Lobbying firm's memo spells out plan to undermine OWS

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
SpaceMarine93
Jedi Knight
Posts: 585
Joined: 2011-05-03 05:15am
Location: Continent of Mu

Lobbying firm's memo spells out plan to undermine OWS

Post by SpaceMarine93 »

From Open Channel, MSNBC:
Lobbying firm's memo spells out plan to undermine Occupy Wall Street
By Jonathan Larsen and Ken Olshansky, MSNBC TV

A well-known Washington lobbying firm with links to the financial industry has proposed an $850,000 plan to take on Occupy Wall Street and politicians who might express sympathy for the protests, according to a memo obtained by the MSNBC program “Up w/ Chris Hayes.”
The proposal was written on the letterhead of the lobbying firm Clark Lytle Geduldig & Cranford and addressed to one of CLGC’s clients, the American Bankers Association.

CLGC’s memo proposes that the ABA pay CLGC $850,000 to conduct “opposition research” on Occupy Wall Street in order to construct “negative narratives” about the protests and allied politicians. The memo also asserts that Democratic victories in 2012 would be detrimental for Wall Street and targets specific races in which it says Wall Street would benefit by electing Republicans instead.

According to the memo, if Democrats embrace OWS, “This would mean more than just short-term political discomfort for Wall Street. … It has the potential to have very long-lasting political, policy and financial impacts on the companies in the center of the bullseye.”
The memo also suggests that Democratic victories in 2012 should not be the ABA’s biggest concern. “… (T)he bigger concern,” the memo says, “should be that Republicans will no longer defend Wall Street companies.”

Two of the memo’s authors, partners Sam Geduldig and Jay Cranford, previously worked for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. Geduldig joined CLGC before Boehner became speaker; Cranford joined CLGC this year after serving as the speaker’s assistant for policy. A third partner, Steve Clark, is reportedly “tight” with Boehner, according to a story by Roll Call that CLGC features on its website.

Jeff Sigmund, an ABA spokesperson, confirmed that the association got the memo. “Our Government Relations staff did receive the proposal – it was unsolicited and we chose not to act on it in any way,” he said in a statement to "Up."

CLGC did not return calls seeking comment.

Boehner spokesman Michael Steel declined to comment on the memo. But he responded to its characterization of Republicans as defenders of Wall Street by saying, “My understanding is that President Obama is the single largest recipient of donations from Wall Street.”
On “Up” Saturday, Obama campaign adviser Anita Dunn responded by saying that the majority of the president’s re-election campaign is fueled by small donors. She rejected the suggestion that the president himself is too close to Wall Street, saying “If that’s the case, why were tough financial reforms passed over party line Republican opposition?”
advertisement



The CLGC memo raises another issue that it says should be of concern to the financial industry -- that OWS might find common cause with the Tea Party. “Well-known Wall Street companies stand at the nexus of where OWS protestors and the Tea Party overlap on angered populism,” the memo says. “…This combination has the potential to be explosive later in the year when media reports cover the next round of bonuses and contrast it with stories of millions of Americans making do with less this holiday season.”

The memo outlines a 60-day plan to conduct surveys and research on OWS and its supporters so that Wall Street companies will be prepared to conduct a media campaign in response to OWS. Wall Street companies “likely will not be the best spokespeople for their own cause,” according to the memo. “A big challenge is to demonstrate that these companies still have political strength and that making them a political target will carry a severe political cost.”
Part of the plan CLGC proposes is to do “statewide surveys in at least eight states that are shaping up to be the most important of the 2012 cycle.”

Specific races listed in the memo are U.S. Senate races in Florida, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Wisconsin, Ohio, New Mexico and Nevada as well as the gubernatorial race in North Carolina.

The memo indicates that CLGC would research who has contributed financial backing to OWS, noting that, “Media reports have speculated about associations with George Soros and others.”
"It will be vital,” the memo says, “to understand who is funding it and what their backgrounds and motives are. If we can show that they have the same cynical motivation as a political opponent it will undermine their credibility in a profound way.”
It disturbs me on a fundamental level how organized are the Corporate efforts to undermine and destroy political opposition. At this rate we will be seeing Huxley's "Brave New World" dystopia very soon.

Also, they just give us a good idea. Maybe the OWS supporters should do what those lobbyists fears the OWS would do; write letters to the Democrat politicians and encourage them to embrace the Occupy Wall Street movement. It just might (and I am being cautious here) make them a sufficiently powerful political force to win through the 2012 elections.
Life sucks and is probably meaningless, but that doesn't mean there's no reason to be good.

--- The Anti-Nihilist view in short.
User avatar
Iroscato
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2360
Joined: 2011-02-07 03:04pm
Location: Great Britain (It's great, honestly!)

Re: Lobbying firm's memo spells out plan to undermine OWS

Post by Iroscato »

Stark wrote:They'd be pretty worthless financiers if they DIDN'T think this way, don't you think?
That is true, at an economic level they're just trying to protect their interests, which is a natural and understandable reaction, sort of. However, it does whiff of cloak-and-dagger, underhand politics which has become so common of lobbyists and financiers.
But Spacemarine, yet again you overreact and start hyperventilating over a news story, and jump to conclusions. Sort it out lad.
Yeah, I've always taken the subtext of the Birther movement to be, "The rules don't count here! This is different! HE'S BLACK! BLACK, I SAY! ARE YOU ALL BLIND!?

- Raw Shark

Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent.

- SirNitram (RIP)
User avatar
madd0ct0r
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6259
Joined: 2008-03-14 07:47am

Re: Lobbying firm's memo spells out plan to undermine OWS

Post by madd0ct0r »

Lobbying firm's memo spells out plan to undermine Occupy Wall Street
Boehner spokesman Michael Steel declined to comment on the memo. But he responded to its characterization of Republicans as defenders of Wall Street by saying, “My understanding is that President Obama is the single largest recipient of donations from Wall Street.”
On “Up” Saturday, Obama campaign adviser Anita Dunn responded by saying that the majority of the president’s re-election campaign is fueled by small donors. She rejected the suggestion that the president himself is too close to Wall Street, saying “If that’s the case, why were tough financial reforms passed over party line Republican opposition?”
fecking brilliant.

Would they have been fighting to stay as far away from Wall Street as possible 3 months ago?
It's a surface change, but it's a start. OWS IS WORKING.
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
User avatar
SpaceMarine93
Jedi Knight
Posts: 585
Joined: 2011-05-03 05:15am
Location: Continent of Mu

Re: Lobbying firm's memo spells out plan to undermine OWS

Post by SpaceMarine93 »

Chimaera wrote:
Stark wrote:They'd be pretty worthless financiers if they DIDN'T think this way, don't you think?
That is true, at an economic level they're just trying to protect their interests, which is a natural and understandable reaction, sort of. However, it does whiff of cloak-and-dagger, underhand politics which has become so common of lobbyists and financiers.
But Spacemarine, yet again you overreact and start hyperventilating over a news story, and jump to conclusions. Sort it out lad.
Sorry. On the bright side, I noticed I am not venting as much as my previous posts.
madd0ct0r wrote:
Lobbying firm's memo spells out plan to undermine Occupy Wall Street
Boehner spokesman Michael Steel declined to comment on the memo. But he responded to its characterization of Republicans as defenders of Wall Street by saying, “My understanding is that President Obama is the single largest recipient of donations from Wall Street.”
On “Up” Saturday, Obama campaign adviser Anita Dunn responded by saying that the majority of the president’s re-election campaign is fueled by small donors. She rejected the suggestion that the president himself is too close to Wall Street, saying “If that’s the case, why were tough financial reforms passed over party line Republican opposition?”
fecking brilliant.

Would they have been fighting to stay as far away from Wall Street as possible 3 months ago?
It's a surface change, but it's a start. OWS IS WORKING.
Not necessarily - last I heard, popularity of the OWS is dropping in the US.

By the way, does anyone know where we can find more information about this specific lobby group? I would like to know everything about them: membership, contracts, employers, address, and recent activities.
Life sucks and is probably meaningless, but that doesn't mean there's no reason to be good.

--- The Anti-Nihilist view in short.
User avatar
Ziggy Stardust
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3114
Joined: 2006-09-10 10:16pm
Location: Research Triangle, NC

Re: Lobbying firm's memo spells out plan to undermine OWS

Post by Ziggy Stardust »

SpaceMarine93 wrote:By the way, does anyone know where we can find more information about this specific lobby group? I would like to know everything about them: membership, contracts, employers, address, and recent activities.
Take a look at their official website.

And this.

(The latter is posted with a grain of salt, as I just grabbed it from a Google search, and it isn't exactly from an unbiased source, but I don't feel like cross-referencing it for accuracy because I don't really give a crap)
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Lobbying firm's memo spells out plan to undermine OWS

Post by Simon_Jester »

SpaceMarine93 wrote:It disturbs me on a fundamental level how organized are the Corporate efforts to undermine and destroy political opposition. At this rate we will be seeing Huxley's "Brave New World" dystopia very soon.
Wrong novel. The 'brave new world' of that story is in a real sense socialist, just a different version of socialism from the ones you're likely to be familiar with.

You should be looking at The Iron Heel by Jack London. He didn't just write stories about dogs in Alaska, you know...

It's public domain- you can get it for free.
Also, they just give us a good idea. Maybe the OWS supporters should do what those lobbyists fears the OWS would do; write letters to the Democrat politicians and encourage them to embrace the Occupy Wall Street movement. It just might (and I am being cautious here) make them a sufficiently powerful political force to win through the 2012 elections.
This is already happening.
SpaceMarine93 wrote:Sorry. On the bright side, I noticed I am not venting as much as my previous posts.
Yes. This is a positive development. Keep it up, man.
Not necessarily - last I heard, popularity of the OWS is dropping in the US.
Don't be too sure. The situation is in constant flux, and the popularity of OWS is not necessarily the same as the popularity of OWS's ideas.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Losonti Tokash
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2916
Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm

Re: Lobbying firm's memo spells out plan to undermine OWS

Post by Losonti Tokash »

Exaclty. It's worth noting that cooperation between occupiers and tea partiers is on the rise, along with the number of people who agree with us but don't like the tents.
Post Reply