EMP

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Tom_Aurum
Padawan Learner
Posts: 348
Joined: 2003-02-11 06:08am
Location: The City Formerly Known As Slaughter

Post by Tom_Aurum »

So... basically one could modify the box that surrounds your average desktop computer, ground it, add a surge protector, and have sucessfully emp sheilded their computer?
Please kids, don't drink and park: Accidents cause people!
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

Tom_Aurum wrote:So... basically one could modify the box that surrounds your average desktop computer, ground it, add a surge protector, and have sucessfully emp sheilded their computer?
Hahaha, no. Your basic computer case has a hard enough time shielding the computer from basic EMI from household appliances, much less the terawatt EMP weapon a sufficiently technical terrorist could build. You need a much better Faraday cage than that to shield against an EMP pulse.
User avatar
Soulman
Padawan Learner
Posts: 331
Joined: 2002-07-04 02:27pm

Post by Soulman »

Perinquus wrote:Problem is, you're making a copy of a copy of a copy, and so on. You get markedly deteriorating picture quality each time. The fact that you'd be making a recording of an old, deteriorating copy won't help either.
With a digital medium such as DVDs you would only get any deterioration if the storage medium itself deteriorates. With an analogue signal any variences in the signal are apparent but with a digital signal the signal would probably have to change by a third before any chage can be seen (and that's only 1 bit out of millions).

And to whomever said that DVDs were write only most DVD recorders support DVD-RW now.

Basically I see DVD-RW/hard-disc recorders taking over in 5-10 years.
Post Reply