Thanas wrote:You can legally buy silencers in the USA? What for?
Because guns are loud and loud noises cause hearing damage.
Moderator: Beowulf
Thanas wrote:You can legally buy silencers in the USA? What for?
Apparently the most common crime with sillencers is illegal posession. Actual use in a crime is essentialy non-existent.His Divine Shadow wrote:You know in Finland and Norway the only law we have on silencers is that you need to own a gun to buy one. It's been like this for ever pretty much, I can't recall a single time a suppressor has ever been used in a crime.Alyeska wrote:Silencers aren't used in crime.
Sea Skimmer wrote:Speaking of silencers, does anyone have first hand experience, or heck, know someone, who's used one of those Econo-Can suppressors that's just an adaptor for an oil filter?
The internal design is quite important as well. I've had suppressors that are bigger yet suppress worse than a smaller but better quality counterpart. I find those oil can things nearly useless for any useful purpose. It'll be fun for shooting at cans at point blank range for all of 5 minutes, then when you can't do anything useful with it later on... well there you are, minus the 200$ required to get the tax stamp for the adapter.Thanas wrote:Isn't it a bit more silent simply due to the larger size of the thing?
More Russian is always good. So how does it shoot? And how is the ammo supply?The Duchess of Zeon wrote:
A bit of Russian heat.
The proposed law is a 1 feature ban, but that bayonet lugs, fixed bayonets and flash hiders would no longer be counted as features. Some new stuff like the mentioned thumbhole stocks, and ANY button based magazine ejector would be. So the M1 rifle wouldn't be banned on features, but for the sake of making sure all those dirty evil cop killing .30-06 AP semi auto rifles are off the streets it would be banned by name.Lonestar wrote:Bayont lug + semituomatic would make the Garand a banned item. That this is even being toyed with shows just how fucking nuts Feinstein is.
Sea Skimmer wrote:
The proposed law is a 1 feature ban, but that bayonet lugs, fixed bayonets and flash hiders would no longer be counted as features. Some new stuff like the mentioned thumbhole stocks, and ANY button based magazine ejector would be. So the M1 rifle wouldn't be banned on features, but for the sake of making sure all those dirty evil cop killing .30-06 AP semi auto rifles are off the streets it would be banned by name.
I've heard a version exists with the M1 rifle on it. It really wouldn't surprise me because the people of her ilk have called for it to be banned before.Lonestar wrote: They've finally produced a list of banned rifles? I thought they hadn't yet. The NRA-ILA claims to have gotten ahold of a draft bill, but it looks like it only mentions the M1 Carbine.
Absurdly. It also seems to be the primary reason why the list of exemptions from the proposed ban is, and this much is on the idiots own website, 900 guns long. Otherwise it would be banning the majority of modern gun models. Instead it becomes a giant catch all to let the idiots pick and choose what weapons are legal, while claiming they are merely banning 'assault weapons'.Eternal_Freedom wrote:Wait, button-based magazine ejectors? Damn that's stupid.
Yeah the NRA does have the best range that I've found and they let you shoot just about anything. Maybe I should stop going right after Christmas or on weekends because you can easily end up waiting an hour, hour and a half plus for a lane.Lonestar wrote:I prefer the NRA HQ range, and will on occassion go to Blue Ridge Arsenal. I go to Bull Run for clay pigeon/skeet shooting.
I also have friends of the family that have a chunk of land in the Shenandoah for plinking purposes. I have a coworker that swears by the Lorton Small-Arms range, and have seen other NOVAians say they like the Silver Eagle range in Loudoun.
EDIT: Just to be clear, my card for the NRA range says "non-member". I refuse to give the NRA more $$$ other than using their excellent range.
So, it appears he has made no mention of a new AWB, and what his office has mentioned(requiring states to report NICS relevant info, how schools and law enforcement can be used for better campus safety, Mental Health needs to be looked out)...has made me cautiously optimistic. As he mentioned he owns firearms, and I vaguely recall him saying he owned a Garand somewhere, it might have been on the local radio "Ask the Senator" program.
Dear Mr. Lonestar,
Thank you for contacting me to share your thoughts on the tragic events in Newtown, Connecticut and your views on gun control.
On December 14, 2012, 20 innocent children and six adults lost their lives in one of the worst, most tragic shootings to ever occur in the United States. As a parent of three daughters, this was the ultimate nightmare. Like the Virginia Tech and Columbine shootings, this tragedy unfolded in what was once regarded as a safe haven free of crime and violence: a school.
I am a strong supporter of the Second Amendment constitutional right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. I own firearms and I have an "A" rating from the National Rifle Association. However, I also recognize that, like with many of our constitutional rights, our Second Amendment rights are not without limits. It is unfortunate that a tragedy of this magnitude is what is needed to prompt action, but we need to have a serious discussion on how to best avoid these kinds of mass shootings in the future. The status quo is not acceptable.
I believe our discussion should cover many issues. We can start by improving the existing criminal background check system. Currently, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is woefully incomplete, with many states failing to submit available records on persons who may be disqualified from purchasing or possessing firearms. With a more complete background check system, we can keep firearms out of the hands of those who have been deemed unfit to possess them.
In addition, we can take common sense measures such as passing the CAMPUS Safety Act (S. 3682), which I introduced last year. That bill would establish a national center for campus public safety within the Department of Justice to serve as a resource center and assist schools and universities in developing campus safety plans and threat assessment tools. We also need to look at changes to our mental health system so we can provide help to those with dangerous mental illnesses before it is too late. There will not be a single solution, but all of these issues and others need to be part of the conversation and I urge you to continue to express your views as we move forward.
Again, thank you for contacting me. For further information or to sign up for my newsletter please visit my website at http://warner.senate.gov[1] .
Sincerely, MARK R. WARNER United States Senator
Aaron MkII wrote:So what about subsonic rounds, did they ban those as well?