Manufactured plans to insert tracking chip into clothings

Exonerate · Post by **Exonerate** » 2003-03-12 11:27pm

http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,58006,00.html

02:00 AM Mar. 12, 2003 PT

In a move wireless industry analysts say will infringe on customers' privacy, clothing designer Benetton plans to weave radio frequency ID chips into its garments to track its clothes worldwide.

The chips will help the Italian clothing manufacturer cut costs by eliminating the need for workers to take inventory by manually scanning individual items of clothing. It will also protect the garments against theft, analysts say.

But analysts warn that the RFID chips could pose significant risks to customers' privacy because they would allow anyone with an RFID receiver to locate customers wearing Benetton clothes, including companies that want to sell them their products.

Mike Liard, an analyst with technology research and consulting firm Venture Development, said the more companies that embed RFID tags in their products, the more likely it is for someone to drive by a home and say, "'Look what we've got in there. An HDTV is in there, and she wears Benetton.'"

"That's a huge concern," Liard said.

Privacy advocates fear that consumers will be bombarded with intrusive advertising since a history of customers' purchases and their identities would be linked with the tag even after they leave the store.

Richard Smith, an Internet privacy and security consultant said he is eerily reminded of a scene from the movie Minority Report, when Tom Cruise enters a department store and is welcomed by a billboard ad. But instead of scanning his eyeballs as was done in Minority Report, his Benetton shirt would be scanned to identify him.

"It's extremely intrusive," Smith said of Benetton's proposed RFID system. "The surveillance network would be initially built to sell clothes in the store but could be used for this other stuff. You don't need to build anything new for that."

Among other businesses, luxury clothing retailer Prada already embeds RFID inventory tags into its clothing. Procter & Gamble, Wal-Mart and British retailer Tesco are other companies mulling over using smart tags for restocking, anti-theft and anti-counterfeit purposes.

Royal Philips Electronics is shipping 15 million RFID chips, which are the size of a grain of sand, to Benetton this year.

Phillips claims the effort is "the world's largest and most comprehensive item-level tagging implementation of RFID technology in the fashion industry to date."

Benetton, which makes casual clothes and sportswear for men, women and children, said it would weave the technology into the collar tags of clothes that cost at least $15 to keep track of them as they ship.

"Benetton has thousands of retail outlets worldwide and therefore wanted to put in place a future-proof technology to bring clear cost benefits to the business, while seamlessly enabling garments to be tracked throughout their lifetime," Terry Phipps, electronic data processing director at the Benetton Group, said in a prepared statement.

The RFID technology offers Benetton a number of advantages, not the least of which is its ease of use. Unlike a bar-code scanner, which must be held directly in front of the item being scanned, employees with RFID receivers or shelves with the technology can scan entire boxes of items from up to five feet away.

The technology would thus require fewer people to scan clothing items for inventory purposes.

It also lets business managers easily store detailed information about customers' buying habits that could spur further sales. For example, when a Benetton customer makes a purchase, a sales clerk could pull up that client's history and say, "Last time you were here, you bought a black skirt. We have a sweater that matches that skirt," Liard said.

The tagging system may also save the company money by reducing theft. The RFID tags can be programmed to set off an alarm if someone leaves a store without paying for an item.

Similarly, the technology would make it harder for merchants to sell stolen or bootlegged versions of clothing in flea markets and other venues. A retailer who spots an item that she suspects is either stolen or illegally manufactured could check its origin using the tagging system.

"You can register (the garment) at the point of sale or register it through a computer," said Victor Chu, a fashion designer and technologist who runs his own company, MIL Digital Labeling.

Chu, who has designed apparel for fashion gurus Ralph Lauren and Tommy Hilfiger, said piracy of high-end clothing and accessories by Prada, Gucci and Louis Vuitton is a "big problem," for which RFID tags may be a solution. He also wasn't alarmed by privacy concerns that may arise when customers leave retail stores with activated RFID tags.

"It's a very local signal," Chu said. "You would have to have the equipment to use it. It's not like it's a GPS tag. A GPS tag would be totally different, and that's expensive for Benetton clothing."

However, Liard sees very few advantages of the tag for consumers. It may help them find the clothes they want in the store and even make it easier for them to return items without a receipt since the store would have recorded the RFID tag.

"But once they walk out of the store, are they going to have questions in their head?" he asked.

Smith suspects that they will. He could see police and government officials wanting to use this system to nab deadbeat dads, kidnappers and other fugitives of the law.

"It's going to be a really bad idea for a company to hide a small radio chip in its clothing," Smith said. "Clearly, those tags need to be deactivated at the cash registers."

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2003-03-13 12:34am

Gah. That is both cool and disturbing.

UltraViolence83 · Post by **UltraViolence83** » 2003-03-13 02:33am

Wasn't something like this on an old thread? Didn't a lot of people say you could short out those chips incredibly easily? Like walking by a microwave or putting on a wool sweater (static electricity) and so forth.

Captain tycho · Post by **Captain tycho** » 2003-03-13 03:49am

I wanna kill something now.

UltraViolence83 · Post by **UltraViolence83** » 2003-03-13 03:51am

That is really DUMB. Couldn't you just rip those fucking things out, anyway?

Xenophobe3691 · Post by **Xenophobe3691** » 2003-03-13 06:30am

*Cues the Imperial March*

Dahak · Post by **Dahak** » 2003-03-13 08:14am

UltraViolence83 wrote:That is really DUMB. Couldn't you just rip those fucking things out, anyway?

Those chips are roughly the size of a tiny, tiny grain of sand. You won't even *see* it...

Montcalm · Post by **Montcalm** » 2003-03-13 08:22am

[paranoid]Its Big Brother man they want to track our every move.[paranoid]

God Emperor · Post by **God Emperor** » 2003-03-13 08:33am

Well look at the bright side kidnappings will go down.

UltraViolence83 · Post by **UltraViolence83** » 2003-03-13 08:42am

No, really. This topic has already been posted. I remember it. RFID chips... Some got into a debate over the feasiblity of such an idea...It was shown to not be feasible. I remember someone saying that electronics that size are too fragile and suseptable(sp?) to very tiny charges of static electricity. If that were on a wool sweater, it wold get fried when you put the damn thing on. Also, I think someone said it had to be close to a radio receiver type thing for it to work properly. Still, though. If you didn't like it, you could always walk in front of a microwave or perhaps a powerful magnet.

UltraViolence83 · Post by **UltraViolence83** » 2003-03-13 08:46am

If they do work, it's a fucking sick idea. There is no way in fucking hell I am going to let someone fucking track me like cattle. Absolutely sickening.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-03-13 01:29pm

God Emperor wrote:Well look at the bright side kidnappings will go down.

Yes, but what if you aren't concerned about being kidnapped? You shouldn't have to be forced to be tracked.

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2003-03-13 01:57pm

Couldn't you just microwave your clothes for five seconds and kill the chips? For that matter, couldn't they just have a powerful magnet at the cash register to destroy the chip?

Cap'n Hector · Post by **Cap'n Hector** » 2003-03-13 11:15pm

As I recall, the chips have a max range of about three to six feet, which makes them hard to track over distances.

Could be nice to put on the right sweater and have that validate your passwords.

UltraViolence83 · Post by **UltraViolence83** » 2003-03-14 04:22am

Groan. Why are people like that pushing for a more technologically determined future? Who the hell needs it? No way I'm wearing a chip on my clothes. That makes me an outcast thirty years from now, so be it.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2003-03-14 09:31am

Every time I hear a news story like this, I become more likely to believe the story of USA starting a global mind control program next year.