I suppose that does need some clarification. Say the physical situation was reversed and Zimmerman was on top of Martin beating him and Martin managed to get Zimmerman's gun and use it against him.JLTucker wrote:Why wouldn't he be charged?Kamakazie Sith wrote: If Martin would have shot and killed Zimmerman after taking the gun and claimed that he was defending his life from Zimmerman I wonder how this would have unfolded. Would Martin have been charged? If not, would there be claims of police corruption? Would there be claims of racism?
Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Milites Astrum Exterminans
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
The question remains. Why on earth would you insinuate that he wouldn't be charged?
- Dalton
- For Those About to Rock We Salute You
- Posts: 22640
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
- Location: New York, the Fuck You State
- Contact:
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Because it'd be considered justifiable under Stand Your Ground, I think.JLTucker wrote:The question remains. Why on earth would you insinuate that he wouldn't be charged?
To Absent Friends
"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster
May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Let's play RAR!! Hipotetical Situation!
Let's suppose that Martin was walking down the street when Zimmerman came up to him and asked him some questions. Zimmy doesn't like the answers and attempts to perform a citizen's arrest, Martin resists and they start a fight. Martin sees that Zimmy has a gun shortly before they go to the ground, Zimmy ends up on top and starts punching Martin in the head. Martin at this point makes a desperation grab for the gun, gets it, and shoots & kills Zimmerman. That is a clean shoot. Under Florida law it should not even be charged. It is perfectly justifiable self-defence.
Or let's start from the beginning of the fight and have it go a bit differently. In this alternate scenario (RAR!) it ends up the same way as what Zimmerman claims in the real life case. Martin is on top after it goes to the ground and he's punching Zimmerman in the head. Zimmerman draws his gun to shoot, but in this case Martin gets control of it and uses it to shoot & kill Zimmerman. This is now manslaughter under Florida law and possibly murder 2. Martin was on top and doing the beating, and once he had control of the gun it's his duty to exit the situation. If he doesn't he gets the book thrown at him.
Let's suppose that Martin was walking down the street when Zimmerman came up to him and asked him some questions. Zimmy doesn't like the answers and attempts to perform a citizen's arrest, Martin resists and they start a fight. Martin sees that Zimmy has a gun shortly before they go to the ground, Zimmy ends up on top and starts punching Martin in the head. Martin at this point makes a desperation grab for the gun, gets it, and shoots & kills Zimmerman. That is a clean shoot. Under Florida law it should not even be charged. It is perfectly justifiable self-defence.
Or let's start from the beginning of the fight and have it go a bit differently. In this alternate scenario (RAR!) it ends up the same way as what Zimmerman claims in the real life case. Martin is on top after it goes to the ground and he's punching Zimmerman in the head. Zimmerman draws his gun to shoot, but in this case Martin gets control of it and uses it to shoot & kill Zimmerman. This is now manslaughter under Florida law and possibly murder 2. Martin was on top and doing the beating, and once he had control of the gun it's his duty to exit the situation. If he doesn't he gets the book thrown at him.
aerius: I'll vote for you if you sleep with me.
Lusankya: Deal!
Say, do you want it to be a threesome with your wife? Or a foursome with your wife and sister-in-law? I'm up for either.
Lusankya: Deal!
Say, do you want it to be a threesome with your wife? Or a foursome with your wife and sister-in-law? I'm up for either.
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
It doesn't remain. I've answered it. Why do you think he would be charged?JLTucker wrote:The question remains. Why on earth would you insinuate that he wouldn't be charged?
Milites Astrum Exterminans
- Gil Hamilton
- Tipsy Space Birdie
- Posts: 12962
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
- Contact:
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Well, it would be a black teenager named Trayvon who isn't from the neighborhood shooting someone who IS from the neighborhood and whose story is "I was just walking, minding my own business, and then this crazy white guy just starts following me for no reason, then jumped me with a gun, which I got away from him and shot him" in freakin' Florida.Kamakazie Sith wrote:I suppose that does need some clarification. Say the physical situation was reversed and Zimmerman was on top of Martin beating him and Martin managed to get Zimmerman's gun and use it against him.
Not for nothing, but what do you think would happen?
"Show me an angel and I will paint you one." - Gustav Courbet
"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert
"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert
"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Yes. It's obvious Sith was making some sort of social commentary on racism with his stupid post before he made a clarification.Gil Hamilton wrote:Well, it would be a black teenager named Trayvon who isn't from the neighborhood shooting someone who IS from the neighborhood and whose story is "I was just walking, minding my own business, and then this crazy white guy just starts following me for no reason, then jumped me with a gun, which I got away from him and shot him" in freakin' Florida.Kamakazie Sith wrote:I suppose that does need some clarification. Say the physical situation was reversed and Zimmerman was on top of Martin beating him and Martin managed to get Zimmerman's gun and use it against him.
Not for nothing, but what do you think would happen?
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
None of which are elements of murder or self defense. It seems like you believe Martin would end up being charged and that this would be due to racism. So, do you believe a black man that is not from the neighborhood and is charged with a crime is likely a victim of racism?Gil Hamilton wrote:Well, it would be a black teenager named Trayvon who isn't from the neighborhood shooting someone who IS from the neighborhood and whose story is "I was just walking, minding my own business, and then this crazy white guy just starts following me for no reason, then jumped me with a gun, which I got away from him and shot him" in freakin' Florida.Kamakazie Sith wrote:I suppose that does need some clarification. Say the physical situation was reversed and Zimmerman was on top of Martin beating him and Martin managed to get Zimmerman's gun and use it against him.
Not for nothing, but what do you think would happen?
Yet, you still haven't made a worth while contribution with your "superior" intellect. I think I can already predict your answer though. You believe Martin would be charged if the situation were reversed. You believe this because you think the entire state of Florida is racist, or perhaps just all white cops. If this isn't correct then instead of wasting time with stupid questions you can actually give a fucking answer or maybe you can just run away from yet another discussion.JLTucker wrote: Yes. It's obvious Sith was making some sort of social commentary on racism with his stupid post before he made a clarification.
When this thread started some people assumed that racism was the reason why Zimmerman was not charged. However, none of the information learned about the incident supports that assumption. Yet, Gil and perhaps you (?) think that Martin would be charged if the self defense situation would be reversed. What basis do you have to make such a definite assumption?
Milites Astrum Exterminans
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Oh, please. I didn't run away from the last discussion. I was hospitalized like I said in your blatant display of harassment via PM. I was pissing blood. I'm sorry I didn't come here to play cops and posters with another stupid discussion. My health matters more than some silly cop getting his uniform in a bunch every time someone discusses police activity and guns. Are you happy with your vendetta?Kamakazie Sith wrote:Yet, you still haven't made a worth while contribution with your "superior" intellect. I think I can already predict your answer though. You believe Martin would be charged if the situation were reversed. You believe this because you think the entire state of Florida is racist, or perhaps just all white cops. If this isn't correct then instead of wasting time with stupid questions you can actually give a fucking answer or maybe you can just run away from yet another discussion.
Yes, I do sincerely think Martin would have been charged. Not only because he was black, but because of the same factors that happened in this case. It would be controversial too given the stand your ground law. But the funny thing is that you appear to think blacks get preferential treatment in a state that is remanded in a region that has been a blight on the country for decades. If that's not what you meant by your trite hypothetical scenario, do enlighten us. I'd also ask that you answer your own question instead of trying to race bait us.
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
You're a bit off. The last discussion that you are referring to was about murderers and life in prison and that was back in December and unless you were out for more than several weeks then you should have returned to continue the discussion that you started.JLTucker wrote: Oh, please. I didn't run away from the last discussion. I was hospitalized like I said in your blatant display of harassment via PM. I was pissing blood. I'm sorry I didn't come here to play cops and posters with another stupid discussion. My health matters more than some silly cop getting his uniform in a bunch every time someone discusses police activity and guns. Are you happy with your vendetta?
I have issue with anyone that starts a discussion under hostile pretenses and fails to continue it. That's a lack of integrity.
Based on what I know about this case I do not believe that Martin would have been charged or that African Americans receive "preferential treatment". It appears that the authorities in that area considered the evidence and the testimony of the those involved and made the most appropriate decision.Yes, I do sincerely think Martin would have been charged. Not only because he was black, but because of the same factors that happened in this case. It would be controversial too given the stand your ground law. But the funny thing is that you appear to think blacks get preferential treatment in a state that is remanded in a region that has been a blight on the country for decades. If that's not what you meant by your trite hypothetical scenario, do enlighten us. I'd also ask that you answer your own question instead of trying to race bait us.
What I find interesting is you still assume a racist conclusion to this alternative scenario when the evidence does not support that conclusion. I'm also not trying to race bait anyone. What I'm attempting to do is get you to think. Is assuming racism due to geography a sound decision? Is continuing to assume racism when the evidence fails to support that notion a sound decision? Are you being impartial? Again, I will remind you that this thread started out with many biases that at this point are unsupported by evidence.
Milites Astrum Exterminans
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
I was hospitalized at the end of December and when I got out I had to recover and I had to get things in order for school. I'm sorry that I didn't get back to our discussion while I was managing the innerworkings of my cock.Kamakazie Sith wrote:You're a bit off. The last discussion that you are referring to was about murderers and life in prison and that was back in December and unless you were out for more than several weeks then you should have returned to continue the discussion that you started.JLTucker wrote: Oh, please. I didn't run away from the last discussion. I was hospitalized like I said in your blatant display of harassment via PM. I was pissing blood. I'm sorry I didn't come here to play cops and posters with another stupid discussion. My health matters more than some silly cop getting his uniform in a bunch every time someone discusses police activity and guns. Are you happy with your vendetta?
I have issue with anyone that starts a discussion under hostile pretenses and fails to continue it. That's a lack of integrity.
For posterity, here is your harassment:
You obviously didn't give a shit and your misogyny is clearly on display. Now, kindly fuck off with your vendetta.Kamakazie Sith wrote:I'm very sorry. I sincerely hope you feel better soon.JLTucker wrote:I'm sick. My piss has the consistency and look of coffee. Our discussion can wait.Kamakazie Sith wrote:Why do you always run from every fucking thread you get involved in. Pull up your panties and defend your position, bitch.
Edit: I'm going to go further. I was also in a bit of mental strife afterward. I was contemplating hurting myself to get a procedure done that I can't afford (ask Aaron). Clearly you're more important.
- Gil Hamilton
- Tipsy Space Birdie
- Posts: 12962
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
- Contact:
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Yes, I do. Black men are far more likely be to arrested and charged for things than white men, in addition to typically being given harsher sentencing and longer jail times for the same crimes. I think that is Martin said exactly what had happened, that Zimmerman just started stalking him and attacked him for no apparent reason while he was just walking along the sidewalk, I think the Sanford police would manage to have more than a healthy amount of skepticism on the issue and not believe that he was merely walking along minding his own business.Kamakazie Sith wrote:None of which are elements of murder or self defense. It seems like you believe Martin would end up being charged and that this would be due to racism. So, do you believe a black man that is not from the neighborhood and is charged with a crime is likely a victim of racism?
"Show me an angel and I will paint you one." - Gustav Courbet
"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert
"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert
"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Like I said I have an issue with someone that starts discussions under hostile circumstances and does not return to continue the conversation. I understand the medical issue but you should have returned and if memory serves this isn't the first time you've abandoned a discussion.JLTucker wrote:
I was hospitalized at the end of December and when I got out I had to recover and I had to get things in order for school. I'm sorry that I didn't get back to our discussion while I was managing the innerworkings of my cock.
This isn't a vendetta though. You replied to me. The hit and run tactics wear thin on me.
I like how you call it harassment. How naive. It would be harassment if I continued to PM you demanding that you return.For posterity, here is your harassment:
You obviously didn't give a shit and your misogyny is clearly on display. Now, kindly fuck off with your vendetta.Kamakazie Sith wrote:I'm very sorry. I sincerely hope you feel better soon.JLTucker wrote:I'm sick. My piss has the consistency and look of coffee. Our discussion can wait.Kamakazie Sith wrote:Why do you always run from every fucking thread you get involved in. Pull up your panties and defend your position, bitch.
Edit: I'm going to go further. I was also in a bit of mental strife afterward. I was contemplating hurting myself to get a procedure done that I can't afford (ask Aaron). Clearly you're more important.[/quote]
Interesting. I guess English is taught differently where you are because being very sorry and sincerely hoping for a return to good health does not mean someone doesn't give a shit. Unlike your feeling for me, Tucker, I don't hate you. Don't project tone of voice or body language into text. I was being sincere and I still am but ny issue is you implied that you would be getting back to the discussion and you never did. I really wouldn't have an issue with that if you weren't hostile to begin with.
Now here we are having a two part discussion and you left out replying to the the other subject of this discussion. Are you done with that conversation?
Milites Astrum Exterminans
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
That's understandable to have doubts. I get that and I share it. My conclusion that Martin would not be charged is because based on what we do know the right decision was made. Still, I have my doubts but I'm following the evidence. Why do you take it a step forward and form a conclusion based off a lack of evidence to support it?Gil Hamilton wrote: Yes, I do. Black men are far more likely be to arrested and charged for things than white men, in addition to typically being given harsher sentencing and longer jail times for the same crimes. I think that is Martin said exactly what had happened, that Zimmerman just started stalking him and attacked him for no apparent reason while he was just walking along the sidewalk, I think the Sanford police would manage to have more than a healthy amount of skepticism on the issue and not believe that he was merely walking along minding his own business.
Milites Astrum Exterminans
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
I don't know what else to say. I got wrapped up in school with demanding courseloads, preparing lessons, and teaching. The only reason I'm here now is because I'm on spring break.Kamakazie Sith wrote:Like I said I have an issue with someone that starts discussions under hostile circumstances and does not return to continue the conversation. I understand the medical issue but you should have returned and if memory serves this isn't the first time you've abandoned a discussion.
Harping on about how I should have come back after facing a health crisis and being busy with school is indicative of someone who doesn't give a shit. I was hosptialized after I sent you that PM. I subsequently fell into a deep depression about my lack medical care. Then other things happened that needed attending to. The last thing on my mind was to come back here and address you. But it's all about you, though, and the severe damage to your ego when someone doesn't finish a conversation with you.Kamakazie Sith wrote:Interesting. I guess English is taught differently where you are because being very sorry and sincerely hoping for a return to good health does not mean someone doesn't give a shit. Unlike your feeling for me, Tucker, I don't hate you. Don't project tone of voice or body language into text. I was being sincere and I still am but ny issue is you implied that you would be getting back to the discussion and you never did. I really wouldn't have an issue with that if you weren't hostile to begin with.
I am. I'm conceding everything I've said about the scenario you put forth. Martin would not be arrested for being a black teenager shooting and killing someone, particularly in Florida which has an overly racist past. If he had used the stand your ground law as a defense, it would not have been controversial. The liberals who hate that laww would not be up in arms. I will disregard the content in Hamilton's post too, comments I would have made. Everything in your scenario would have been peachy and we'd all be spared 20+ page threads.Kamakazie Sith wrote:Now here we are having a two part discussion and you left out replying to the the other subject of this discussion. Are you done with that conversation?
Please accept my concession as I move on to other things, greater things.
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
It is entirely possible to give a shit about your health situation but still be irritated with your conduct.JLTucker wrote: I don't know what else to say. I got wrapped up in school with demanding courseloads, preparing lessons, and teaching. The only reason I'm here now is because I'm on spring break.
Harping on about how I should have come back after facing a health crisis and being busy with school is indicative of someone who doesn't give a shit. I was hosptialized after I sent you that PM. I subsequently fell into a deep depression about my lack medical care. Then other things happened that needed attending to. The last thing on my mind was to come back here and address you. But it's all about you, though, and the severe damage to your ego when someone doesn't finish a conversation with you.
I see a lot of potential for interesting discussion here. Instead you blow it all way continuing to be an asshole.I am. I'm conceding everything I've said about the scenario you put forth. Martin would not be arrested for being a black teenager shooting and killing someone, particularly in Florida which has an overly racist past. If he had used the stand your ground law as a defense, it would not have been controversial. The liberals who hate that laww would not be up in arms. I will disregard the content in Hamilton's post too, comments I would have made. Everything in your scenario would have been peachy and we'd all be spared 20+ page threads.
Please accept my concession as I move on to other things, greater things.
I think there would be controversy. I think Martin would not have been charged and I do have doubt because of the racism in Florida but the evidence we have seen so far in this particular case fro from those directly involved, besides Zimmerman, does not support a conclusion of racism. It doesn't rule it out either. What I'm interested in discussing is what reasoning is used to take that step from doubt to conclusion. You, and Gil, have concluded that Martin would be charged and you base this off of Florida's history. Do you think it is right or constructive to determine that individuals are racist because they live in a certain location?
Milites Astrum Exterminans
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
wtf KS people walk away from discussions all the time, JLTucker isn't even in the top 20 of those who do so regularily.
You are clearly being a dick due to vendetta issues.
You are clearly being a dick due to vendetta issues.
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
We settled the issue via PM.Spoonist wrote:wtf KS people walk away from discussions all the time, JLTucker isn't even in the top 20 of those who do so regularily.
You are clearly being a dick due to vendetta issues.
Do you have anything to add to the other topic?
Milites Astrum Exterminans
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Nice evade there... So you are allowed to tangent but I aint allowed to respond? Sweet freud.Kamakazie Sith wrote:We settled the issue via PM.Spoonist wrote:wtf KS people walk away from discussions all the time, JLTucker isn't even in the top 20 of those who do so regularily.
You are clearly being a dick due to vendetta issues.
Do you have anything to add to the other topic?
And nope don't have too much to add that couldn't be better covered in the regular gun control topics.
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Uh. You responded, man. I was just letting you know that the matter is settled via PM, like it should have been to start with. My fault.Spoonist wrote:Nice evade there... So you are allowed to tangent but I aint allowed to respond? Sweet freud.Kamakazie Sith wrote:We settled the issue via PM.Spoonist wrote:wtf KS people walk away from discussions all the time, JLTucker isn't even in the top 20 of those who do so regularily.
You are clearly being a dick due to vendetta issues.
Do you have anything to add to the other topic?
And nope don't have too much to add that couldn't be better covered in the regular gun control topics.
Milites Astrum Exterminans
- Ziggy Stardust
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3114
- Joined: 2006-09-10 10:16pm
- Location: Research Triangle, NC
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Well, let's put that little distraction aside and see if we can salvage an interesting discussion out of this ...
I don't think it is too much of a stretch to say that, in this hypothetical scenario of Martin shooting Zimmerman, that the PROBABILITY of Martin being charged would be higher than is the case with Zimmerman IRL. It has nothing to do with it being Florida. But (and correct me if I am wrong, I don't have a lot of time right now to fact check thoroughly) the statistical evidence in the US pretty strongly indicates that, all else being equal, race can be a strong factor in determining the actions of the police/courts. Even when you remove the race issue, Zimmerman's history with the neighborhood watch and such could potentially impact the way the police believe Martin's account of the story. Race aside, police MAY be more likely to believe a known neighborhood watch cooperator than a kid in a hoodie that isn't from that neighborhood.
I am not saying that Martin DEFINITELY would have been charged. Similarly, I am not saying that race was a major or determining factor in Zimmerman not being charged, as I don't necessarily believe that the arguments are equivalent.
For the purposes of discussing the issue, do you or do you not agree that in the hypothetical where the situations are reversed, the chances of Martin being charged would have been higher, even if only nominally so? If not, is it because you disagree with my reasoning here, or because you think other factors are more important in this instance?
In any case, I don't want to agree with Tucker or Gil, so try to take my point here as independent of their own.Kamakazie Sith wrote: I think there would be controversy. I think Martin would not have been charged and I do have doubt because of the racism in Florida but the evidence we have seen so far in this particular case fro from those directly involved, besides Zimmerman, does not support a conclusion of racism. It doesn't rule it out either. What I'm interested in discussing is what reasoning is used to take that step from doubt to conclusion. You, and Gil, have concluded that Martin would be charged and you base this off of Florida's history. Do you think it is right or constructive to determine that individuals are racist because they live in a certain location?
I don't think it is too much of a stretch to say that, in this hypothetical scenario of Martin shooting Zimmerman, that the PROBABILITY of Martin being charged would be higher than is the case with Zimmerman IRL. It has nothing to do with it being Florida. But (and correct me if I am wrong, I don't have a lot of time right now to fact check thoroughly) the statistical evidence in the US pretty strongly indicates that, all else being equal, race can be a strong factor in determining the actions of the police/courts. Even when you remove the race issue, Zimmerman's history with the neighborhood watch and such could potentially impact the way the police believe Martin's account of the story. Race aside, police MAY be more likely to believe a known neighborhood watch cooperator than a kid in a hoodie that isn't from that neighborhood.
I am not saying that Martin DEFINITELY would have been charged. Similarly, I am not saying that race was a major or determining factor in Zimmerman not being charged, as I don't necessarily believe that the arguments are equivalent.
For the purposes of discussing the issue, do you or do you not agree that in the hypothetical where the situations are reversed, the chances of Martin being charged would have been higher, even if only nominally so? If not, is it because you disagree with my reasoning here, or because you think other factors are more important in this instance?
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
I do believe the chances of Martin being charged are higher for all those reasons listed. What I am pointing out is that before we had the facts everyone, including myself, made conclusions regarding the mindset of others. Racism is still a problem in this country. However, assuming people are racist before the facts come in is damaging in its own way.Ziggy Stardust wrote: In any case, I don't want to agree with Tucker or Gil, so try to take my point here as independent of their own.
I don't think it is too much of a stretch to say that, in this hypothetical scenario of Martin shooting Zimmerman, that the PROBABILITY of Martin being charged would be higher than is the case with Zimmerman IRL. It has nothing to do with it being Florida. But (and correct me if I am wrong, I don't have a lot of time right now to fact check thoroughly) the statistical evidence in the US pretty strongly indicates that, all else being equal, race can be a strong factor in determining the actions of the police/courts. Even when you remove the race issue, Zimmerman's history with the neighborhood watch and such could potentially impact the way the police believe Martin's account of the story. Race aside, police MAY be more likely to believe a known neighborhood watch cooperator than a kid in a hoodie that isn't from that neighborhood.
I am not saying that Martin DEFINITELY would have been charged. Similarly, I am not saying that race was a major or determining factor in Zimmerman not being charged, as I don't necessarily believe that the arguments are equivalent.
For the purposes of discussing the issue, do you or do you not agree that in the hypothetical where the situations are reversed, the chances of Martin being charged would have been higher, even if only nominally so? If not, is it because you disagree with my reasoning here, or because you think other factors are more important in this instance?
Milites Astrum Exterminans
- Ziggy Stardust
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3114
- Joined: 2006-09-10 10:16pm
- Location: Research Triangle, NC
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
Agreed completely.
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
New development. Zimmerman's lawyers just released a bunch of photos and text messages taken from Trayvon Martin's cellphone showing him... Well, being a fairly typical US teenager, to be honest. He smoked weed, he got into playground scuffles at school, he photographed himself posing with a pistol (which was probably borrowed or a gun-range rental) and was making inquiries about buying one for himself.
It's plain and simple character assasination, and I'm not going to dignify it by sending referrer traffic the Daily Mail's way about it. (Yes, surprise surprise, they seem to be the first UK paper to pick up on it.)
It's plain and simple character assasination, and I'm not going to dignify it by sending referrer traffic the Daily Mail's way about it. (Yes, surprise surprise, they seem to be the first UK paper to pick up on it.)
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)
Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin
Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon
I Have A Blog
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)
Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin
Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon
I Have A Blog
Re: Trayvon Martin Case (Zimmerman charged; 2nd deg. murder)
How is it character assassination for there to be photos showing that a teenager is, oh holy shit, not the angel his mother wants him to be remembered as and is in fact a teenager and maybe in fact one with a rebellious streak in certain parts of his personality?