From where is this(40k related)

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

Post Reply
User avatar
IvanTih
Padawan Learner
Posts: 202
Joined: 2010-08-02 06:18pm

From where is this(40k related)

Post by IvanTih »

I hear about one Cairn-class defeating so I wonder from where is that piece of fluff?
Also why does everyone say that Sol system has been moved(it's placed wrong on maps and other argue that since Castigator warp jumped entire planet why couldn't they warp jump a star system,but remember that was a Chaos possed titan and anything can be possibe with warp).
User avatar
IvanTih
Padawan Learner
Posts: 202
Joined: 2010-08-02 06:18pm

Re: From where is this(40k related)

Post by IvanTih »

I did a typo on the Cairn part.
It should say "ten Retributions".
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: From where is this(40k related)

Post by NecronLord »

IvanTih wrote:I hear about one Cairn-class defeating so I wonder from where is that piece of fluff?
Fanwank
Also why does everyone say that Sol system has been moved
Fanwank
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
IvanTih
Padawan Learner
Posts: 202
Joined: 2010-08-02 06:18pm

Re: From where is this(40k related)

Post by IvanTih »

NecronLord wrote:
IvanTih wrote:I hear about one Cairn-class defeating so I wonder from where is that piece of fluff?
Fanwank
Also why does everyone say that Sol system has been moved
Fanwank
Thanks. :mrgreen:
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: From where is this(40k related)

Post by Serafina »

Actually, the solar system HAS moved. Not BEEN moved, mind you - but we rotate along with the rest of the galaxy, so technically the solar system will be in a different position in 40K years than it is today.

That's only really relevant if we accept the theory that the Eye of Terror is fixed and not rotating alongside the Galaxy, but that's pretty much speculation and hardly relevant even if we accept it.


As for a Cairn-Battlesip beating ten Retribution-class battleships: Yes, that sounds like fanwank. As a rule of thumb, you need three IoM-battleships to beat one Necron-battleship (and generally a 3:1 superiority, at least a local one, to beat identical ships). At least with something as straight-forward as a Retribution, less so if you got specialists at hand.
The Cairn could certainly escape tough, which some could count as a victory.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
IvanTih
Padawan Learner
Posts: 202
Joined: 2010-08-02 06:18pm

Re: From where is this(40k related)

Post by IvanTih »

Couldn't Cairn just pick-off Retributions,one by one?After all they have Inertialess Drive,stealh and if that fails hull regeneration.
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: From where is this(40k related)

Post by Serafina »

IvanTih wrote:Couldn't Cairn just pick-off Retributions,one by one?After all they have Inertialess Drive,stealh and if that fails hull regeneration.
Not unless you hand the Retributions an idiot ball. They have good range and can cover each other pretty well (remember that space is 3D).
Also, such an engagement would not happen anyway - there would be support fleets on both sides. That further reduces the odds for Necrons, because escorts are just as nasty against their capships as they are against those of other races, while their own escorts are escort-hunters and lack dedicated anti-capship weapons such as torpedoes.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
IvanTih
Padawan Learner
Posts: 202
Joined: 2010-08-02 06:18pm

Re: From where is this(40k related)

Post by IvanTih »

Serafina wrote:
IvanTih wrote:Couldn't Cairn just pick-off Retributions,one by one?After all they have Inertialess Drive,stealh and if that fails hull regeneration.
Not unless you hand the Retributions an idiot ball. They have good range and can cover each other pretty well (remember that space is 3D).
Also, such an engagement would not happen anyway - there would be support fleets on both sides. That further reduces the odds for Necrons, because escorts are just as nasty against their capships as they are against those of other races, while their own escorts are escort-hunters and lack dedicated anti-capship weapons such as torpedoes.
Wow,that broke my illusions about total Necron superiority in space.Can't their escort's weapon best the torpedoes in firepower?
User avatar
Black Admiral
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1870
Joined: 2003-03-30 05:41pm
Location: Northwest England

Re: From where is this(40k related)

Post by Black Admiral »

Quoting from the Necron fleet list for BFG, a Cairn-class tombship is "perfectly capable of defeating any Imperial battleship currently in service" (BFG 2002 annual, pg. 8; I believe the same quote's in the PDF version available on the GW website), which certainly implies that any IoM capital ship that tried fighting a Cairn-class wouldn't be walking away from it. That's about the only information on the Cairn-class I know of; while one does appear briefly in Dark Creed, there's nothing there that gives any idea of its ship-to-ship firepower.
"I do not say the French cannot come. I only say they cannot come by sea." - Admiral Lord St. Vincent, Royal Navy, during the Napoleonic Wars

"Show me a general who has made no mistakes and you speak of a general who has seldom waged war." - Marshal Turenne, 1641
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: From where is this(40k related)

Post by Serafina »

Well, we can go somewhat by the BFG Gothic-rules for a so-so comparision, which is where my 3:1 statement from above is coming from - tough that was designers intent, so it tells us that this is most likely intended to be in-universe. There are also several descriptions of battles and anti-Necron tactics that i mentioned above.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
Bob the Gunslinger
Has not forgotten the face of his father
Posts: 4760
Joined: 2004-01-08 06:21pm
Location: Somewhere out west

Re: From where is this(40k related)

Post by Bob the Gunslinger »

Serafina wrote:Well, we can go somewhat by the BFG Gothic-rules for a so-so comparision, which is where my 3:1 statement from above is coming from - tough that was designers intent, so it tells us that this is most likely intended to be in-universe. There are also several descriptions of battles and anti-Necron tactics that i mentioned above.
You're not somewhat going by BFG rules, you're entirely going by them. And you know that they aren't accurate because the game designers themselves stated that they had to tone down or "nerf" the Necrons from their first incarnation to balance the game more. The Necrons are too powerful to play against when they are portrayed accurately by the rules. That pretty much disqualifies your "Necron escorts suck" bullshit, since it was entirely based on game mechanics. At least one of the Ciaphas Cain novels portrays Necron escorts destroying Chaos cruisers without taking any noticeable damage, so the fluff argues against your interpretation.


The fullest fluff we have on the capabilities of Necron ships (listed in one of the BFG PDFs) is the incident where five Necron Shroud class cruisers enter the Solar system and bypass, outrun or survive all of Terra's and Mars's defenses long enough to get to Mars with one ship actually landing on Mars before it is destroyed. We're not talking about some 3:1 margin, but invading the System of Holy Terra at the heart of the Imperium. Necron ships are very impressive.
"Gunslinger indeed. Quick draw, Bob. Quick draw." --Count Chocula

"Unquestionably, Dr. Who is MUCH lighter in tone than WH40K. But then, I could argue the entirety of WWII was much lighter in tone than WH40K." --Broomstick

"This is ridiculous. I look like the Games Workshop version of a Jedi Knight." --Harry Dresden, Changes

"Like...are we canonical?" --Aaron Dembski-Bowden to Dan Abnett
Junghalli
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5001
Joined: 2004-12-21 10:06pm
Location: Berkeley, California (USA)

Re: From where is this(40k related)

Post by Junghalli »

Serafina wrote:Actually, the solar system HAS moved. Not BEEN moved, mind you - but we rotate along with the rest of the galaxy, so technically the solar system will be in a different position in 40K years than it is today.

That's only really relevant if we accept the theory that the Eye of Terror is fixed and not rotating alongside the Galaxy, but that's pretty much speculation and hardly relevant even if we accept it.
It wouldn't move very significantly in those timescales though, the sun's velocity around the galactic center is less than .001 c from the estimates I've seen, so in 40K years it'll have moved less than 40 light years. That's pretty much totally insignificant on the galactic scale.

As for the Eye being fixed relative to the central black hole, I doubt that would make much of a difference unless you lived very close to it. Assuming it's a similar distance to the galactic center from Earth and the stars around it are moving at a similar speed to the sun you'll be in danger of being swallowed by it within the next thousand years if you live within 1 light year of it. The process would be so slow you'd probably have tons of time to see it coming and evacuate and could easily outrun it with relatively slow sublight ships, let alone FTL ones. As I remember it's some distance from Earth on the galactic scale so even if we're headed straight for it we wouldn't have anything to worry about for many millions of years.

Edit: you may know this anyway as you said it wasn't relevant anyway.
Post Reply