There's this guy I know, brilliant scientist in his field (Physics). Creationist. He got into an argument in a Comp-Sci class with the Professor over the concept of Evolutionary Algorithms. His position was that the theory evolution is flawed and therefore the entire concept behind the algorithm is flawed. Thankfully the professor shot him down rather quickly with "you can believe whatever you want, but for the purposes of this class, we will operate in reality".Darth Wong wrote:Maybe he was smart when he was young, and pickled his brain over the years. Maybe he took degrees that are a lot easier than you might think, or at least require good bullshit skills but little in the way of logic. Who knows? Either way, he says remarkably stupid things on a regular basis, and they aren't just incidents of "misspeaking", because he defends them afterwards.
Despite this, he is exceptionally skilled at the research he does. Just because one is brilliant at one thing they are good at, does not mean they have a right to spout their opinion on something they are clearly ignorant of. I think Bill-O suffers from the same problem. According to Wikipedia, His Masters was in Public Administration. His thesis was on how mandatory drug rehabilitation reduces crime, something that we can easily see fit into his worldview. I personally think he does the same thing as the South Park brothers, in that he researches and studies the hell out of things that interest him or fit with his preconceived notions, and ignores the rest.