense Cynicism.

Factio republicanum delenda est
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Re: Statistical Evidence of US Judicial System's Racism

Post by Master of Ossus »

Alyrium Denryle wrote:Then correct for case load. It is a very simple matter really. Categorize different sorts of cases and the median amount of money spent on said different types, and multiply by the median number of cases in a year with a bit of leeway in case they have more--combined of course with the ability to roll over money from year to year.
Ummm... actually, that's very hard to do. How do you calculate the "median amount of money spent on said different types?" Keep in mind, public defenders currently actually serve clients now using such a system, but on fewer resources than the DA. For that matter, how do you categorize different sorts of cases? How do you handle cases in which the defendant demands an appeal of right?
Do this for both the public defenders office and the DA's office and you have yourself a more or less fair system.

Minor nitpick: One does not have to be indigent to need a public defender. With the amount defense attorneys cost, you just have to not be extremely well off.
"Indigent" is the legal term for someone who is entitled to a public defender.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
Post Reply