Kitsune wrote:See this is one of those posts which shows that you use written abuse in your posts
Yes, yes it is. You've really managed to be here for a long time without grasping the board culture, haven't you?
Kitsune wrote:Raw Shark wrote:My hat's off to you, Sir: Not even David Copperfield would have the audacity to attempt to move a set of goalposts so far, so fast, without a live audience noticing.
What does this even mean?
David Copperfield is a stage magician famous for appearing to move large objects surreptitiously.
Moving the Goalposts is the manner of dishonesty you are using in the text I was referring to. Am I going to have to Google everything for you, or are you done with that copy of Helter Skelter yet?
Kitsune wrote:Raw Shark wrote:Sounds like that guy got totally screwed by the system. What does that have to do with the case in question?
The prosecutor had to come up with a strange explanation to explain the lack of blood.
Same her, you have a lack of evidence of him in the crime scenem, no DNA evidence, and no blood in the car he used.
Sure, but this guy had four people providing an alibi and didn't confess. I'm really not seeing the similarity.
Kitsune wrote:Raw Shark wrote:Congratulations on equating traffic court with 1st Degree Murder. You have officially failed the Turing Test.
You fail. . . .The evidence to convict for murder should be much higher than a traffic case.
Yes, but the reluctance to waste court time and investigative resources on an ambiguous traffic case should be greater than in a murder case.
Kitsune wrote:Raw Shark wrote:No, I wrote, "Go whack off over a copy of Helter Skelter, you dumbfuck strawmanning murder groupie," because I made a valid point (that your claim that I quoted demonstrates textbook CSI Effect), and you responded with a lazy generalization that misrepresented my position, like I said in the same post. You were therefore being a dishonest weasel, and the rules here say that I get to insult you all I like if you are being a dishonest weasel. Please do try to pull your head out of your ass and get it right. Maybe it's time for a change of avatar - I'd suggest Smartass the Weasel from Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, but right now you're acting more like his henchman Stupid...
I read this as simple verbal abuse. You seem completely unable to deal with people disagreeing with you.
No, I am unable to deal with people who are disagreeing with me dishonestly in a polite manner.
Kitsune wrote:Raw Shark wrote:That's too bad, because if you had, you would've noticed that I pointed out that what you are currently admitting to is a clear violation of the board rules. Jackass.
Fine report me to the moderators and do not forget to add that part of the reason was because I do not enjoy reading your personal abuse.
No, seriously, read
Posting Rules 3 and 5 and Debating Rule 3. This is not the kind of board where you get to say, "I don't have to respond to your valid points because you used mean words!" as I've pointed out repeatedly, you fucking crybaby.