Priesto wrote:Would you please stop using such poor language in your posts.
How predictable. Whine about your opponent's manners when you can't address his points. I called you a fucking moron because that's precisely what you are. I challenged you to produce
one lousy example of Hitler doing something that the Biblical God couldn't match for ferocity, brutality, and viciousness.
Your failure to do so in two consecutive replies after two consecutive challenges represents tacit admission of defeat, yet you claim that you have answered my points! I don't think you understand that a proper answer to a point is to find a flaw in its reasoning or facts; you have done neither. You simply state that you disagree, and you seem to feel that this constitutes a rebuttal.
The judgement of an evil people by God, doesn't need to be justified.
In other words, you are incapable of justifying God's use of genocide (or even explaining how the entire nation of Canaan with all of its denizens, young and old, could possibly be "evil"), so you won't even bother trying.
Being evil is insanity in itself.
Wrong, you idiot. I pointed out the proper definition of insanity in my last post, which you ignored along with everything else anyone here has ever said to you.
You even acknowleged evil, something you believe not to exist.
Fuck you, you intolerant little piece of shit. Since I'm an atheist, you assume that I believe evil does not exist? It exists, motherfucker. With your strident claims that it was OK to commit genocide against entire races in the Old Testament, you're a walking example of it.
God has the right to judge and you'd know that all of his actions are justified. Hitler's actions of hate cannot be justified. Also, we do not have the capacity to judge since we are not all knowing or all pure and holy.
Your irrational and self-contradictory opinion. Nothing more.
I will recap once more, and then I am through wasting time with you. You agree that Hitler is evil. You claim that God is good. I produced numerous examples showing that God commits more evil acts than Hitler, thus forcing us into one of three conclusions:
- God commits similar acts to those of Hitler, therefore both God and Hitler are evil.
- God commits similar acts to those of Hitler, therefore both God and Hitler are good.
- Good and evil are decided by the words of your spokespeople, not your deeds. And since Jesus said lots of nice things, God is good despite his deeds.
Of those, the only palatable option is #1: both God and Hitler are evil. You appear to be using #3, although you won't admit it.
But of course, you don't recognize that there is a massive contradiction in your claim that Hitler is more evil than God, even though God commits more evil acts than Hitler, because you have intellectual blinders on and you are too fucking stupid to start with facts and move to conclusions rather than going the other way around.
You once asked why no one responded to your last post. I tried to explain to you that your incredible stupidity and outright refusal to debate properly by addressing points was the reason. Unfortunately, you are obviously too dense to figure it out even after having it spelled out for you.