Bakustra wrote:You're quite literally wrong from the very first sentence, sir. There is an oil industry. There are abandoned oil rigs from an effort to establish oil mining in an area filled with hostile natives in a large desert you pass through in-game. They do have an oil industry, at the very least. So you are quite simply wrong, but you're a wiki-warrior anyhow, so being wrong is somewhat like your default state.
Wiki-warrior? Um, what? Wikipedia has a general plot summary at best, the only technology they ever mention is the stuff the game runs on. The FF wiki is worse. And I'm not about to go buy a game to win a debate on the internet. And none of my sources discussed any mention of oil in FF12, so I'm sorry that I may have missed that. You have any screen shots?
But there are two ways to look at it. One is that coal power is superior to Mist, and therefore they're inferior because magic is always inferior to technology, and besides, they haven't gone into space!
In the few sources I could even find mention of electricity or technology in it was stated that electricity opened the doors to even larger constructs. Obviously, they didn't build on that potential.
This is your way. It is an interesting way from a philosophical standpoint, but I'll get to that later. The other way is that Mist is superior to other means of generating electricity, because it is compact, and doesn't produce the pollution of other methods.
I'm not saying magic has it's uses, I'm saying that the potential of electricity was ignored, when with it, I'm sure they could at least improve upon what they have. And modern electric generators are quite compact as well, and with that your giant air fortress doesn't have to rely on sucking the power from mists which may not even exist on Earth. (One of my sources stated that one of the airships powered itself through this, along with other magic.)
Therefore, they use it because it is better, not because they're all genetically inferior or whatever your brain assembles.
Have you been reading the same things I've been posting? I have never once mentioned a single FF race, only refereed to the civilization, and even then I have never mentioned one of those by either.
What I find interesting is this apparent belief that nothing can ever be better than the modern day at anything. The only grudging exceptions are when the modern day is clearly outclassed, and still there are holdouts obsessed with tactics and doctrine. I'm not going to speculate on the possible origins of this, but I find it an interesting belief nonetheless.
The ability to outclass something in a few areas do not make their outright failures any less laughable. Look at the ancient Greeks for example, their philosophers had computed many things such as the circumference, radius, and area of the Earth, along with many advances in geometry that later formed trigonometry. Yet due to the lack of enthusiasm for actual experimentation, the Greek ideas about motion were completely and entirely wrong! Does this make their accomplishes any less impressive? No. Do their accomplishes make their failures any less laughable? No!
Yes, the ability to build airships the size of battleships or buildings is impressive. Guess what? It doesn't make up for the fact that these airships haven't been utilized to their full potential. Logic, mind you, isn't a modern thing. If I explained these airships to Alexander the Great, I'm sure he put two and two together and figure out that you could easily decimate opposing ground forces with them.
Also, take note that I am not very well informed about this game, and that the research I've done presents few, if any, quantifiable statements, so I have to pick through what seems right and what seems wrong and base my assumptions and speculations off of that. You, someone who claims to be knowledgeable about the game and its universe, have offered no quantifiable statements in your arguments either. In fact, you've ignored one of my points outright, which is listed below:
Imperial528 wrote:Now, I don't know the size of the warships exactly, or whatever they are made of, but how would the 488 pound warhead of the AGM-84 Harpoon fare against one? This missile can be carried and launched by bombers, and I'm sure that some modification to the programming could make it Air-to-Air rather than Air-to-Sea or Sea-to-Sea. A single B-52 bomber can carry twelve missiles, and a missile destroyer could carry many more. The F-16 and the F/A-18 can carry the same missile.