Stark Trek Into Darkness *SPOILERS*
Moderator: Vympel
- Lord Revan
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 12235
- Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
- Location: Zone:classified
Re: Stark Trek Into Darkness *SPOILERS*
I wouldn't be supriced if Admiral Marcus had left the Starfleet chain of command in a mess after the attack in San Fransisco on purpose to make sure no "peace loving weakling" (read:anyone sane) would be able to stop him if they found about his plans. So earth CnC might have been trying to figure out who has the authority to launch the ships since they can't get Marcus to authorize it (as he's dead at this point).
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
Re: Stark Trek Into Darkness *SPOILERS*
While it wasn't made entirely clear, I got the impression that the Vengeance was limping toward Earth on what little engine power it had left after the exploding torpedoes tore the guts out of the engineering section. To anyone watching it would probably have looked as if the Vengeance was trying to stop the Enterprise's own near-death spiral, with the first clue of Khan's attempted suicide run probably not being until it flew past the Enterprise in Earth's atmosphere, which would have been WAY too late to do anything about it.Batman wrote:Mind you if the sequence had been much longer I would ask why no other ship tried to tow Vengeance clear or at least blew her into harmlessly small chunks before reentry, (or did the same for the Big E when she was deorbiting) but as depicted I'm perfectly willing to accept 'what the hell is going on' general confusion to explain why nobody else got involved in that.
- Arawn Fenn
- Youngling
- Posts: 116
- Joined: 2012-08-16 10:03pm
- Location: Dol Guldur
Re: Stark Trek Into Darkness *SPOILERS*
Yeah, that was the point. So how do some dead ships at Vulcan mitigate the issue of an apparent lack of ships at Earth?Batman wrote:That'd be the part where Nero had already blown them to scrap by the time the Big E arrived at Vulcan?
No, I think I was arguing that Earth appeared to be completely undefended as usual. But have fun with that strawman, I guess.NecronLord wrote:Are you seriously arguing that they should have kept those ships around Earth instead of helping Vulcan?
- Eternal_Freedom
- Castellan
- Posts: 10413
- Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
- Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire
Re: Stark Trek Into Darkness *SPOILERS*
Earth was undefended because they sent all available ships (seven of them) to help Vulcan since the main fleet was elsewhere. Those ships get massacred and the main fleet still can't make it back in time to stop the Narada. This really isn't hard to understand.
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."
Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."
Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
- NecronLord
- Harbinger of Doom
- Posts: 27384
- Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
- Location: The Lost City
Re: Stark Trek Into Darkness *SPOILERS*
They had ships at Earth, fuckwit. Then they were called away. If you are arguing that they should have kept Earth defended then you consequently argue that some or all of those ships should not have gone to help Vulcan.Arawn Fenn wrote:No, I think I was arguing that Earth appeared to be completely undefended as usual. But have fun with that strawman, I guess.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
- Arawn Fenn
- Youngling
- Posts: 116
- Joined: 2012-08-16 10:03pm
- Location: Dol Guldur
Re: Stark Trek Into Darkness *SPOILERS*
Thanks for the recap, Einstein.NecronLord wrote:Then they were called away.
What am I, your puppet? Maybe some of them should not have gone to the Laurentian system. Either way the problem remains: Earth was completely undefended by a certain point in the film. And you seem to indicate that this was by choice: that they intentionally left no ships behind. Which was kind of the point. So I think it fits the pattern. But I guess each incidence of this trope is a uniquely special little snowflake, or something.NecronLord wrote:If you are arguing that they should have kept Earth defended then you consequently argue that some or all of those ships should not have gone to help Vulcan.
- Batman
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 16427
- Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
- Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks
Re: Stark Trek Into Darkness *SPOILERS*
None of them did. They went to the Vulcan system.What am I, your puppet? Maybe some of them should not have gone to the Laurentian system.NecronLord wrote:If you are arguing that they should have kept Earth defended then you consequently argue that some or all of those ships should not have gone to help Vulcan.
The trope is that there's never any starships around to defend Earth period. There undeniably were quite a few of them in this movie. Yes, they decided to send all of them to Vulcan, but that trip took all of what, 5 minutes? With that kind of response time yo can afford to leave your strategic centre uncovered for a short period of time especially when there is zero evidence of an external threat.Either way the problem remains: Earth was completely undefended by a certain point in the film. And you seem to indicate that this was by choice: that they intentionally left no ships behind. Which was kind of the point. So I think it fits the pattern. But I guess each incidence of this trope is a uniquely special little snowflake, or something.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
Re: Stark Trek Into Darkness *SPOILERS*
I think he's talking about the fleet rendezvous Spock was going to until Kirk got back aboard and changed the plan.Batman wrote:None of them did. They went to the Vulcan system.What am I, your puppet? Maybe some of them should not have gone to the Laurentian system.NecronLord wrote:If you are arguing that they should have kept Earth defended then you consequently argue that some or all of those ships should not have gone to help Vulcan.
Earth wasn't undefended, though. Remember those defense grid codes Nero was so eager to get from Pike? Earth was protected by a defense system that gave even Nero enough pause for him to go out of his way to secure the codes; and this is with the same ship that took out something like 40 Klingons and then wiped the floor with the Starfleet relief force at Vulcan. Apparently it's pretty good.Arawn Fenn wrote:And you seem to indicate that this was by choice: that they intentionally left no ships behind. Which was kind of the point. So I think it fits the pattern. But I guess each incidence of this trope is a uniquely special little snowflake, or something.
"How can I wait unknowing?
This is the price of war,
We rise with noble intentions,
And we risk all that is pure..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, Forever (Rome: Total War)
"On and on, through the years,
The war continues on..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, We Are All One (Medieval 2: Total War)
"Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear." - Ambrose Redmoon
"You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." - Harvey Dent, The Dark Knight
This is the price of war,
We rise with noble intentions,
And we risk all that is pure..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, Forever (Rome: Total War)
"On and on, through the years,
The war continues on..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, We Are All One (Medieval 2: Total War)
"Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear." - Ambrose Redmoon
"You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." - Harvey Dent, The Dark Knight