Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by PeZook »

This will change when you're flying an airship in Jool's upper atmosphere.

You know you want this!
Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.
User avatar
Imperial528
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1798
Joined: 2010-05-03 06:19pm
Location: New England

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Imperial528 »

I kind of cheated by launching this via Orion, but that was just to get it to solar orbit. It's a kethane depot, currently weighing at about 49.51 tons. Orbiting Ike because gravity is easy there:

Image

Image
User avatar
TimothyC
Of Sector 2814
Posts: 3793
Joined: 2005-03-23 05:31pm

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by TimothyC »

I finally have docking. Yes, I am that sad and pathetic.

Image

The main station module has the new Wet Workshop mod as it's main compartment. The RCS tanks are from the KSPX mod (as are the short RCS tanks on the orbiters, the large SAS modules, and the large battery on the station).
"I believe in the future. It is wonderful because it stands on what has been achieved." - Sergei Korolev
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10392
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

Well, my Lightspeed Prototype topped out at just under 1% of c, and poor Jebediah is now screaming his way past Eeloo's orbit. I think I'll leave the Orions in the barn for now.

In other news, have now mastered orbits to the point of achieving stable orbits every time, barring some rocket-related failure. I've sent Kerbals around the Mun, the mission which showed me the wonders of the NERVA engine in the stock game. Next effort is to get docking sorted so I can go and retrieve the aforementioned Kerbals.
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Serafina »

Is anyone else doing gravity assists, by the way? By now i tend to slingshot around the Mun on most on my extra-Kerbin missions, it just saves pretty significant amounts of delta-V.

It's not really complicated either - just put your vector so that you get into the Muns influence, but without getting captured. It's almost guaranteed to give you an extra bit of delta-V - while it's possible to use gravity assists to slow down, that tends to be lot more difficult (i'm still practicing that around Jool, using its moons to slow down).
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by PeZook »

I am just about to try it on the outbound leg of my Eve mission, actually, though I'm worried the lack of precision will mean I'll waste more delta-v than I've saved during correction burns.
Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.
User avatar
TimothyC
Of Sector 2814
Posts: 3793
Joined: 2005-03-23 05:31pm

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by TimothyC »

Serafina wrote:Is anyone else doing gravity assists, by the way? By now i tend to slingshot around the Mun on most on my extra-Kerbin missions, it just saves pretty significant amounts of delta-V.

It's not really complicated either - just put your vector so that you get into the Muns influence, but without getting captured. It's almost guaranteed to give you an extra bit of delta-V - while it's possible to use gravity assists to slow down, that tends to be lot more difficult (i'm still practicing that around Jool, using its moons to slow down).
Pezook is right, the amount of DeltaV you buy tends to not be worth more than the extra you need for course corrections unless the timing is perfect. For slowing down, Aero-braking is very useful to complete a capture.
"I believe in the future. It is wonderful because it stands on what has been achieved." - Sergei Korolev
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Simon_Jester »

In real life, gravity-assists are planned out years in advance by teams of NASA astrodynamicists with supercomputers; it's no wonder that we can't do it by the seat of our pants in KSP.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Vanas
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1808
Joined: 2005-03-12 05:31pm
Location: Surfing the Moho
Contact:

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Vanas »

TimothyC wrote:I finally have docking. Yes, I am that sad and pathetic.
To be fair, I've not docked anything yet. I've just sent up a docking testbed thing, but as ever, I'm doing everything with no plan, clue or autopilot, so it should be interesting.
According to wikipedia, "the Mohorovičić discontinuity is the boundary between the Earth's crust and the mantle."
According to Starbound, it's a problem solvable with enough combat drugs to turn you into the Incredible Hulk.
Grumman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2488
Joined: 2011-12-10 09:13am

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Grumman »

I'm having another go at building my first space station, and this is the first module. It features twelve micro-rockets, each of which weighs 300 kilograms and is capable of safely delivering a Kerbal from Low Kerbin Orbit to the surface.
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7504
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Zaune »

Well, I got Jeb to the Mun. He doesn't have enough fuel to get back off again, and I've yet to replicate the feat of entering a stable Munar orbit, but the lander's on the surface and more or less in working order.

Also, I've learned that gravity turns aren't all they're cracked up to be; if your rocket has even slightly imperfect flight characteristics it tends to result in unplanned lithobraking.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
User avatar
TimothyC
Of Sector 2814
Posts: 3793
Joined: 2005-03-23 05:31pm

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by TimothyC »

Zaune wrote:Well, I got Jeb to the Mun. He doesn't have enough fuel to get back off again, and I've yet to replicate the feat of entering a stable Munar orbit, but the lander's on the surface and more or less in working order.

Also, I've learned that gravity turns aren't all they're cracked up to be; if your rocket has even slightly imperfect flight characteristics it tends to result in unplanned lithobraking.
The main thing to do is make sure your center of drag is aft of your center of mass. Sometimes this means that you have larger fins on your first stage that you don't always need.
"I believe in the future. It is wonderful because it stands on what has been achieved." - Sergei Korolev
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7504
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Zaune »

Huh. I thought the ideal was for the centre of lift exactly dead-on or slightly in front of the centre of mass.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
Grumman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2488
Joined: 2011-12-10 09:13am

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Grumman »

Zaune wrote:Huh. I thought the ideal was for the centre of lift exactly dead-on or slightly in front of the centre of mass.
No. Think of it like a parachute - the centre of mass wants to keep going at the same speed, while the centre of drag wants to go more slowly. If the back of the rocket is trying to go faster than the front of the rocket, it is inclined to flip, making it less stable.
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7504
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Zaune »

Okay, that makes sense. Thanks.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
User avatar
TimothyC
Of Sector 2814
Posts: 3793
Joined: 2005-03-23 05:31pm

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by TimothyC »

Zaune wrote:Okay, that makes sense. Thanks.
It follows also that you want your center of lift aft of your center of mass because if the CoL is forward of the CoM, your plane wants to pitch up uncontrollably. don't forget to think about how the the CoM changes as the fuel gets burned.
"I believe in the future. It is wonderful because it stands on what has been achieved." - Sergei Korolev
Grumman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2488
Joined: 2011-12-10 09:13am

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Grumman »

I've just landed my second rover on the Mun, after the first was destroyed in a freak handbrake accident. This is the rocket that got it there.
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7504
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Zaune »

So... Guessing you don't have the improved aerodynamics mod installed?
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
Grumman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2488
Joined: 2011-12-10 09:13am

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Grumman »

No, I don't. The only mod I have is the Kerbal Engineer, to do the work of calculating rocket stats for me.
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7504
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Zaune »

First successful Mun landing and return! Hell yeah!
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
Grumman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2488
Joined: 2011-12-10 09:13am

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Grumman »

Space Station Goliath is up and running. It weighs 70 tons, and was delivered to orbit by three 40-ton turborockets.
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by PeZook »

I really love the microrockets, but I can't help but wonder if the chutes don't rip the girders off when they deploy.
Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.
Grumman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2488
Joined: 2011-12-10 09:13am

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Grumman »

PeZook wrote:I really love the microrockets, but I can't help but wonder if the chutes don't rip the girders off when they deploy.
It hasn't been a problem so far. Mk 1 command pods are capable of landing with a single Mk 16 chute, and the microrockets only weigh a third as much. They just don't have enough inertia to fail in such a manner. Here's proof, from the first manned test.
Grumman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2488
Joined: 2011-12-10 09:13am

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Grumman »

Just a heads up: The next patch (0.21) is probably going to be out next week, and it will break save game compatibility. They're changing how the game keeps track of your Kerbanauts and improving the Mun terrain, so if you want your stuff to carry over you might need to do some tinkering or copying and pasting to get things working.
Marko Dash
Jedi Knight
Posts: 719
Joined: 2006-01-29 03:42am
Location: south carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: Kerbal Space Program, Revisited.

Post by Marko Dash »

ASAS is also getting reworked, IIRC the ASAS part itself is going away and the function will be integral to the pods. the way it acts is also being changed so that it doesn't over react when it's close to the set heading, so control surfaces won't flap around endlessly, and it wont waste as much RCS fuel.
If a black-hawk flies over a light show and is not harmed, does that make it immune to lasers?
Post Reply