But we are still at the stage where the media is inveting things about the shooter before we have a chance to invent our own things about him DW. We are still a day away (Gotta let the nightly news shows get their two cents in) from being able to use the shooter to justify our own perceptions and prejudices. Granted if his name was Mohammad it'd be different but given the shooters names was James Holmes we can't spin that into an obvious narrative just yet we still have to find out/invent things about the shooter before he can be used as a political chip.Darth Wong wrote:Now that we're learning more about the shooter, let everyone commence using him to justify their pre-conceived prejudices and socio-economic or political theories!
*Edit after all this is James Holmes of the Tea Party, or maybe not (Thank you Brian Ross of ABC for even bringing a random thing you found on the Internets and did not bother to verify on the news hour like it was "news")