Star Trek Warp = Alcubierre Drive?

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
edaw1982
Padawan Learner
Posts: 181
Joined: 2011-09-23 03:53am
Location: Orkland, New Zealand

Star Trek Warp = Alcubierre Drive?

Post by edaw1982 »

I know Mister Alcubierre came out with his proposal in 1994 which I know was a good many decades after Star Trek (The Cage 1964 and/or Where No Man has Gone Before 1966).
But with what is known now, would it be fair to say that the Cochrane-style warp is a sort of Alcubierre Drive?
"Put book front and center. He's our friend, we should honour him. Kaylee, find that kid who's taking a dirt-nap with baby Jesus. We need a hood ornment. Jayne! Try not to steal too much of their sh*t!"
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10413
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Star Trek Warp = Alcubierre Drive?

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

Um, no. The Alcubierre warp drive needs a monstrous amount of mass in front of the ship and an equally monstrous amount of negative mass behind the ship. Since no one in ST mentions anything about "negative mass" in regards to warp drive (given ST's love of technobabble, you'd expect it to turn up at least once), it's not an Alcubierre drive. Also, ST drives are explicitly stated to utilise "subspace" which the Alcubierre drive most certainly does not.
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
Post Reply