I hope this is a joke

HemlockGrey · Post by **HemlockGrey** » 2003-02-23 05:24pm

http://www.mufor.org/moon.htm

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2003-02-23 05:28pm

Occam alert....

Post by **Sea Skimmer** » 2003-02-23 05:28pm

The fact that people who can draw such conclusions from those pictures can actually create a web site is just scary.

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2003-02-23 05:29pm

I bet they were built by the same people that built the face on Mars.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2003-02-23 05:32pm

They were built by the same people who believed in the original Nessie photograph.

In other words, it's all in their minds.

Andrew J. · Post by **Andrew J.** » 2003-02-23 05:39pm

Hell, that triangle doesn't even look equilateral!

Darth Yoshi · Post by **Darth Yoshi** » 2003-02-23 05:44pm

The photo quality is so bad that you have to be hallucinating to see anything.

Frank Hipper · Post by **Frank Hipper** » 2003-02-23 06:15pm

You guys have never heard of the lunar anomalies before? Seriously?
It, of course is all bullshit, but these nuts have been pulling this shit for decades.

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2003-02-23 06:24pm

Frank Hipper wrote:You guys have never heard of the lunar anomalies before? Seriously?
It, of course is all bullshit, but these nuts have been pulling this shit for decades.

I'm going to pull some shit that I've done every time this crap comes up; stop caring.

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2003-02-23 06:37pm

It's just more of Richard Hoagland's hoaxes. Pay them no heed...

Wicked Pilot · Post by **Wicked Pilot** » 2003-02-23 06:56pm

neoolong wrote:I bet they were built by the same people that built the face on Mars.

And the great Pyrmids

Montcalm · Post by **Montcalm** » 2003-02-23 07:32pm

How did they get pictures of my secret base on the moon.

kojikun · Post by **kojikun** » 2003-02-23 07:51pm

I was looking through my telescope tonight and look what I found on the moon:

linky to piccy

Captain tycho · Post by **Captain tycho** » 2003-02-23 07:51pm

Montcalm wrote:How did they get pictures of my secret base on the moon.

I'm wondering how they found mine.

Frank Hipper · Post by **Frank Hipper** » 2003-02-23 07:56pm

kojikun wrote:I was looking through my telescope tonight and look what I found on the moon:

linky to piccy

Very funny. Well, no. A little funny.

kojikun · Post by **kojikun** » 2003-02-23 08:00pm

Its real I tell you! I didnt make that image in photoshop! I swear!!

ArmorPierce · Post by **ArmorPierce** » 2003-02-23 08:04pm

All I saw were very fuzzy blew up pictures.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-02-23 08:32pm

kojikun wrote:I was looking through my telescope tonight and look what I found on the moon:

linky to piccy

I was directed to a "Page not found" error page.

Anyway, why did these beings decide to build cities in barren, inhostible planets in our system, then why don't see such structures on our planet, which a far more suitable place to live than the moon or Mars?

On the Earth page, I found tihs bit of pseudoscience, which I believe was refuted in an older thread here.

The disc's reactor uses a fuel which does not occur naturally on Earth. This fuel is a super-heavy, stable, element with an atomic number of 115 and does not appear on our periodic chart. Element 115 has a twofold purpose : First, it is the source of a gravity wave that is unknown to Earth's scientists, the "Gravity A" wave. Second, it is the source of the anti-matter radiation which is reacted to provide power.

The Gravity A wave eminates from the nucleus of Element 115 and actually extends past the perimeter of the atom. The propulsion system of the disc amplifies and focuses this Gravity A wave to cause space/time to bend, much like space/time bends in the intense gravitational field of a black hole. The ability to direct gravity to cause space/time distortions allows the disc to cross vast expanses of space/time without travelling in a linear mode at a high rate of speed.

Inside the reactor, the Element 115 is transmuted to Element 116 which is unstable and immediately decays releasing antimatter. The antimatter is reacted with gaseous matter which causes a total annihilation reaction, the 100 percent conversion of matter to energy. The heat from this reaction is converted to electrial energy by a solid state, near 100 percent efficient thermoelectric generator. It is this energy that is used to amplify the Gravity A wave.

Post by **Alyrium Denryle** » 2003-02-23 08:35pm

DPDarkPrimus wrote:They were built by the same people who believed in the original Nessie photograph.

In other words, it's all in their minds.

Hey I believed the original nessie photo...when I was 7

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2003-02-23 09:15pm

Was the Loch Ness Monster ever conclusively proven to be a fraud?

Frank Hipper · Post by **Frank Hipper** » 2003-02-23 09:39pm

Crayz9000 wrote:Was the Loch Ness Monster ever conclusively proven to be a fraud?

The only explanation that comes close to making sense, other than being an outright fraud, is that people are seeing waves, or otters.
There is not enough animal life in Loch Ness to feed a viable population of large predators.
There isn't even enough plant life for something as big as it is claimed to be.
It has been swept shore to shore with sonar with no results.
No Nessie.

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2003-02-23 10:04pm

Yeah... it's actually kind of sad, since this creationist book that was published a few years ago tried to use Nessie to prove its Young Earth assertion...

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-02-23 10:48pm

Crayz9000 wrote:Was the Loch Ness Monster ever conclusively proven to be a fraud?

Aside from the points Frank brought up, it should be noted that you cannot conclusively prove a negative. The burden of proof is upon those who would claim it exists, and so far they have failed miserably.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-02-23 10:48pm

Crayz9000 wrote:Yeah... it's actually kind of sad, since this creationist book that was published a few years ago tried to use Nessie to prove its Young Earth assertion...

My question is: How do you prove your point with something that doesn't exist? That's what happens when YECs bring God into a debate, after all.

As for the Loch Ness Monster, he currently works in a casino.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2003-02-23 11:22pm

Alyrium Denryle wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:They were built by the same people who believed in the original Nessie photograph.

In other words, it's all in their minds.
Hey I believed the original nessie photo...when I was 7

Hey, I didn't... and I was into that whole supernatural stuff back then.