Human shields unhappy with target choices!

Post by **Sea Skimmer** » 2003-02-22 08:36pm

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... world.html

Stupid shits are unhappy Iraq wasnt to use them to protect its army.

Shinova · Post by **Shinova** » 2003-02-22 08:46pm

*breaths in*

GODDAMN HYPOCRITES!!! IT WAS YOUR OWN FREE-FUCKING-WILL TO CHOOSE TO BE HUMAN SHIELDS!!! WHAT DO YOU CUNTS EXPECT!!? PUT YOU SOMEWHERE SAFE WHERE THE US WON'T GO TO!!!!?? JEE-FUCKING-CHRIST!!! HAVE YOU PEOPLE EVER CONSIDERED USING THAT GRAY MASS BETWEEN YOUR EARS CALLED YOUR BRAIN!!!!???

OH WAIT, THAT'S RIGHT! YOU LEFT IT BEHIND WITH THE REST OF WHAT LITTLE GOODNESS YOU HAD LEFTTHE MOMENT YOU DECIDED TO GO TO IRAQ!!!

[/end rant]

*whew*

Hypocrites.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-02-22 08:48pm

How can you get angry at this? It's really pretty fucking funny when you think about it.

Shinova · Post by **Shinova** » 2003-02-22 08:49pm

Darth Wong wrote:How can you get angry at this? It's really pretty fucking funny when you think about it.

Funny. Sure. But it's ridiculous. Very.

Post by **Colonel Olrik** » 2003-02-22 08:50pm

He he he. The poor little shields didn't sign to protect bunkers. Boo oohoo oohoo

My heart bleeds.

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2003-02-22 08:51pm

I think Saddam is morally obligated to use these fuckers as a shield for the Iraqi army in order to purge their idiocy from the gene pool. These all ought to be Darwin award recipients.

Tsyroc · Post by **Tsyroc** » 2003-02-22 08:52pm

It is funny.

I was reading an article on these people the other day and one of the reasons they gave for doing it was that they hoped their presence would deter the pilots flying overhead from dropping bombs on them.

Maybe if there were enough of them and they were visible, but then I'd expect the same if there were a lot of civilians present. Still, if the target was critical enough it's still going to be all she wrote.

I think the shields might be more effective against ground troops but I could be mistaken.

theski · Post by **theski** » 2003-02-22 08:53pm

Paint big freakin bullseye on them. Can Martin Sheen please be on the first boat over. (If there is a God) please please please...

Montcalm · Post by **Montcalm** » 2003-02-22 08:55pm

What the fuck did they expect,they volunteered to be human shields now they complain about what to protect,schools need no protections from possible attack.

Shinova · Post by **Shinova** » 2003-02-22 08:55pm

theski wrote:Paint big freakin bullseye on them. Can Martin Sheen please be on the first boat over. (If there is a God) please please please...

What about Martin Sheen?

Tsyroc · Post by **Tsyroc** » 2003-02-22 08:56pm

theski wrote:Paint big freakin bullseye on them. Can Martin Sheen please be on the first boat over. (If there is a God) please please please...

But if Martin Sheen dies we won't have anyone to take in all the homeless people.

Sheen likes to march on behalf of homeless people. It's another excuse for him to be drunk in public.

Damaramu · Post by **Damaramu** » 2003-02-22 08:58pm

One shield who has agreed to move into the bunker in the South Baghdad Electricity Plant is Godfrey Meynell, 68, a former high sheriff of Derbyshire and a veteran of the Colonial Office in Aden, south Yemen.

He has appealed to the RAF not to kill him. "I am an old man and they know I am here," he said. "If they bomb this site, they will be deliberately targeting me too."

Gimme a fuckin' break.....

theski · Post by **theski** » 2003-02-22 09:00pm

Shinova, Martin Sheen, embodies everything that is wrong with the Hollywood antiwar crowd.. BTW to all: did you know they dug Joan Baez out of the grave to sing some anti war songs,, Is there no creativity left in Hollywood??

Cal Wright · Post by **Cal Wright** » 2003-02-22 09:04pm

I hope to hell that every last one of them dies a horriably firey death, by a direct result of an explosion caused by a warhead that was funded by my hard earned tax dollars. Darwin in action folks.

HemlockGrey · Post by **HemlockGrey** » 2003-02-22 09:40pm

"But I really wanted to guard a truck!"

"Sorry. We're assigning you to the children's hospital."

"But there's four tons of absestos and fifty liters of anthrax in there!"

The Dark · Post by **The Dark** » 2003-02-22 10:13pm

What're they going to do next, send Jane Fonda over to show how Saddam Hussein's really quite a nice guy when you get to know him, and the Kurds are better off under him than they would be on their own?

Tragic · Post by **Tragic** » 2003-02-22 10:23pm

Do bunker busters have camera on them. Cause i would wanna see the look on there face when they see the bombs coming.

Enforcer Talen · Post by **Enforcer Talen** » 2003-02-22 10:28pm

let's see. . . the morals of not shooting people who go into warzones of their own free will. . . vs the patroitism instilled in your typical army grunt.

Post by **AdmiralKanos** » 2003-02-22 10:30pm

The Dark wrote:What're they going to do next, send Jane Fonda over to show how Saddam Hussein's really quite a nice guy when you get to know him, and the Kurds are better off under him than they would be on their own?

She's done that kind of thing before. Don't they still call her "Hanoi Jane" in some circles?

theski · Post by **theski** » 2003-02-22 10:36pm

It was rumored that they were going to Try her for Giving aid and comfort to the enemy..

The Dark · Post by **The Dark** » 2003-02-22 10:37pm

AdmiralKanos wrote:
The Dark wrote:What're they going to do next, send Jane Fonda over to show how Saddam Hussein's really quite a nice guy when you get to know him, and the Kurds are better off under him than they would be on their own?
She's done that kind of thing before. Don't they still call her "Hanoi Jane" in some circles?

Exactly why I mentioned it

. Let's just say she ain't real popular to a lot of military people I know. How she escaped treason charges I'll never know. She is as much a war criminal as Iva Ikuko Toguri ("Tokyo Rose"). The full story's at http://www.snopes.com/military/fonda.htm

Post by **Sea Skimmer** » 2003-02-22 10:38pm

AdmiralKanos wrote:
The Dark wrote:What're they going to do next, send Jane Fonda over to show how Saddam Hussein's really quite a nice guy when you get to know him, and the Kurds are better off under him than they would be on their own?
She's done that kind of thing before. Don't they still call her "Hanoi Jane" in some circles?

Yes

Post by **Vympel** » 2003-02-22 10:46pm

Sea Skimmer wrote:
AdmiralKanos wrote:
The Dark wrote:What're they going to do next, send Jane Fonda over to show how Saddam Hussein's really quite a nice guy when you get to know him, and the Kurds are better off under him than they would be on their own?
She's done that kind of thing before. Don't they still call her "Hanoi Jane" in some circles?
Yes

Jane Fonda copped a lot of bullshit lies for that- the little pieces of paper story being one- completely false. Who makes up this stuff?

Seriously though- what a dumb bitch.

IRG CommandoJoe · Post by **IRG CommandoJoe** » 2003-02-22 11:43pm

You're saying Jane Fonda didn't really show the pieces of paper to the commie?

phongn · Post by **phongn** » 2003-02-22 11:57pm

IRG CommandoJoe wrote:You're saying Jane Fonda didn't really show the pieces of paper to the commie?

No. The Dark posted a link to Snopes's article on Fonda.