The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Because it's completely possible to insult someone in a way that doesn't use hateful and dehumanizing slurs.
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Aren't all insults hateful?Losonti Tokash wrote:Because it's completely possible to insult someone in a way that doesn't use hateful and dehumanizing slurs.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Well, what I am asking is why retard is more of an outrageous insult than the others cited here. Unless, of course, you are advocating for banning all curse words that degrade people and have a bad background.Ford Prefect wrote:I'm not sure it's really helpful to come to these sorts of conclusions. 'Who has it worse' is a pretty morbid question to ask, and when you consider the implied inverse I don't think it would be a very comfortable one.Thanas wrote:Maybe a better question would be if using "retard" is as offensive as "cocksucker" or other derogatory terms for gays? Is it as offensive as if I would say "suck my dick" to someone?
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Where did anyone advocate banning any words?
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
You are saying that retard is just as bad as words that are banned on this board.Losonti Tokash wrote:Where did anyone advocate banning any words?
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Well, the thread title is "Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult". If I fail to understand you, please explain to me what your goal here is?Losonti Tokash wrote:Where did anyone advocate banning any words?
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Which is somehow equivalent to me saying any words should be banned. Say whatever the fuck you want, I won't stop you. But you should know that using certain words make you an insensitive asshole poking fun at the expense of a persecuted minority. And that by using those terms, you're helping to perpetuate it.Flagg wrote:You are saying that retard is just as bad as words that are banned on this board.Losonti Tokash wrote:Where did anyone advocate banning any words?
Ideally it would be socially unacceptable to use people with a developmental disability as an object of ridicule or to insult someone by comparing said person to them. Right now it largely is acceptable due in part to people's ignorance and the reinforcement of negative stereotypes by popular media.Well, the thread title is "Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult". If I fail to understand you, please explain to me what your goal here is?
Last edited by Losonti Tokash on 2012-05-01 10:55pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Ford Prefect
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8254
- Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
- Location: The real number domain
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Setting aside that we didn't start the thread, 'acceptability' isn't about banning. It is not strictly speaking illegal to use racist or homophobic slurs in Australia in private, but that doesn't mean that they're acceptable.Thanas wrote:Well, the thread title is "Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult". If I fail to understand you, please explain to me what your goal here is?
What is Project Zohar?
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
So your point was to attack people who use words that make your butt hurt, miss manners?Losonti Tokash wrote:Which is somehow equivalent to me saying any words should be banned. Say whatever the fuck you want, I won't stop you. But you should know that using certain words make you an insensitive asshole poking fun at the expense of a persecuted minority. And that by using those terms, you're helping to perpetuate it.Flagg wrote:You are saying that retard is just as bad as words that are banned on this board.Losonti Tokash wrote:Where did anyone advocate banning any words?
Ideally it would be socially unacceptable to use people with a developmental disability as an object of ridicule or to insult someone by comparing said person to them. Right now it largely is acceptable due in part to people's ignorance and the reinforcement of negative stereotypes by popular media.Well, the thread title is "Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult". If I fail to understand you, please explain to me what your goal here is?
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Every person I've ever met who used "retard" as an insult has never spent any length of time around people with a developmental disability. They generally also haven't even considered the possibility that it might be unacceptable and, if they have, simply constructed rationalizations so as to not own up to their previous use of a hateful term.
So, are you admitting it's a bigoted term and you'd just like to keep using it because you want to upset people?So your point was to attack people who use words that make your butt hurt, miss manners?
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Losonti Tokash wrote:Every person I've ever met who used "retard" as an insult has never spent any length of time around people with a developmental disability. They generally also haven't even considered the possibility that it might be unacceptable and, if they have, simply constructed rationalizations so as to not own up to their previous use of a hateful term.
Well you've just met someone who worked with the mentally disabled while doing security, and has a mentally disabled niece. So blow it out your ass miss manners.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
That makes you the biggest piece of shit I've ever met. Go fuck yourself.Flagg wrote:Losonti Tokash wrote:Every person I've ever met who used "retard" as an insult has never spent any length of time around people with a developmental disability. They generally also haven't even considered the possibility that it might be unacceptable and, if they have, simply constructed rationalizations so as to not own up to their previous use of a hateful term.
Well you've just met someone who worked with the mentally disabled while doing security, and has a mentally disabled niece. So blow it out your ass miss manners.
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
My point is that it's as bigoted a term as idiot is, meaning it's not.Losonti Tokash wrote: So, are you admitting it's a bigoted term and you'd just like to keep using it because you want to upset people?
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Nice ad hominem there, miss manners.Losonti Tokash wrote:That makes you the biggest piece of shit I've ever met. Go fuck yourself.Flagg wrote:Losonti Tokash wrote:Every person I've ever met who used "retard" as an insult has never spent any length of time around people with a developmental disability. They generally also haven't even considered the possibility that it might be unacceptable and, if they have, simply constructed rationalizations so as to not own up to their previous use of a hateful term.
Well you've just met someone who worked with the mentally disabled while doing security, and has a mentally disabled niece. So blow it out your ass miss manners.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
The goal that I had when I started the thread was to provoke discussion. Furthermore, I was talking about acceptability in a social context.Thanas wrote:Well, the thread title is "Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult". If I fail to understand you, please explain to me what your goal here is?Losonti Tokash wrote:Where did anyone advocate banning any words?
Invited by the new age, the elegant Sailor Neptune!
I mean, how often am I to enter a game of riddles with the author, where they challenge me with some strange and confusing and distracting device, and I'm supposed to unravel it and go "I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE" and take great personal satisfaction and pride in our mutual cleverness?
- The Handle, from the TVTropes Forums
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
You are literally the only person I have ever met who thinks they are equivalent.Flagg wrote:My point is that it's as bigoted a term as idiot is, meaning it's not.Losonti Tokash wrote: So, are you admitting it's a bigoted term and you'd just like to keep using it because you want to upset people?
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
You have worked with people that have a developmental disability and have a niece with one, yet you continue to use a word that is hurtful and offensive to them. This makes you a piece of shit. Would you say these at work? Would you say these around her parents?Flagg wrote:Nice ad hominem there, miss manners.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Alright then, I'll attempt to narrow it down. What insults do you think are acceptable then?Ford Prefect wrote:Setting aside that we didn't start the thread, 'acceptability' isn't about banning. It is not strictly speaking illegal to use racist or homophobic slurs in Australia in private, but that doesn't mean that they're acceptable.
(Also, I don't really think retard is at the same level as the n-word. The level of suffering behind the n-word is of a whole different scale.)
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
No and I wouldn't call them stupid, idiot, or moron, either. They are all especially hurtful to mentally disabled people. But I don't hold retard as any more offensive than the aforementioned insults.Losonti Tokash wrote:You have worked with people that have a developmental disability and have a niece with one, yet you continue to use a word that is hurtful and offensive to them. This makes you a piece of shit. Would you say these at work? Would you say these around her parents?Flagg wrote:Nice ad hominem there, miss manners.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Then you're just an asshole. If you're fine with that, then okay. But don't pretend you're not an asshole using hateful words. If you won't use a term around the people it describes, maybe you shouldn't fucking use it.Flagg wrote:No and I wouldn't call them stupid, idiot, or moron, either. They are all especially hurtful to mentally disabled people. But I don't hold retard as any more offensive than the aforementioned insults.Losonti Tokash wrote:You have worked with people that have a developmental disability and have a niece with one, yet you continue to use a word that is hurtful and offensive to them. This makes you a piece of shit. Would you say these at work? Would you say these around her parents?Flagg wrote:Nice ad hominem there, miss manners.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
"Tool"Thanas wrote:Alright then, I'll attempt to narrow it down. What insults do you think are acceptable then?Ford Prefect wrote:Setting aside that we didn't start the thread, 'acceptability' isn't about banning. It is not strictly speaking illegal to use racist or homophobic slurs in Australia in private, but that doesn't mean that they're acceptable.
(Also, I don't really think retard is at the same level as the n-word. The level of suffering behind the n-word is of a whole different scale.)
"Fucklord/Shitlord"
"Shithead"
And according to Amanda Marcone, "Douchebag" is non-sexist and should go here.
These are just examples- there are plenty of ways to concisely showcase your lack of respect for another person that aren't built on a foundation of intolerance.
Invited by the new age, the elegant Sailor Neptune!
I mean, how often am I to enter a game of riddles with the author, where they challenge me with some strange and confusing and distracting device, and I'm supposed to unravel it and go "I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE" and take great personal satisfaction and pride in our mutual cleverness?
- The Handle, from the TVTropes Forums
- Flagg
- CUNTS FOR EYES!
- Posts: 12797
- Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
- Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Losonti Tokash wrote: Then you're just an asshole. If you're fine with that, then okay. But don't pretend you're not an asshole using hateful words. If you won't use a term around the people it describes, maybe you shouldn't fucking use it.
Again, how is retard any more hateful than idiot?
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
-Negan
You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan
He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
- Losonti Tokash
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2916
- Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
I've explained it to you half a dozen times. Go read one of them.
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Those are all generic: they say "I don't like you" but obscure the reason why. Which is all right if your goal is just to cobble together screeds against people, but unsatisfactory sometimes, if you're insulting something for a reason.Bakustra wrote:"Tool"
"Fucklord/Shitlord"
"Shithead"
And according to Amanda Marcone, "Douchebag" is non-sexist and should go here.
"Bob is being a fucklord" doesn't tell anyone what Bob is actually doing to make you so upset about him. "Bob is being retarded" gives a hint, even given that the word may be unacceptably obnoxious.
So I don't think those are interchangeable, unless you use your insults mad-libs style and don't care which one you use in a given situation.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Re: The Acceptability of Using Disabilities to Insult
Okay, so here's where I introduce you to Insults 220: The Art of Extended Insults. Let's start off with a basic example:
"Simon, Humpty Dumpty is looking at you and going 'Damn, that guy is one crazy-ass fence-sitter'. You're so indecisive Charlie Brown would call you 'that wishy-washy kid'."
In this case, I am using more words to clearly indicate that I dislike your method of attempting to be neutral and refusing to commit to acceptability or unacceptability one way or the other, which presents a persona of mindless contrarian behavior.
Alternatively, I could use something along the lines of
"Heinleinman, when somebody asks about the weather, do you go, 'Well, gee, it could be rainy because of all the clouds, but the clouds could blow away in the next minute or so..'" to further elaborate on how much I loathe your vacillation.
Or I could do it like this:
"So tell me, Simon, have you ever seen an opinion expressed that you didn't immediately want to contradict? When someone says 'Is the pope Catholic?', do you insist on bringing up heretical patriarchs? Is it physically impossible for you to just agree with someone?" and thus express disgust with your contrarian attitudes.
Finally, I could go this way:
"Simon, I think getting your mind off its lazy medulla oblongata and thinking up ways to express yourself without the crutch of intellectual shorthand will make you less of a fucking intellectual slacker" and talk specifically about my problems with your argument.
I could go even more outrageous with any of these- e.g. "At least Hitler had actual fucking opinions he held. I'm not convinced you've managed to reach that point yet." but I hope that the points are taken.
"Simon, Humpty Dumpty is looking at you and going 'Damn, that guy is one crazy-ass fence-sitter'. You're so indecisive Charlie Brown would call you 'that wishy-washy kid'."
In this case, I am using more words to clearly indicate that I dislike your method of attempting to be neutral and refusing to commit to acceptability or unacceptability one way or the other, which presents a persona of mindless contrarian behavior.
Alternatively, I could use something along the lines of
"Heinleinman, when somebody asks about the weather, do you go, 'Well, gee, it could be rainy because of all the clouds, but the clouds could blow away in the next minute or so..'" to further elaborate on how much I loathe your vacillation.
Or I could do it like this:
"So tell me, Simon, have you ever seen an opinion expressed that you didn't immediately want to contradict? When someone says 'Is the pope Catholic?', do you insist on bringing up heretical patriarchs? Is it physically impossible for you to just agree with someone?" and thus express disgust with your contrarian attitudes.
Finally, I could go this way:
"Simon, I think getting your mind off its lazy medulla oblongata and thinking up ways to express yourself without the crutch of intellectual shorthand will make you less of a fucking intellectual slacker" and talk specifically about my problems with your argument.
I could go even more outrageous with any of these- e.g. "At least Hitler had actual fucking opinions he held. I'm not convinced you've managed to reach that point yet." but I hope that the points are taken.
Invited by the new age, the elegant Sailor Neptune!
I mean, how often am I to enter a game of riddles with the author, where they challenge me with some strange and confusing and distracting device, and I'm supposed to unravel it and go "I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE" and take great personal satisfaction and pride in our mutual cleverness?
- The Handle, from the TVTropes Forums