Feminazism

[Captain tycho]

Right....
And so the mass of stupidity grows in the universe....

[Peregrin Toker]

However, incoherent ranting about everything being a symbol of male oppression is no better than "black rage" ranting about everything being the fault of "the white man".

It's fueled by real, legitimate facts but it's driven by an outraged sense of historical injustice rather than a utilitarian desire to solve problems in the here and now. As a result, it creates more problems rather than solving them.

If anything, the incoherent ranting you decsribe resembles nothing more than communist drivel about property rights being the source of all evil.

Ladies and gentlemen, we have discovered the underlying design philosophy of the united federation of planets.

The warp nacelles of the UFP's spaceships do look rather phallic.

Anyway the thing to remember about modern femminists is that they are looking for someone to opress them so they can whinge about it. It's their hobby and pastime. They enjoy it, it gives them an ego boost, they are therefore, pathetic.

Not all feminists are like that. One of them, Christina Hoff Sommers, even wrote several books where she criticized other feminists for being too extreme.

[Lord Pounder]

I work as a secretary for an electrical retailer. Today i had a call from the secretary of a local Electrical Shop. She asked to speak to the secretary and when i said that was me. She laughed and asked me why i couldn't get a proper mans job. IF ANY MAN HAD THE SAME ATTITUDE TO A WOMAN, SAY A FEMALE MECHANIC SHE'D SUE THE MAN FOR A FORTUNE. That really pissed me off as you can tell. I gave her a whole rant about wasn't equality for all and not just women on their monthlies and then i threated to start Mens Liberation. I'm gonna get 100,000 men to protest in some capital with me. We're gonna demand the right to be secretaries if we want and we're gonna burn out skidmarked y-fronts/boxers. WHO's WITH ME? anyone?

[Raoul Duke, Jr.]

I say, they should build a giant vagina then.

But then people would complain about being reminded of the domineering, judgemental symbol of the female genitalia...

...Or am I the only thinks of it that way?

If men built a snow penis, feminists would tear it down for reminding them of a "power" they don't have.

If women built a snow penis, feminists would tear it down and say that those women are foolishly subjugating themselves to men's dominance by worshipping the "symbol" of man's "phallic power".

If men built a snow vagina, feminists would destroy it saying that the men put it there to remind women of their supposed "inferiority".

If women built a snow vagina, feminists would destroy it and say that it's demeaning to women in its likeness of a woman submissively spreading her legs to a man.



That's my viewpoint and summation.

Much fun could be had with this... imagine, if you will, the fun to be had by building a statue of a dour, frumpy, chronically unlaid cow-wench in a flannel shirt and ripped jeans with a cheeseburger in one hand and a dog-eared copy of The Vagina Monologues in the other.

They'd spot it... congregate... and become chronically (and hopefully terminally) confused.

[Lord Pounder]

On the basis that these feminists are saying large cylingrical objects are demeaning i am hereforth refusing to use any kind of door, in fact i'm gonna burn every doorway i see. The doorframe is a representation of the mans need to enter things and the door is a representation of womanly oppression towards men.

[Raoul Duke, Jr.]

On the basis that these feminists are saying large cylingrical objects are demeaning i am hereforth refusing to use any kind of door, in fact i'm gonna burn every doorway i see. The doorframe is a representation of the mans need to enter things and the door is a representation of womanly oppression towards men.

Indeed. The Freudian context of a man walking through a doorway symbolizing a penis being devoured by a vagina is incontrovertible. In essence as a man, if you walk through a doorway you are essentially saying, "Yes, I admit it -- I'm a prick." Simply unconscionable.

[Alex Moon]

On the basis that these feminists are saying large cylingrical objects are demeaning i am hereforth refusing to use any kind of door, in fact i'm gonna burn every doorway i see. The doorframe is a representation of the mans need to enter things and the door is a representation of womanly oppression towards men.

Indeed. The Freudian context of a man walking through a doorway symbolizing a penis being devoured by a vagina is incontrovertible. In essence as a man, if you walk through a doorway you are essentially saying, "Yes, I admit it -- I'm a prick." Simply unconscionable.

Can I sig this?

[Raoul Duke, Jr.]

On the basis that these feminists are saying large cylingrical objects are demeaning i am hereforth refusing to use any kind of door, in fact i'm gonna burn every doorway i see. The doorframe is a representation of the mans need to enter things and the door is a representation of womanly oppression towards men.

Indeed. The Freudian context of a man walking through a doorway symbolizing a penis being devoured by a vagina is incontrovertible. In essence as a man, if you walk through a doorway you are essentially saying, "Yes, I admit it -- I'm a prick." Simply unconscionable.

Can I sig this?

Feel free.

[Alex Moon]

Indeed. The Freudian context of a man walking through a doorway symbolizing a penis being devoured by a vagina is incontrovertible. In essence as a man, if you walk through a doorway you are essentially saying, "Yes, I admit it -- I'm a prick." Simply unconscionable.

Can I sig this?

Feel free.

Thanks.