How bad were Naboo's casualties?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by FaxModem1 »

So, the Gungans fought the Droid army, and the Naboo people were supposedly starving, how bad was the aftermath? I ask, because I don't recall seeing a lot of Gun an or Naboo bodies. What does the EU say on the matter?
Image
Cowl
Youngling
Posts: 70
Joined: 2012-02-14 02:19pm

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Cowl »

The Gungans were carrion-eaters. In the extended director's cut Jar Jar Binks was seen wolfing down various baby limbs, and scooping up slimy innards from eviscerated corpses. The long Gungan face with the protruding bill was actually meant to allow for the meat to rot inside of the oral cavity, allowing for the putrefying bacteria to accelerate the rotting process, producing more savory flavors in accordance to the palate of the Gungan. The resulting halitosis was unspeakably foul, which largely necessitated the isolation of the Gungans.

It took the legendary discipline of two Jedi to finally establish diplomatic relations with these noxious creatures. And it should also be now apparent why the Trade Federation opted for a droid army.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Sea Skimmer »

I always figured the 'starvation' bit was just disinformation being spread to try to convince the Queen to surrender. Unless the EU says otherwise, I'd keep assuming that. Starving the population isn't supported by the movie when everyone seems well and happy in the victory parade, and it'd be directly contrary to the Trade Federation's goal of exploiting the place as a protected market.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Darth Tanner
Jedi Master
Posts: 1445
Joined: 2006-03-29 04:07pm
Location: Birmingham, UK

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Darth Tanner »

Also if there were mass deaths on Naboo in trade federation prison camps then it would be much more difficult to explain why Gunray escapes any form of criminal sanction. It would be much easier to argue his case without thousands of dead humans hanging around his neck and mass murder is probably not included in an interstellar trading companies standard practice, he does after all seem to ignore Palpatines orders to wipe out the Gungans, taking them prisoner instead.
Get busy living or get busy dying... unless there’s cake.
User avatar
Atia
Youngling
Posts: 62
Joined: 2011-05-15 12:19pm

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Atia »

What was the time span of Phantom Menace, or at least from the invasion of Naboo to it being liberated. Unless I am misremembering it could not have been more than a couple of days or a week tops right? Would it even be possible for people to be dying of starvation on a massive scale in that time?
User avatar
atg
Jedi Master
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2005-04-20 09:23pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by atg »

Sea Skimmer wrote:I always figured the 'starvation' bit was just disinformation being spread to try to convince the Queen to surrender. Unless the EU says otherwise, I'd keep assuming that. Starving the population isn't supported by the movie when everyone seems well and happy in the victory parade, and it'd be directly contrary to the Trade Federation's goal of exploiting the place as a protected market.
IIRC the Darth Plaguies novel mentions that the message Amidala received about the people starving was faked by Maul.
Marcus Aurelius: ...the Swedish S-tank; the exception is made mostly because the Swedes insisted really hard that it is a tank rather than a tank destroyer or assault gun
Ilya Muromets: And now I have this image of a massive, stern-looking Swede staring down a bunch of military nerds. "It's a tank." "Uh, yes Sir. Please don't hurt us."
Kreller1
Youngling
Posts: 54
Joined: 2009-11-04 02:36pm

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Kreller1 »

Gunray was heard to tell Governor Bibble that "the people are starving, and you, Governor are going to die much sooner than they are I'm afraid." Or something close to that, so it wasn't just the faked Maul transmission sent to the queen that was saying this.
*edit* Also remember that the orbital blockade had been in place for x amount of time before the droid boots hit the dirt on Naboo. So, assuming Naboo had to import food in order to survive, and the blockade prevented this, there is a possibility of the starvation thing being legit.
"Your faith in the permanence of universal laws and the consistent nature of the universe should stand as a glowing example to believers everywhere." ~Sela
User avatar
Dalton
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
Posts: 22637
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: New York, the Fuck You State
Contact:

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Dalton »

Cowl: produce evidence of your claim.
Image
Image
To Absent Friends
Dalton | Admin Smash | Knight of the Order of SDN

"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster

May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
Cowl
Youngling
Posts: 70
Joined: 2012-02-14 02:19pm

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Cowl »

That would be a difficult task indeed, as the above was an attempt at satire, albeit somewhat stilted. The reason for this is that I saw that the thread was left ignored for a appreciable amount of time and I sought to deliver it from oblivion, in the hope that another would return the courtesy for one of my own threads.
User avatar
Dalton
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
Posts: 22637
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: New York, the Fuck You State
Contact:

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Dalton »

Cowl wrote:That would be a difficult task indeed, as the above was an attempt at satire, albeit somewhat stilted. The reason for this is that I saw that the thread was left ignored for a appreciable amount of time and I sought to deliver it from oblivion, in the hope that another would return the courtesy for one of my own threads.
I see. Carry on then.
Image
Image
To Absent Friends
Dalton | Admin Smash | Knight of the Order of SDN

"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster

May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
User avatar
Panzersharkcat
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1705
Joined: 2011-02-28 05:36am

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Panzersharkcat »

Hilariously, he's basically describing Darths and Droids Gungans, who eat people and were only kept from eating everybody in Theed by the PCs playing Jedi distracting the PC playing Jar-Jar.
"I'm just reading through your formspring here, and your responses to many questions seem to indicate that you are ready and willing to sacrifice realism/believability for the sake of (sometimes) marginal increases in gameplay quality. Why is this?"
"Because until I see gamers sincerely demanding that if they get winged in the gut with a bullet that they spend the next three hours bleeding out on the ground before permanently dying, they probably are too." - J.E. Sawyer
User avatar
Luke Skywalker
Padawan Learner
Posts: 376
Joined: 2011-06-27 01:08am

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Luke Skywalker »

Really, Red Letter Media makes a good point that the power generator that was the backdrop to the lightsaber duel was large enough to power the Naboo...well, basically forever. It's hard to imagine what a pacifistic, sparsely inhabited planet like Naboo would need with such a reactor, but clearly power isn't an issue. Food couldn't be either, unless if the droid army was razing farmland (which we never see), as such a lush planet is obviously self sufficient (see: Earth). The blockade only appeared to have economic consequences, and we never see droids shooting civilians on the street.

Although I've wondered; when the Queen and company take off on the ship to run the blockade, they are fired upon by what appear to be quad turbolasers, or perhaps quad laser cannons. Doubtlessly many shots missed; would they not hit the planet? Would they not cause enormous collateral damage?
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Sea Skimmer »

ICS calls them quad turbolasers, but remember Saxtons's stuff also indicates that dedicated warships obtain high firepower by diverting almost all power into the main battery. Meanwhile Trade Federation ships aren't dedicated warships, and are clearly underway during the escape. Very little large scale collateral damage would occur meanwhile even if blasts measured in dozens of megatons impacted in the many oceans and large lakes of the planet, and even hits on the dry surface aren't going to leave all that much obvious damage in anything we see in the movie. A planet is a pretty big thing and water soaks up energy like crazy.

Given the damage we see to the droids on the ship's hull, it looks like firepower being used was very low, which is logical given that the goal was to capture and not kill.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by FaxModem1 »

Well, we do know there are 'camps', that people will be processed in. Maybe the droids were ordered not to feed the citizens?
Image
Kreller1
Youngling
Posts: 54
Joined: 2009-11-04 02:36pm

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Kreller1 »

Now that you mention it, Luke, we don't hear anything about "food" issues until after the invasion force makes it to the surface. At that point the TF army was gathering people up and parking them in camps where they could be deprived of food, etc. But if that is the case, the invasion army hadn't been there long enough to cause mass starvation after just a couple of days, (sure, folks will be hungry, and the very old and very young will be the first to go, and may do so rather quickly..) so maybe this was just a propaganda piece to try and manipulate people such as the Queen to accept TF demands.
"Your faith in the permanence of universal laws and the consistent nature of the universe should stand as a glowing example to believers everywhere." ~Sela
Valten1992
Redshirt
Posts: 6
Joined: 2012-05-30 04:14am

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Valten1992 »

Did'nt that battle for Naboo game on N64 go into more detail about the occupation? Not a novel, but it might fill in gaps....
User avatar
Skywalker
Redshirt
Posts: 27
Joined: 2012-06-22 01:14am

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Skywalker »

I find it very hard to believe that Naboo couldn't sustain itself for a few months at least. WHat would happen if Earth was blockaded? We'd be absolutely fine, because we don't rely on space goods.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16429
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Batman »

You just answered your own question. Earth is for the time being a closed system economically speaking. Naboo is not, any more than Earth's nations are currently. The worlds in Wars are a lot closer to countries in the current world with interdependent economies than they are to isolated star sytems faring on their own.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Simon_Jester »

Even so, a lot of countries are agriculturally self-sufficient, or close enough to it that they won't suffer immediate famine if someone blockades them.

Not all are, but a lot are.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12236
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Lord Revan »

btw we do know that Naboo is the sector capital for the Chommel sector, that has over 40,000 inhabited worlds (of which less then 0.1% are "member" worlds), so the orginal blockade could have wrecked havok on the sectorial trade without causing any signifigant death in Naboo itself.

Also do we even know if Naboo had any major agriculture, after all in the republic you could easily import food off-world and keep Naboo as a "resort" world of sorts.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
aussiemuscle308
Padawan Learner
Posts: 201
Joined: 2011-01-20 10:53pm

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by aussiemuscle308 »

Cowl wrote:The Gungans were carrion-eaters. In the extended director's cut Jar Jar Binks was seen wolfing down various baby limbs, and scooping up slimy innards from eviscerated corpses. The long Gungan face with the protruding bill was actually meant to allow for the meat to rot inside of the oral cavity, allowing for the putrefying bacteria to accelerate the rotting process, producing more savory flavors in accordance to the palate of the Gungan. The resulting halitosis was unspeakably foul, which largely necessitated the isolation of the Gungans. .
Hah, hah. that explains why the Naboo wanted nothing to do with them. yuck!
========================================
If you believe in Telekinesis, raise my hand.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16429
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Batman »

Please tell me you're either kidding or 9 years old.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Skywalker
Redshirt
Posts: 27
Joined: 2012-06-22 01:14am

Re: How bad were Naboo's casualties?

Post by Skywalker »

Batman wrote:You just answered your own question.
Yes I know. It was rhetorical.
Post Reply