And you don't know or don't want to know what you're talking about.Wow, dude your a dumbass
That shield was projected from surface, and was not shield of DSII itself.1) Then why the fuck did the need to blow up the tower on endor for?
Intrepid class used tritanium in bulkheads, while hull was duranium - yet, it was describet to be built light. Which means that "normal" ships most probably use tritanium in hull (which is logical, given how superior tritanium is in terms of damage resistance. Plus we have lot of evidence that GCS hull is stronger than Voyager's - if you watch Odyssey ramming scene, you will notice that "bug" that rammed Odyssey suffered warp core breach). Odyssey itself was destroyed by warp core breach - had "bug" hit her in saucer, she would probably have survived.2) Yes in bulkheads and in cube "infrastructure" (memory aplha)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poB74Lcwv80
a) Every collision scene from movies plus look of their ships.4) Proof that starwars uses steel? Proof that Startrek uses Tritanium hulls? (Oh and proof of the density of Tritanium in the first place?)
b) Logic. Bulkheads of Intrepid and Galaxy class hulls were composed from tritanium. Hull of Intrepid class was composed from duranium, and Intrepid class is "built to be light". Galaxy class also showed better resistence from weapons than what would follow from hull thickness itself.
c) It is way denser than duranium. Plus Borg scout ship massed 2 500 000 metric tons, while much larger Intrepid class massed 700 000 metric tons. Even if only 20% of Borg vessel was above surface, it would be only 15-20 meters high in total.