Do we still need unions?

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Ariphaos
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1739
Joined: 2005-10-21 02:48am
Location: Twin Cities, MN, USA
Contact:

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by Ariphaos »

LadyTevar wrote:Why do we need Unions?

Upper Big Branch Mine was a Non-Union Mine, ran by Massey Energy. The miners knew the mine was trouble, but there was no union to protect them if they complained. It was shut up and work the mine, or find another job, and 29 men paid the price for it.
This sort of thing.

Unions can certainly become a problem, but when labor isn't a perfect market, it's typically because there are few employers and many would-be employees. Unions are not the optimal solution - lots of potential employers and many opportunities for self-employment are. If they create the reverse - a single hiring pool with many employers begging for labor - you have a similar problem, economically if not necessarily morally.

That said, I'm generally of the opinion that a union needs to justify its existence. I've seen all sorts of crap pulled by union members where I've worked.
Give fire to a man, and he will be warm for a day.
Set him on fire, and he will be warm for life.
User avatar
Korto
Jedi Master
Posts: 1196
Joined: 2007-12-19 07:31am
Location: Newcastle, Aus

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by Korto »

The union forms a friendly "Go To" place for any workers who feel they have a problem at their workplace. It's a place that understands what you do, formed of people who do, or have done, the same thing as you, who are actually there For You. As opposed to the government, which can be scary to people, and is there "for everybody" (including big business). The union is cashed up, has legal resources, and has people who understand the fine print of the contracts and regulations as pertains to you. A lot of people here may have no problem knowing where to go for information, and understanding the information they've been given, but a lot of that shit can be pretty opaque to some people more used to working with their hands at a building site.
It's something you keep on hearing around the workplace, if someone has a problem it's "Go and talk to your union", someone tells how they had a problem and then they "Went and talked to their union."
“I am the King of Rome, and above grammar”
Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor
User avatar
aerius
Charismatic Cult Leader
Posts: 14799
Joined: 2002-08-18 07:27pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by aerius »

My opinion are pretty close to Starglider's, before I became a government union monkey I worked in the electronics manufacturing sector which is mostly contract work. Some had unions, most did not, or if they did it was only for some of the workers. Was there a big difference between working for union & non-union companies? Not really. The working conditions, pay, and benefits were pretty close, with one exception.

That exception was a company where the workers were represented by the autoworkers' union, it was actually the worst company to work for since all the big union BS was there in abundance. Benefits were better, pay was better but the union dues evened it all back out in the end, but holy fuck was it ever a hostile working environment. If you didn't suck up to the union they'd leave you up shit creek and encourage the other workers to shun you. And since the company hated the union the workers would end up as the sacrificial pawns in the power struggle, good luck if you get picked on by the company if you're on the union's shitlist for not sucking up to them.

Personally I have nothing against smaller unions which actually help their workers, they're a good thing. They provide networking for their members, help them out with grievances, and don't get into retarded power trips which fuck everyone over. They'll actually work with instead of against the employers to everyone's long term benefit. They can sit down with management, look at the company's plans, balance sheets, and projections then come up with something that's fair to everyone. And if there's some jackass worker who needs to go, the union will look at it and go "yup, douchebag, fire him, we don't like him either".

The problem is when the union gets too big and starts taking power trips. For instance the Teachers' union here likes to go on strike every few years to demand a double digit pay raise and more benefits. At the same time they have a retarded seniority system which makes older teachers impossible to fire unless they rape your child, and which leads to many good younger teachers burning out or getting forced out of the education system. As a result of the union's policies there's no accountability in the education system and it flat out sucks.

It's the same thing in my public sector union, it's a business in itself rather than a union to help out workers. Our union heads pull in a 7-figure incomes and owns multi-million dollar cottages. There's a strong us vs. them attitude which is promoted by the union to justify its own existence, they encourage us to file grievances over the most petty crap you can imagine so they can keep their lawyers busy and claim that they're "doing something" and "fighting for the workers". They pressured one of my co-workers to file a grievance because his boss gave him a warning for skipping work and showing up late; he fucked up, he got a warning, and they wanted him to file a grievance against his boss for mental distress and creating a hostile work environment. You can't make this shit up.

I'd say that overall, the days of big unions such as the CAW, Teachers' unions, public workers' unions and other such organizations is over. We don't need them anymore and they've long outlived their usefulness and become parasitic leechfucks. Smaller unions still have their uses and can still benefit their members as well as the companies which employ their members.
Image
aerius: I'll vote for you if you sleep with me. :)
Lusankya: Deal!
Say, do you want it to be a threesome with your wife? Or a foursome with your wife and sister-in-law? I'm up for either. :P
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by Simon_Jester »

What happens to the employees when a big union is broken?

Do conditions stay good but hey presto, the problems the union caused go away?

Or do you get a new set of problems from employers scaling back benefits and listening to wonky consultants who think you get more work out of your employees by harassing them all day?

I suspect, aerius, that you'll get the latter more than the former. Unions can have power and abuse it, but employers have a lot more power, so any tendency to abuse it is more prone to blowups. The credible threat of unionization (even in a non-union environment) helps to keep employers honest and gives them an incentive to deal squarely and respectfully with their workers. The total absence of unions causes the opposite.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Lusankya
ChiCom
Posts: 4163
Joined: 2002-07-13 03:04am
Location: 人间天堂
Contact:

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by Lusankya »

Out of curiosity, how many of the countries with "problem" unions have a strong Labour Party? Ditto for the countries where unions are largely not perceived to be a problem?

It seems to me that the unions having a political wing might serve to tone down some of the excesses that the North Americans seem to be going on about, since in countries like Australia, England, etc, the public at large are able to punish any union misbehaviour at the ballot box.
"I would say that the above post is off-topic, except that I'm not sure what the topic of this thread is, and I don't think anybody else is sure either."
- Darth Wong
Free Durian - Last updated 27 Dec
"Why does it look like you are in China or something?" - havokeff
aieeegrunt
Jedi Knight
Posts: 512
Joined: 2009-12-23 10:14pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by aieeegrunt »

aerius wrote: The problem is when the union gets too big and starts taking power trips.
This is a problem with any human endeavor organized along hierarchical lines. I mean you need unions to combat the corporations in the first place because they're too big relative to their workers and thus run amok on power trips.

Meanwhile, the German Auto Industry has strong unions, highly paid workers and are profitable. The US Auto industry does the opposite and is a debacle needing government bailouts every other decade. There's a good article http://www.remappingdebate.org/article/ ... s?page=0,0 detailing why.

in a nutshell
"...Workers in the German auto industry maintain high wages and good working conditions through two overlapping sets of institutions. First, in the auto industry, virtually all workers are unionized members of IG Metall, the German autoworkers’ union. With such union density, workers have considerable power to keep wages high. German autoworkers have the right to strike, but as Horst Mund, head of the International Department of IG Metall explained to Remapping Debate, they “hardly use it, because there is an elaborate system of conflict resolution that regularly is used to come to some sort of compromise that is acceptable to all parties.”

In addition to high trade union density supporting the power of German autoworkers’ wages, the German constitution itself includes a second mechanism for keeping employees involved in the decisions of the firm for which they work. The Works Constitution Act provides for the creation of Works Councils in each factory. The Works Councils provide a mechanism through which a company's management must work with employees, whether they are in a union or not, on issues affecting work life, such as shop floor conditions, scheduling shifts, and other issues particular to the factory. This system, according to Mund, institutionalized “direct contact for workers’ representatives with management at various levels, from lower to middle to senior management in daily affairs. So you exercise some kind of dialogue where you don’t always wear your management pin or your union pin.”

Mund points out that the German example goes “against all mainstream wisdom of the neo-liberals. We have strong unions, we have strong social security systems, we have high wages. So, if I believed what the neo-liberals are arguing, we would have to be bankrupt, but apparently this is not the case. Despite high wages…despite our possibility to influence companies, the economy is working well in Germany.”..."

The part that makes me laugh at the folly of man is despite the example right in front of their fucking eyes of how decentralizing decision making, and how well paid workers secure in their jobs is the best profitability boost there is, German management will immediately default to the proven broken US model as soon as the fucking leash is off them.
"...When asked why German firms operate so differently with respect to labor in different countries, Claude Barfield, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute where he studies international trade and globalization, told Remapping Debate that they do so, in part, “because they can get away with it so far.”

Though a Volkswagen-Chattanooga spokesperson told Remapping Debate that “it is up to our production team members to decide” whether to join a union, Barfield points out that all of the German-based auto manufacturers in the U.S. located in right-to-work states are “not unhappy with the situation they have now,” citing the fact that they “have more authority, they have more power” than they would in a unionized context.

Barfield said that factors other than wages brought the German carmakers to right-to-work states. A central reason for their interest in those states, he says, “has to do with not wanting to…get involved with work rules and seniority.” They have, he continued, “a much greater flexibility just in assigning work, and to be able to have plants change as conditions change. So, they’re not unhappy with that. They would not say they are happier with this than the system they deal with in Germany, but they probably are.”..."
Given this, I'd say that unions are not only neccessary, but basically mandatory. Absent checks and balances, managament can and will drive the fucking place into the ground to common misery of all.
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10336
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by Solauren »

I'm going to partically disagree with Aerius on the 'big unions time is past'.

The problem with those unions are the people running them, not the people themselves.

Take, for example, Sid Ryan. He's a photo-op asshole. Plain and simple. He hears of any protest, he is there. Any labor dispute, he's there.

Even if his union is not involved, he's there 'showing support'.

Bullshit.

I've seen the man away from the camera. He's an asshole. I've watched him shove people out of the way to get to a food plater. And not politely either.

And he's in charge of a big union. That's why that union behaves badly. It's just the guy running it being his true self.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
User avatar
salm
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 10296
Joined: 2002-09-09 08:25pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by salm »

You might want to add that the word "neo liberal" means something very similar to "neocon" and has little to do with the way North Americans use the word "liberal".

<edit>That was directed at the text aieeegrunt quoted.</edit>
aieeegrunt
Jedi Knight
Posts: 512
Joined: 2009-12-23 10:14pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by aieeegrunt »

Thanks, I keep forgetting that the Americans have those retarded terms to go with their retarded system of units and measurements.

Edit: derp I cannot type derp
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by Simon_Jester »

aieeegrunt wrote:This is a problem with any human endeavor organized along hierarchical lines. I mean you need unions to combat the corporations in the first place because they're too big relative to their workers and thus run amok on power trips.

Meanwhile, the German Auto Industry has strong unions, highly paid workers and are profitable. The US Auto industry does the opposite and is a debacle needing government bailouts every other decade. There's a good article http://www.remappingdebate.org/article/ ... s?page=0,0 detailing why.

in a nutshell...

The part that makes me laugh at the folly of man is despite the example right in front of their fucking eyes of how decentralizing decision making, and how well paid workers secure in their jobs is the best profitability boost there is, German management will immediately default to the proven broken US model as soon as the fucking leash is off them...

Given this, I'd say that unions are not only neccessary, but basically mandatory. Absent checks and balances, managament can and will drive the fucking place into the ground to common misery of all.
Go figure. There's a natural tendency for managers to want to manage, to tell people what to do and organize things. Having to slow down and adopt a consensual strategy (negotiate with a union rep, be forced to reconsider disciplinary decisions rather than just being able to say "you're fired," and so on) gets in the way of that urge to manage.

Whether the urge to manage is constructive, or whether it just lets people with unchecked power make bad decisions that demoralize and de-skill their workforce, is another matter.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
aieeegrunt
Jedi Knight
Posts: 512
Joined: 2009-12-23 10:14pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by aieeegrunt »

The problem with top down management style is that it restricts the number of differing viewpoints applied to solving problems. I can't count the number of times we've had "solutions" or "improvements" come from outside the shop floor that were worse than useless. We used to get the best results when you had at least one of each of the following groups working together on something; floor monkey, engineer, office management. More importantly it also gets everybody involved and invested in making things work. When you keep get things imposed from Mt Olympus that are just plain fucking stupid it completely destroys morale and leads to "button pressing monkey syndrome".
User avatar
The Yosemite Bear
Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
Posts: 35211
Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
Location: Dave's Not Here Man

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by The Yosemite Bear »

Trust me, we really still need them in the US, trust me

oh and in other news, we just got a contract after 9 months....
Image

The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by Enigma »

I have never been part of a union but I believe that the major unions need a strong rap on the knuckles. I remember a few years ago of a teacher's strike in Vancouver (I believe it was there) and the teachers were behaving worse than grade school children. On the news, I saw a bunch of them violently shaking a person's car (forgot who he was but he was on the school board's side.) and taunting and insulting the guy as he got out of it.

Crap like that is what leaves a bad taste in my mouth regarding unions.

Big unions no longer really look out for their member's welfare but to make sure those member dues keep flowing in and to negotiate a better contract so the dues will be even higher, meaning the higher ups in the union get more money and they'll strike if management wants to downsize the workforce or reduce some of the wages in order to keep the company in the black. When they do strike, it'll be to the detriment to the overall public. Three years ago, the union for Ottawa's city owned bus company (OC Transpo) went on strike not too long before the holiday season and stayed on strike for three to four months, stranding many to find alternative transportation through the snow.

Teacher's unions have gone on strike at a point where it could affect the students' ability to take their exams and therefore have their grades affected.

Big unions have no love but for themselves. I have no qualms with smaller unions. I also am not adverse to companies treating their employees well enough that they do not need a union. I used to work for a company like that. JDS Uniphase paid their employees well, we received excellent health insurance and if our employee review was good, we'd get stocks from the company. I remember getting about $800 one time from selling a small amount of the company's stock. I know of at least one long time employee that became a millionaire just from the stocks alone (though I do not know if he cashed out before the tech bust). In a company like that, there is no need for a union and from what I remember from another colleague, no one wanted a union because of how well they were treated by management.

Overall, unions are still needed. big unions need their kneecaps busted and if you're in a company that treats you well, then no union is needed. :)
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
Eulogy
Jedi Knight
Posts: 959
Joined: 2007-04-28 10:23pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by Eulogy »

Enigma wrote:<snip>
If the public or more reasonable union members won't or can't keep Big Unions in line, then the economy will do it for them. Just look at GM.

Government unions might think they're immune, but the public and the government can only be sheared so many times. Said unions will inevitably suffer backlash should they push too far.

Enigma, did the public eventually turn on either of the unions you named? Examples could be enlightening.
"A word of advice: next time you post, try not to inadvertently reveal why you've had no success with real women." Darth Wong to Bubble Boy
"I see you do not understand objectivity," said Tom Carder, a fundie fucknut to Darth Wong
aieeegrunt
Jedi Knight
Posts: 512
Joined: 2009-12-23 10:14pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by aieeegrunt »

Enigma wrote: Big unions have no love but for themselves. I have no qualms with smaller unions. I also am not adverse to companies treating their employees well enough that they do not need a union. I used to work for a company like that. JDS Uniphase paid their employees well, we received excellent health insurance and if our employee review was good, we'd get stocks from the company. I remember getting about $800 one time from selling a small amount of the company's stock. I know of at least one long time employee that became a millionaire just from the stocks alone (though I do not know if he cashed out before the tech bust). In a company like that, there is no need for a union and from what I remember from another colleague, no one wanted a union because of how well they were treated by management.
The place I work for used to be like this. The problem is the same as with any "enlightened despot" scenario, it falls apart as soon as somebody not so enlightened has the reins.
User avatar
The Yosemite Bear
Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
Posts: 35211
Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
Location: Dave's Not Here Man

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by The Yosemite Bear »

also even with big unions a lot depends on how the locals handle things, I remeber 10 years ago when I was represented by AFL-CIO supsidiery SEIU, when the Mayor of NY, and their Govenor wouldn't pay full benefits to the 9-11 families, the AFL-CIO raised money for all of the widows and orphans through donations by all of the locals nationwide, not just those who were AFL-CIO members killed that day. Yes, that's right the Bush government, the State of New York, the Port Authority, and the City didn't, we did.
Image

The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
User avatar
The Yosemite Bear
Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
Posts: 35211
Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
Location: Dave's Not Here Man

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by The Yosemite Bear »

I also remember in 92 when the Teamsters threatened Bush I, after the trucker was nearly beaten to death in LA, even though that guy was not a union members, the teamsters refused to travel to LA, until, Bush provided security for truckers, and disaster assistance.
Image

The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
User avatar
TheFeniX
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4869
Joined: 2003-06-26 04:24pm
Location: Texas

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by TheFeniX »

On the point of the UAW union, I've always heard the comment that they're what's wrong with GM and why the company went to shit. So, why aren't they dragging Ford down who has been been doing fairly well (loads better than GM or Chrysler) during this economic shit-hole of a decade? I never get a straight answer on that one and I honestly would like to know. I always assumed it's because GM made stupid shit like the Avalanche while Ford kept selling F-150s for around $20,000.

For those who think unions can do whatever the fuck they want, please read the Taft-Harley Act. And many states (Texas included) make it illegal to force workers to join a union. In fact, check a presidential election map: pretty much every red state is this way. Red (right-to-work) states fucking hate unions, because why shouldn't companies get away with paying shit wages and no benefits? But even in Texas, a union is required to fight for a employee who refuses to join and pay dues.

Wal-Mart, a bastion of high worker wages and benefits would rather close a store down than risk a union forming. So... take what you will from that.

I hope there's a day when we don't need unions. I just know I won't live to see it, especially with the way shit's been going in my short work-life.
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by Enigma »

Eulogy wrote:
Enigma wrote:<snip>
If the public or more reasonable union members won't or can't keep Big Unions in line, then the economy will do it for them. Just look at GM.

Government unions might think they're immune, but the public and the government can only be sheared so many times. Said unions will inevitably suffer backlash should they push too far.

Enigma, did the public eventually turn on either of the unions you named? Examples could be enlightening.
No not really that I know of. AFAIK, strikes from the big union usually end with binding arbitration so no sides really win. When the teacher's and bus unions went on strike a lot of the public were on their side but then slowly their support began to erode the longer the strike lasted and the more the public were being affected. Near the end the public sentiment was basically "Get the strike over with, already!".

I find that there's too much love for the union, more so in Quebec in which the unions have a hell of a lot more clout than in other provinces.

Large unions for the private sector do not have the same clout as the public sector unions.
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
aieeegrunt
Jedi Knight
Posts: 512
Joined: 2009-12-23 10:14pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by aieeegrunt »

TheFeniX wrote:On the point of the UAW union, I've always heard the comment that they're what's wrong with GM and why the company went to shit. So, why aren't they dragging Ford down who has been been doing fairly well (loads better than GM or Chrysler) during this economic shit-hole of a decade? I never get a straight answer on that one and I honestly would like to know. I always assumed it's because GM made stupid shit like the Avalanche while Ford kept selling F-150s for around $20,000.
As somebody who's worked for a GM parts supply for ten years I can say 100% that it's because GM is run by morons. They can't get their shit together enough to give us a schedule of what they need from us more than a day in advance, and they'll constantly change that schedule as the day progesses and yet still expect us to hit the original delivery date. This means constant machine changeovers and the resultant lost time. This is of course extra cost that we, one way or another, pass on to them.

They also mandate all sorts of useless layers of superflous paperwork and extra staff. We were required to have a "Team Lead" for every 5 or 6 staff, which meant for every 4 guys working you have one guy standing there with a coffee in his hand. We similarily have to have a "Quality Auditor" because herp derp line worker too dumb to measure shit, that's another guy standing around with a coffee up his ass. So I think a part is out of spec I'm supposed to stop and tell my team lead, who then calls the quality auditor over, who then does a measurement, who then tells the Team Lead an adjustment is required, who then tells me. PRODUCTIVITY LOL.

Our upper management has managed to secure just enough Ford business for 2012 that we can tell GM to fuck themselves, and all those clipboard assholes are back on the line. BWA HA HA HA! The ones that were decent and helped out around the line should be allright, but the ones who let it go to their heads and were too good to get their hands dirty are in for some sweet sweet payback.
I hope there's a day when we don't need unions. I just know I won't live to see it, especially with the way shit's been going in my short work-life.
Human nature being what it is, that won't happen ever.
User avatar
PainRack
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7581
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:03am
Location: Singapura

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by PainRack »

Another perspective perhaps? I come from Singapore where the unions are either government run flunkies or crushed out of line if they go against the government viewpoint.

And in such a perspective, despite the prevalence and potential political power of the trade unions( in terms of representation), their actual impact on workers is less than useless. The attempts of the SIA pilot union to actually garnish better wages and representation was crushed when Lee Kuan Yew, then the Minister Mentor met directly with their heads and delivered his ultimatium.

Other unions such as service workers, healthcare workers etc are ultimately useless as a source for referral and conflict resolution. The only times we see union representation is during attempts to raise wages or health benefits. However, all of this is ultimately decided/negated by government intervention. if the government decides that a pay cut is neccessary, be it in CPF(payroll tax), mean variable benefits and etc, that policy gets rolled out with "union support". If the government decides that the companies need to hire older workers, then the unions attempts to prevent discrimination and firing of older workers get approved. If the government doesn't believe that pregnant ladies are being discriminated against.......... well, you get the story.


In such an environment, its hard to believe why there's even a need for unions other than as a source of patronage.
Let him land on any Lyran world to taste firsthand the wrath of peace loving people thwarted by the myopic greed of a few miserly old farts- Katrina Steiner
User avatar
TheFeniX
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4869
Joined: 2003-06-26 04:24pm
Location: Texas

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by TheFeniX »

PainRack wrote:In such an environment, its hard to believe why there's even a need for unions other than as a source of patronage.
Your post isn't talking about a union. It seems more like government corruption using the word "union" so workers feel like they had some say as they're constantly screwed.
User avatar
Lord Pounder
Pretty Hate Machine
Posts: 9695
Joined: 2002-11-19 04:40pm
Location: Belfast, unfortunately
Contact:

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by Lord Pounder »

This is just my experience but here goes.

In an old call centre I worked in I joined the Communication Workers Union. Long story short my employers fucked me in the ass with no dinner and movie, or even foreplay.

Naturally as a card carrying lefty I went to my Union to ask them to represent me in an unfair dismissal case. Now it has to be said that the Call Centre I worked in refused to acknowledge the CWU as a rep for the workers as they said they had an employee forum the satisfied european law.

I had a great case, my employer fired me because I followed company the guidelines with regards to an insurance quote for a disabled person, the company guidelines found such a person more of a risk and made a policy with the company needlessly high. The customer I spoke to filed a complaint with disability discrimination and the company left me personally carrying the can for their policy, which they changed as soon as the complaint was filed.

After a lengthy process my Union rep, who for months assured me I have an air tight case and I would be able to sue the Call Centre for thousands in lost earnings and stress, came to me and said that the Union didn't think I stood a chance in the case and he sent me away with a cheque for £500, which didn't even cover the Unions fees I'd paid since joining.

Strangely enough not too long afterwards the CWU got their foot in the door with the Call Centre.

Since then I don't have a high opinion of unions.
RIP Yosemite Bear
Gone, Never Forgotten
User avatar
PainRack
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7581
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:03am
Location: Singapura

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by PainRack »

TheFeniX wrote:
PainRack wrote:In such an environment, its hard to believe why there's even a need for unions other than as a source of patronage.
Your post isn't talking about a union. It seems more like government corruption using the word "union" so workers feel like they had some say as they're constantly screwed.
The unions are outright powerless because the only way they can get any policies enacted is through the blessing of the government.

All the benefits they provide, from the credit loans of the NTUC, cheaper supermarkets and etc could have been easily replaced by free enterprise or governments. Hell, the common view is that the National Trade Union Congress is a branch of government.
Wage increases negotiations will automatically fail if the government steps in and says no. Labour friendly policies such as ending discrimination against the elderly automatically pass if the government endorses and supports it.

We might as well end the facade of union dues and etc and just petition the ministers and members of parliament directly.
Let him land on any Lyran world to taste firsthand the wrath of peace loving people thwarted by the myopic greed of a few miserly old farts- Katrina Steiner
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Re: Do we still need unions?

Post by phongn »

TheFeniX wrote:On the point of the UAW union, I've always heard the comment that they're what's wrong with GM and why the company went to shit. So, why aren't they dragging Ford down who has been been doing fairly well (loads better than GM or Chrysler) during this economic shit-hole of a decade? I never get a straight answer on that one and I honestly would like to know. I always assumed it's because GM made stupid shit like the Avalanche while Ford kept selling F-150s for around $20,000.
It wasn't just the unions that had problems at GM. Upper management was clueless (even worse at Chrysler, particularly during the time of DaimlerChrysler) but the worst of the problems were papered over in the era of the SUV and easy credit. When the recession hit, neither company were in a good position at any level, from management down to labor (though GM was finally beginning to fix their management and design teams).

Ford had somewhat more competent management who also secured private credit at the right time giving them breathing room. That allowed them enough time to complete their restructuring and reforms, time that neither GM nor Chrysler had.
Post Reply