Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

lord Martiya
Jedi Master
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2007-08-29 11:52am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by lord Martiya »

Zinegata wrote:Also, regarding Char:

He was always overrated. His main claim to fame is that he sank five battleships during the Loum, but his subsequent military career was mediocre at best. The only reason he managed to stave off being sacked was that Kishira saw an opportunity to poach a reasonably good Space Attack Force ace pilot, and got smitten because he had the same mask fetish she did :P.
Well, maybe there was the fact he was still pretty good at blowing up things (the exact thing Kycilia used him for). For more complicated things she and Dozle sent different people (she sent M'qube, Dozle sent Ramba Ral. Both have easily outperformed Char as commanders), but when it came at blowing up things...
And about Loum, there's a nice blow at Char reputation in Origins: while talking of Zeon aces after finding out the Three Black Stars were around, Job John repeated of how Char sank five battleships at Loum... Only to have Ryu nitpicking that only one was a battleship, three ships were Salamis battlecruisers and one was of another model he failed to state because of the wounds inflicted on him by Ramba Ral. And in the Loum flashback we see EXACTLY what ships Char sank: in the order a carrier-adapted Columbus nuked in the hangar (incidentally, in this incarnation Loum is a veteran of Loum, and that Columbus was his mothership), a Salamis, a couple Magellans (one of which was Wakkein's ship) and then another Salamis, this one with a single, well-placed nuke. OK, Ryu mistook one of the Magellans for a Salamis, but the thing is that Origins debunked Char claim to fame... Interesting noting that Char NEVER referred to the five battleships he sank, only to the fact he was damn good at blowing up things. Maybe he knew to be overrated...
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Zinegata »

Char's five battleship claim mainly comes from the (usually) reliable MSV archives. However, sinking five battleships would mean he sank nearly half of the Federation battleship force at the Loum (as MSV tends to use the lower numbers, and hence follows EB1's twelve Magellan-class figure as opposed to the dozens in EB39).

In every depiction of Char's famed Loum attack (i.e. G-Generation, Char's Counter-attack the Video Game), he never sinks five Magellan class ships. It's usually five Salamis class cruisers, or a mix of ships. Which does lend credence to the claim that when MSV refers to Char sinking five battleships, they actually mean five warships.

Still, the top scorer at the Loum is actually Shin Matsunaga - who sank six ships in total (one battleships, five cruisers).

Char's career post-Loum however, consisted mainly of disobeying orders (or having his men disobey orders and get themselves killed). He personally destroys a lot of enemy machines, but he never actually follows the sound military objectives that are given to him. This is most blatantly displayed at A Bao A Qu - while Char decided to try and hunt down Amuro with his Zeong, he only engaged and destroyed Federation forces who were directly opposing him, instead of taking them all on as he should.

By contrast, Amuro deliberately avoided fighting Char until the White Base and most of the ships were already landing at A Bao A Qu, where they could deliver devastating point-blank fire that would bring the space fortress down.
lord Martiya
Jedi Master
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2007-08-29 11:52am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by lord Martiya »

Zinegata wrote:Char's career post-Loum however, consisted mainly of disobeying orders (or having his men disobey orders and get themselves killed). He personally destroys a lot of enemy machines, but he never actually follows the sound military objectives that are given to him. This is most blatantly displayed at A Bao A Qu - while Char decided to try and hunt down Amuro with his Zeong, he only engaged and destroyed Federation forces who were directly opposing him, instead of taking them all on as he should.

By contrast, Amuro deliberately avoided fighting Char until the White Base and most of the ships were already landing at A Bao A Qu, where they could deliver devastating point-blank fire that would bring the space fortress down.
Yeah, I know. That's why I said Char was mainly used to blow up things, it was the one thing he could do best than anyone else save Lalah.
User avatar
scythewielder
Youngling
Posts: 55
Joined: 2006-01-05 03:57pm
Location: Far to the south

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by scythewielder »

To be perfectly honest...as long as it's all about silly fiction created for a purely commercial purpose, I don't really care about how many intended or unintended politically and factually incorrect parallels are implied or directly expressed in any of the Gundam series or any of the franchises Japan has ever produced for matter. I don't think it's worth the effort of reading too much into any of them or feeling offended, regardless of what the creators did or didn't mean to say.

Outside of the direct use of quasi-Nazi imagery and rhetoric, which is definitely in poor taste and insensitive...real or perceived "revisionism" in non-historical fiction where giant robots or people with fantastical powers fight each other isn't much of a problem. Its main purpose is to entertain and sell merchandise, not to educate. I'd rather see the Japanese revise their educational system and its textbooks to match the realities of their WWII crimes than worry about the white-washing of the non-existent Zeon, Orb or what have you.

To put it another way, I don't really care about the fact that many American cartoons both past and present portray the U.S. or the West at large as squeaky-clean good guys fighting evil foreigners, aliens or worse either, in spite of the fact that the implied historical parallels would arguably make this setup just as -if not more- insensitive and offensive thanks to the wonders of colonialism, imperialism and the like. The United States itself has brought a lot of good but also a lot of harm to this world and yet it's constantly portrayed in a positive light in most of its entertainment output (the exceptions make up a small part of the pie). It's not worth getting up in arms over that.

Mindlessly waving around the Zeon flag or finding ways to portray Char Aznable as an admirable figure instead of the stubborn psychological wreck he really was by the time CCA came around is nothing but child's play, at the end of the day, and any viewer who reaches the flawed conclusion that "Zeon is right!" somehow means "WWII Germany / Japan was right!" must be too ignorant or stupid to live in the first place if they can't distinguish fact from fiction.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Zinegata »

Or you can just say "Gundam is just a 30 minute toy commercial". Pretty much all knowledgeable Gundam fans know this to be true.

The thing is, Gundam isn't comparable to an American Saturday Morning cartoon. Because Gundam isn't Japan's equivalent of a Saturday morning cartoon. It's their equivalent of Star Trek. It's their flagship science fiction show. Heck, if this site was founded by a Japanse sci-fi fan (who had little contact with the West) it would likely be named Musai.net

And isn't the point of SD.net to discuss these shows? A lot of digital ink has been spilled on this site on topics like how the TNG Federation is in fact a communist society. Hence, it's equally valid to discuss how Gundam shows are increasingly becoming vehicles of extreme Japanese nationalism.
User avatar
Setzer
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 3138
Joined: 2002-08-30 11:45am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Setzer »

And to think that before I read this thread my chief problem with the Gundam series was the proliferation of Char clones.

Was he really disobeying orders by sneaking into Jaburo? I thought his job was sabotage, not recon.
Image
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Zinegata »

Setzer wrote:And to think that before I read this thread my chief problem with the Gundam series was the proliferation of Char clones.

Was he really disobeying orders by sneaking into Jaburo? I thought his job was sabotage, not recon.
His job was to search for the secret entrances to Jaburo, and to sabotage the GM production lines if possible. He suceeded in both. If he had stopped there, it would have been a "Well Done, Mission Accomplished" on his record.

The problem is that instead of simply withdrawing after accomplishing both missions, he told California Base to drop all of its troops on Jaburo, insisting that they could take the massive Federation base with only minimal preparations. The drop operation was a fiasco - largely because while Char had discovered the undground entrances (which MSMs could use), he hadn't found the entrances that would let conventional ground MS into Jaburo.

The result was a lot of dead Zaku, Gouf, and Dom pilots who never even reached Jaburo's interior. Meanwhile, Char's own MSM force was forced to fight on its own against the Gundam and Jaburo's GM teams, where it was destroyed piecemeal. California Base never recovered and would be unable to launch any further offensive operations.

(Admittedly, the California Base commander shouldn't have listened to Char, so Char's not soley to blame here. But nonetheless they threw away months of planning - and the chance to see Zeon's Funny Marine Mobile Suit Corp in action.)
User avatar
scythewielder
Youngling
Posts: 55
Joined: 2006-01-05 03:57pm
Location: Far to the south

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by scythewielder »

Zinegata wrote:The thing is, Gundam isn't comparable to an American Saturday Morning cartoon. Because Gundam isn't Japan's equivalent of a Saturday morning cartoon. It's their equivalent of Star Trek. It's their flagship science fiction show. Heck, if this site was founded by a Japanse sci-fi fan (who had little contact with the West) it would likely be named Musai.net
Or perhaps it would be named Yamato.net, but I digress... :P
And isn't the point of SD.net to discuss these shows? A lot of digital ink has been spilled on this site on topics like how the TNG Federation is in fact a communist society. Hence, it's equally valid to discuss how Gundam shows are increasingly becoming vehicles of extreme Japanese nationalism.
Certainly, but let's get some perspective in here...how many Star Trek fans are actually communist in any meaningful way, as opposed to within the confines of fantasy land? How many Star Wars fans are actually in favor of authoritarian empires ruled through terror and fear? Do you want to argue that Gundam has had any real impact on the development of Japanese nationalism?
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Zinegata »

No, clearly you're the one who is lacking perspective.

You are whining about people analyzing Gundam. In a website whose primary purpose is to analyze sci-fi.

Seriously, what are you doing here then? It seems you're just wasting our time with your false concerns.
User avatar
scythewielder
Youngling
Posts: 55
Joined: 2006-01-05 03:57pm
Location: Far to the south

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by scythewielder »

Rather touchy, aren't we? Never said that you couldn't argue about it. Feel free to do so.

My so-called "false concerns" are merely a position that deals with the initial question that brought about this topic and the gist of the subsequent discussion it sparked. I don't see how being skeptical of the ultimate relevance assigned to such matters isn't a valid form of analysis. One would think you should be able to realize that much.

Then again, considering that this topic has already strayed pretty far from its original purpose into general talk about whatever goes on in Gundam, period, your reaction is perhaps understandable if not the least bit admirable.
lord Martiya
Jedi Master
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2007-08-29 11:52am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by lord Martiya »

Zinegata wrote:His job was to search for the secret entrances to Jaburo, and to sabotage the GM production lines if possible. He suceeded in both. If he had stopped there, it would have been a "Well Done, Mission Accomplished" on his record.

The problem is that instead of simply withdrawing after accomplishing both missions, he told California Base to drop all of its troops on Jaburo, insisting that they could take the massive Federation base with only minimal preparations. The drop operation was a fiasco - largely because while Char had discovered the undground entrances (which MSMs could use), he hadn't found the entrances that would let conventional ground MS into Jaburo.

The result was a lot of dead Zaku, Gouf, and Dom pilots who never even reached Jaburo's interior. Meanwhile, Char's own MSM force was forced to fight on its own against the Gundam and Jaburo's GM teams, where it was destroyed piecemeal. California Base never recovered and would be unable to launch any further offensive operations.
Wait, I just re-watched that part of the series, and as far I know he was stalking the White Base while waiting for orders when he managed to find out the approximate position of one of Jaburo spaceship gates (not too difficult: there was little Minovsky particles, so he could track the White Base, and when it disappeared), and after reporting it troops from California Base arrived and he found himself on a red Z'Gok he had JUST RECEIVED (it was apparently the very first time he rode it) leading the only successful penetration in the base. He was ordered to enter and blow up whatever he could only AFTER the fiasco, probably to salvage something from the failure.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Zinegata »

scytheweilder->

Ignoring your "holier than thou" attitude...

It's relevant as Gundam is encouraging Japanese teenagers to chant Nazi slogans in public gatherings. It may be for fun, but I think some people may find that to be exceedingly retarded.

And because we simply can discuss such matters here.
lord Martiya wrote:Wait, I just re-watched that part of the series, and as far I know he was stalking the White Base while waiting for orders when he managed to find out the approximate position of one of Jaburo spaceship gates (not too difficult: there was little Minovsky particles, so he could track the White Base, and when it disappeared), and after reporting it troops from California Base arrived and he found himself on a red Z'Gok he had JUST RECEIVED (it was apparently the very first time he rode it) leading the only successful penetration in the base. He was ordered to enter and blow up whatever he could only AFTER the fiasco, probably to salvage something from the failure.
It's been a while so, forgive me if I got the order of events a little wrong.

Re-checking the sources, the sequence of events is:

1) Char tracks down the White Base to a secret Jaburo entrance.

2) Char tells the California Base to launch an immediate assault based on this information. He's given a Z'Gok and Acguy team.

3) Fiasco ensues as the MSMs find the underwater entrance, but the ground MS aren't able to find the entrances.

4) Char gets the sabotage mission in an attempt to make up for the fiasco.

Ignore my first post on the matter then, the order (and therefore conclusion) is wrong :D.
User avatar
Gramzamber
Jedi Knight
Posts: 777
Joined: 2009-10-09 01:49pm

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Gramzamber »

Zinegata wrote:scytheweilder->

Ignoring your "holier than thou" attitude...

It's relevant as Gundam is encouraging Japanese teenagers to chant Nazi slogans in public gatherings. It may be for fun, but I think some people may find that to be exceedingly retarded.

And because we simply can discuss such matters here.
Nazis don't have the monopoly on nationalist salutes you know.
It may be styled after them, but it isn't. It's at worst a fascist slogan, but it's a fictional fascist slogan, and I fail to see how shouting "Sieg Zeon!" is any worse than dressing up as a Sith Lord and declaring you will use your powers to decimate all who stand in your way.
"No it's just Anacrap coming to whine and do nothing." -Mike Nelson on Anakin Skywalker
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Zinegata »

Gramzamber wrote:Nazis don't have the monopoly on nationalist salutes you know.
It may be styled after them, but it isn't. It's at worst a fascist slogan, but it's a fictional fascist slogan, and I fail to see how shouting "Sieg Zeon!" is any worse than dressing up as a Sith Lord and declaring you will use your powers to decimate all who stand in your way.
You're contradicting yourself a bit here. They're not Nazis, but only based on Nazis?

I fail to see how portraying fictional genocidal racist maniacs as the good guys is something that's not offensive. Shouldn't this kind of BS be called out, particularly when it's reflection of the culture that produced this piece of fiction?

Moreover, here's the irony of all this: The original Gundam saga (especially the Zeon saga) was meant to be a cautionary tale against the evils of extreme ideology and racism. That's why Newtype powers stopped Axis from destroying the Earth. It was Tomino basically telling fans "Look, just because you're Newtype doesn't give you the right to kill Old Types!" And a major theme of the whole series is how leaders manipulate ideology and racism to make people fight pointless wars against each other.

Instead, thanks largely to the new series, we have people who think the genocidal maniacs are the good guys and chant "Sieg Zeon!"
User avatar
Ritterin Sophia
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5496
Joined: 2006-07-25 09:32am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Ritterin Sophia »

Zinegata wrote:Instead, thanks largely to the new series, we have people who think the genocidal maniacs are the good guys and chant "Sieg Zeon!"
As has been said, how is this any different than a 40ker shouting 'Blood For the Blood God!' or 'For the Emprah!' when Khornate dogma is savagely murdering things and the Imperium is an oppressive, xenophobic theocracy? Or Starship Troopers fans say 'Service for Citizenship'? Or how about Star Wars fans quoting Darth Vader?

It's not, it's harmless fun. How do I know this? Because I do it too, because villains drive the story and are most often some of the most interesting characters.
A Certain Clique, HAB, The Chroniclers
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Zinegata »

General Schatten wrote:As has been said, how is this any different than a 40ker shouting 'Blood For the Blood God!' or 'For the Emprah!' when Khornate dogma is savagely murdering things and the Imperium is an oppressive, xenophobic theocracy? Or Starship Troopers fans say 'Service for Citizenship'? Or how about Star Wars fans quoting Darth Vader?
The fact that the source material unrelentingly depicts Khorne, Starship Troopers, and the Galactic Empire as the bad guys (Well, okay, Starship Troopers is a satire on how the humans are the bad guys, but that's the point).

As opposed to Zeon, where the animators have begun trying to make them the good guys, because again Zeon = Japan and they're deliberately ignoring their own history and Gundam's existing legacy as a distinctly anti-ideology series.

Again, this is pointless whining, and I'm not going to answer this point again. If you feel that there is nothing wrong with shouting "Sieg Zeon", do so. But don't be surprised if people start thinking you're a skinhead.
lord Martiya
Jedi Master
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2007-08-29 11:52am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by lord Martiya »

Zinegata wrote:Ignore my first post on the matter then, the order (and therefore conclusion) is wrong :D.
There's also the fact he didn't send the request, he just informed California Base of the location, the scene change to Jaburo and THEN we get Char mentioning incoming troops from California.
More probably there was a standing order from the sector commander (that is identified as major general Romero in Gundam: The Origin), who ordered an immediate attack in his quest for glory. And after Romero got killed in the battle, Char had to save something from the disaster.
I am all to debunk Char mythos and return the Red Comet to his true status of resident Person of Mass Destruction, but this time he's not at fault.
User avatar
Ritterin Sophia
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5496
Joined: 2006-07-25 09:32am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Ritterin Sophia »

Zinegata wrote:Again, this is pointless whining, and I'm not going to answer this point again.
Hey, go fuck yourself, kiddo. You're the one whining about harmless nerd fun. :roll:
A Certain Clique, HAB, The Chroniclers
User avatar
Commander 598
Jedi Knight
Posts: 767
Joined: 2006-06-07 08:16pm
Location: Northern Louisiana Swamp
Contact:

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Commander 598 »

I prefer "Sieg Kaiser".
User avatar
Ford Prefect
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8254
Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
Location: The real number domain

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Ford Prefect »

Zinegata wrote:As opposed to Zeon, where the animators have begun trying to make them the good guys, because again Zeon = Japan and they're deliberately ignoring their own history and Gundam's existing legacy as a distinctly anti-ideology series.
Yeah, see, I don't actually know how you've come to this conclusion. You mentioned 0083 earlier on, and I've actually seen that OVA and while it is not exactly a scathing indictment of every single Zeke it encounters it certainly isn't a vehicle for 'Zeon apologism' like you seem to have suggested. The Delaz Fleet is unambiguously the antagonist, even though they're being used by elements of the Federation, and the most sympathetic and outright good characters are generally Feddies (so long as they're not Monsha).

Also, I'm having a serious disconnect with the idea of Contolism being a racist ideology, given that it is a combination of a philosophy which states that the Earth is sacred and we should live in space to leave it in peace, and a philosophy that states that space colonies should be sovereign nations. That he believed that living in space would facillitate a transformation into 'Newtypes' is not actually racist, especially since for Deikun the main thing that was important about Newtypes was their supposed ability to understand each other without misconnception (we can accept that Deikun was a serious idealist). I seriously have not managed to find anything, anything at all, which suggests that Contolism contains a serious current of 'spacenoid superiority' as a philosophical tenet.
What is Project Zohar?

Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Zinegata »

lord Martiya wrote:
Zinegata wrote:Ignore my first post on the matter then, the order (and therefore conclusion) is wrong :D.
There's also the fact he didn't send the request, he just informed California Base of the location, the scene change to Jaburo and THEN we get Char mentioning incoming troops from California.
More probably there was a standing order from the sector commander (that is identified as major general Romero in Gundam: The Origin), who ordered an immediate attack in his quest for glory. And after Romero got killed in the battle, Char had to save something from the disaster.
I am all to debunk Char mythos and return the Red Comet to his true status of resident Person of Mass Destruction, but this time he's not at fault.
I'm gonna defer to you for this one because your viewing of the series is fresher than mine :)
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Zinegata »

Ford Prefect wrote:Yeah, see, I don't actually know how you've come to this conclusion. You mentioned 0083 earlier on, and I've actually seen that OVA and while it is not exactly a scathing indictment of every single Zeke it encounters it certainly isn't a vehicle for 'Zeon apologism' like you seem to have suggested. The Delaz Fleet is unambiguously the antagonist, even though they're being used by elements of the Federation, and the most sympathetic and outright good characters are generally Feddies (so long as they're not Monsha).
Yes. Bask Ohm is totally a sympathetic and outright good character :P.
Also, I'm having a serious disconnect with the idea of Contolism being a racist ideology, given that it is a combination of a philosophy which states that the Earth is sacred and we should live in space to leave it in peace, and a philosophy that states that space colonies should be sovereign nations. That he believed that living in space would facillitate a transformation into 'Newtypes' is not actually racist, especially since for Deikun the main thing that was important about Newtypes was their supposed ability to understand each other without misconnception (we can accept that Deikun was a serious idealist). I seriously have not managed to find anything, anything at all, which suggests that Contolism contains a serious current of 'spacenoid superiority' as a philosophical tenet.
Okay, an actual argument on the series itself! Yay!

It's be helpful to read through the setting notes. Translated copy here:

http://www.ultimatemark.com/gundam/

In particular...
Zeon Zum made his declaration of independence sixteen years before the outbreak of war. But the Earth Federation, which controlled the Sides, didn't recognize Zeon's independence.

Zeon, believing that the excessive human population was too large to be sustained by Earth's mineral resources, took a position opposed to the Federation's pacifism. But without special minerals such as mercury and platinum, which existed only on Earth, the Sides could never achieve complete independence.

After Zeon Zum's death, his successor Degwin Zabi actively began preparations for war against the Earth Federation. Ten years later, in the year 0078, Zeon destroyed four Sides and exterminated almost 50 percent of humanity with its unilateral attacks. But by the spring of the following year, the ongoing war had reached a stalemate, as both the Principality of Zeon and the Earth Federation had exhausted their fighting strength.
Bold sections are mine.

Contolism, from the original setting notes, wasn't just about moving people to humanity. It's real intent was to actually reduce the total population of humanity by means opposed to pacifism. Doesn't that sound a bit like eugenics?

Moreover, here's another later passage:
After Zeon Zum's death, Degwin Zabi tried to put Zeon Zum's ideals into practice—in other words, the two goals of regulating the excessively large human population, and putting the Federation under Zeon control. Meanwhile, the Zabi family intensified their system of military dictatorship and carried out preparations for the outbreak of war.
Now, we keep hearing Char (and pretty much nobody else) claim that "the Zabis subverted my father's ideals!" But the setting notes contradicts Char's lone and partisan testimony. It states that Degwin does, in fact, sincerely try to implement Zeon's ideals. And that involves population reduction, and conquest.

Finally, here's the kicker from the timeline:
U.C. 0071
The Principality of Zeon begins development of new weapons for use in the era of Minovsky physics. The compact fusion reactor is completed.

Gihren Zabi proclaims his Survival of the Selected theory.
* This is the English translation used in Gundam Officials. Literally, it's something like Survival of the Superior Race.
Note that in previous translations, what Gihren proclaims is the "Master Race" theory.

Now, most Zeon fans hand-wave this as "Zabi subverting Zeon's ideals". But again, the setting notes actually say this is actually what Zeon wanted. He believed in population control. Which leads to eugenics. Which leads to genocide.

-----

Moreover...

Contolism's main point is that "The Spacenoid man is superior to the Earthnoid man. Because only the Spacenoid man can become a Newtype". That's a racist ideology because it holds one group of people above another. "Only black men can jump" may be a joke in the real world, but if you turn that entire line of thinking into an ideology, then it's a racist ideology.

And funnily, again, Contolism is actually totally debunked in the original series. It's proven that Earthnoids can be Newtype too. Thus, the whole "moving to space will result in a new kind of man" justification is actually bullshit.
User avatar
Ford Prefect
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8254
Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
Location: The real number domain

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Ford Prefect »

Zinegata wrote:Yes. Bask Ohm is totally a sympathetic and outright good character :P.
Bask Om is too fat to be confined to your petty human views of 'morality'. :) Incidentally, despite being a colossal prick, I think Bask is actually kind of interesting. Consider when Emma questions his methods prior to her defection, his reaction is basically 'I like your attitude, and I want to see how you would handle this situation so you're in command'. This is actually kind of unusual when you compare him to Jamitov, Paptimus 'The Man From Jupiter' Scirocco and even Char. There's no ulterior motive suggested, unlike with Paptimus 'The Man From Jupiter' Scirocco letting people do as they please, no control freak tendancies or whatever. I mean obviously he's a fat, callous murderer who wears goggles pretty much constantly but his concession to Emma was so bizarrely level that even she is visibly confused. :lol:


Anyway, that's getting a little away from what I actually want to discuss: quite frankly, I still don't buy it. I don't think you're being dishonest or anything, but your interpretation here is really narrow when it can be read in more than one way, and when taking into account other sources the picture changes quite significantly. For example, you cite the early setting notes as saying that that Zeon Zum Deikun being 'opposed to the Federation's pacifism'. First of all, that sentence doesn't actually make much sense, which leads me to believe that it's been translated poorly. While it is fair to say that Deikun was opposed to overpopulation, as that was the driving factor behind Ereism, half of Deikun's Contolism philosophy, but I don't think you can properly conclude that this means that he intended to actively reduce the population through any sort of violent or systematic means. In fact I think that, based on other sources, we can actually conclude that the opposite was the case, and that passagei s simply poorly translated. While a later passage suggests that Degwin intended to perform some kind of forced reduction of the human population in line with Contolism, the actual show itself disaggrees: after all, Degwin actually insults Gihren and his plans to reduce the human population. More to the point, he actually specifically states that Gihren will never live to Zeon Zum Deikun's ideals of a 'Newtype', and is instead destined to become a new Hitler.

That alone should suffice, but there's more. From both Roman Album Extra 42 and the Entertainment Bible, we know that the Federation, in response to the declaration of independance in Side 3, put ona serious tough guy act. They put both economic and military pressure on Side 3 in order to bring them back into line. This honestly shouldn't be surprising given that the Earth Federation was well practiced at being real dicks to Spacenoids: the Alien Landowners Act actually prevented Spacenoids from owning land on Earth, and from memory travel between the Sides was heavily restricted. I can't remember where I read those unfortuantely, so take them with a grain of salt, but Deikun is noted to have moved to Side 3 'secretly', suggesting that he was either a target as a major political dissident, or that it was indeed very difficult to travel between colony clusters. in any case, we know from the Entertainment Bible that, despite engaging in a military build up in the form of the Zeonic national guard (obviously a response to Feddie aggression), Deikun was not interested in aggression himself, and up until his death was seeking political sollutions to the independance problem. In fact, the Entertainment Bible describes the huge military build-up and intention to go to war on Degwin's part as a 'complete 180' compared to Deikun's policies. It seems fairly reasonable to assume that the specifics of the setting changed from the early setting notes, and that what they say about Deikun is not necessarily authoriative taking into consideration other sources written after the airing of the series.

This should honestly come as no surprise given the suspicious circumstances behind Zeon Zum Deikun's death. While it has never been stated that Degwin Sodo Zabi was behind Deikun's death, smart money says that he was. The novellisation, though not exactly compatible with the television series, indicates that Gihren Zabi was involved, and at that age it seems reasonable to assume that he was moving to Degwin's tune; outside of that, the necessity of both Artesia and Casval Deikun to go into hiding as children doesn't exactly suggest a legitimate exchange of power. Further more, while only Char claims that the Zabi's twisted Deikun's ideals, I think this is actually demonstrably the case. If the Zabis really did believe in Contolism, which holds the ideals of Ereism as part of its founding principles, how could they possibly authorise Operation British? Strictly speaking Ereism refers to pollution and I suppose technically speaking colony drops are 'clean', but such a huge strike on the Earth seems ideologically incompatible with Contolism.

Further, even if you accept that Deikun believed in population control specifically, saying that this automatically leads to eugenics and then to genocide is almost hysterical in the logic it follows. Population control is not an evil in itself. China's one child policy is a method of population control, and while there are a number of valid criticisms relating to that particular policy, there are other options such as delays in birth, planned spacing of births and so on. Honestly, your argument relies on a single early source which is not fully compatible with the series itself, and that is inconsistent with other sources. Further, I can't agree with this idea that Deikun supported a notion of spacenoid superiority, because as far as I can tell nothing of the sort has ever been suggested, and even gleaning it from the original setting notes (which I admit do paint Deikun in a much darker light) seems pretty weak. Yes, Deikun's early theories on Newtypes do state that humanity should move into space in order to facillitate our 'evolution' into what he called Newtypes, but that is not a racist ideology. It is an ideology which suggests that the future of humanity is in space, and that's an entire different kettle of fish. Yes, it is implicit in Newtypism that living on Earth will result in no Newtypes, but taking into account the Ereism that Deikun lived by that element of the theory can be read as the Earth just not being the right environment for humanity to live in. It makes no value judgements about the worth of earthnoids; Cardeas Vist's explanation of early Newtype theory makes literally no reference to the idea that Spacenoids are superior, and given the nature of Vist's conversation with Zinnerman I don't see why he'd gloss over it (I mean Vist pretty much says 'seriously guys the revival of Zeon is pretty dumb', he's playing it straight). I don't think there's nearly enough evidence to suggest that there was any sort of racist element to early Newtype theory. Yes, to an extent Deikun was wrong about the necessity of space as an environment, but there's nothing actually wrong with part of the theory not holding up with time - it happens all the time with other theories. That said, how many natural Newtypes shown in the series were earthnoids? There's Amuro, Jerid and maaaybe Revil, but the majority of Newtypes are spacenoids so clearly Deikun was onto something.

Essentially, I think the majority of evidence does not lend itself to the idea that the Republic of Zeon was formed on the basis of a racist, genocidal ideology. That said, this is not to suggest that the Principality of Zeon was actually fighting for good reasons, and it's a part of the series that even if Zeon initially had a just goal, they were not just themselves. The Principality was rife with heedless ambition and corruption, and any noble fight for independance was lost the moment Degwin came to power.

PS. I put a lot of effort into this post apart and it would make me sad if you broke it down into chunks to reply to piecemeal.
What is Project Zohar?

Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Zinegata »

Ford Prefect wrote:Bask Om is too fat to be confined to your petty human views of 'morality'. :) Incidentally, despite being a colossal prick, I think Bask is actually kind of interesting. Consider when Emma questions his methods prior to her defection, his reaction is basically 'I like your attitude, and I want to see how you would handle this situation so you're in command'. This is actually kind of unusual when you compare him to Jamitov, Paptimus 'The Man From Jupiter' Scirocco and even Char. There's no ulterior motive suggested, unlike with Paptimus 'The Man From Jupiter' Scirocco letting people do as they please, no control freak tendancies or whatever. I mean obviously he's a fat, callous murderer who wears goggles pretty much constantly but his concession to Emma was so bizarrely level that even she is visibly confused. :lol:
To be fair, you're right - Bask Ohm is depicted as a ruthless bastard, but not a scheming bastard. It's probably why he's offed by Scirocco.

However, personally speaking the most interesting Titans officer who never changes sides is Gady Kinsey. The guy has skills, as he outwits Bright at least once in Zeta Gundam. He also apparently disobeyed orders to gas a colony - making him one of the few hard-core Titans to have morals. Too bad his characterization is a bit sparse and he bites it when the giant laser beam fires :(

-------

Now, unto Contolism! (I'm cutting away your post to save space, but nice research)

First of all, claiming that Deikun wanted to usher the Newtype revolution by peaceful means is actually a fair assessment. Even the setting notes support this. Note that the setting notes specifically point to the Degwin Zabi as "militarizing" Zeon, so it may be truer to say that while Zeon formulated the ideology, it was the Zabis who began to radicalize the movement.

Moreover, while Degwin may have "militarized" Zeon, it was Gihren who explicitly turns Contolism into a justification for his "Master Race Theory". So from a merely radical, militaristic Zeon, Gihren Zabi may very well have sent Zeon straight into full-scale genocide mode.

(And note that there are actual recorded revolts within Side 3 against this radicalization - such as the protests in Quintzem colony that turned violent.)

Still, if you trace the roots of it all, it all goes back to Contolism. Peaceful Independence -> Independence by Military Means -> Genocide for the Master Race!

Why do I claim that Contolism is the root of it all? Well...

You're correct that the Federation put down strong economic sanctions against Zeon. There were also other economic reasons for indepedence. However, take a look at his speech from the third Gundam novel:

http://gundam.wikia.com/wiki/Zeon_Zum_Deikun

What's so interesting about this speech is that he makes no mention of any economic hardships by Spacenoids. He does not say "No taxation without representation!". He does not say "Let us travel freely!". Instead, the key line in his speech is:
It is the height of arrogance for those who remain on Earth to look up at the heavens and believe they can continue to rule over all its inhabitants. It is true that we- the space colonists- were largely shipped from Earth against our will as a population-control measure. But now we are developing a new identity and awareness. We are a new people. We live, eat, and sleep among the stars. We live in infinite space, and we will have access to infinite energy until the sun burns out fifty billion years from now. Our consciousness will expand, and infinite space will be our true home. God has given us the stars to live among.
He's saying that the Spacenoid man is different from the Earthnoid man. He (almost) goes as far and say that Spacenoids are a different species. This is the entire premise of Zeon's existence - Not taxation. Not freedom of travel. The belief that the Spacenoid man is different from the Earthnoid man - and that the Spacenoid man is superior because he has infinite energies and vistas compared to the Earthnoid man.

Thus, the ideology developed as follows:

It began with Zeon saying that the "Spacenoid man is superior than the Earthnoid man."

It was then taken to its militaristic extreme by Degwin Zabi. "Because the Spacenoid man is superior to the Earthnoid, he has a right to fight back."

And finally it was taken to its genocidal extreme by Gihren Zabi, who said that not only should the Spacenoid man fight back, only Spacenoids alone deserve to remain alive.

The only real question that remains is this: Was Zeon's ideals really subverted? Or did the Zabis merely take the ideology to its logical and violent conclusion?

I again point back to Zeon's speech, and note the final line:
In ancient times the Christians fought bloody battles for control over the birthplace of their religion, but there is no need for humanity to repeat this mistake over Earth.
I don't think Tomino made a reference to the Middle East (where we keep repeating the same mistakes) by accident.

-----------

Also, regarding Newtypes... the current concensus is that birthplace does not matter. Instead, what matters is you experience both Earth and Space. It's telling that one of the most famous lines from Zeta Gundam - "You're weighed down by the gravity of the Earth!", was changed decades later by Tomino to say "You can't understand the size and gravity of the Earth."

Again, given how much Tomino keeps saying that "fans don't get Newtypes are really supposed to mean", I think he was trying to make it real explicit.
User avatar
Ford Prefect
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8254
Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
Location: The real number domain

Re: Just what the heck were they thinking (Gundam)?

Post by Ford Prefect »

Interpreting that passage alone, maybe you could take it as racist, but taken as a whole it's pretty clear that he's talking about space as a better environment for human beings. His complaint against earthnoids is actually directed at the ruling elite as opposed to every earthnoid ever: he specifically says that the Earth should be free of human interference, as opposed to ruled over by an uncaring upper class of arrogant people who continually plunder it. Of course, a crux of his speech is that in order for mankind to advance it must move to its best environment - which is space. By inference, you can suppose that Deikun is saying that the Earth is thus a bad environment for human development, and that earthnoids are being held back. I can see how someone could extrapolate this into a racist ideology, but in itself it is not a racist statement. The simple fact of the matter is that some environments are bad, and that does have an effect on development of 'civillisation'. Jared Diamond's book Guns, Germs and Steel deals specifically with this idea, that some parts of the world were just more suitable than others. I think the juxtaposition of Europe and Australia is a good example of this, but if I said 'Australia is a shitty place to build a civillisation' that doesn't necessarily mean that I think the indigenous peoples of this country are inferior specimens of humanity.
What is Project Zohar?

Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
Post Reply