Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
fgalkin
Carvin' Marvin
Posts: 14557
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
Contact:

Re: Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

Post by fgalkin »

Thanas wrote:
Ah yes, he is in favor of instead running seperate bus lines. Much better. Though he does get props for defending the idea of a public company.
A private company that only serves the Haredi community would have the same autonomy as the rest of their community. Basically, he's telling them to get back to their ghetto and keep their crap off the public buses.

This is the Chief Ashkenazi Rabbi. It's a rebuke from as high as you can get in the country.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
User avatar
fgalkin
Carvin' Marvin
Posts: 14557
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
Contact:

Re: Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

Post by fgalkin »

Also, while we're at it, here's Jerusalem's police chief insisting that there will be zero tolerance for gender discrimination by the Haredis, promising to arrest the offenders, and running an undercover sting op at the local elections after the Haredi rabbi called for different voting times for men and women. Also, they broke up a protest against the refusal to segregate the buses.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Last edited by fgalkin on 2011-12-19 11:03am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

Post by Thanas »

fgalkin wrote:A private company that only serves the Haredi community would have the same autonomy as the rest of their community. Basically, he's telling them to get back to their ghetto and keep their crap off the public buses.
Why are those autonomous communities even existing today?


As to the police chief, that is good to hear.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
fgalkin
Carvin' Marvin
Posts: 14557
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
Contact:

Re: Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

Post by fgalkin »

Thanas wrote:
fgalkin wrote:A private company that only serves the Haredi community would have the same autonomy as the rest of their community. Basically, he's telling them to get back to their ghetto and keep their crap off the public buses.
Why are those autonomous communities even existing today?


As to the police chief, that is good to hear.
Same reason there are things like Amish communities existing in the USA? Religious freedom (within Judaism, at least).

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
eyl
Jedi Knight
Posts: 714
Joined: 2007-01-30 11:03am
Location: City of Gold and Iron

Re: Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

Post by eyl »

New Civili Service guidelines and some other steps intended to combat this phenomenon (also some remarks from the IDF COS and Netanyahu further down the article).
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28846
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

Post by Broomstick »

fgalkin wrote:Also, while we're at it, here's Jerusalem's police chief insisting that there will be zero tolerance for gender discrimination by the Haredis, promising to arrest the offenders, and running an undercover sting op at the local elections after the Haredi rabbi called for different voting times for men and women. Also, they broke up a protest against the refusal to segregate the buses.
That is all excellent news to hear.
fgalkin wrote:
Thanas wrote:
fgalkin wrote:A private company that only serves the Haredi community would have the same autonomy as the rest of their community. Basically, he's telling them to get back to their ghetto and keep their crap off the public buses.
Why are those autonomous communities even existing today?

As to the police chief, that is good to hear.
Same reason there are things like Amish communities existing in the USA? Religious freedom (within Judaism, at least).
Except for two points:

1) The Amish do not seek to impose their rules on anyone else, and
2) A community like the Amish are not, in fact “autonomous”. They are subject to existing laws including those prohibiting segregation in public accommodations such, as, for example, a bus line.

A better example is a private ambulance run by the orthodox Jewish community in New York City (I know it was around in the 1980's, I presume it's still in existence). Although funded by the Jewish community and often answering calls originating in that community they are still required to adhere to all licensing, health, and safety regulations and are not allowed to refuse their services to anyone of any gender, color, or creed who calls them (or gets them on 911 rotation).

Another example happened in the 1990's in the Rogers Park ultra-orthodox community in Chicago – they attempted to prevent anyone from driving in “their” neighborhood on their sabbeth. They got in a lot of trouble. They are free to avoid driving, even prohibit it on their private property (synagogue grounds, for example), but absolutely forbidden to obstruct the free travel of others on public ways.

Some ultra-orthodox nutter attempting that sort of bullshit on a public bus in the US is most likely going to get shouted down by the others on the bus. I can't imagine Chicago cops (especially black ones) playing along with such a bigot, although, since all things are possible, I suppose it could happen.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
User avatar
fgalkin
Carvin' Marvin
Posts: 14557
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
Contact:

Re: Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

Post by fgalkin »

Broomstick wrote:
Except for two points:

1) The Amish do not seek to impose their rules on anyone else, and
The ultra-Orthodox do, but what they're doing is illegal, hence the crackdown.

2) A community like the Amish are not, in fact “autonomous”. They are subject to existing laws including those prohibiting segregation in public accommodations such, as, for example, a bus line.
There are several laws from which the Amish are exempt. They pay no Social Security taxes, they are not required to send their children to state schools, or to educate them past the 8th grade.

A better example is a private ambulance run by the orthodox Jewish community in New York City (I know it was around in the 1980's, I presume it's still in existence). Although funded by the Jewish community and often answering calls originating in that community they are still required to adhere to all licensing, health, and safety regulations and are not allowed to refuse their services to anyone of any gender, color, or creed who calls them (or gets them on 911 rotation).
That is similar to the bus service in question, I believe. Except some assholes are not happy about this.
Another example happened in the 1990's in the Rogers Park ultra-orthodox community in Chicago – they attempted to prevent anyone from driving in “their” neighborhood on their sabbeth. They got in a lot of trouble. They are free to avoid driving, even prohibit it on their private property (synagogue grounds, for example), but absolutely forbidden to obstruct the free travel of others on public ways.

Some ultra-orthodox nutter attempting that sort of bullshit on a public bus in the US is most likely going to get shouted down by the others on the bus. I can't imagine Chicago cops (especially black ones) playing along with such a bigot, although, since all things are possible, I suppose it could happen.
Israeli cops weren't playing along with them, either. He asked if the woman would move on her own to shut the asshole up, then made sure he stopped holding up the bus. Then, the Jerusalem chief of police started his crackdown.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28846
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

Post by Broomstick »

fgalkin wrote:
2) A community like the Amish are not, in fact “autonomous”. They are subject to existing laws including those prohibiting segregation in public accommodations such, as, for example, a bus line.
There are several laws from which the Amish are exempt. They pay no Social Security taxes, they are not required to send their children to state schools, or to educate them past the 8th grade.
Railroad workers are ALSO exempt from social security taxes. Although social security taxes in the US are nearly universal they are not entirely so.

Also, while the Amish are exempt from social security neither can they collect it. They do not pay into social security or medicare but neither do they ever utilize either. There have always been some who have bitched about that, but at least if they do not pay into the system neither do they ever burden it, either.

(Amish communities are essentially self-insuring - they cover the retirement and medical care of all their members. Likewise, railroad workers have a separate retirement system from the those who rely on social security. In both cases, those not paying into SS are covered by an alternative system).

Also, in the US, NO ONE is required to send a child to a "state school". We have always had, and still continue to have, private schools both religious and secular. That is not an "exemption". The requirement is to educate a child, it does not require how that education is to be obtained. Hence the legality of home-schooling, private tutors, public schools, private schools, or a combination of all of the above. The law says a child must be educated, not how that is to occur, and that applies to everyone in the US.

Also, education in the US is only compulsory until a certain age, NOT to a certain grade level or awarding of a degree. The exact age of compulsion varies from state to state (as so many things do here) and is NOT set by the Federal government, and in many states that age is still 14... coincidentally the same age the Amish typically leave school. That age requirement applies to everyone, not just the Amish. By keeping their children in school through the 8th grade the Amish are, in fact, adhering to the letter of the law that applies to everyone else. An exception is not being made for them.

So really, the only "exception" here is the opt-out of social security.
Some ultra-orthodox nutter attempting that sort of bullshit on a public bus in the US is most likely going to get shouted down by the others on the bus. I can't imagine Chicago cops (especially black ones) playing along with such a bigot, although, since all things are possible, I suppose it could happen.
Israeli cops weren't playing along with them, either. He asked if the woman would move on her own to shut the asshole up, then made sure he stopped holding up the bus. Then, the Jerusalem chief of police started his crackdown.
I would be shocked if a US cop even went so far as to ask the woman if she'd move to the back of the bus. I'd expect a more typical response to be "Sit down and shut up, motherfucker, where other people sit is none of your goddamned business". Telling anyone to sit in the back of the bus in the US is pretty hot-button since the 1960's. I wouldn't expect it to be "fighting words" other places, but here it would be perceived as enormously rude and insulting, and direct reference to Jim Crow laws and segregation. It's pretty much declaring yourself publicly to be bigot and an intolerant asshole.

It's not that people don't sit in the back of the bus - a lot of folk do. The difference is between choosing to be back there, and someone else making the decision for you.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
User avatar
Faqa
Jedi Master
Posts: 1340
Joined: 2004-06-02 09:32am
Contact:

Re: Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

Post by Faqa »

evilsoup wrote:Someone could find it disturbing that the policeman asked the woman to move to the back. I don't, it was probably more of a 'oh come on, just placate the nutter' thing.
Not according to the woman herself - she claims she was asked twice to move, with the phrasing of "Are you willing to respect these people and sit in the back?". Her response was "I'm dressed modestly, that's as much respect as they're going to get".

This may have just been a lone nutter, but the timing could not be worse for the religious community - it comes right on the heels of a furor over religious soldiers trying to leave a ceremony because a woman was singing, not to mention a year of some shitty lawmaking. On the ground here, it seems to have pushed a shitload of people from ambivalence to "OK, FUCK the Orthodox" (which is responsible for the Jeru crackdown among other things).

On the one hand, this is a fight that's been long overdue. On the other hand, splintering society = bad. Ah, well, this is all temporary till the Orthodox baby-machines outbreed us and kill this country for good.
"Peace on Earth and goodwill towards men? We are the United States Goverment - we don't DO that sort of thing!" - Sneakers. Best. Quote. EVER.

Periodic Pwnage Pantry:

"Faith? Isn't that another term for ignorance?" - Gregory House

"Isn't it interesting... religious behaviour is so close to being crazy that we can't tell them apart?" - Gregory House

"This is usually the part where people start screaming." - Gabriel Sylar
User avatar
PhilosopherOfSorts
Jedi Master
Posts: 1008
Joined: 2008-10-28 07:11pm
Location: Waynesburg, PA, its small, its insignifigant, its almost West Virginia.

Re: Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

Post by PhilosopherOfSorts »

Broomstick wrote: I would be shocked if a US cop even went so far as to ask the woman if she'd move to the back of the bus. I'd expect a more typical response to be "Sit down and shut up, motherfucker, where other people sit is none of your goddamned business". Telling anyone to sit in the back of the bus in the US is pretty hot-button since the 1960's. I wouldn't expect it to be "fighting words" other places, but here it would be perceived as enormously rude and insulting, and direct reference to Jim Crow laws and segregation. It's pretty much declaring yourself publicly to be bigot and an intolerant asshole.

It's not that people don't sit in the back of the bus - a lot of folk do. The difference is between choosing to be back there, and someone else making the decision for you.
Really? I'd maybe be shocked if a cop MADE someone sit at the back of the bus, but them asking doesn't bother me, as long as the other party can say refuse. I'm seeing it as the cop going "Can you please just humor this guy so we can all get going?" The woman refusing, probably pointing out that she was there first, and the cop telling the asshole to get over it get the fuck out, with the asshole choosing the latter so he woudn't get girl cooties.
A fuse is a physical embodyment of zen, in order for it to succeed, it must fail.

Power to the Peaceful

If you have friends like mine, raise your glasses. If you don't, raise your standards.
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28846
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: Woman refuses to go to back of bus.

Post by Broomstick »

Well, you're in Pennsylvania, I'm in the Chicago area. I'm fully willing to acknowledge some cultural differences over that distance.

That, and I live in a city 85% black - "go to the back of the bus" has a different meaning for that group than for some others.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
Post Reply