Infographic - the war on women

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
madd0ct0r
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6259
Joined: 2008-03-14 07:47am

Infographic - the war on women

Post by madd0ct0r »

http://itsawaronwomen.com/

Handy for how it collects everything together, and quite pretty with it.

Not my work. Done by campign group in Washington DC - possibly DNC linked, not sure.
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
User avatar
xthetenth
Jedi Master
Posts: 1192
Joined: 2010-02-20 12:45am

Re: Infographic - the war on women

Post by xthetenth »

Health and Human Services (HHS) mandated that health insurance plans provide contraceptive services without co-pays.

Prior to this, viagra was covered by insurance more frequently than contraceptives.

What the fuck gives?
Grumman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2488
Joined: 2011-12-10 09:13am

Re: Infographic - the war on women

Post by Grumman »

xthetenth wrote:Health and Human Services (HHS) mandated that health insurance plans provide contraceptive services without co-pays.

Prior to this, viagra was covered by insurance more frequently than contraceptives.

What the fuck gives?
The idea of insurance is to take spikes in expenses and spread them out to make them easier to handle. This does not apply to contraception, where the need for contraception is already both widespread and ongoing. It would be like buying insurance for your water bill.

If you want to subsidise the cost of contraception to reduce the perceived cost go right ahead, but it's not insurance.
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: Infographic - the war on women

Post by Serafina »

Except that "health insurance" isn't like other insurance. Because a healthy life is ultimately a human right, and some people need their "health insurance" to cover even regular costs like contraception, vaccinations and such.

Also, unlike with other insurance, in healthcare prevention is worth A LOT. By your logic we shouldn't cover regular checkups either - those are a calculable cost after all, right?
But not covering those will ultimately to a vast increase in healthcare cost, which then has to be covered by "health insurance".

Bottom line:
Health insurance is a misnomer and not comparable to, say, car insurance. Because health is a ultimate necessity for everyone.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: Infographic - the war on women

Post by Terralthra »

Grumman wrote:
xthetenth wrote:Health and Human Services (HHS) mandated that health insurance plans provide contraceptive services without co-pays.

Prior to this, viagra was covered by insurance more frequently than contraceptives.

What the fuck gives?
The idea of insurance is to take spikes in expenses and spread them out to make them easier to handle. This does not apply to contraception, where the need for contraception is already both widespread and ongoing. It would be like buying insurance for your water bill.
Small ongoing costs like birth control are orders of magnitude smaller than the spike in costs of a pregnancy and child.
User avatar
xthetenth
Jedi Master
Posts: 1192
Joined: 2010-02-20 12:45am

Re: Infographic - the war on women

Post by xthetenth »

Grumman wrote:
xthetenth wrote:Health and Human Services (HHS) mandated that health insurance plans provide contraceptive services without co-pays.

Prior to this, viagra was covered by insurance more frequently than contraceptives.

What the fuck gives?
The idea of insurance is to take spikes in expenses and spread them out to make them easier to handle. This does not apply to contraception, where the need for contraception is already both widespread and ongoing. It would be like buying insurance for your water bill.

If you want to subsidise the cost of contraception to reduce the perceived cost go right ahead, but it's not insurance.
It's functionally equivalent to if not actually preventative medicine which also gets covered under insurance because of the risk of greater costs later on as covered in previous posts. Even more than that, it's getting short shrift compared to boner pills of all things. Boner pills. What life-threatening issues do boner pills in the context of being boner pills treat? They sure aren't getting covered for the niche treatments they're used in in those numbers. What massive expense do they prevent? Hell, why don't they get not covered because they cause an increased risk of greater costs later on?
Post Reply