Flathead watershed protected from mineral exploitation

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Flathead watershed protected from mineral exploitation

Post by Alyeska »

The Missoulian
excerpt:
The deal to protect the North Fork of the Flathead from mining and energy exploration got final approval on Tuesday at a gathering in Washington, D.C., with Montana Sens. Max Baucus and Jon Tester and Canadian Ambassador Gary Doer.

In addition to confirming that The Nature Conservancy and Nature Conservancy of Canada will contribute $9.4 million to reimburse mining company expenses, the gathering also announced plans for Canadian legislation to permanently protect the area.

British Columbia government representatives pledged to enact new mineral and coal land reserve regulations, a Southern Rocky Mountain Management Plan, and other guidelines that restrict mining and energy development in the Flathead watershed.
I am estatic about this. I used to live in the Flathead valley (not the same location in the article) and our watershed is primarily Glacier Park and the North Fork which is from the Canadian wildnerness location. The wild life in that region is incredible. And the quality of water we get out of the North Fork is also very good. Its extensively used for irrigation and it affects our lakes. After doing some hiking in the North Fork itself I've come to appreciate the environment up there.

Recent mineral exploration by mining firms on the Canadian side have been a serious concern to those of us living in North Western Montana. We don't have a history of mining or coal and we have an appreciation for the wilderness as it is. We have Glacier Park and the Great Bear Wilderness right there to enjoy. I am absolutely thrilled that we were able to come to an agreement with Canada on this issue. It will protect a vast area and secure things for our future.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
General Trelane (Retired)
Jedi Knight
Posts: 620
Joined: 2002-07-31 05:27pm
Location: Gothos

Re: Flathead watershed protected from mineral exploitation

Post by General Trelane (Retired) »

We Canadians have not had a good track record regarding mining and its toxic effluent in that region. While this article is good news, I'd keep my fingers crossed until the pledges actually become law.
Time makes more converts than reason. -- Thomas Paine, Common Sense, 1776
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Re: Flathead watershed protected from mineral exploitation

Post by Aaron »

General Trelane (Retired) wrote:We Canadians have not had a good track record regarding mining and its toxic effluent in that region. While this article is good news, I'd keep my fingers crossed until the pledges actually become law.
Any chance of more info? I'm from B.C. and always saw us as more environmentally aware then other Provinces.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
General Trelane (Retired)
Jedi Knight
Posts: 620
Joined: 2002-07-31 05:27pm
Location: Gothos

Re: Flathead watershed protected from mineral exploitation

Post by General Trelane (Retired) »

Aaron wrote:Any chance of more info?
Certainly. My comment was actually off the cuff and based on remembrances of outcries from Washington residents and municipalities concerned with pollutants in the Columbia River originating from BC mining operations. This made national headlines back in the late '80s and early '90s (if memory serves). A little google-fu reveals that Teck Cominco's smelter at Trail, BC, is the big culprit. The CBC article A Century of Slag provides a summary of the problem though it is a little dated (being from 2003). A more recent 2008 Lexpert article Cross-Border Environmental Litigation provides interesting follow-up to the legal ramifications of this case.

While googling, it also became clear that BC has a big problem with pollution (particularly river acidification) from abandoned mines, but they are trying to remediate those (to varying degrees of success).

Aaron wrote:I'm from B.C. and always saw us as more environmentally aware then [sic] other Provinces.
And I'm from Alberta and always saw us as less environmentally aware than other provinces. :wink:
Time makes more converts than reason. -- Thomas Paine, Common Sense, 1776
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Re: Flathead watershed protected from mineral exploitation

Post by Aaron »

General Trelane (Retired) wrote:Certainly. My comment was actually off the cuff and based on remembrances of outcries from Washington residents and municipalities concerned with pollutants in the Columbia River originating from BC mining operations. This made national headlines back in the late '80s and early '90s (if memory serves). A little google-fu reveals that Teck Cominco's smelter at Trail, BC, is the big culprit. The CBC article A Century of Slag provides a summary of the problem though it is a little dated (being from 2003). A more recent 2008 Lexpert article Cross-Border Environmental Litigation provides interesting follow-up to the legal ramifications of this case.

While googling, it also became clear that BC has a big problem with pollution (particularly river acidification) from abandoned mines, but they are trying to remediate those (to varying degrees of success).
Jesus, what a fucking disaster. Though it makes the issues here with folks being against a new local uranium mine make more sense to me.

And I'm from Alberta and always saw us as less environmentally aware than other provinces. :wink:
:lol:
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
Post Reply