Defining Imperialism

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Defining Imperialism

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Looking at the locked HOS thread about Enlightenment and Marina, I looked at imperialism, whats wrong with being Imperialistic?

Lenin defined Imperialism as the "Imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism", ofcourse Lenin was full of shit and is dead anyway so fuck him and his definition, later we can tip over his sarcofocaus.

Imperialism is when one nation exerts political, economic, social or military control or influence over another nation or people.

Essentially, it's a nation that expands itself in the world, whats wrong with expanding ones society? It does not have to be done millitarily, and expanding ones society creates standards that makes life easier, I'd say ancient Roman imperialism homogenized europe, and thank the lord for that, if we where more different we'd all be dead now.

So, is it right to use imperialism in a negative manner? That seems kind of faulty to me.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Post by Coyote »

Generally, though, Imperialism is imposing one set of moral values and social codes on another country that probably does not want it. It is usually characterized by a forceful takeover, and these things are a bad idea.

I find darkly amusing (and can well up zero pity for) countries that eagerly yuk up things from another culture; ie, US movies, jeans, cigarettes, fast food, cars, fashions, music, computers, video games, luxury items-- and thin bawl and whine (and moo and squeal) about the provider country's "Imperialism".

Voluntary purchase and demand on their part does not constitute Imperialism on our part.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Admiral Johnason
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2552
Joined: 2003-01-11 05:06pm
Location: The Rebel cruiser Defender

Post by Admiral Johnason »

So, by what you are saying, Iraq is going to have malls when we're through with them?
Liberals for Nixon in 3000: Nixon... with carisma and a shiny robot body.

never negoiate out of fear, but never fear to negoiate.

Captian America- Justice League

HAB submarine commander-
"We'll break you of your fear of water."
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Defining Imperialism

Post by NecronLord »

His Divine Shadow wrote:Lenin defined Imperialism as the "Imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism", ofcourse Lenin was full of shit
Damm Straight.

Imperialism is when one nation exerts political, economic, social or military control or influence over another nation or people.

Essentially, it's a nation that expands itself in the world, whats wrong with expanding ones society? It does not have to be done millitarily, and expanding ones society creates standards that makes life easier, I'd say ancient Roman imperialism homogenized europe, and thank the lord for that, if we where more different we'd all be dead now.

So, is it right to use imperialism in a negative manner? That seems kind of faulty to me.
Peoples front of Judea, or was it Judean people's front? wrote: REG: Yeah. All right, Stan. Don't labour the point. And what have they ever given us in return?!
XERXES: The aquaduct?
REG: What?
XERXES: The aquaduct
REG: Oh. Yeah, yeah. They did give us that. Uh, that's true. Yeah.
COMMANDO #3: And the sanitation.
LORETTA: Oh, yeah, the sanitation, Reg. Remember what the city used to be like?
REG: Yeah. All right. I'll grant you the aqueduct and the sanitation are two things that the Romans have done.
MATTHIAS: And the roads.
REG: Well, yeah. Obviously the roads. I mean, the roads go without saying, don't they? But apart from the sanitation, the aqueduct, and the roads--
COMMANDO: Irrigation.
XERXES: Medicine.
COMMANDOS: Huh? Heh? Huh...
COMMANDO #2: Education.
COMMANDOS: Ohh...
REG: Yeah, yeah. All right. Fair enough.
COMMANDO #1: And the wine.
COMMANDOS: Oh, yes. Yeah...
FRANCIS: Yeah. Yeah, that's something we'd really miss, Reg, if the Romans left. Huh.
COMMANDO: Public baths.
LORETTA: And it's safe to walk in the streets at night now, Reg.
FRANCIS: Yeah, they certainly know how to keep order. Let's face it. They're the only ones who could in a place like this.
C1OMMANDOS: Hehh, heh. Heh heh heh heh heh heh heh.
REG: All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?
XERXES: Brought peace.
REG: Oh. Peace? Shut up!
However what most people think of when they hear the phrase "Imperialism" is the 'colonial' powers of the 19th and 20th century. It is telling that when the romans left Britain the Brits sent letters begging them to return. When the Brits and French left their 'colonies', it was usually due to being kicked out.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
kojikun
BANNED
Posts: 9663
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:23am
Contact:

Post by kojikun »

The Roman Empire fell because they didnt let Goths into Rome, but Goths wanted to be part of the great Roman Empire with all its sophistication so they forced their way in. Figure that, wars were fought to JOIN empires back then..
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

I would simply define imperialism as forcing one's cultural ideas onto another culture that does not desire to acquire them.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
HemlockGrey
Fucking Awesome
Posts: 13834
Joined: 2002-07-04 03:21pm

Post by HemlockGrey »

The Roman Empire fell because they didnt let Goths into Rome, but Goths wanted to be part of the great Roman Empire with all its sophistication so they forced their way in. Figure that, wars were fought to JOIN empires back then..
Well, they certainly bungled that one...
The End of Suburbia
"If more cars are inevitable, must there not be roads for them to run on?"
-Robert Moses

"The Wire" is the best show in the history of television. Watch it today.
User avatar
SyntaxVorlon
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5954
Joined: 2002-12-18 08:45pm
Location: Places
Contact:

Post by SyntaxVorlon »

Imperialism, the more modern definition, is based on Britain's Empire, or rather Victoria's. During her reign Victorian England invaded numerous undeveloped countries, destroyed numerous African nations which staunchly opposed being taken over, operated or allowed autonomy for the worst most racist governments under the commonwealth to crop up, South Africa, Australia, etc. It imposed its mighty will upon all of these small countries to vastly increase the wealth of a minority in Britain.

The fact is the US is imposing it's will on other countries and to their detriment in most countries. The fact is that it imposes a middle level of it's will and this comes out to be worse than total or near nothing control. Why? Because it will support the government of the first person willing to comply. Noriega, Pinochet(hard t at the end not an A, he's chilean not french), Saddam Hussein, etc. And it has tried to mastermind coups in countries where the politicians were in favor of limiting trade with the US or curtailing the abilities of it's corporations, Venezuela. It has funded paramilitary and geurrila organizations to press it's agenda, Columbia, Al Queda, Nicaragua, the Taliban. Only to back away and let the situation degrade to the point where these paramilitary and geurrilla orgs have become vehemontly destructive and/or attacked the US, Al Queda, Nicaragua, the Taliban.
And it has gone to war far too many times over oil and oil interests in the last 20 years.
Now what is the point of this rant, oh yeah imperialism. Well that little hall of shame of the US's greatest intelligence blunders and international sociopolitical gaffes goes to show what a horrible job the US is doing as an imperial power. It has squandered it or overused it and done what most other imperial powers have, which is absorb as much wealth as it can, trick itself to think that it's done the world a favor by homogenizing and extorting it, and finished of by doing such a halfassed job as a hegemonic controller that the people it's sent millions or even billions of dollars to bomb or kill it's opponents have turned their weapons back on us. Now because a security breach here and there the richest nation in the world is the most paranoid and the biggest target. But at least we get to buy from the Gap.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

HemlockGrey wrote:
The Roman Empire fell because they didnt let Goths into Rome, but Goths wanted to be part of the great Roman Empire with all its sophistication so they forced their way in. Figure that, wars were fought to JOIN empires back then..
Well, they certainly bungled that one...
The first appearance in europe of 'the plague' and the first known eruption of Krakatoa around the same time really didn't much help.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
SyntaxVorlon
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5954
Joined: 2002-12-18 08:45pm
Location: Places
Contact:

Post by SyntaxVorlon »

The bubonic plague? That came from Asia I thought. Started in Asia, mongols attacked and gave it to the Genoans in one of their middle eastern strongholds, by flinging diseased bodies into the city. They went back to Europe and it spread from there.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

SyntaxVorlon wrote:The bubonic plague? That came from Asia I thought. Started in Asia, mongols attacked and gave it to the Genoans in one of their middle eastern strongholds, by flinging diseased bodies into the city. They went back to Europe and it spread from there.
Nope that was the 'black death' the bubonic plague has been around for millennia. This one wasn't as effective a strain.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

NecronLord wrote:Nope that was the 'black death' the bubonic plague has been around for millennia. This one wasn't as effective a strain.
So, the two are same kinda viruses but different strains?
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

His Divine Shadow wrote:
NecronLord wrote:Nope that was the 'black death' the bubonic plague has been around for millennia. This one wasn't as effective a strain.
So, the two are same kinda viruses but different strains?
Probably. This one is known as "Justinians Plague" and was probably bubonic, or a related strain.

One site on it

Another

More

Those are quick references, you can doubtless find better if you search a little.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Defining Imperialism

Post by Peregrin Toker »

His Divine Shadow wrote:
Imperialism is when one nation exerts political, economic, social or military control or influence over another nation or people.
If anything is wrong with that sort of imperialism is that it might violate the sovereignity of others.
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6730
Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
Contact:

Post by Slartibartfast »

SyntaxVorlon wrote:Imperialism, the more modern definition, is based on Britain's Empire, or rather Victoria's. During her reign Victorian England invaded numerous undeveloped countries, destroyed numerous African nations which staunchly opposed being taken over, operated or allowed autonomy for the worst most racist governments under the commonwealth to crop up, South Africa, Australia, etc. It imposed its mighty will upon all of these small countries to vastly increase the wealth of a minority in Britain.

The fact is the US is imposing it's will on other countries and to their detriment in most countries. The fact is that it imposes a middle level of it's will and this comes out to be worse than total or near nothing control. Why? Because it will support the government of the first person willing to comply. Noriega, Pinochet(hard t at the end not an A, he's chilean not french), Saddam Hussein, etc. And it has tried to mastermind coups in countries where the politicians were in favor of limiting trade with the US or curtailing the abilities of it's corporations, Venezuela. It has funded paramilitary and geurrila organizations to press it's agenda, Columbia, Al Queda, Nicaragua, the Taliban. Only to back away and let the situation degrade to the point where these paramilitary and geurrilla orgs have become vehemontly destructive and/or attacked the US, Al Queda, Nicaragua, the Taliban.
And it has gone to war far too many times over oil and oil interests in the last 20 years.
Now what is the point of this rant, oh yeah imperialism. Well that little hall of shame of the US's greatest intelligence blunders and international sociopolitical gaffes goes to show what a horrible job the US is doing as an imperial power. It has squandered it or overused it and done what most other imperial powers have, which is absorb as much wealth as it can, trick itself to think that it's done the world a favor by homogenizing and extorting it, and finished of by doing such a halfassed job as a hegemonic controller that the people it's sent millions or even billions of dollars to bomb or kill it's opponents have turned their weapons back on us. Now because a security breach here and there the richest nation in the world is the most paranoid and the biggest target. But at least we get to buy from the Gap.
Well, first I must state that I think you're a moron when it comes to debating Sci-Fi. But here you're dead on target. Very good, have a cookie :)
Image
Post Reply