Go look up Buck v Bell, then you get back to me about the mentally ill and violence.Flagg wrote:There is no history of violence behind it.
The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- Ford Prefect
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8254
- Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
- Location: The real number domain
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
What is Project Zohar?
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Ford Prefect wrote:Go look up Buck v Bell, then you get back to me about the mentally ill and violence.Flagg wrote:There is no history of violence behind it.
Do your own work. You want to make an argument then fucking make it. And prove that the word retard is a loaded term that incites violence.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
That's fucking bullshit. I specifically said multiple times it helps normalize an attitude of derision for people with a developmental disability and it does have a history of violence and hate behind it. I literally cannot fathom how you think a slur referring to people that historically have been the victims of genocide and forced sterilizations and continue to be widely victimized by violence, rape, and other forms of discrimination doesn't have a negative history.
Here, since you're fucking lazy as balls:
Here, since you're fucking lazy as balls:
Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), was the United States Supreme Court ruling that upheld a statute instituting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the mentally retarded, "for the protection and health of the state." It was largely seen as an endorsement of negative eugenics—the attempt to improve the human race by eliminating "defectives" from the gene pool.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Maybe a better question would be if using "retard" is as offensive as "cocksucker" or other derogatory terms for gays? Is it as offensive as if I would say "suck my dick" to someone?
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Yeah, that's horrible. And exactly what does it have to do with calling someone a retard as an insult? How does me calling you a retard make me a bigot? Face it, if retard is a bigoted word then so is idiot.Losonti Tokash wrote:That's fucking bullshit. I specifically said multiple times it helps normalize an attitude of derision for people with a developmental disability and it does have a history of violence and hate behind it. I literally cannot fathom how you think a slur referring to people that historically have been the victims of genocide and forced sterilizations and continue to be widely victimized by violence, rape, and other forms of discrimination doesn't have a negative history.
Here, since you're fucking lazy as balls:Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), was the United States Supreme Court ruling that upheld a statute instituting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the mentally retarded, "for the protection and health of the state." It was largely seen as an endorsement of negative eugenics—the attempt to improve the human race by eliminating "defectives" from the gene pool.
Edit: Oh, and lazy is telling me to go look something up rather than taking the time to post it for all to see.
Last edited by Flagg on 2012-05-01 10:01pm, edited 1 time in total.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Well both of those terms can be used to describe a woman. Society doesn't seem to view either of those statements as bigoted. But there is an equal case for those terms to be considered bigoted against gays as retard is against the mentally disabled.Thanas wrote:Maybe a better question would be if using "retard" is as offensive as "cocksucker" or other derogatory terms for gays? Is it as offensive as if I would say "suck my dick" to someone?
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
"Retard isn't a hateful word."
"Uh, yeah it is. It's pretty fucking horrible to say to anybody, particularly anybody with a developmental disability."
"Well, uh...there's no history of violence behind it!"
"Bullfuckingshit, they've been murdered and sterilized in huge numbers for being who they are."
"Well, it's not hateful!"
"Uh, yeah it is. It's pretty fucking horrible to say to anybody, particularly anybody with a developmental disability."
"Well, uh...there's no history of violence behind it!"
"Bullfuckingshit, they've been murdered and sterilized in huge numbers for being who they are."
"Well, it's not hateful!"
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
BTW, here's the definition of bigot:
Oddly the mentally disabled don't seem to fall under any of those categories. So it would seem it's impossible to be bigoted against the mentally handicapped. Not to say that you can't be a total cunt about them.big·ot
[big-uht]
noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Gee, according to yet another of your pedantic, cherry picked definitions that completely ignores commonly accepted uses of a term, it is also impossible to be a bigot against racial minorities.
Edit: Or women! Or gays!
I'm sorry we're telling you that your inalienable right to be a total asshole makes you, in fact, a total asshole.
Edit: Or women! Or gays!
I'm sorry we're telling you that your inalienable right to be a total asshole makes you, in fact, a total asshole.
Last edited by Losonti Tokash on 2012-05-01 10:15pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Losonti Tokash wrote:"Retard isn't a hateful word."
"Uh, yeah it is. It's pretty fucking horrible to say to anybody, particularly anybody with a developmental disability."
"Well, uh...there's no history of violence behind it!"
"Bullfuckingshit, they've been murdered and sterilized in huge numbers for being who they are."
"Well, it's not hateful!"
You're a dishonest shitwit, you know that? Retard isn't a hateful word and it doesn't incite violence the way racial and homophobic epithets do. Your entire argument is that it makes the mentally disabled feel bad.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
My bad, I didn't see the rest of the definition.Losonti Tokash wrote:Gee, according to yet another of your pedantic, cherry picked definitions that completely ignores commonly accepted uses of a term, it is also impossible to be a bigot against racial minorities.
Edit: Or women! Or gays!
I'm sorry we're telling you that your inalienable right to be a total asshole makes you, in fact, a total asshole.
Still nothing about the mentally disabled.a person who is intolerant of any ideas other than his or her own, esp on religion, politics, or race
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
It's a word used to hurt people. It's a word used to incite violence and ridicule against a particular group. How is it not hateful just because you're a douchebag?Flagg wrote:Losonti Tokash wrote:"Retard isn't a hateful word."
"Uh, yeah it is. It's pretty fucking horrible to say to anybody, particularly anybody with a developmental disability."
"Well, uh...there's no history of violence behind it!"
"Bullfuckingshit, they've been murdered and sterilized in huge numbers for being who they are."
"Well, it's not hateful!"
You're a dishonest shitwit, you know that? Retard isn't a hateful word and it doesn't incite violence the way racial and homophobic epithets do. Your entire argument is that it makes the mentally disabled feel bad.
PS your extended definition still doesn't include gays or women, guess it's impossible to be bigoted against them too. But yeah, thanks for letting us know that the dictionary and popular media are the arbiters of what is and is not acceptable.
Last edited by Losonti Tokash on 2012-05-01 10:21pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Losonti Tokash wrote:Gee, according to yet another of your pedantic, cherry picked definitions that completely ignores commonly accepted uses of a term, it is also impossible to be a bigot against racial minorities.
Edit: Or women! Or gays!
I'm sorry we're telling you that your inalienable right to be a total asshole makes you, in fact, a total asshole.
You have utterly failed to prove your point.
Either admit that the word idiot is as offensive as the word retard or concede.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
It's not. It doesn't get used the same way at all, it doesn't have the same connotation, it doesn't get shouted at people with a developmental disability as they're walking down the street or being beaten/raped. Retard does.Flagg wrote:Losonti Tokash wrote:Gee, according to yet another of your pedantic, cherry picked definitions that completely ignores commonly accepted uses of a term, it is also impossible to be a bigot against racial minorities.
Edit: Or women! Or gays!
I'm sorry we're telling you that your inalienable right to be a total asshole makes you, in fact, a total asshole.
You have utterly failed to prove your point.
Either admit that the word idiot is as offensive as the word retard or concede.
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Who uses retard to incite violence against the mentally disabled? And of course it's used to hurt people. All insults are.Losonti Tokash wrote:It's a word used to hurt people. It's a word used to incite violence and ridicule against a particular group. How is it not hateful just because you're a douchebag?Flagg wrote:Losonti Tokash wrote:"Retard isn't a hateful word."
"Uh, yeah it is. It's pretty fucking horrible to say to anybody, particularly anybody with a developmental disability."
"Well, uh...there's no history of violence behind it!"
"Bullfuckingshit, they've been murdered and sterilized in huge numbers for being who they are."
"Well, it's not hateful!"
You're a dishonest shitwit, you know that? Retard isn't a hateful word and it doesn't incite violence the way racial and homophobic epithets do. Your entire argument is that it makes the mentally disabled feel bad.
No, it does. You must be too retarded to understand that when it says "esp" it's inclusive not exclusive.PS your extended definition still doesn't include gays or women, guess it's impossible to be bigoted against them too.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
This is an insult aimed at a specific group for a trait they have no control over and does not reflect upon their value as a human being.Flagg wrote:Who uses retard to incite violence against the mentally disabled? And of course it's used to hurt people. All insults are.
Then that means it can include people with a developmental disability, dumbass.No, it does. You must be too retarded to understand that when it says "esp" it's inclusive not exclusive.PS your extended definition still doesn't include gays or women, guess it's impossible to be bigoted against them too.
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
It has the same meaning so it must be just as bad, right? Is bitch now a bigoted word? Because women are called that while walking down the street or being beaten/raped.Losonti Tokash wrote:It's not. It doesn't get used the same way at all, it doesn't have the same connotation, it doesn't get shouted at people with a developmental disability as they're walking down the street or being beaten/raped. Retard does.Flagg wrote:Losonti Tokash wrote:Gee, according to yet another of your pedantic, cherry picked definitions that completely ignores commonly accepted uses of a term, it is also impossible to be a bigot against racial minorities.
Edit: Or women! Or gays!
I'm sorry we're telling you that your inalienable right to be a total asshole makes you, in fact, a total asshole.
You have utterly failed to prove your point.
Either admit that the word idiot is as offensive as the word retard or concede.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Yeah, actually, bitch is a misogynist word. Good job.
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
So is bitch, cunt, whore...Losonti Tokash wrote:This is an insult aimed at a specific group for a trait they have no control over and does not reflect upon their value as a human being.Flagg wrote:Who uses retard to incite violence against the mentally disabled? And of course it's used to hurt people. All insults are.
True.Then that means it can include people with a developmental disability, dumbass.No, it does. You must be too retarded to understand that when it says "esp" it's inclusive not exclusive.PS your extended definition still doesn't include gays or women, guess it's impossible to be bigoted against them too.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Losonti Tokash wrote:Yeah, actually, bitch is a misogynist word. Good job.
So we can include bitch on the list of los's no-no words?
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Yeah, and people shouldn't use those either. Holy fuckin shit.Flagg wrote:So is bitch, cunt, whore...
So then that was a complete waste of time and accomplished nothing other than to be amazingly pedantic yet again. Awesome!True.Then that means it can include people with a developmental disability, dumbass.
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
So basically your custom title should be miss manners.Losonti Tokash wrote:Yeah, and people shouldn't use those either. Holy fuckin shit.Flagg wrote:So is bitch, cunt, whore...
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
I am grievously wounded by your assertion that I don't feel the need to degrade human beings based on qualities that have nothing to do with who they are.Flagg wrote:So basically your custom title should be miss manners.Losonti Tokash wrote:Yeah, and people shouldn't use those either. Holy fuckin shit.Flagg wrote:So is bitch, cunt, whore...
- Ford Prefect
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8254
- Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
- Location: The real number domain
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
I'm not sure it's really helpful to come to these sorts of conclusions. 'Who has it worse' is a pretty morbid question to ask, and when you consider the implied inverse I don't think it would be a very comfortable one.Thanas wrote:Maybe a better question would be if using "retard" is as offensive as "cocksucker" or other derogatory terms for gays? Is it as offensive as if I would say "suck my dick" to someone?
What is Project Zohar?
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Why are you on this board which not only tolerates, but celebrates insulting people, miss manners?Losonti Tokash wrote: I am grievously wounded by your assertion that I don't feel the need to degrade human beings based on qualities that have nothing to do with who they are.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw