Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
the atom
Padawan Learner
Posts: 320
Joined: 2011-07-13 11:39am

Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by the atom »

The answer should seem fairly obvious, however apparently phasers have shown KEW-like effects in the past, and I have heard it asserted that they are in fact a type of kinetic weapon. Is there any type of truth to this? Or is it sheer idiocy (my personal answer)? Hopefully somebody here could provide me with a solid answer.
"Please allow me to introduce myself, I'm a man of wealth and taste..."
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16429
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by Batman »

They can't be either. Their effects are completely incompatible with both. DEW doesn't work because even ignoring the fact that a DEW with enough energy to vapourize a human being would not only result in there being a human being's worth of vapourized matter (which is curiously absent) but wouldn't do that, it's drill a tunnel through said human (likely killing him in the process to be sure but not by complete vapourization) and expend most of its energy on whatever happens to be behind the guy you shot at.
Kinetic weapons don't work either. Phasers display no recoil whatsoever and the only time they DO display clear kinetic impact effects (the Klingon Kirk phasers in TSFS) is completely incompatible with physical impactors.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
the atom
Padawan Learner
Posts: 320
Joined: 2011-07-13 11:39am

Re: Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by the atom »

Ah that's what I figured. The vaporization thing never occurred to be before though. I suppose in the event of true vaporization there would be something of an explosion, which is of course missing.
"Please allow me to introduce myself, I'm a man of wealth and taste..."
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by Metahive »

Batman wrote:They can't be either. Their effects are completely incompatible with both. DEW doesn't work because even ignoring the fact that a DEW with enough energy to vapourize a human being would not only result in there being a human being's worth of vapourized matter (which is curiously absent) but wouldn't do that, it's drill a tunnel through said human (likely killing him in the process to be sure but not by complete vapourization) and expend most of its energy on whatever happens to be behind the guy you shot at.
Sometimes phasers do punch holes into people, examples are in the episodes The Augments and Suspicions. It's only the highest setting that inspires complete disintegration.
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Re: Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by Connor MacLeod »

This is a rather poorly phrased question, and it ignores the fundamental nature of phasers as a sort of particle beam weapon.

Rather, particle beams, which are DEWs, are also kinetic energy weapons because kinetic energy is the way they do damage to the target. Moreover phasers aren't massless particles, they don't move at lightspeed.. but they do move so they HAVE to have KE by definition. Is the KE a damage mechanism? We don't know, but it's not impossible either. We know phasers can have significant thermal effects but we've never actually witnessed the disintgration mechanism having thermal effects to any great degree.

That out of the way I'm presuming this has something to do with some retarded thread elsewhere, and if so what specifically is it phasers are supposed to be doing?
User avatar
the atom
Padawan Learner
Posts: 320
Joined: 2011-07-13 11:39am

Re: Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by the atom »

Connor MacLeod wrote:This is a rather poorly phrased question, and it ignores the fundamental nature of phasers as a sort of particle beam weapon.

Rather, particle beams, which are DEWs, are also kinetic energy weapons because kinetic energy is the way they do damage to the target. Moreover phasers aren't massless particles, they don't move at lightspeed.. but they do move so they HAVE to have KE by definition. Is the KE a damage mechanism? We don't know, but it's not impossible either. We know phasers can have significant thermal effects but we've never actually witnessed the disintgration mechanism having thermal effects to any great degree.

That out of the way I'm presuming this has something to do with some retarded thread elsewhere, and if so what specifically is it phasers are supposed to be doing?
I understand the question is poorly phrased and You guessed correctly. The premise of the current discussion is that the Borg can adapt to KEWs because apparently phasers are now KEWs, so therefore bullets and melee attacks would be worthless against them.

So in all reality it's the same trollercoaster that's been going on for years now.
"Please allow me to introduce myself, I'm a man of wealth and taste..."
User avatar
Darth Tedious
Jedi Master
Posts: 1082
Joined: 2011-01-16 08:48pm

Re: Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by Darth Tedious »

I thought phasers fired EM and nadion particles in a ratio determined by the phaser's setting...

I would think at most settings the KE is definitely not the damage mechanism.
the atom wrote:The premise of the current discussion is that the Borg can adapt to KEWs because apparently phasers are now KEWs, so therefore bullets and melee attacks would be worthless against them.
That sounds like the work of Borg fanwhores trying to further wank out an already dubious ability...
the atom wrote:So in all reality it's the same trollercoaster that's been going on for years now.
Indeed.
"Darth Tedious just showed why women can go anywhere they want because they are, in effect, mobile kitchens." - RazorOutlaw

"That could never happen because super computers." - Stark

"Don't go there girl! Talk to the VTOL cause the glass canopy ain't listening!" - Shroomy
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Re: Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by Connor MacLeod »

KEWs can cover a gamut of topics, and they won't all behave differently. A knife and a bullet will behave differently. A bullet and a particle beam will behave differently. Hell a projectile itself can behave differently depending on shape, velocity, mass, etc. Much more ifnormation is needed if a comparison can even begin to be made, much less analyzed.
User avatar
the atom
Padawan Learner
Posts: 320
Joined: 2011-07-13 11:39am

Re: Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by the atom »

But aren't KEWs strictly speaking a physical impactor of some kind (projectile, melee instrument, etc)?
"Please allow me to introduce myself, I'm a man of wealth and taste..."
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16429
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by Batman »

The particles in a particle beam absolutely are physical impactors. They may be tiny and of little mass, but they're definitely physical, and unlike a knife or a baseball bat, they're also likely going to be moving rather fast. While they're generally treated as a subset of DEW in most SciFi they at the very least have the potential to be kinetic energy weapons.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
StarSword
Jedi Knight
Posts: 985
Joined: 2011-07-22 10:46pm
Location: North Carolina, USA, Earth
Contact:

Re: Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by StarSword »

We got into this one floor up in the Sci-Fi forum earlier today. (Can't remember if you were involved, Batman, so don't hit me for saying something you already know. :)) The consensus was that yes, the particles do impart kinetic energy, but subatomic particles don't have enough KE to do anything of note even when accelerated to relativistic speeds, and that the damage done by a particle beam is from the other energy in the beam (heat, electricity, whatever).
Star Carrier by Ian Douglas: Analysis and Talkback

The Vortex Empire: I think the real question is obviously how a supervolcano eruption wiping out vast swathes of the country would affect the 2016 election.
Borgholio: The GOP would blame Obama and use the subsequent nuclear winter to debunk global warming.
User avatar
Darth Tedious
Jedi Master
Posts: 1082
Joined: 2011-01-16 08:48pm

Re: Are phasers KEWs or DEWs?

Post by Darth Tedious »

StarSword wrote:We got into this one floor up in the Sci-Fi forum earlier today. (Can't remember if you were involved, Batman, so don't hit me for saying something you already know. :)) The consensus was that yes, the particles do impart kinetic energy, but subatomic particles don't have enough KE to do anything of note even when accelerated to relativistic speeds, and that the damage done by a particle beam is from the other energy in the beam (heat, electricity, whatever).
I was a part of that conversation, it was in relation to phasers against SG Replicators. And yes, particle beams do tend to use other mechanisms besides KE to do their damage. In the case of phasers, it's the funky effects that nadion particles cause, with their odd NDF/"vapourising"/phaserising/fucking shit out of the space-time continuum business.
"Darth Tedious just showed why women can go anywhere they want because they are, in effect, mobile kitchens." - RazorOutlaw

"That could never happen because super computers." - Stark

"Don't go there girl! Talk to the VTOL cause the glass canopy ain't listening!" - Shroomy
Post Reply