Quasi-Fermat Equasion

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Enola Straight
Jedi Knight
Posts: 793
Joined: 2002-12-04 11:01pm
Location: Somers Point, NJ

Quasi-Fermat Equasion

Post by Enola Straight »

Is there a solution for X^e+Y^e=Z^e, where X,Y,and Z are whole numbers and e is the base of the natural log?

I know, due to Fermat, that no whole number solutions exist for whole number exponents greater than 2, but e isn't a whole number (2.71828182856...).

I also know that certain rational fraction and decimal exponents work, but what about
irrational/trancendental exponents?
Masochist to Sadist: "Hurt me."
Sadist to Masochist: "No."
User avatar
Grog
Padawan Learner
Posts: 290
Joined: 2002-07-18 11:32am
Location: Sweden

Re: Quasi-Fermat Equasion

Post by Grog »

i thought it was untrue for Rational exponents in general cant remember why tough. It is false in general for irrational numbers tough (and quite easy to prove). I would guess that it is hard to prove/unknown it for a specific number like e.
User avatar
Grog
Padawan Learner
Posts: 290
Joined: 2002-07-18 11:32am
Location: Sweden

Re: Quasi-Fermat Equasion

Post by Grog »

Grog wrote:i thought it was untrue for Rational exponents in general cant remember why tough. It is false in general for irrational numbers tough (and quite easy to prove). I would guess that it is hard to prove/unknown it for a specific number like e.
quote sorry my proof idea does not prove that there are irrational solutions ignore me
User avatar
Enola Straight
Jedi Knight
Posts: 793
Joined: 2002-12-04 11:01pm
Location: Somers Point, NJ

Re: Quasi-Fermat Equasion

Post by Enola Straight »

Parallel discussion on Straight Dope.
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/sho ... st14915085
Masochist to Sadist: "Hurt me."
Sadist to Masochist: "No."
Post Reply