The Federation

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: The Federation

Post by The Romulan Republic »

I don't see how canon fails to be relevant outside a vs debate. It still helps to have an agreed upon standard of what evidence is legitimate, surely?
User avatar
Baffalo
Jedi Knight
Posts: 805
Joined: 2009-04-18 10:53pm
Location: NWA
Contact:

Re: The Federation

Post by Baffalo »

The Romulan Republic wrote:I don't see how canon fails to be relevant outside a vs debate. It still helps to have an agreed upon standard of what evidence is legitimate, surely?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_canon

Pretty much sums it up. I can't find the link to where it is on the Star Trek website, but I'm content enough with this.
"I subsist on 3 things: Sugar, Caffeine, and Hatred." -Baffalo late at night and hungry

"Why are you worried about the water pressure? You're near the ocean, you've got plenty of water!" -Architect to our team
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: The Federation

Post by Stofsk »

The Romulan Republic wrote:I don't see how canon fails to be relevant outside a vs debate. It still helps to have an agreed upon standard of what evidence is legitimate, surely?
That's only important if you're forced to deal with raving lunatics who scream 'Canon!' every waking moment.
Image
User avatar
Darth Tedious
Jedi Master
Posts: 1082
Joined: 2011-01-16 08:48pm

Re: The Federation

Post by Darth Tedious »

The Romulan Republic wrote:I don't see how canon fails to be relevant outside a vs debate. It still helps to have an agreed upon standard of what evidence is legitimate, surely?
That would be why I said 'mostly in versus cases'. It would indeed still be handy to have an agreed policy for PST discussion.
Baffalo wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_canon

Pretty much sums it up. I can't find the link to where it is on the Star Trek website, but I'm content enough with this.
But which method outlined there are you content with?
"Darth Tedious just showed why women can go anywhere they want because they are, in effect, mobile kitchens." - RazorOutlaw

"That could never happen because super computers." - Stark

"Don't go there girl! Talk to the VTOL cause the glass canopy ain't listening!" - Shroomy
User avatar
Baffalo
Jedi Knight
Posts: 805
Joined: 2009-04-18 10:53pm
Location: NWA
Contact:

Re: The Federation

Post by Baffalo »

Darth Tedious wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:I don't see how canon fails to be relevant outside a vs debate. It still helps to have an agreed upon standard of what evidence is legitimate, surely?
That would be why I said 'mostly in versus cases'. It would indeed still be handy to have an agreed policy for PST discussion.
Baffalo wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_canon

Pretty much sums it up. I can't find the link to where it is on the Star Trek website, but I'm content enough with this.
But which method outlined there are you content with?
Anything Gene voted canon prior to his death, then Paramount afterwards. In the event of a conflict, Paramount's say trumps Gene's because they financed it.
"I subsist on 3 things: Sugar, Caffeine, and Hatred." -Baffalo late at night and hungry

"Why are you worried about the water pressure? You're near the ocean, you've got plenty of water!" -Architect to our team
User avatar
aussiemuscle308
Padawan Learner
Posts: 201
Joined: 2011-01-20 10:53pm

Re: The Federation

Post by aussiemuscle308 »

Destructionator XIII wrote:(While that might be describing the TOS atmosphere relative to his experience, it could have also been much uglier before Kirk's time too. (I don't think it happened that way in ENT, but I haven't seen most of it so I can't say for sure.)
most of what we see of the Klingons in ST:E is pretty much rip off of ST:6 :twisted:
========================================
If you believe in Telekinesis, raise my hand.
Post Reply