[Scratches head]Darth Wong wrote:He said it was actually possible that they might think a black girl looks hispanic. He did not even consider the possibility that there is a such thing as a black colombian, or that black colombians are in fact quite common.Simon_Jester wrote:He said that was "actually possible," not "can't possibly be true."
Well, I'm not sure I agree with your take on his phrasing, but I'm not going to dispute it.
Point.If she isn't contesting the identification even after you've told her you're going to deport her, why the hell would you think it's incorrect? Under normal circumstances, if someone was erroneously identified as a criminal of the same name and subject to deportation orders, he or she would immediately object. He or she would object continuously until the moment you close the aircraft door.I imagine Korto is thinking: "Even if the girl kept giving a false name, shouldn't they be trying to do some kind of cross-check to verify her identity? Like, trying to contact someone who might know or recognize her, like whoever accused her of the crime she's wanted for?"
As I said, we don't know that this happened; we don't know what happened at all yet. But to chalk it up to gross incompetence is premature.
I would think it a good idea, as a matter of routine practice, to always try and double-check the identity of people in your custody. At least to the extent of snapping a photo and making a few phone calls to people who you think know them, if possible. It avoids a lot of problems that are, at best, awkward for the bureaucracy.
But maybe it would be too much work; I am not an expert on the logistics of keeping people in custody.