Stravo wrote:The thing to remember with the Vorlons or any of the other First Ones is that they tend to take the long view on things. Why didn't they get involved in the Earth Minbari war? Because they needed Valen to be born and created under a spefic set of circumstances to close the circle. No Earth Minbari War = No Sinclar finding his destiny. For them the death of 250,000 humans and near extinction of the human race was a fair price to pay for winning the prior Shadow War and establishing a social order of peace on Minbar as well as the othe rippling effects Valen had on galactic history. The short term chaos in the social order they create with telepaths (and that seems to be limited to humans because other alien species seem to have seamlessly incorporated telepaths into their societies) is balanced out by the long term goal of eliminating the shadows or at the very least curtail and shorten the shadow wars. With a Vorlon its like dealing with an immortal chess master. You think 10 moves ahead and they're thinking what will happen over millennia as a consequence of each of their moves. They gladly take a hit now to pull out a victory ten generations from now.
Ok, I accept that. So lets leave the Earth-Minbari war to one side and accept that the Vorlons have to allow that to happen. What about all the other wars? The Dilgar war and how many other conflicts that happened during the last thousand years that had no connection to the Shadows? Why did the Vorlons not act to prevant wars? They seemingly killed Jhadur to prevent the races becoming immortal, not to stop the chaos that would happen from other races slaughtering each other for the Enzyme.
As for telepaths, it does seem that Earth is the only place where there is resentment among the "normals". I don't like that, because I imagine that there hasto have been problems within other races, but alas its only Earth that is shown. Certainly you'd think that at least the Centauri would have had internal problems as well.
The Vorlon goal (to me anyway) seems to be to manipulate a single individual (Valen in the last war, Sheridan in the current one) to coordinate an alliance to win against the Shadows. Now thats commendable, but that doesn't directly address the idea of Order, just stopping the Shadows from causing Chaos. Remember the Delann/Shadows dialogue and the Sheridan/Vorlons dialogue from Into the Fire? The Shadows try to convince Delann of the rightness of their cause of chaos and death, the Vorlons......just tell Sheridan that the Shadows have to be destroyed. Nothing else. They don't actually explain the positive attraction of Order to him (just one line at the the end about their must be Order and Obedience).
I don't really see how the Vorlons did "lose their way" (up to the planet killer stuff anyway). There seems very little evidence by their actions that they were extreme zelots of Order in any long-term shape even though its always attributed to them. Just short-term coalitions to defeat the Shadows. Anti-Shadow, not pro-Order. The Vorlons are very much a reactive species only.
Stravo wrote:
As to the angel thing some of the sourcebooks like the Minbari sourcebook point out that the Vorlons are actually uncomfortable with religion and using it as a tool for control partly because they are opposed to immitating something they don't believe in (divinity) and they had a bad experience with the Minbari when they tried to tell them they were not gods as they believed but just advanced aliens. That sparked off a rebellion that led to nearly glassing Minbar.
Also in the Drakh sourcebook there is a mention of some sort of compact that the Shadows were bound to that they could not claim to be gods but if a race freely chose to worship them then they would be fine with that. This may hint at some sort of agreement between the First Ones to avoid being worshipped as gods. The angel disguise is just a form of conditioning and control to help being seen in a positive light.
I have not seen the Minbari or Drakh fact books, but what you say doesn't track with what is mentioned in Thirdspace. Lyta said that the Vorlons began to believe that they really were Gods, after all the races they instructed worshipped them. So the Vorlons didn't condemn the worshippers out of hand as being wrong. Now thats not an endorsment of religion by the Vorlons, but its pretty close (I wonder if religious wars were fought over interpretations of the Vorlons divinity, aka, more chaos due to the Vorlons not handing down a specific religious creed. But thats just my supposition)
Stravo wrote:
It is interesing to note that the Shadows for all intents and purposes kept to their word. They spread chaos and destruction but did not start mucking around with races and such until the Vorlons starting seeding telepaths around the galaxy and started their angel disguise trick. In other words, the lords of order were the first ones to break the rules and the Shadows simply followed suit as a way to keep up.
No argument there. The Shadows stick to their word, as despicable as it is.
Stravo wrote:
And they didn't destroy Zha'ha'dum earlier because Lorien was there.
Ok, fine, but why didn't they destroy the other worlds that the Shadows used that were near Z'Ha'dum? According to G'Kar there were several worlds that were reoccupied by the Shadows after 1000 years absence. Why were they not destroyed after the last war, during which there must have been some sort of direct Shadow/Vorlon physical action? I can understand the Vorlons/Shadows holding off when races are been manipulated, but given the zeal with which they directly attack each other in Into the Fire, I don't understand how a siege of Z'ha'dum would not convince the Shadows to at least bring out their big guns and the Vorlons to not at least destroy the Shadow planets that are Lorienless.