Galaxy's Child oddity

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Galaxy's Child oddity

Post by Uraniun235 »

"This modification was due to be introduced..."
"In the next class starship." -Leah and Geordi

If the modification (which supposedly was a positive change) was due for the next class starship, why was Geordi able to implement it on the Enterprise? And if he could do that, why hasn't the procedure been carried out on all Federation starships? (or at least all Galaxy-class starships)
User avatar
Warspite
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1970
Joined: 2002-11-10 11:28am
Location: Somewhere under a rock

Re: Galaxy's Child oddity

Post by Warspite »

Uraniun235 wrote:"This modification was due to be introduced..."
"In the next class starship." -Leah and Geordi

If the modification (which supposedly was a positive change) was due for the next class starship, why was Geordi able to implement it on the Enterprise? And if he could do that, why hasn't the procedure been carried out on all Federation starships? (or at least all Galaxy-class starships)
This is Star Trek, remember? Everything lasts for one episode.

Now, what was the next class to be introduced after the Galaxy?
[img=left]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v206/ ... iggado.jpg[/img] "You know, it's odd; practically everything that's happened on any of the inhabited planets has happened on Terra before the first spaceship." -- Space Viking
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Galaxy's Child oddity

Post by Ted C »

Warspite wrote: This is Star Trek, remember? Everything lasts for one episode.
That's not always the case.

The engine modification they're discussing in "Galaxy's Child" -- a reorientation of the dilithium crystals -- was something Geordi originally implemented in "Booby Trap".

Also, the deflector-dish blast used against the Borg in "Best of Both Worlds" was attempted again in "Night Terrors", and random shield fluctuation was repeated a couple of times following BoBW (although it was inexplicably forgotten in Generations).
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Galaxy's Child oddity

Post by Peregrin Toker »

Warspite wrote:
Uraniun235 wrote:"This modification was due to be introduced..."
"In the next class starship." -Leah and Geordi

If the modification (which supposedly was a positive change) was due for the next class starship, why was Geordi able to implement it on the Enterprise? And if he could do that, why hasn't the procedure been carried out on all Federation starships? (or at least all Galaxy-class starships)
This is Star Trek, remember? Everything lasts for one episode.

Now, what was the next class to be introduced after the Galaxy?
I think he might have been referring to the Sovereign-class which was under development at that time if I recall correctly, since it was supposed to replace the Galaxy as the Federation's top-of-the-line battleship. (or was it??)
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

No, I think the Sovereign was to replace the Excelsior. The original replacement for the Galaxy was to be the Nova, but this changed and the name Nova went to a replacement for the very old Oberth.

Oh, and this is all non-canon speculation, some of which I can't even remember where I heard it.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Warspite
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1970
Joined: 2002-11-10 11:28am
Location: Somewhere under a rock

Re: Galaxy's Child oddity

Post by Warspite »

Ted C wrote:The engine modification they're discussing in "Galaxy's Child" -- a reorientation of the dilithium crystals -- was something Geordi originally implemented in "Booby Trap".

Also, the deflector-dish blast used against the Borg in "Best of Both Worlds" was attempted again in "Night Terrors", and random shield fluctuation was repeated a couple of times following BoBW (although it was inexplicably forgotten in Generations).
Hum, only one implementation. The deflector blast it's different, since it's a tactical aplication under way, without requiring major modifications, or impeding alterations to the original design of the equipment, usually, tapping a few strokes on the touch-screens, put it in another, the original design allos for certain modifications to be carried at the "user's discretion".

An engine modification requires downtime, with the ship (possibly) in drydock, previous submittance of designs, inspections, and analysis, all the necessary paperwork to implement an alteration on the original design, and further introductions fleet-wide.

Unfortunately, since we only follow the adventures of the Enterprise, it's not possible to know if these alterations are implemented in other ships, or the deflector blast and shield fluctuation.
[img=left]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v206/ ... iggado.jpg[/img] "You know, it's odd; practically everything that's happened on any of the inhabited planets has happened on Terra before the first spaceship." -- Space Viking
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Galaxy's Child oddity

Post by Ted C »

Warspite wrote: Hum, only one implementation. The deflector blast it's different, since it's a tactical aplication under way, without requiring major modifications, or impeding alterations to the original design of the equipment, usually, tapping a few strokes on the touch-screens, put it in another, the original design allos for certain modifications to be carried at the "user's discretion".
On the contrary, the deflector dish blast was not part of the deflector's design, and it took hours of preparation in both instances.
Warspite wrote: An engine modification requires downtime, with the ship (possibly) in drydock, previous submittance of designs, inspections, and analysis, all the necessary paperwork to implement an alteration on the original design, and further introductions fleet-wide.
Reorienting the Enterprise's dilithium crystals in "Booby Trap" apparently required little or no downtime, since the power from the reactor was necessary to maintain the shields against constant radiation bombardment from the asseton assimilators.
Warspite wrote: Unfortunately, since we only follow the adventures of the Enterprise, it's not possible to know if these alterations are implemented in other ships, or the deflector blast and shield fluctuation.
We might easily conclude that the modification to the warp core had not been implemented on other ships. When Leah Brahms visited the ship in "Galaxy's Child", she complained that Geordi had been "screwing up" her engines (or some similar derogatory remark). If the modification had been implemented throughout the fleet, such an opinion from her would be pretty odd. Also, in "The Masterpiece Society", Geordi claimed that the Enterprise had the most powerful M/AM warp reactor in Starfleet; the Enterprise being the only ship with his engine modification would justify that claim.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
Warspite
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1970
Joined: 2002-11-10 11:28am
Location: Somewhere under a rock

Post by Warspite »

Ok, I need to get my hands on TNG DVD's... 8)
[img=left]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v206/ ... iggado.jpg[/img] "You know, it's odd; practically everything that's happened on any of the inhabited planets has happened on Terra before the first spaceship." -- Space Viking
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

Vympel wrote:No, I think the Sovereign was to replace the Excelsior. The original replacement for the Galaxy was to be the Nova, but this changed and the name Nova went to a replacement for the very old Oberth.
I thought that the Excelsior was replaced long ago by the Ambassador-class.

By the way, the Nova-class is one of the smaller ships in Starfleet, how the heck could such a ship be intended to replace a large battleship such as the Galaxy-class??
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Simon H.Johansen wrote:
I thought that the Excelsior was replaced long ago by the Ambassador-class.

By the way, the Nova-class is one of the smaller ships in Starfleet, how the heck could such a ship be intended to replace a large battleship such as the Galaxy-class??
It's from the old TNG tech manual- re-read what I said. In the TM, it was said the next ship after the Galaxy successor class would be called Nova-class- obviosuly, plans changed.

Also note that the Soveriegn is much more of a battleship than a cruise liner (which is what the damn Galaxy is).
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

Vympel wrote:Also note that the Soveriegn is much more of a battleship than a cruise liner (which is what the damn Galaxy is).
Yeah, but in the TNG episode "Conundrum", one of the characters (can't remember which) described the Galaxy-class as a battleship.
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Simon H.Johansen wrote: Yeah, but in the TNG episode "Conundrum", one of the characters (can't remember which) described the Galaxy-class as a battleship.
Yeah, but I meant in terms of what we see going on there- we've never seen families on a Sovereign, for example.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Simon H.Johansen wrote:
Vympel wrote:Also note that the Soveriegn is much more of a battleship than a cruise liner (which is what the damn Galaxy is).
Yeah, but in the TNG episode "Conundrum", one of the characters (can't remember which) described the Galaxy-class as a battleship.
Yeah but that was the alien posing as MacDuff it was in his interest to cast the Enterprise in a military light to further his own aims.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

TheDarkling wrote:
Simon H.Johansen wrote:Yeah, but in the TNG episode "Conundrum", one of the characters (can't remember which) described the Galaxy-class as a battleship.
Yeah but that was the alien posing as MacDuff it was in his interest to cast the Enterprise in a military light to further his own aims.
Doesn't explain why the rest of the crew agreed with his assessment.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Darth Wong wrote:
TheDarkling wrote:
Simon H.Johansen wrote:Yeah, but in the TNG episode "Conundrum", one of the characters (can't remember which) described the Galaxy-class as a battleship.
Yeah but that was the alien posing as MacDuff it was in his interest to cast the Enterprise in a military light to further his own aims.
Doesn't explain why the rest of the crew agreed with his assessment.
No Worf agreed with his assesment - Worf, you know the guy who would probably describe a toothpick as an easily concealed but less than sturdy weapon.
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Just to clarify- I'm not saying that the Galaxy is literally designed as the Love Boat, I just meant that the Sovereign doesn't seem to have the Galaxy's jack of all trades/ explorer/ family carrying idiocy mission.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

Vympel wrote:Just to clarify- I'm not saying that the Galaxy is literally designed as the Love Boat, I just meant that the Sovereign doesn't seem to have the Galaxy's jack of all trades/ explorer/ family carrying idiocy mission.
While the Galaxy-class is a jack-of-all-trades, it was the most powerful ship in the Starfleet, until the first Sovereign-class vessels entered service.
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Simon H.Johansen wrote:
Vympel wrote:Just to clarify- I'm not saying that the Galaxy is literally designed as the Love Boat, I just meant that the Sovereign doesn't seem to have the Galaxy's jack of all trades/ explorer/ family carrying idiocy mission.
While the Galaxy-class is a jack-of-all-trades, it was the most powerful ship in the Starfleet, until the first Sovereign-class vessels entered service.
Incorrect. The Warpod Nebula was more powerful. When the Akira came out it was more powerful.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Typhonis 1
Rabid Monkey Scientist
Posts: 5791
Joined: 2002-07-06 12:07am
Location: deep within a secret cloning lab hidden in the brotherhood of the monkey thread

Post by Typhonis 1 »

Lets face it the Galaxy was a horse designed by a committe IE a camel .yes it looked good and did several tsks well,but wasnt a true warship.
Brotherhood of the Bear Monkey Clonemaster , Anti Care Bears League,
Bureaucrat and BOFH of the HAB,
Skunk Works director of the Mecha Maniacs,
Black Mage,

I AM BACK! let the SCIENCE commence!
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Post by Ted C »

Typhonis 1 wrote:Lets face it the Galaxy was a horse designed by a committe IE a camel .yes it looked good and did several tsks well,but wasnt a true warship.
Since it was invariably called into action whenever the Federation faced a military threat, it was obviously the best "warship" they had, even if it was a lousy design for that job.

You'd think that a government that had recently fought a war against the Cardassians would design at least a few genuine combat vessels, but they bought this armed luxury liner instead. It took the Borg to get them off their asses to design the Defiant.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Ted C wrote:
Typhonis 1 wrote:Lets face it the Galaxy was a horse designed by a committe IE a camel .yes it looked good and did several tsks well,but wasnt a true warship.
Since it was invariably called into action whenever the Federation faced a military threat, it was obviously the best "warship" they had, even if it was a lousy design for that job.

You'd think that a government that had recently fought a war against the Cardassians would design at least a few genuine combat vessels, but they bought this armed luxury liner instead. It took the Borg to get them off their asses to design the Defiant.
The multi role feature and size of the Galaxy class made it an ideal ship to use when sending a message to others. However the Federation did have ships that could be considered combat designs. Nebulas with Warpods and New Orleans with their torpedo pods (theory).
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Admiral Johnason
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2552
Joined: 2003-01-11 05:06pm
Location: The Rebel cruiser Defender

Post by Admiral Johnason »

The Akira and the Defiant are some examples. Then there is the Federation class and several Excelisors have been made with war in mind.
Liberals for Nixon in 3000: Nixon... with carisma and a shiny robot body.

never negoiate out of fear, but never fear to negoiate.

Captian America- Justice League

HAB submarine commander-
"We'll break you of your fear of water."
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

Admiral Johnason wrote:The Akira and the Defiant are some examples. Then there is the Federation class and several Excelisors have been made with war in mind.
Federation-class? I tought that it would have been obsolete in the 24th century.
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
Post Reply