Copyright troll sues for ownership of Drudge Report

[General Zod]

And now for something completely different.

News aggregation impresario Matt Drudge is being sued for copyright infringement for reproducing a copyrighted photo along with a link to a story about airport security on the Las Vegas Review-Journal website.

The plaintiff in the case is Righthaven, a company that's earned a reputation this year as a world-class copyright troll. Righthaven has sued nearly 200 parties this year alone. Righthaven has typically gone after those who post news excerpts of its partners, such as the Las Vegas Review-Journal, but pledged to be more discretionary after being handed a defeat in court by a judge who recently ruled that one of its targets had "fair use" to its work.

Instead, Righthaven announced it had teamed up with the nation's second-biggest news chain, owners of the Denver Post among others, and has now filed a lawsuit that arguably takes the mass-suer to a whole new level with its biggest target yet.

In the new lawsuit, Righthaven asks a judge to "lock the Drudge Report Domain and transfer control of the Drudge Report Domain to Righthaven."

Why?

According to the complaint filed yesterday in Nevada District Court, the Drudge Report website is alleged to have posted a photo first found in the Denver Post showing a TSA agent giving a pat-down at an airport.

Drudge's post also allegedly contained "an embedded hyperlink entitled: 'VEGAS CONFIDENTIAL,' linking directly to a section of the Las Vegas Review-Journal website."

Drudge has been sued before for committing libel via his provocative linking. In 1997, former Clinton White House aide Sidney Blumenthal sued Drudge for defamation, a case that was later settled on favorable terms to Drudge four years later. The topic of linking liability in the defamation context is also being examined this week at Canada's Supreme Court.

This lawsuit, though, is a rarity insofar as copyright infringement being connected to linking. Righthaven takes issue with the fact that the Drudge Report has no DMCA takedown regime to respond to those who alleged violations of copyright.

The plaintiff demands statutory damages for willful infringement, costs, and an injunction that would allow Righthaven to seize the Drudge Report domain.

It's kind of amazing that these clowns haven't been disbarred yet considering many of the lawsuits they've filed arguably fall under fair use.

[Molyneux]

That seems astonishingly silly on the part of Righthaven. I wonder if the Drudge Report can countersue and ask for their name and assets?

[Xon]

Depending on where this case gets heard radically alters how it will play out. One thing for sure, it'll hit appeals no matter what happens.

Righthaven's got a rep for being a copyright troll, and saddly the copyright laws let them get away with way to much. Thankfully they are in the new industry atm, and are too small to buyout the copyright of stuff I care about so I don't have to worry about my favourite fanfic authors being sued for copyright infringement(or having thier works pulled). But if Righthaven does win and win the inevitable appeal, this type of thing will become more common.