Chris Hedges tells it like it is

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Einzige
LOLbertarian Douchebag
Posts: 400
Joined: 2010-02-28 01:11pm

Chris Hedges tells it like it is

Post by Einzige »

I'm not typically a fan of this guy - he's a member of what can be called the "Religious Left", which in my mind isn't too far off from populism - but when he's right, he's right.

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/do_ ... _20100913/
There are no longer any major institutions in American society, including the press, the educational system, the financial sector, labor unions, the arts, religious institutions and our dysfunctional political parties, which can be considered democratic. The intent, design and function of these institutions, controlled by corporate money, are to bolster the hierarchical and anti-democratic power of the corporate state. These institutions, often mouthing liberal values, abet and perpetuate mounting inequality. They operate increasingly in secrecy. They ignore suffering or sacrifice human lives for profit. They control and manipulate all levers of power and mass communication. They have muzzled the voices and concerns of citizens. They use entertainment, celebrity gossip and emotionally laden public-relations lies to seduce us into believing in a Disneyworld fantasy of democracy.

The menace we face does not come from the insane wing of the Republican Party, which may make huge inroads in the coming elections, but the institutions tasked with protecting democratic participation. Do not fear Glenn Beck or Sarah Palin. Do not fear the tea party movement, the birthers, the legions of conspiracy theorists or the militias. Fear the underlying corporate power structure, which no one, from Barack Obama to the right-wing nut cases who pollute the airwaves, can alter. If the hegemony of the corporate state is not soon broken we will descend into a technologically enhanced age of barbarism.

Investing emotional and intellectual energy in electoral politics is a waste of time. Resistance means a radical break with the formal structures of American society. We must cut as many ties with consumer society and corporations as possible. We must build a new political and economic consciousness centered on the tangible issues of sustainable agriculture, self-sufficiency and radical environmental reform. The democratic system, and the liberal institutions that once made piecemeal reform possible, is dead. It exists only in name. It is no longer a viable mechanism for change. And the longer we play our scripted and absurd role in this charade the worse it will get. Do not pity Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. They will get what they deserve. They sold the citizens out for cash and power. They lied. They manipulated and deceived the public, from the bailouts to the abandonment of universal health care, to serve corporate interests. They refused to halt the wanton corporate destruction of the ecosystem on which all life depends. They betrayed the most basic ideals of democracy. And they, as much as the Republicans, are the problem.

“It is like being in a pit,” Ralph Nader told me when we spoke on Saturday. “If you are four feet in the pit you have a chance to grab the top and hoist yourself up. If you are 30 feet in the pit you have to start on a different scale.”

All resistance will take place outside the arena of electoral politics. The more we expand community credit unions, community health clinics and food cooperatives and build alternative energy systems, the more empowered we will become.

“To the extent that these organizations expand and get into communities where they do not exist, we will weaken the multinational goliath, from the banks to the agribusinesses to the HMO giants and hospital chains,” Nader said.

The failure of liberals to defend the interests of working men and women as our manufacturing sector was dismantled, labor unions were destroyed and social services were slashed has proved to be a disastrous and fatal misjudgment. Liberals, who betrayed the working class, have no credibility. This is one of the principal reasons the anti-war movement cannot attract the families whose sons and daughters are fighting and dying in Iraq and Afghanistan. And liberal hypocrisy has opened the door for a virulent right wing. If we are to reconnect with the working class we will have to begin from zero. We will have to rebuild the ties with the poor and the working class which the liberal establishment severed. We will have to condemn the liberal class as vociferously as we condemn the right wing. And we will have to remain true to the moral imperative to foster the common good and the tangible needs of housing, health care, jobs, education and food.

We will, once again, be bombarded in this election cycle with messages of fear from the Democratic Party—designed, in the end, to serve corporate interests. “Better Barack Obama than Sarah Palin,” we will be told. Better the sane technocrats like Larry Summers than half-wits like John Bolton. But this time we must resist. If we express the legitimate rage of the dispossessed working class as our own, if we denounce and refuse to cooperate with the Democratic Party, we can begin to impede the march of the right-wing trolls who seem destined to inherit power. If we again prove compliant we will discredit the socialism we should be offering as an alternative to a perverted Christian and corporate fascism.
I'm neither a left-winger nor a socialist, and I absolutely agree with him. How can liberals possibly argue that their politics is anti-elitist and egalitarian when they have consistently shown preference to business and industry over the working class? Why should they expect that class to defend them at the polls when they refuse to defend that class in the halls of power?

And don't get me started on the failures of liberalism on an institutional level. There's a reason why Roosevelt and the Keynesians were credited as being the "saviors of American capitalism": because they did precisely what business wanted them to, when they wanted it.

And I also agree with his palliative: a rebirth of libertarian volunteerism, both outside of and against the State, to delegitimize that institution and the interests it serves.
When the histories are written, I'll bet that the Old Right and the New Left are put down as having a lot in common and that the people in the middle will be the enemy.
- Barry Goldwater

Americans see the Establishment center as an empty, decaying void that commands neither their confidence nor their love. It was not the American worker who designed the war or our military machine. It was the establishment wise men, the academicians of the center.
- George McGovern
Samuel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4750
Joined: 2008-10-23 11:36am

Re: Chris Hedges tells it like it is

Post by Samuel »

Just a few notes.
We must build a new political and economic consciousness centered on the tangible issues of sustainable agriculture, self-sufficiency and radical environmental reform.
The bolded items are stupid. While insuring that agriculture doesn't cause environmental destruction could be what the first item means, I doubt he is just referencing that.
The more we expand community credit unions, community health clinics and food cooperatives and build alternative energy systems, the more empowered we will become.

“To the extent that these organizations expand and get into communities where they do not exist, we will weaken the multinational goliath, from the banks to the agribusinesses to the HMO giants and hospital chains,” Nader said.
If it was possible to have more competitors in the field, they probably would already be there. The existing companies have either economies of scale or government backing to ensure their existance. I don't think this can work.
Liberals, who betrayed the working class, have no credibility.
Liberals were allied with the working class? Hasn't the entire liberal platform of social reform a giant fuck you to the working class which is generally socially conservative?
If we express the legitimate rage of the dispossessed working class as our own, if we denounce and refuse to cooperate with the Democratic Party, we can begin to impede the march of the right-wing trolls who seem destined to inherit power.
I don't see this working. Like, at all. For this to work you'd need to be able to
-spread a message to get a large enough block of people to buy into that you can influence the balance of power
-set up alternate institutions in fields that don't have them
-insure said institutions don't turn into corporations (which they tend to do because corporations seem to work better for large scale firms)
-avoid having a crazy wing free ride off your attempts
and, of course
-come up with methods to deal with the problems currently plaguing the US once you gain power
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: Chris Hedges tells it like it is

Post by General Zod »

There are no longer any major institutions in American society, including the press, the educational system, the financial sector, labor unions, the arts, religious institutions and our dysfunctional political parties, which can be considered democratic.
Is this a joke? Since when have any of these organizations (aside from the obvious political partices, and maybe not even then) been "democratic"? How the fuck do you even apply that term to the financial sector or religious institutions? This entire rant sounds like one massive false premise.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Vaporous
Jedi Knight
Posts: 596
Joined: 2006-01-02 10:19pm

Re: Chris Hedges tells it like it is

Post by Vaporous »

General Zod wrote:Is this a joke? Since when have any of these organizations (aside from the obvious political partices, and maybe not even then) been "democratic"? How the fuck do you even apply that term to the financial sector or religious institutions? This entire rant sounds like one massive false premise.
A democratic religious institution would have more power concentrated in the laity and the average worshiper than in a hierarchy. It's the difference between an aristocratic elective monarchy like the Roman Catholic Church where the priests are above the people and a Protestant sect where the worshiper and the minister are on more equal terms. One of the major themes of the Reformation was breaking the power of an established Clergy and redefining the word "church" to mean "all the Christians" instead of "all the christian priests". I suppose if we follow his logic, he'd be angry about the rise of super churches were thousands pack stadiums to be ordered how to live and vote by preachers who serve the same interests as political leaders. Labor unions are giving economic power to the workers. It's a loose use of "democratic" but still acceptable. It still would have been helpful if he explained what he means when he says "democratic" so that we wouldn't have to guess.
User avatar
Vaporous
Jedi Knight
Posts: 596
Joined: 2006-01-02 10:19pm

Re: Chris Hedges tells it like it is

Post by Vaporous »

Gah. too late to edit.

My biggest problem with this article is that it's just what you said it was; a rant. He doesn't say what he means about anything or go into any great effort to prove himself. It seems meant to be meant to be that, though. I guess he expects us to read his books to discover his magic Cure All in more detail.
Samuel wrote:Just a few notes.
We must build a new political and economic consciousness centered on the tangible issues of sustainable agriculture, self-sufficiency and radical environmental reform.
1.The bolded items are stupid. While insuring that agriculture doesn't cause environmental destruction could be what the first item means, I doubt he is just referencing that.


*snip*
Liberals, who betrayed the working class, have no credibility.
2.Liberals were allied with the working class? Hasn't the entire liberal platform of social reform a giant fuck you to the working class which is generally socially conservative?

*more snip*
1. What do you think he's saying and why specifically is it stupid? He could very well mean "don't farm in such a way that you make farming impossible in the future".
2. Socially conservative, maybe, but economically? Where did the talk of a square deal for labor or a new deal for the American people and social safety nets and unionization came from and who was it for? Who voted for them?
Samuel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4750
Joined: 2008-10-23 11:36am

Re: Chris Hedges tells it like it is

Post by Samuel »

1 Because the reason that farming for a large part isn't sustainable is because it uses massive amounts of inputs. The reason it does that is because it gives you large amount of outputs. If he means "use more water efficient technology" and the like that might be reasonable, but I have a feeling he is refering to things like organic and buying food from local producers (hence the self-sufficiency comment). Generally bad ideas.

2 Wasn't that done solely to attract votes away from the Republicans and socialists? Or am I confusing liberals with the 1900-1920s Progressives? Heck, Johnson made the Great Society but when it came between that or a war guess which he choose? It just doesn't seem to me supporting the working class is the primary objective of the Democratic Party.
Post Reply