Re: Baerne:
I'm a little unsure about that, not least because it will do strange things to the "less-active" players who
are engaged in the game but aren't posting at the same rate that, say, me, Steve, and Shroom do. If we start rearranging countries, where do we stop? Do we redraw the whole map? What happens when people suddenly wake up and realize they've got Shep for a neighbor* or something?
A lot of people might wind up having to retcon a fair chunk of their strategic situation in light of the new neighbors, or the removal of old ones.
*Not a prospect for the faint of heart!
EDIT: In a lot of places, the active or semi-active players are already (more or less) clustered; the Koprulu Zone comes to mind, as does Tanasinn/Sorchus/Force Lord over to the upper left. The really
dead parts of the map is the extreme left edge, the left side of the lower edge (with the Pfhor and Chirons), and an area around the middle of the extreme right edge (where the RIS, Altacarans, French, ESR, League of Free Stars, and apparently now the Hiigarans are all largely inactive).
My impression is that there are relatively few places where an active player is
surrounded by inactive players; even there, a fair amount of player-on-player interaction can occur at a distance.
Steve wrote:I wrote the population as 200 million quite a long while ago. In part it's because I didn't intend Pendleton to have as much landmass as Earth and to have a lot more ocean and it was also to reflect that the original population was fairly small and that there has been a constant "leak" of population (unsurprisingly coinciding with every Anglian occupation over the centuries) representing the emigration of freed slaves and abolitionists driven out after prior reconstruction efforts failed as well as any basic emigration (people approaching the upper class who decided they want to live on a First Galaxy planet, so they liquidate their assets into a galactic-standard currency and move off-world). Not to mention occasional slave revolts.
OK. That combination of factors could do it, I suppose, though even then I'd feel a little odd about a population under 500 million or so. Otherwise, you wind up either with so little land area that everyone's living on a handful of mountain peaks while what would be continental plains on Earth are underwater, or with the conclusion that most of the land that's left is inhospitable... or that the "leaks" of population are on the order of half the population leaving every few generations, which seems a bit extreme.