Testing the hypothesis of a holographic Universe

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
Sela
Padawan Learner
Posts: 249
Joined: 2009-01-04 10:01pm
Contact:

Testing the hypothesis of a holographic Universe

Post by Sela »

I've tried to understand this as it *sounds* like an exceedingly cool concept, but I think I lack the necessary basis for understanding. Here's the article:
SymmetryBreaking (SLAC/Fermilab Publication)

Hogan’s holometer: Testing the hypothesis of a holographic universe

In 2008, Fermilab particle astrophysicist Craig Hogan made waves with a mind-boggling proposition: The 3D universe in which we appear to live is no more than a hologram.

Now he is building the most precise clock of all time to directly measure whether our reality is an illusion.

The idea that spacetime may not be entirely smooth – like a digital image that becomes increasingly pixelated as you zoom in – had been previously proposed by Stephen Hawking and others. Possible evidence for this model appeared last year in the unaccountable “noise” plaguing the GEO600 experiment in Germany, which searches for gravitational waves from black holes. To Hogan, the jitteriness suggested that the experiment had stumbled upon the lower limit of the spacetime pixels’ resolution.

Black hole physics, in which space and time become compressed, provides a basis for math showing that the third dimension may not exist at all. In this two-dimensional cartoon of a universe, what we perceive as a third dimension would actually be a projection of time intertwined with depth. If this is true, the illusion can only be maintained until equipment becomes sensitive enough to find its limits.

“You can’t perceive it because nothing ever travels faster than light,” says Hogan. “This holographic view is how the universe would look if you sat on a photon.”

Not everyone agrees with this idea. Its foundation is formed with math rather than hard data, as is common in theoretical physics. And although a holographic universe would answer many questions about black hole physics and other paradoxes, it clashes with classical geometry, which demands a universe of smooth, continuous paths in space and time.

“So we want to build a machine which will be the most sensitive measurement ever made of spacetime itself,” says Hogan. “That’s the holometer.”
The holometer is named after a 17th century surveyor's instrument.

The holometer is named after a 17th century surveyor's instrument.

The name “holometer” was first used for a surveying device created in the 17th century, an “instrument for the taking of all measures, both on the earth and in the heavens.” Hogan felt this fit with the mission of his “holographic interferometer,” which is currently being developed at Fermilab’s largest laser lab.

In a classical interferometer, first developed in the late 1800s, a laser beam in a vacuum hits a mirror called a beamsplitter, which breaks it in two. The two beams travel at different angles down the length of two vacuum pipe arms before hitting mirrors at the end and bouncing back to the beamsplitter.

Since light in a vacuum travels at a constant speed, the two beams should arrive back to the mirror at precisely the same time, with their waves in sync to reform a single beam. Any interfering vibration would change the frequency of the waves ever so slightly over the distance they traveled. When they returned to the beamsplitter, they would no longer be in sync.

In the holometer, this loss of sync looks like a shaking or vibrations that represent jitters in spacetime itself, like the fuzziness of radio coming over too little bandwidth.

The holometer’s precision means that it doesn’t have to be large; at 40 meters in length, it is only one hundredth of the size of current interferometers, which measure gravitational waves from black holes and supernovas. Yet because the spacetime frequencies it measures are so rapid, it will be more precise over very short time intervals by seven orders of magnitude than any atomic clock in existence.

“The shaking of spacetime occurs at a million times per second, a thousand times what your ear can hear,” said Fermilab experimental physicist Aaron Chou, whose lab is developing prototypes for the holometer. “Matter doesn’t like to shake at that speed. You could listen to gravitational frequencies with headphones.”

The whole trick, Chou says, is to prove that the vibrations don’t come from the instrument. Using technology similar to that in noise-cancelling headphones, sensors outside the instrument detect vibrations and shake the mirror at the same frequency to cancel them. Any remaining shakiness at high frequency, the researchers propose, will be evidence of blurriness in spacetime.

“With the holometer’s long arms, we’re magnifying spacetime’s uncertainty,” Chou said.
Conceptual design of the Fermilab holometer

Conceptual design of the Fermilab holometer

Hogan’s team liked the holometer idea so much they decided to build two. One on top of the other, the machines can confirm one another’s measurements.

This month, having successfully built a 1-meter prototype of the 40-meter arm, they will weld the parts of the first of the vacuum arms together.

Hogan expects the holometer to begin collecting data next year.

“People trying to tie reality together don’t have any data, just a lot of beautiful math,” said Hogan. “The hope is that this gives them something to work with.

For more details on the specifics of the proposed Holometer, including some of the fundamental mathematical underpinnings (i think), check *here*. I'm really curious as to what you guys make of this. Particularly to the more physics-qualified members - how much of this is smoke-and-mirrors and how much is actually solid? What (if anything) are the implications should their hypothesis be shown to be true?
There is no surer aphrodisiac to a man than a woman who is interested in him.
Bottlestein
Racist Pig Fucker
Posts: 312
Joined: 2010-05-26 05:36pm
Location: CA / IA USA

Re: Testing the hypothesis of a holographic Universe

Post by Bottlestein »

^ Some of the dark energy calculations would have to be redone. Our calculations of the "zero point energy" of space would be incorrect, and we would have to calculate our Renormalization theories again.

On the plus side - there might be a job opening for me in QFT again :lol:
User avatar
LaCroix
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5196
Joined: 2004-12-21 12:14pm
Location: Sopron District, Hungary, Europe, Terra

Re: Testing the hypothesis of a holographic Universe

Post by LaCroix »

I think I need a replacement brain after trying to comprehend this.

Can someone translate this theory's implications in dumb-ass terms for me? What would that change?
A minute's thought suggests that the very idea of this is stupid. A more detailed examination raises the possibility that it might be an answer to the question "how could the Germans win the war after the US gets involved?" - Captain Seafort, in a thread proposing a 1942 'D-Day' in Quiberon Bay

I do archery skeet. With a Trebuchet.
Bottlestein
Racist Pig Fucker
Posts: 312
Joined: 2010-05-26 05:36pm
Location: CA / IA USA

Re: Testing the hypothesis of a holographic Universe

Post by Bottlestein »

^ In biology, chemistry, econ, engineering - nothing changes.
In quantum field theory (QFT), a parameter whose value was unknown becomes fixed, but as a number that is unexpected. Some stuff that determines what the "expected" photon density and matter/antimatter ratio of the universe should be are calculated from this parameter. All this stuff has to be recalculated, with this new value.

1) Photon density "higher" than expected: Either one of 2 possible cases - fermion/anti fermion processes before the first electron and positron collided to form photons - so new particle physics. Or, case 2: Expansion history of universe was slower in the past than what we expected - so gravity effects we have not considered (maybe M theoretic effects, quantum gravity, maybe something new)

2) Photon density "lower" than expected: Either one of 3 possible cases - more "photon sinks" in the universe than thought - maybe more black holes. Case 2: Expansion history of universe was faster in the past than what we expected - so dark energy effects are greater than we thought - so changes to theories that hypothesize dark energy (maybe changes to M theory). Case 3: Photogenesis (electron and positron colliding to form photons for the first time) was not as "bright" (did not produce as many photons), as we thought. This implies our production rates for matter and antimatter are off - new particle physics.

EDIT: There's a 3rd case - the photon density exactly "equals" what we expected. This means someone fudged the math - nothing in theoretical physics should be that exact :D
Post Reply