Matter & Antimatter

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
cadbrowser
Padawan Learner
Posts: 494
Joined: 2006-11-13 01:20pm
Location: Kansas City Metro Area, MO
Contact:

Matter & Antimatter

Post by cadbrowser »

Exerpt from a book I was reading last night (I'll post the name of the book tomorrow):
When matter and antimater come together they annihilate each other in the form of pure energy.
I'm confused. Isn't any form of energy essentially composed of fundamental particles?

Please don't beat me over the head too hard...just for some reason my brain locked up when I read that passage.

:banghead:

I understand that the antimatter and matter particle are annihilated...I am just confused by what the author means as "pure energy".
Financing and Managing a webcomic called Geeks & Goblins.


"Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most." -Ozzy
"Cheerleaders are dancers who have gone retarded." - Sparky Polastri
"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass...and I'm all out of bubblegum." - Frank Nada
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10405
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Matter & Antimatter

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

As I understand it, they mean "pure energy" in the sense that ALL of the energy is thrown out in the form of gamma/x rays and other forms of light, unlike, say, nuclear reactions where a good chunk of the energy is lost propelling subatomic fragments away from each other.

In other words, pure energy = just EM stuff, no particles.
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
Shadow6
Youngling
Posts: 146
Joined: 2009-01-20 08:58pm

Re: Matter & Antimatter

Post by Shadow6 »

Not necessarily. For instance, baryon-antibaryon (particles comprised of three quarks) annihilation produces mesons (quark/antiquark pairs) which eventually decay to give a net product of photons, electrons, positrons and neutrinos.
MrDakka
Padawan Learner
Posts: 271
Joined: 2011-07-20 07:56am
Location: Tatooine

Re: Matter & Antimatter

Post by MrDakka »

This is all assuming that each particle will meet its antimatter counterpart. However in all likelihood, not all of the matter will annihilate with the antimatter due to the blast wave generated. I always though this was rather a large problem for antimatter warheads.

Doubtless someone will engineer a clever way to reduce this or perhaps eliminate the problem altogether.
Needs moar dakka
User avatar
cadbrowser
Padawan Learner
Posts: 494
Joined: 2006-11-13 01:20pm
Location: Kansas City Metro Area, MO
Contact:

Re: Matter & Antimatter

Post by cadbrowser »

Ahhhh, OK...that is what I was thinking, but wanted to make sure that I was comprehending it. Oh the book is named "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Green.

Thanks so much!
Financing and Managing a webcomic called Geeks & Goblins.


"Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most." -Ozzy
"Cheerleaders are dancers who have gone retarded." - Sparky Polastri
"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass...and I'm all out of bubblegum." - Frank Nada
User avatar
someone_else
Jedi Knight
Posts: 854
Joined: 2010-02-24 05:32am

Re: Matter & Antimatter

Post by someone_else »

yeah, antimatter is much more useful to rad-kill stuff than to blow it up or produce energy/thrust.
In a proton-antiproton annihilation you get something like 1/3 of the output in fucking high energy gamma rays.

The detail that at least 1/3 of that goes away as neutrinos (not "pure energy" at all, the kind of particle less likely to interact even if it flies through light years of lead) and that most other stuff decays into neutrinos shortly thereafter leaves you with a power-conversion efficiency that sucks balls.

a paper that goes more in depth, Comparison of fusion antiproton propulsion systems for interplanetary travel
I'm nobody. Nobody at all. But the secrets of the universe don't mind. They reveal themselves to nobodies who care.
--
Stereotypical spacecraft are pressurized.
Less realistic spacecraft are pressurized to hold breathing atmosphere.
Realistic spacecraft are pressurized because they are flying propellant tanks. -Isaac Kuo

--
Good art has function as well as form. I hesitate to spend more than $50 on decorations of any kind unless they can be used to pummel an intruder into submission. -Sriad
User avatar
cadbrowser
Padawan Learner
Posts: 494
Joined: 2006-11-13 01:20pm
Location: Kansas City Metro Area, MO
Contact:

Re: Matter & Antimatter

Post by cadbrowser »

Thanks someone_else, looking at the paper now.

Edit: Ok...no I'm not. That site is ALSO blocked by my employer. UGH!
Financing and Managing a webcomic called Geeks & Goblins.


"Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most." -Ozzy
"Cheerleaders are dancers who have gone retarded." - Sparky Polastri
"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass...and I'm all out of bubblegum." - Frank Nada
HMS Conqueror
Crybaby
Posts: 441
Joined: 2010-05-15 01:57pm

Re: Matter & Antimatter

Post by HMS Conqueror »

Strictly it's a nonsense statement; photons aren't "purer energy" than massive particles. However that is not how people without much physics education perceive it.

It just means that the mass-energy of the particles is converted to gamma rays.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Matter & Antimatter

Post by Simon_Jester »

cadbrowser wrote:Exerpt from a book I was reading last night (I'll post the name of the book tomorrow):
When matter and antimater come together they annihilate each other in the form of pure energy.
I'm confused. Isn't any form of energy essentially composed of fundamental particles?

Please don't beat me over the head too hard...just for some reason my brain locked up when I read that passage.

:banghead:

I understand that the antimatter and matter particle are annihilated...I am just confused by what the author means as "pure energy".
It's a common rhetorical term for an interaction that leaves behind only light, basically.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
MrDakka
Padawan Learner
Posts: 271
Joined: 2011-07-20 07:56am
Location: Tatooine

Re: Matter & Antimatter

Post by MrDakka »

someone_else wrote: a paper that goes more in depth, Comparison of fusion antiproton propulsion systems for interplanetary travel
Antimatter beam core rocket FTW
Needs moar dakka
Post Reply