Flagg wrote:You're whining about a tiny amount of damage sustained to a space shuttle? What were they supposed to do, encase it in titanium in 3 days?
They should have never had it if they couldn't protect it from a hurricane - remember the decision was partly based on the ability to exhibit the shuttle for 500 years. Less than half way through year one, and it's been damaged twice. Maybe it should have gone to the site that had the building ready to go - The Seattle Museum of Flight.
Flagg wrote:Looks like they did and they ripped in the wind. The orbiter can sustain a fucking reentry, I don't think a hurricane (especially a cat 1) looked like much of a threat.
The aerodynamic loads of reentry are more or less fixed, and can be planned for. There is a reason you wouldn't land a shuttle in a hurricane.
Losonti Tokash wrote:What the fuck is wrong with you?
Many things, but if Enterprise hadn't been damaged twice in 6 months now, it would be a lot easier to let go.
Broomstick wrote:Not only that, but a museum piece that likely suffered only superficial damage at worst.
It's the pattern it's helping to establish. Intrepid wasn't ready for the shuttle, and yet it got it anyway.
Broomstick wrote:The 30+ dead, billions of dollars in damage, 7 million+ without power, evacuated hospitals, flooding, etc. etc.? Pfft!
Perish forbid I bring up some storm caused damage in a thread about the storm!
"I believe in the future. It is wonderful because it stands on what has been achieved." - Sergei Korolev