That's a matter of opinion. Some people enjoy it; and you didn't say a fucking thing about the story; Havok did, in the OP.General Zod wrote:Do I have to explicitly say that "the game is a boring piece of shit" in order to get you to not twist my words? Where the fuck did I say anything about the story for that matter?ShadowDragon8685 wrote: Please note that Havok's requirements for storyline is "it doesn't have to be great."
Who the fuck are you to call drivel: I was illustrating, point-by-point, the ways in which STO meets or comes close to Havok's original requirements.The key thing he's looking for that it doesn't have is being good. Frankly I wouldn't recommend STO to anyone.I won't say STO is a great game by any stretch, but it does have (most of) what he's looking for:
>snip drivel<
And I would, if only to give it a try before deciding you don't like it. Have you played it, or are you regurgitating second or thirdhand accounts of the game which may be months old?
Without knowing someone's definitions of what makes a good game, all you do is project your own desires onto them. When I made a thread asking about space-based games on the PC, I said, frontpage, "don't even say EvE, because I hate it." Yet, people brought up EvE, and insisted it was good, even going to the lengths of haranguing at me about how my definitions of "good" and "roleplaying" were wrong.
Frankly that's bullshit. Havok stated, first post, what he was looking for, and I pointed out the ways in which the closest game I can think of to his dream game met and failed to meet his requirements.