Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Moderator: NecronLord
Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Is there any sci-fi and fantasy non-human military force that can be defeated or at least fought to a draw by armies from Earth's history, from the ancient past, starting at the Battle of Megiddo (15th century B.C.) to the end of the First World War.
Part 1:
How would the army that you think of defeat their opposing sci-fi/fantasy army in a land engagement? With all equipment used on land?
For example, can anybody imagine trebuchets Golden BBing AT-AT's in their legs? I remember in some of the threads here that those walking 4 legged monstrosities can be destroyed just by tripping them. How about the Bugs, or the Orcs (LOTR) attacking the fortresses of Verdun?
Part 2:
How much wanking up is needed to enable these armies to fight the sci-fi or fantasy armies at their best and with ALL their equipment? For example, I wanna know how much wanking up, technological or magical, you need to give Admiral Horatio Nelson and the English fleet a chance to engage and defeat...say the Minbari. In Space.
And part three of this funny topic.
Let's pit the combined armies of...all the armies that mankind has ever raised in it's history vs. these sci-fi opponents. Just how many people is that? Would this be the first case the Zerg from Starcraft gets zerg rushed? And the Bugs too? Would the Klingons and the Narns love being pitted against this gigantic army? Will Napoleon and Ceasar and Alexander the Great and all the military greats of our history outsmart and outnumber Sauron at the battle of the Black Gate? Will the Orcs of Warhammer 40k actually stop for a moment to think about the sheer ridiculity of this scenario? What will happen?
Please respond.
Part 1:
How would the army that you think of defeat their opposing sci-fi/fantasy army in a land engagement? With all equipment used on land?
For example, can anybody imagine trebuchets Golden BBing AT-AT's in their legs? I remember in some of the threads here that those walking 4 legged monstrosities can be destroyed just by tripping them. How about the Bugs, or the Orcs (LOTR) attacking the fortresses of Verdun?
Part 2:
How much wanking up is needed to enable these armies to fight the sci-fi or fantasy armies at their best and with ALL their equipment? For example, I wanna know how much wanking up, technological or magical, you need to give Admiral Horatio Nelson and the English fleet a chance to engage and defeat...say the Minbari. In Space.
And part three of this funny topic.
Let's pit the combined armies of...all the armies that mankind has ever raised in it's history vs. these sci-fi opponents. Just how many people is that? Would this be the first case the Zerg from Starcraft gets zerg rushed? And the Bugs too? Would the Klingons and the Narns love being pitted against this gigantic army? Will Napoleon and Ceasar and Alexander the Great and all the military greats of our history outsmart and outnumber Sauron at the battle of the Black Gate? Will the Orcs of Warhammer 40k actually stop for a moment to think about the sheer ridiculity of this scenario? What will happen?
Please respond.
-
- Village Idiot
- Posts: 4046
- Joined: 2005-06-15 12:21am
- Location: The Abyss
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
The great majority of fantasy armies would be crushed by post-gunpowder militaries. As for sci-fi; besides the die-if-you-pee-on-them Signs aliens, there's the Roxolani from The Road Not Taken. They had starships and anitigravity, but were armed with muskets. First World War forces squash them.kilopi505 wrote:Is there any sci-fi and fantasy non-human military force that can be defeated or at least fought to a draw by armies from Earth's history, from the ancient past, starting at the Battle of Megiddo (15th century B.C.) to the end of the First World War.
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Does that statement mean you’ve never seen Star Wars The Empire Strikes Back? You are missing out on life man.kilopi505 wrote: Golden BBing AT-AT's in their legs? I remember in some of the threads here that those walking 4 legged monstrosities can be destroyed just by tripping them.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Yes. That is a proud no. I have never seen any of Star Wars movies from 1 and 4 to 6.Sea Skimmer wrote:Does that statement mean you’ve never seen Star Wars The Empire Strikes Back? You are missing out on life man.kilopi505 wrote: Golden BBing AT-AT's in their legs? I remember in some of the threads here that those walking 4 legged monstrosities can be destroyed just by tripping them.
- The Yosemite Bear
- Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
- Posts: 35211
- Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
- Location: Dave's Not Here Man
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Orks at Helms Deep vs. British Army Circa 18th century.
The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
kilopi505 wrote:Yes. That is a proud no. I have never seen any of Star Wars movies from 1 and 4 to 6.Sea Skimmer wrote:Does that statement mean you’ve never seen Star Wars The Empire Strikes Back? You are missing out on life man.kilopi505 wrote: Golden BBing AT-AT's in their legs? I remember in some of the threads here that those walking 4 legged monstrosities can be destroyed just by tripping them.
I know I'd watch that moviekilopi505 wrote: How about the Bugs attacking the fortresses of Verdun?
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 322
- Joined: 2010-08-10 07:55pm
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Most fantasy armies would get pwned by gunpowder and after age armies.
Starship troopers ground armies (if numbers are equalized) would have a good chance of losing to a WW1 era army.
Starship troopers ground armies (if numbers are equalized) would have a good chance of losing to a WW1 era army.
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Don't most fantasy armies have lots of MAGEs, AKA Mobile Arcane Gun Emplacements?Star Wars 888 wrote:Most fantasy armies would get pwned by gunpowder and after age armies.
Yesterday upon the stair
I met a man who wasn't there.
He wasn't there again today.
I think he's from the CIA.
I met a man who wasn't there.
He wasn't there again today.
I think he's from the CIA.
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Don't many fantasy armies also have things like dragons--untouchable airpower there--monsters whose mere appearance would destroy morale, and hordes of charging enemies like Orcs that are literally fearless?
"No, no, no, no! Light speed's too slow! Yes, we're gonna have to go right to... Ludicrous speed!"
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 322
- Joined: 2010-08-10 07:55pm
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
The power of dragons in fantasy literature varies greatly, and are rarely actually part of armies.Srelex wrote:Don't many fantasy armies also have things like dragons--untouchable airpower there--monsters whose mere appearance would destroy morale, and hordes of charging enemies like Orcs that are literally fearless?
BTW, wtf @ the "literally fearless" orcs if you're talking about Lord of the Rings. The orcs were scared shitless in the movies and iirc the books.
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 322
- Joined: 2010-08-10 07:55pm
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
The Yosemite Bear wrote:Orks at Helms Deep vs. British Army Circa 18th century.
The ENTIRE British Army? vs only the orcs or the trolls and mamiluks and such too?
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
I was referring more to generics orcs as a whole, such as Warhammer Orcs. Maybe I'm exagerrating a tad, as I'm not massively into fantasy.Star Wars 888 wrote:
The power of dragons in fantasy literature varies greatly, and are rarely actually part of armies.
BTW, wtf @ the "literally fearless" orcs if you're talking about Lord of the Rings. The orcs were scared shitless in the movies and iirc the books.
"No, no, no, no! Light speed's too slow! Yes, we're gonna have to go right to... Ludicrous speed!"
- The Yosemite Bear
- Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
- Posts: 35211
- Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
- Location: Dave's Not Here Man
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
no more your typical colonial force sent to quell uprisings of the natives,Star Wars 888 wrote:The Yosemite Bear wrote:Orks at Helms Deep vs. British Army Circa 18th century.
The ENTIRE British Army? vs only the orcs or the trolls and mamiluks and such too?
The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
I'm mildly curious how the Ewoks or the Gungans would fare against Romans or other pre-gunpowder armies.
Those force fields and static bubble things the Gungans used wouldn't be much use against the forces of Genghis Khan... might protect against arrows but would be pretty weak if the mongols went melee. Of course if the gungans had blasters or any decent ranged weapons then all bets are off. Of course, gungans are amphibious so they could just swim underwater... not like Genghis could raze their buildings to the ground if they are underwater.
The Ewoks would have a tough time against anyone who is willing to set their forest on fire.
Those force fields and static bubble things the Gungans used wouldn't be much use against the forces of Genghis Khan... might protect against arrows but would be pretty weak if the mongols went melee. Of course if the gungans had blasters or any decent ranged weapons then all bets are off. Of course, gungans are amphibious so they could just swim underwater... not like Genghis could raze their buildings to the ground if they are underwater.
The Ewoks would have a tough time against anyone who is willing to set their forest on fire.
Fry: No! They did it! They blew it up! And then the apes blew up their society too. How could this happen? And then the birds took over and ruined their society. And then the cows. And then... I don't know, is that a slug, maybe? Noooo!
Futurama: The Late Philip J. Fry
Futurama: The Late Philip J. Fry
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Umm...whose side? The Mobile Infantry or the Bugs?Star Wars 888 wrote:Most fantasy armies would get pwned by gunpowder and after age armies.
Starship troopers ground armies (if numbers are equalized) would have a good chance of losing to a WW1 era army.
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Grenades and Sniper fire would put them down. And WW1 Artillery too.Axiomatic wrote:Don't most fantasy armies have lots of MAGEs, AKA Mobile Arcane Gun Emplacements?Star Wars 888 wrote:Most fantasy armies would get pwned by gunpowder and after age armies.
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Can we try the Ork forces at Helms Deep vs. Wellington? Or vs. the whole British army at the Anglo-Boer war?The Yosemite Bear wrote:no more your typical colonial force sent to quell uprisings of the natives,Star Wars 888 wrote:The Yosemite Bear wrote:Orks at Helms Deep vs. British Army Circa 18th century.
The ENTIRE British Army? vs only the orcs or the trolls and mamiluks and such too?
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
I know I'd watch that movie[/quote]kilopi505 wrote: How about the Bugs attacking the fortresses of Verdun?
Who would win? The French or the Bugs?
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
It depends. While I'm not massively familiar or interested with it, the Warhammer setting has very potent mages who could very well destroy such opposition before it can react, from what I can gather. Besides, I don't think WW1 artillery was had the capability to target individuals on the battlefield.kilopi505 wrote: Grenades and Sniper fire would put them down. And WW1 Artillery too.
"No, no, no, no! Light speed's too slow! Yes, we're gonna have to go right to... Ludicrous speed!"
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Artillery barrage, on the general vicinity of the mages. I doubt they can withstand a thousand gun barrage just like in WW1. Besides, ok Warhammer mages may be impossible, I think because you said it, but other settings? DEAD.Srelex wrote:It depends. While I'm not massively familiar or interested with it, the Warhammer setting has very potent mages who could very well destroy such opposition before it can react, from what I can gather. Besides, I don't think WW1 artillery was had the capability to target individuals on the battlefield.kilopi505 wrote: Grenades and Sniper fire would put them down. And WW1 Artillery too.
- Lord Revan
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 12238
- Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
- Location: Zone:classified
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
The thing is that artillery barrages work best against large formations of exposed troops (or to break morale of entrenched troops) but they're fairly inefficient in killing a single (or few) mansized target(s), it maybe work and you get a direct hit, you just might bombard the area with thousands of shells and not even make scratch at your intended target or anything from between and that's assuming said mage is wearing a simple cotton/wool robe and not some sort of armor or having magic barriers to protect him.kilopi505 wrote:Artillery barrage, on the general vicinity of the mages. I doubt they can withstand a thousand gun barrage just like in WW1. Besides, ok Warhammer mages may be impossible, I think because you said it, but other settings? DEAD.Srelex wrote:It depends. While I'm not massively familiar or interested with it, the Warhammer setting has very potent mages who could very well destroy such opposition before it can react, from what I can gather. Besides, I don't think WW1 artillery was had the capability to target individuals on the battlefield.kilopi505 wrote: Grenades and Sniper fire would put them down. And WW1 Artillery too.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Artillery barrage, on the general vicinity of the mages. I doubt they can withstand a thousand gun barrage just like in WW1. Besides, ok Warhammer mages may be impossible, I think because you said it, but other settings? DEAD.[/quote]
The thing is that artillery barrages work best against large formations of exposed troops (or to break morale of entrenched troops) but they're fairly inefficient in killing a single (or few) mansized target(s), it maybe work and you get a direct hit, you just might bombard the area with thousands of shells and not even make scratch at your intended target or anything from between and that's assuming said mage is wearing a simple cotton/wool robe and not some sort of armor or having magic barriers to protect him.[/quote]
Do the mages know that they have to hide, put up shields or drop prone when an artillery barrage starts? Besides, who says we can't use gas? Mage, meet Chlorine. Chlorine, meet mage. Have fun choking to death.
The thing is that artillery barrages work best against large formations of exposed troops (or to break morale of entrenched troops) but they're fairly inefficient in killing a single (or few) mansized target(s), it maybe work and you get a direct hit, you just might bombard the area with thousands of shells and not even make scratch at your intended target or anything from between and that's assuming said mage is wearing a simple cotton/wool robe and not some sort of armor or having magic barriers to protect him.[/quote]
Do the mages know that they have to hide, put up shields or drop prone when an artillery barrage starts? Besides, who says we can't use gas? Mage, meet Chlorine. Chlorine, meet mage. Have fun choking to death.
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
Dragons are in my opinion, gigantic overglorified flying flamethrowers. Sopwith Camels and Fokkers would peck it to death with machine guns from outside the dragons range. And besides, how fast are dragons? Something that big, even if I suspend my disbelief, would just be as fast as an ordinary bird. Biplanes however...and we can build planes faster than dragons can breed if it is simply a battle of attrition.Srelex wrote:Don't many fantasy armies also have things like dragons--untouchable airpower there--monsters whose mere appearance would destroy morale, and hordes of charging enemies like Orcs that are literally fearless?
Orcs, meet machine guns, bolt action rifles, trenches and barbed wire. Machine gun, bolt action rifle, trench and barbed wire, meet orcs. Have fun.
And even if we are talking about earlier than the gunpowder age...Orcs, meet Leonidas and the Spartans. Enough said.
-
- Village Idiot
- Posts: 4046
- Joined: 2005-06-15 12:21am
- Location: The Abyss
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
That really depends on the dragons. You've got teleporting dragons, magic using dragons, dragons that fly faster than the speed of sound, dragons that melt mountains with laser "breath", dragons that can destroy worlds, and scads of other super-powered varieties. Others are just big lizards with really bad breath.kilopi505 wrote:Dragons are in my opinion, gigantic overglorified flying flamethrowers. Sopwith Camels and Fokkers would peck it to death with machine guns from outside the dragons range. And besides, how fast are dragons? Something that big, even if I suspend my disbelief, would just be as fast as an ordinary bird. Biplanes however...and we can build planes faster than dragons can breed if it is simply a battle of attrition.Srelex wrote:Don't many fantasy armies also have things like dragons--untouchable airpower there--monsters whose mere appearance would destroy morale, and hordes of charging enemies like Orcs that are literally fearless?
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
- The Yosemite Bear
- Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
- Posts: 35211
- Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
- Location: Dave's Not Here Man
Re: Historical armies vs nonhuman Sci-fi/fantasy armies
how about wellington since the boer war wasn't for a century or so later.
The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin