The Harm of Belief in God

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Rye »

Maj wrote:This statement cannot be proven and is completely ridiculous. There is no human society free of superstition, nor can there be. Further, you have absolutely no clue what the ramifications are of a lack of superstition beyond what you imagine.
What the fuck? I don't expect a human society to be free of superstition, and its lack (or rather, being able to spot it) is fine. I do it all the time, so do millions of other people. If anything, it means you're not had by conmen as often because you can spot when things are too good to be true. The benefits of skepticism and parsimonious empirical reasoning are all around you in the forms of technology born from a scientific process.

A society that's more educated and able to spot bullshit in their own thinking is going to be worse how?
I'm willing to bet that your version of history is just as oversimplified as your version if electricity. So I'll just ask instead: Are there any bad things in history that are not the fault of religion?
Of course there are. There are things that are not the fault of nazi ideology, this doesn't mean nazi ideology isn't responsible for motivating a truckload of bad actions that the absence of such an ideology would have prevented.

Oddly enough, it's the people arguing against superstition who have largely come up with reasons why it was necessary at some point in human development. Personally, I find that they are compelling reasons to still have superstitious beliefs. Pattern recognition? Science couldn't happen without it. Helping retain sanity when feeling lonely? Given that depression and alienation are more prevalent in the "civilized" world, I think that it's needed more than ever.
You can have induction and deduction without thinking there's a ghost in your pants. Depression and alienation are not down to superstitious beliefs (in fact, they appear in some of the most unstable and unhappy fairly regularly). Simpler ways of life, working less and being in nicer climates tend to be associated with less mental illness, unsurprisingly. More surprisingly is that in times of war, there's noticeably less suicide.
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
User avatar
Formless
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4143
Joined: 2008-11-10 08:59pm
Location: the beginning and end of the Present

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Formless »

Maj wrote:
Formless wrote:* Which, by the way, strikes me as idolatry [appealing to evolution as if it were a divine authority]. Last I checked your world view considers that a sin.
I don't have time to respond further than this today because I have other things to do, but you might want to take a step back before you make an assumption.

You have no idea what my "world view" is.

The ONLY thing I've said about any religious affiliation on these boards is that I'm an inactive member of the Mormon church - which just means that I have yet to be excommunicated.

So, while you can go ahead and call me names if it makes you feel better, don't go off telling me what I believe because you have no fucking clue.
Last I checked, Mormons (being a subset of Christianity) still obeyed "thou shalt not have any god before me". Indignation doesn't change that. Now, if you want to claim that you don't in fact believe in God or the church or any of that shit, why the fuck are you so defensive about it? Serious question. I'm not making any unreasonable assumptions here.
"Still, I would love to see human beings, and their constituent organ systems, trivialized and commercialized to the same extent as damn iPods and other crappy consumer products. It would be absolutely horrific, yet so wonderful." — Shroom Man 777
"To Err is Human; to Arrr is Pirate." — Skallagrim
“I would suggest "Schmuckulating", which is what Futurists do and, by extension, what they are." — Commenter "Rayneau"
The Magic Eight Ball Conspiracy.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

Formless->

And last I checked, people who believe in God in a modern society are allowed to believe in the theory of Evolution too.

Frankly, calling someone as practicing idolatry because they believe in Evolution is called a dick move. It's an insult to every Monotheist who believes and defends the theory of evolution.

Belief in God does not make someone stupid. It's time you fucking grow up and realize that the term "religious extremist" exists not because of religion, but there really are small sects of stupid people who try to deny thngs like science and evolution which even their fellow Christians deem extremist.

Maj has a point. Religion does not necessarily make people do bad things. They may use it to justify doing bad things, but even rational science can twisted and used to justify commiting evil acts too. To say that every religious person is an intolerant, book-burning extremist, is to also say that every person who believes in evolution believes in eugenics and genocide.

And quite frankly, you're certainly using science to bad-mouth a person who you don't know, so all you're showing is that whatever you "worship" - science or religion - doesn't save you from intolerance or stupidity.

Stop with spreading the hate. Your statements are just as intolerant as the religious extremists. Intolerance is intolerance, no matter how you justify it.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

Rye wrote:More surprisingly is that in times of war, there's noticeably less suicide.
I'm going to have to ask a citation, because PTSD has definitely caused many sucides in the military.

Not to mention the numerous suicides near the end of WW2 for Germany, and the mass suicides whenever the Japanese stared defeat in the face in the same war.
Aranfan
Padawan Learner
Posts: 288
Joined: 2008-02-01 12:01pm
Location: Center of the Universe (General Relativity)

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Aranfan »

Zinegata wrote:And quite frankly, you're certainly using science to bad-mouth a person who you don't know, so all you're showing is that whatever you "worship" - science or religion - doesn't save you from intolerance or stupidity.

Stop with spreading the hate. Your statements are just as intolerant as the religious extremists. Intolerance is intolerance, no matter how you justify it.

Exactly. Let Maj be as Mormon as he may be, a Mormon and nothing but a Mormon he can never be, for his is this Mormon. Mormonism is just a name, I could equally call him a StarDestroyerite and stereotype him that way as a christian hating atheist abortionist, it'd be equally dunderheaded as if I had called him a bookburning christain supersitionist. Because I don't know Maj from Adam.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

Also...
Formless wrote:No one claimed it was the only thing that causes harm or has caused harm, but in fact if you read "Mein Kampf" Hitler made it very clear that the Holocaust was as much a religious thing as a racist thing.
That's a really, really far stretch. Mein Kampf is really just a book looking for scapegoats for the real issue - Germany's defeat during the First World War. The agony of several million dead German boys who died in the trenches sowed the seeds of hatred that made Mein Kampf fly - not its allegedly religious aspects.
The Crusades were point blank a religiously motivated event.
Uh, no.

They were organized by the Catholic Church, but the military muscle was ultimately provided by men who just wanted loot and fame, not a place in the Kingdom of Heaven.

Religion played a role, but wealth, riches, and prestige did too.
The Inquisition was mandated by the fucking Catholic Church.
Except it's actually more of a national institution as opposed to being a Church institution. Countries like Spain devoted great support towards the Inquisition, but other nations (i.e. France) did not.

And these Inquisitions, frankly, seem to be strongest in countries with a record of religious minorities (i.e. Muslims and Jews in Spain), whose elimination would serve state interests.

So again, is it really religion driving this, or realtpolitik?
Etc. And you deny that religion is harmful? What world are you living in?
A world where 99% of people who worship religion aren't actually violent psycopaths who wake up and say "I will kill people in the name of God".
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

Aranfan wrote:
Zinegata wrote:And quite frankly, you're certainly using science to bad-mouth a person who you don't know, so all you're showing is that whatever you "worship" - science or religion - doesn't save you from intolerance or stupidity.

Stop with spreading the hate. Your statements are just as intolerant as the religious extremists. Intolerance is intolerance, no matter how you justify it.

Exactly. Let Maj be as Mormon as he may be, a Mormon and nothing but a Mormon he can never be, for his is this Mormon. Mormonism is just a name, I could equally call him a StarDestroyerite and stereotype him that way as a christian hating atheist abortionist, it'd be equally dunderheaded as if I had called him a bookburning christain supersitionist. Because I don't know Maj from Adam.
Maj is a she :P.
Aranfan
Padawan Learner
Posts: 288
Joined: 2008-02-01 12:01pm
Location: Center of the Universe (General Relativity)

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Aranfan »

Zinegata wrote:
Aranfan wrote:
Zinegata wrote:And quite frankly, you're certainly using science to bad-mouth a person who you don't know, so all you're showing is that whatever you "worship" - science or religion - doesn't save you from intolerance or stupidity.

Stop with spreading the hate. Your statements are just as intolerant as the religious extremists. Intolerance is intolerance, no matter how you justify it.

Exactly. Let Maj be as Mormon as he may be, a Mormon and nothing but a Mormon he can never be, for his is this Mormon. Mormonism is just a name, I could equally call him a StarDestroyerite and stereotype him that way as a christian hating atheist abortionist, it'd be equally dunderheaded as if I had called him a bookburning christain supersitionist. Because I don't know Maj from Adam.
Maj is a she :P.
Exactly my f'ing point! Stereotyping is all kinds of idiocy that can be easily hijacked by all kinds of shit. Its just as easy to make the leap from "science is good" to "anyone who opposes science should be shot", as from "god is good" to "anyone who opposes god should be shot". It happens whenever a rich and useful idea is abstracted, treated as objective reality instead of the useful fiction it actually is, and social pressure is levied to force people to give that idea unquestioned respect.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

I agree completely Aranfan.
User avatar
Lusankya
ChiCom
Posts: 4163
Joined: 2002-07-13 03:04am
Location: 人间天堂
Contact:

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Lusankya »

Maj wrote:
Rye wrote:You're not going to get rid of it completely, but the simple fact is that it's not necessary for a prosperous, ethical society and frequently has negative consequences that do not happen in its absence.
This statement cannot be proven and is completely ridiculous. There is no human society free of superstition, nor can there be. Further, you have absolutely no clue what the ramifications are of a lack of superstition beyond what you imagine.
It is worth noting that Chinese society, while not being completely free from religion or superstition, has never had religion or superstition as a main driving force in its government or culture. As early as Confucius, superstition was considered to be very much a lower-class thing. Societal views on ethics were influenced by various schools of philosophy, rather than the teachings of any religion.

The fact that a society can not only exist and be prosperous and ethical with minimal input from religion, but furthermore exist for thousands of years in such a state supports Rye's assertion that religion is not necessary quite strongly, don't you think?
"I would say that the above post is off-topic, except that I'm not sure what the topic of this thread is, and I don't think anybody else is sure either."
- Darth Wong
Free Durian - Last updated 27 Dec
"Why does it look like you are in China or something?" - havokeff
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

Lusankya wrote:
Maj wrote:
Rye wrote:You're not going to get rid of it completely, but the simple fact is that it's not necessary for a prosperous, ethical society and frequently has negative consequences that do not happen in its absence.
This statement cannot be proven and is completely ridiculous. There is no human society free of superstition, nor can there be. Further, you have absolutely no clue what the ramifications are of a lack of superstition beyond what you imagine.
It is worth noting that Chinese society, while not being completely free from religion or superstition, has never had religion or superstition as a main driving force in its government or culture. As early as Confucius, superstition was considered to be very much a lower-class thing. Societal views on ethics were influenced by various schools of philosophy, rather than the teachings of any religion.

The fact that a society can not only exist and be prosperous and ethical with minimal input from religion, but furthermore exist for thousands of years in such a state supports Rye's assertion that religion is not necessary quite strongly, don't you think?
You're not Chinese, are you?

While most Chinese technically worship either Confuciunism or Buddhism, the only reason they don't seem to be "superstitious" is because neither of these religion have a highly visible organization like the Catholic Church doing stupid, superstitious shit in their name.

In reality (speaking as a Filipino-Chinese), most of my Chinese relatives are hugely superstitious and often end up having small shrines for every little Deity or spirit they could think of. They have rituals for "ensuring good fortune" or "pacifying evil spirits". Hell, have you ever heard of Feng Shui?

So no, please pick another civilization for your "Society without superstition". Even mainland Chinese have managed to maintain these same superstitions (just go into the store of a newly-arrived Chinese immigrant and you're almost guaranteed to find a shrine dedicated to prosperity) despite Mao's best efforts.
Aranfan
Padawan Learner
Posts: 288
Joined: 2008-02-01 12:01pm
Location: Center of the Universe (General Relativity)

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Aranfan »

Zinegata wrote:I agree completely Aranfan.
For example: take the extremely useful fiction of society. In actuality, a society is a group of individuals who have banded together for the mutual purpose of not dying. Yet society, this group, has become something to die for. Those who are for this call it patriotism, but really it is equally well called nationalism. And we know how badly nationalism gets hijacked.
Last edited by Aranfan on 2010-09-24 01:32am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Chaotic Neutral
Jedi Knight
Posts: 576
Joined: 2010-09-09 11:43pm
Location: California

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Chaotic Neutral »

So, can anyone giver reasons why belief in god is helpful?
User avatar
Formless
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4143
Joined: 2008-11-10 08:59pm
Location: the beginning and end of the Present

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Formless »

Zinegata wrote:Formless->

And last I checked, people who believe in God in a modern society are allowed to believe in the theory of Evolution too.

Frankly, calling someone as practicing idolatry because they believe in Evolution is called a dick move. It's an insult to every Monotheist who believes and defends the theory of evolution.
Its not that she's defending evolution-- its that she's trying to act like its a moral authority. Something that, last I checked (you know, from that time in my life when I was a christian?) was considered the domain of God by christians. That, for the context illiterate, is what I mean. Frankly, I don't care if you think its a dick move to point out an inconsistency in someone's stated belief system and what they actual argue in practice.
Belief in God does not make someone stupid. It's time you fucking grow up and realize that the term "religious extremist" exists not because of religion, but there really are small sects of stupid people who try to deny thngs like science and evolution which even their fellow Christians deem extremist.
Where did I try to paint all religious people as extremists? I don't care if you don't like it, they are chrisitans/religious people and they do in fact cause harm in part because of their religion. Distance yourself from them all you like, it doesn't effect anything I said-- unless you think I was trying to paint all religious people as extremists, which is a strawman.
Maj has a point. Religion does not necessarily make people do bad things.
When did I say it necessarily did? All I've claimed is that it can, has, and will continue to cause harm in multiple forms, and I've given multiple lines of evidence to show that this is true. You are just sticking your fingers in your ears and acting self righteous about it.
They may use it to justify doing bad things, but even rational science can twisted and used to justify commiting evil acts too.
Name one time it has.
To say that every religious person is an intolerant, book-burning extremist, is to also say that every person who believes in evolution believes in eugenics and genocide.
For someone who claims I need to grow up, you seem to do a lot of putting words into my mouth.
And quite frankly, you're certainly using science to bad-mouth a person who you don't know, so all you're showing is that whatever you "worship" - science or religion - doesn't save you from intolerance or stupidity.

Stop with spreading the hate. Your statements are just as intolerant as the religious extremists. Intolerance is intolerance, no matter how you justify it.
If I got a dollar every time I saw a christian try to paint an atheist as intolerant based on absolutely not justification whatsoever or pull the "help help I'm being oppressed" card in retaliation for someone calling out the crimes of their religion, I would be a rich man indeed.

Seriously, cram it up your ass. As an atheist, I am part of a minority in a country where said minority is often discriminated against. You aren't. I cannot even tell some of the people I know that I am an atheist-- some of them are in my extended family for fucks sake. Do you have this problem? Do you? You do not get to tell me what its like to be hated, shiteater. You don't fucking know what its like. :finger:
That's a really, really far stretch. Mein Kampf is really just a book looking for scapegoats for the real issue - Germany's defeat during the First World War. The agony of several million dead German boys who died in the trenches sowed the seeds of hatred that made Mein Kampf fly - not its allegedly religious aspects.
Its not so much of a stretch when you realize that he did exactly what he said he was going to do when he got the political power to do so. Sorry if your apologism doesn't impress me.
Uh, no.

They were organized by the Catholic Church, but the military muscle was ultimately provided by men who just wanted loot and fame, not a place in the Kingdom of Heaven.

Religion played a role, but wealth, riches, and prestige did too.
How many times does it need to be pointed out that this is a red herring? That religion played a role at all is all I need to prove in order to say that it can or has caused harm in the past. You aren't denying this.
Except it's actually more of a national institution as opposed to being a Church institution. Countries like Spain devoted great support towards the Inquisition, but other nations (i.e. France) did not.

And these Inquisitions, frankly, seem to be strongest in countries with a record of religious minorities (i.e. Muslims and Jews in Spain), whose elimination would serve state interests.

So again, is it really religion driving this, or realtpolitik?
And national governments can't act out of a religious belief now? :roll:

Oh, and I see you ignore the obvious implications of your own facts. That the Inquisitions were stronger in areas where there were large religious minorities actually strengthens my argument, because it indicates religious intolerance as a factor in motivating the inquisition! Why do you think it was in the state's interest in the first place?
A world where 99% of people who worship religion aren't actually violent psycopaths who wake up and say "I will kill people in the name of God".
1) Pulling a statistic out of your ass on the spot proves nothing.

2) I and others have given other examples of how religion can be harmful without having to invoke fanaticism. Furthermore, most of this discussion isn't about religion, its about superstition, you illiterate moron.

3) Even to the extent that's true, its only because most of those people don't actually know what their religion preaches, or have come up with rationals over time for taking less backward interpretations of their religion's teachings. That, and most people on this earth aren't actually mono-theists of the Abrahamic variety. In fact, well over half aren't. In fact, a good chunk of the earth is made up of Bhuddists, Hindus, and assorted other faiths with their own, less harmful beliefs (though I still wouldn't want to live under the Hindu Cast system, that's for damn sure). Tell me again, which one of your pantheons is it I'm supposed to believe in?

All you have proven here is your own ineptitude.
Last edited by Formless on 2010-09-24 01:37am, edited 2 times in total.
"Still, I would love to see human beings, and their constituent organ systems, trivialized and commercialized to the same extent as damn iPods and other crappy consumer products. It would be absolutely horrific, yet so wonderful." — Shroom Man 777
"To Err is Human; to Arrr is Pirate." — Skallagrim
“I would suggest "Schmuckulating", which is what Futurists do and, by extension, what they are." — Commenter "Rayneau"
The Magic Eight Ball Conspiracy.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

Also, Lusankya, before I forget...

Before we start calling Chinese Civilization ethical and prosperous, you also might want to remember that China has had many, many Civil Wars in its history. And the death toll of some of these Civil Wars rival the death toll of a World War. For instance...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiping_rebellion

It's worth noting that the leader of this rebellion was claiming he was the younger brother of Jesus. Said rebellion killed 20 million people.

So, again, let's not start claiming that Chinese Civilization is free from superstition... okay?
User avatar
Formless
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4143
Joined: 2008-11-10 08:59pm
Location: the beginning and end of the Present

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Formless »

Zinegata wrote:So, again, let's not start claiming that Chinese Civilization is free from superstition... okay?
Lusankya wrote:It is worth noting that Chinese society, while not being completely free from religion or superstition, has never had religion or superstition as a main driving force in its government or culture.
Jesus, you just don't fucking know how to read do you?
"Still, I would love to see human beings, and their constituent organ systems, trivialized and commercialized to the same extent as damn iPods and other crappy consumer products. It would be absolutely horrific, yet so wonderful." — Shroom Man 777
"To Err is Human; to Arrr is Pirate." — Skallagrim
“I would suggest "Schmuckulating", which is what Futurists do and, by extension, what they are." — Commenter "Rayneau"
The Magic Eight Ball Conspiracy.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

Formless wrote:Its not that she's defending evolution-- its that she's trying to act like its a moral authority.
No she's not. Stop lying.

She's just applying natural selection to what is widely seen as a mental, as opposed to genetic trait.

Which, while not entirely in line with Darwin's theory, has some merit. Again: Why would a mental trait persist through several generations of humans if it serves no useful purpose?

If you're saying that it's totally wrong to apply the theory of evolution to a mental trait, then you'd have a point. But you're not. You're just outright lying about what she is saying.
Distance yourself from them all you like, it doesn't effect anything I said-- unless you think I was trying to paint all religious people as extremists, which is a strawman.
Says the person who claim that Maj was trying to say Evolution = An Actual God.

Stop the bullshit. You jumped on someone over a really spurious reason. I called you out on it. Now you're just a whining brat.
Name one time it has.
During the Second World War, Nazi scientists live humans for a series of medical experiments. The Nazi experiments resulted in valuable data in the field of medicine. For instance, by immersing a live victim in a pool of ice-cold water, the Nazis killed several hundred Jews but gathered vital data on how hypothermia affects and kills the body. This data remains in use to this day.

So again, stop the bullshit. Just because you worship science doesn't give you the right to be an intolerant asshat.
Seriously, cram it up your ass. As an atheist, I am part of a minority in a country where said minority is often discriminated against.
I don't give a damn what you believe. What I am pointing out is that regardless of your beliefs, you are being an ass.
Its not so much of a stretch when you realize that he did exactly what he said he was going to do when he got the political power to do so. Sorry if your apologism doesn't impress me.
Misdirection. Completely failed to refute that Mein Kampf was, in fact, the product of Germany's defeat in WW1 as opposed to religious belief.
How many times does it need to be pointed out that this is a red herring? That religion played a role at all is all I need to prove in order to say that it can or has caused harm in the past. You aren't denying this.
Bzzzt. Misidirection again. You did not say "it played a role". You said it was a "point blank religiously motivated event". I showed alternate motivations. You did not refute them. Again.

Because again, believing in science doesn't mean you're not fucking stupid.
And national governments can't act out of a religious belief now? :roll:
Bzzzt. Misdirection for a THIRD time. Thank you for showing you're not interested in history, but only focusing on using history to show that you are right.

Your exact words were "The Inquisition was mandated by the fucking Catholic Church."

I responded by pointing out that it wasn't actually the Catholic Church that implemented the Inquisition. National governments did. And those that did implement them had often had state interests that coincided with these Inquisitions.

I addressed your points, and refuted them. And for the third time, instead of trying to refute my counter-arguments, you ran away and tried to introduce a different tangent.

Again, grow up.
1) Pulling a statistic out of your ass on the spot proves nothing.
[/quote]

Yes it does. It proves that you're only interested in shouting "Religion is evil", regardless of evidence.

So again, stop harassing good and decent people just because they happen to believe in God AND believe that the theory of evolution is real?

Faith and science are not mutually exclusive.
Last edited by Zinegata on 2010-09-24 01:55am, edited 2 times in total.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

Formless wrote:
Zinegata wrote:So, again, let's not start claiming that Chinese Civilization is free from superstition... okay?
Lusankya wrote:It is worth noting that Chinese society, while not being completely free from religion or superstition, has never had religion or superstition as a main driving force in its government or culture.
Jesus, you just don't fucking know how to read do you?
I can read, thank you very much. But you sir are apparently incapable of not lying.

If you actually read my entire post, I'm saying that anyone who says that Chinese aren't highly superstitious are mistaken. Again, China had a civil war that killed 20 million people, started by someone who claim to be Jesus' younger brother.

So again, I'm just presenting facts. You're simply manipulating facts because you can't get your own bigotry under control.
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Metahive »

Zinegata wrote:If you actually read my entire post, I'm saying that anyone who says that Chinese aren't highly superstitious are mistaken. Again, China had a civil war that killed 20 million people, started by someone who claim to be Jesus' younger brother.

So again, I'm just presenting facts. You're simply manipulating facts because you can't get your own bigotry under control.
If you think Hong Xiuquan's pseudo-christian delusions were the primary impetus to his rebellion then I can only ask you to read more chinese history. His goals were firmly grounded on political reasons, as in "This foreign regime sucks, let's take our country back and install our own".

Not much superstition there.
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
User avatar
Lusankya
ChiCom
Posts: 4163
Joined: 2002-07-13 03:04am
Location: 人间天堂
Contact:

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Lusankya »

Zinegata wrote:While most Chinese technically worship either Confuciunism or Buddhism, the only reason they don't seem to be "superstitious" is because neither of these religion have a highly visible organization like the Catholic Church doing stupid, superstitious shit in their name.
The post you just quoted wrote:Chinese society ... has never had religion or superstition as a main driving force in its government or culture.
Anyway, you obviously don't know shit about what you're talking about, otherwise you'd realise that Confucianism is a social philosophy. Buddhism, while being an actual religion, was never as major a force in shaping the culture as other factors.
In reality (speaking as a Filipino-Chinese), most of my Chinese relatives are hugely superstitious and often end up having small shrines for every little Deity or spirit they could think of. They have rituals for "ensuring good fortune" or "pacifying evil spirits". Hell, have you ever heard of Feng Shui?
I couldn't give a shit about what your stupid fat relatives believe. The fact that they're superstitious cuntrags does not actually change the fact that for most of history, most Chinese have been more or less non-religious - and certainly less religious than pretty much any other old-world civilisation.
Zinegata wrote:If you actually read my entire post, I'm saying that anyone who says that Chinese aren't highly superstitious are mistaken.
There is actually a difference between people being superstitious and superstition strongly influencing society. I never denied that superstition existed in China. Religion and superstition have always existed in China. The levels have varied, though. They were lower during the times of peace and higher during the times of strife and conflict, for which I see you have already kindly provided an example:
Again, China had a civil war that killed 20 million people, started by someone who claim to be Jesus' younger brother.
Well, at least China never had an aggressive war that killed 55 million people, started by someone who claimed to be on a mission from God. And Europe has a lower population than China too. Think how many more that is In fact, China has never had an aggressive war. Civil wars, yes, but never a war more aggressive than attempts to put a buffer between them and the Mongols. If you're going to claim that China is a non-ethical society, then you will have to claim that every society ever is non-ethical, which makes discussing anything with you completely pointless.
"I would say that the above post is off-topic, except that I'm not sure what the topic of this thread is, and I don't think anybody else is sure either."
- Darth Wong
Free Durian - Last updated 27 Dec
"Why does it look like you are in China or something?" - havokeff
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

Nope, you're taking my statements out of context.

Somebody here has claimed that China is a prosperous, ethical society and that is largely devoid of superstition.

I have shown that ordinary Chinese are in fact highly superstitious and often worship try to placate multiple spirits regularly. Despite Mao's attempt to stamp this out.

I have then shown that China's "prosperity" is somewhat mythical. There have been massive rebellions that have killed millions.

I then showed that superstition/religion intolerance and mass killings do, in fact, intersect in Chinese history at times. Taiping is one of them.

Now, we can argue till tomorrow if the religious thing was the prime motivation behind the revolt, but it's a point I never asserted. I just said the link existed.
User avatar
Lusankya
ChiCom
Posts: 4163
Joined: 2002-07-13 03:04am
Location: 人间天堂
Contact:

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Lusankya »

Zinegata wrote:I have then shown that China's "prosperity" is somewhat mythical. There have been massive rebellions that have killed millions.
Personally, I find America's prosperity to be somewhat mythical, because it went through the Civil War and the Great Depression. Therefore, American society is non-prosperous and non-ethical. QED. 8)
"I would say that the above post is off-topic, except that I'm not sure what the topic of this thread is, and I don't think anybody else is sure either."
- Darth Wong
Free Durian - Last updated 27 Dec
"Why does it look like you are in China or something?" - havokeff
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Metahive »

Zinegata wrote:I have then shown that China's "prosperity" is somewhat mythical. There have been massive rebellions that have killed millions.
According to that standard, no proseperous country has ever existed in history. Persians? Were enganged in wars. Romans? Had massive civil wars and rebellions. Spaniards? They had their share of strife too. As did the Ottomans, the French, the British and well, every other state that reached the heighest of heights.
Because the only true posperity is the everlasting one.

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

d'oh, history/real life 101! The higher you get up the higher you can fall too!
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

Lusankya wrote:Anyway, you obviously don't know shit about what you're talking about, otherwise you'd realise that Confucianism is a social philosophy. Buddhism, while being an actual religion, was never as major a force in shaping the culture as other factors.
I'll take your evasion of the question "You're not really Chinese" as confirmation that you really are a non-Chinese talking out of his ass.

Also, you're employing misdirection. Again, the main point is neither has an organization that actively shows them as superstitious stupid people. Not whether or not Confucionism is "technically" a religion.
I couldn't give a shit about what your stupid fat relatives believe. The fact that they're superstitious cuntrags does not actually change the fact that for most of history, most Chinese have been more or less non-religious - and certainly less religious than pretty much any other old-world civilisation.
You cite no sources, and do not even have anecdotes. You instead try to insult my relatives. That's called being scum.
There is actually a difference between people being superstitious and superstition strongly influencing society. I never denied that superstition existed in China. Religion and superstition have always existed in China. The levels have varied, though. They were lower during the times of peace and higher during the times of strife and conflict, for which I see you have already kindly provided an example:
False assertions without even anecdotes to support it. Again, do you deny that Chinese invented mystical concepts like Feng Shui (and Yin & Yang, and Chi), or do Chinese have numerous "spirits" they try to placate?
Well, at least China never had an aggressive war that killed 55 million people, started by someone who claimed to be on a mission from God. And Europe has a lower population than China too. Think how many more that is In fact, China has never had an aggressive war. Civil wars, yes, but never a war more aggressive than attempts to put a buffer between them and the Mongols. If you're going to claim that China is a non-ethical society, then you will have to claim that every society ever is non-ethical, which makes discussing anything with you completely pointless.
[/quote][/quote]

Whether it's internal or external aggression, killing millions of people does not make a society prosperous, nor ethical.

Stop making up shit about people you've never met.
Zinegata
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: 2010-06-21 09:04am

Re: The Harm of Belief in God

Post by Zinegata »

Metahive wrote:
Zinegata wrote:I have then shown that China's "prosperity" is somewhat mythical. There have been massive rebellions that have killed millions.
According to that standard, no proseperous country has ever existed in history. Persians? Were enganged in wars. Romans? Had massive civil wars and rebellions. Spaniards? They had their share of strife too. As did the Ottomans, the French, the British and well, every other state that reached the heighest of heights.
Because the only true posperity is the everlasting one.

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

d'oh, history/real life 101! The higher you get up the higher you can fall too!
Nope, this is what's called taking what I said out of context. Again.

Clearly, your point is not to debate, but to just snipe. I'll ignore your bullshit now.
Post Reply