Star Trek Armour

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10413
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

Crazedwraith wrote:
That's hilarious according to Voyager polarising your hull can a) be used to increase your sensor visibility and make it more likely a downed shuttle be found or b> be used to hide yourself from enemy sensors and approach undetected.

one bit of technobabble, two completely opposite uses.
[trektard]Obviously you polarize it one way for stealth and one way for obviousness, duh![/trektard]
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16427
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Batman »

While I can't think of any reason why you'd want that as a feature in a system the primary purpose of is to strengthen your hull (somehow), modern day ECM can do just that.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10413
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

Batman wrote:While I can't think of any reason why you'd want that as a feature in a system the primary purpose of is to strengthen your hull (somehow), modern day ECM can do just that.
Maybe it wasn't the intended feature but turned out to be occasionally useful and deemed to be worth keeping (or deemed not problematic enough to be worth loosing the whole strengthened hull aspect).
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16427
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Batman »

My point was it IS entirely possible for a system to both be 'YAY! Big Honking Target' AND 'Nobody Here, move along' in the real world, so something like that happening in Trek (intentional or otherwise) is hardly unbelievable.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
aussiemuscle308
Padawan Learner
Posts: 201
Joined: 2011-01-20 10:53pm

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by aussiemuscle308 »

Prometheus Unbound wrote:Image

Circa 2365
Is that a Federation toilet on the second level? :twisted:
========================================
If you believe in Telekinesis, raise my hand.
Prometheus Unbound
Jedi Master
Posts: 1141
Joined: 2007-09-28 06:46am

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Prometheus Unbound »

In 2375, Tom Paris attempted to polarize the Delta Flyer's hull after it had crash-landed in order to make it easier for the USS Voyager's sensors to find them. (VOY: "Once Upon a Time")

In 2376, Voyager's hull was polarized in order to mask their approach towards the errant USS Equinox. (VOY: "Equinox, Part II")


:/

Oh, Voyager.
NecronLord wrote:
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
User avatar
EnterpriseSovereign
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4362
Joined: 2006-05-12 12:19pm
Location: Spacedock

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by EnterpriseSovereign »

"Year of hell" comes to mind, where Voyager had to go to warp without the SIF field. Since the ship had been completely shot up by the Krenim, there were bits of hull literally falling off. In "The Disease" it was shown that the field could be temporarily extended to protect another ship if it was docked, though it did put Voyager at risk.

It seems that the whole polarising hull has one effect when used on a starship, and the opposite when applied to a shuttle :lol:
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Enigma »

EnterpriseSovereign wrote:"Year of hell" comes to mind, where Voyager had to go to warp without the SIF field. Since the ship had been completely shot up by the Krenim, there were bits of hull literally falling off. In "The Disease" it was shown that the field could be temporarily extended to protect another ship if it was docked, though it did put Voyager at risk.

It seems that the whole polarising hull has one effect when used on a starship, and the opposite when applied to a shuttle :lol:
I thought it was the deflector dish being offline that caused Voyager to slowly disintegrate?
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16427
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Batman »

No, I'm reasonably certain that it was the SIF being offline (combined with massive battle damage to her hull) that made VOY come apart at Warp.
And the navigational deflector's job is to keep stuff from hitting the ship, NOT to keep in one piece during Warp travel. There was an incident where timely reactivation of the nav deflector prevented space debris from (further) crippling the ship in 'Year of Hell' so maybe your thinking of that.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Darth Nostril
Jedi Knight
Posts: 986
Joined: 2008-04-25 02:46pm
Location: Totally normal island

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Darth Nostril »

Prometheus Unbound wrote:
In 2375, Tom Paris attempted to polarize the Delta Flyer's hull after it had crash-landed in order to make it easier for the USS Voyager's sensors to find them. (VOY: "Once Upon a Time")

In 2376, Voyager's hull was polarized in order to mask their approach towards the errant USS Equinox. (VOY: "Equinox, Part II")


:/

Oh, Voyager.
Positive polarization makes a ship more detectable.
Negative polarization makes a ship less detectable.
And Neutral polarization reverses entropy, quantumizes everything in sight, makes cracks in singularity event horizons and permanently suppresses higher brain functions (hence the survival of Neelix for the entire duration when a sane crew would have spaced him five minutes after meeting him)
So I stare wistfully at the Lightning for a couple of minutes. Two missiles, sharply raked razor-thin wings, a huge, pregnant belly full of fuel, and the two screamingly powerful engines that once rammed it from a cold start to a thousand miles per hour in under a minute. Life would be so much easier if our adverseries could be dealt with by supersonic death on wings - but alas, Human resources aren't so easily defeated.

Imperial Battleship, halt the flow of time!

My weird shit NSFW
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Eternal_Freedom wrote:
Crazedwraith wrote:
That's hilarious according to Voyager polarising your hull can a) be used to increase your sensor visibility and make it more likely a downed shuttle be found or b> be used to hide yourself from enemy sensors and approach undetected.

one bit of technobabble, two completely opposite uses.
[trektard]Obviously you polarize it one way for stealth and one way for obviousness, duh![/trektard]
Or its actually the same principle being used for active cancellation of enemy sensor pulses, which we can actually do with modern aircraft radars, and the polarization of the hull is just creating a medium to broadcast it somehow.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Prometheus Unbound
Jedi Master
Posts: 1141
Joined: 2007-09-28 06:46am

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Prometheus Unbound »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
Eternal_Freedom wrote:
Crazedwraith wrote:
That's hilarious according to Voyager polarising your hull can a) be used to increase your sensor visibility and make it more likely a downed shuttle be found or b> be used to hide yourself from enemy sensors and approach undetected.

one bit of technobabble, two completely opposite uses.
[trektard]Obviously you polarize it one way for stealth and one way for obviousness, duh![/trektard]
Or its actually the same principle being used for active cancellation of enemy sensor pulses, which we can actually do with modern aircraft radars, and the polarization of the hull is just creating a medium to broadcast it somehow.
Do you honestly thing they thought that through?
NecronLord wrote:
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16427
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Batman »

Most likely not. Just because they hit on something that looks like it would actually work and even has real-world precedence of a sort essentially by random chance doesn't change the fact that they did, though.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Tribble
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3130
Joined: 2008-11-18 11:28am
Location: stardestroyer.net

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Tribble »

Some ships also appear to have double-layer hulls for at least certain areas like Engineering. The E-D for example was shown to have that in BOBW. Presumably that was why it was able to survive for MUCH longer against the Borg's cutting beam than other Starfleet ships. The inner hull was apparently more heavily armoured than the outer one: once the shields went down the outer hull was pretty quickly breached, while the inner hull lasted long enough for Data to shut the Cube down.
"I reject your reality and substitute my own!" - The official Troll motto, as stated by Adam Savage
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Connor MacLeod »

How does one envision armor is actually supposed to work in trek to begin with? Start there, and then you can decide whether they are armored or not (EG like Sea Skimmer's ideas.)
User avatar
Lord MJ
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1562
Joined: 2002-07-07 07:40pm
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Armour

Post by Lord MJ »

Voyager flying itself apart in YOH is something that always bothered me.

Was Voyager just cruising around at impulse speeds for weeks? How did Voyager cover 20 light years in 3 weeks without warp drive. Furthermore Voyager had 5 days without any Krenim attacks (was after the timeline changed reducing them to a pre-warp civilization) and they didn't manage to do anything to repair the SIF?

Furthermore in Part 2, it is heavily implied that they were traveling at warp after they left their nebula. So a Voyager that is practically falling apart can travel at warp, but a relatively intact Voyager can not?

Gah!
Post Reply