House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

Post by General Zod »

This is bordering on conspiracy theory, but I think it's an interesting take on the situation and implies that Cantor's loss wasn't just some random fluke but the concerted effort of a few financial backers to oust Cantor from office.

http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-r ... -elections
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who has always been considered one of the more Conservative members of the House, lost in a primary to upstart Tea Party challenger David Brat.

Brat, an economics college professor, was vastly outraised by Cantor, and most polls leading up to the primary showed Cantor with a very comfortable lead.

In the immediate aftermath of last night’s shocker in Virginia, analysts have been saying Brat’s victory was just a fluke.

They couldn’t be more wrong.

Dave Brat’s victory wasn’t just a fluke, and he isn’t just some Tea Partying economics college professor from Virginia.

Both he and his victory have dark money written all over them.

Back in 2008 during America’s financial collapse, BB&T Bank was one of the many big banks that crashed. In order to stay afloat, that bank took a $3.1 billion bailout from the Bush administration.

At the helm of the bank at that time was John Allison, an Ayn Rand-loving CEO.

According to The Street, during his time as CEO of BB&T, Allison regularly used the BB&T Charitable Foundation, “to provide grants to schools that agree to create courses on capitalism that feature the study of ‘Atlas Shrugged.’”

Meanwhile, according to New York Magazine, Allison gave $500,000 to Randolph-Macon College to hire Dave Brat, so that he too could teach the Ayn Rand libertarian philosophy as an economics professor.

Shortly after BB&T accepted $3.1 billion government bailout from the Bush Administration, Allison resigned as CEO, and was picked up by Charles Koch, to become the new president of the Cato Institute, formerly known as the Charles Koch Foundation, and to keep spreading the work of Rand.

Much like the BB&T Charitable Foundation, Koch-allied groups like The Cato Institute have spent millions of dollars, putting college professors in economics departments across the country, so that they can spread the good word of Ayn Rand, and help create a libertarian paradise in America.

As ThinkProgress pointed out back in 2011, Florida State University’s economics department accepted a $1.5 million grant from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation, now the Cato Institute, which would provide funding for new professors, who would likely teach about Ayn Rand and libertarian economics.

Similarly, Koch-backed groups have given money to a number of other universities, including West Virginia University, George Mason University, Clemson University, and even the Ivy-League Brown University.

Basically, the Kochtopus is spending millions and millions of dollars, placing college professors in economics departments across the country, so that they can promote Ayn Rand and the libertarian philosophy to future generations of Americans.

So, Dave Brat is far more than just a college professor who beat Eric Cantor in a fluke of a primary.

He is a complete shill for Ayn Rand-loving libertarians and the Koch Brothers.

And he is apparently a graduate of the Kochtopus’ “Teach Ayn Rand in College, Do Well, and We’ll Send You to Washington” program.

Besides saying that Brat’s win was just a fluke and that he’s just a college professor, pundits have also been saying that Cantor lost to Brat because of his stances on immigration, and because he ran a poor campaign.

Again, that couldn’t be further from the truth.

Last night, after Cantor was declared the loser, talking heads on Fox So-Called News praised the power of talk radio, and gave credit to right-wing talk radio pundits, particularly Laura Ingraham and Mark Levin, for Brat’s win. That credit is probably well deserved.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22463
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Re: House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

Post by Mr Bean »

There are two problems with this theory
1. They don't provide a line between "Koch funded professor" to "Koch guy wins"
2. They don't mention or list any Koch influences or spending during the run up to Cantor losing.


As far as anyone can tell Brat won on the fact he took a position on one issue and stuck by it while Cantor tried to take that same issue and have it both ways. Further Cantor ignored his home district to spend most of his time focusing on his national ambitions. It's not like Brat had ten million in ad buys going into the voting or Cantor was being slammed by 3rd party groups day in day out. Cantor spent much more than the other guy and was MIA from a lot of events in his state that politicos are expected to attend.

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Iroscato
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2360
Joined: 2011-02-07 03:04pm
Location: Great Britain (It's great, honestly!)

Re: House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

Post by Iroscato »

So the bare-bones reason that I can glean from this is...Cantor just got complacent and assumed he would win easily?
Yeah, I've always taken the subtext of the Birther movement to be, "The rules don't count here! This is different! HE'S BLACK! BLACK, I SAY! ARE YOU ALL BLIND!?

- Raw Shark

Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent.

- SirNitram (RIP)
User avatar
White Haven
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6360
Joined: 2004-05-17 03:14pm
Location: The North Remembers, When It Can Be Bothered

Re: House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

Post by White Haven »

Which, to be fair, had been the case for quite some time.

Oops.
Image
Image
Chronological Incontinence: Time warps around the poster. The thread topic winks out of existence and reappears in 1d10 posts.

Out of Context Theatre, this week starring Darth Nostril.
-'If you really want to fuck with these idiots tell them that there is a vaccine for chemtrails.'

Fiction!: The Final War (Bolo/Lovecraft) (Ch 7 9/15/11), Living (D&D, Complete)Image
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

Post by Knife »

His poller was telling him he had it by 30 points. lol.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Maraxus
Padawan Learner
Posts: 309
Joined: 2004-10-10 04:13pm
Location: University of California at Santa Barbara

Re: House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

Post by Maraxus »

At least the honest pollsters are owning up to how bad they are at their jobs:
The Washington Post wrote:It’s no wonder that CBS News deploys pollster Frank Luntz as a contributor. He’s quotable.

In a segment on the news of the day — House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s primary loss to challenger Dave Brat — “CBS This Morning” co-anchor Charlie Rose asked Luntz why Cantor hadn’t seen the loss coming.

Luntz ate it up: “Right now there are 230 House Republicans who are waking up praying that they do not have Eric Cantor’s pollster. Honestly, and I’m one of them, we Republican pollsters suck. We have no ability to be able to analyze the electorate.”

Good, fun TV.

Yet as Media Matters’ Eric Hananoki points out, compromised TV, too. Luntz is the CEO of the political strategy firm Luntz Global, which has received more than $15,000 in fees from Cantor for Congress, as Hananoki details via Federal Election Commission filings.

Accordingly, it may be little surprise that Luntz lamented Cantor’s electoral fail: “I think for the GOP it’s going to be very dangerous now for a Republican to talk to Democrats, as it was Democrats to talk to Republicans a few years ago. That this a blow for conversation. This is a blow for some sort of cooperation and I think it’s bad for the country, not just bad for the Republicans,” said Luntz.

Also, this: “I think this is such a great loss not just for Virginia, but for the country. Eric Cantor had the ability to negotiate. Eric Cantor had the ability to sit toe to toe and make concessions and make agreements. And maybe that hurt him in the primary, but that’s exactly what we need in Washington, and now we’re losing him.”

Through all that, CBS News didn’t disclose to viewers that Luntz’s firm had worked for Cantor. The network did identify him as a “Republican strategist.”

Rose, perhaps in an attempt to even the segment’s take on Cantor, noted that the Virginia Republican was a “pipeline to Wall Street” for raising funds. Luntz amplified on the tubular metaphor, insisting that Cantor was a “pipeline to Americans who just wanted people to get things done.”

What does CBS News have to say about this? “His work as a strategist for Republicans was disclosed on the broadcast,” noted CBS News spokeswoman Sonya McNair.

There’s some logic here: Saying that Luntz strategizes for Republicans could be interpreted to encompass his work for Cantor, who is a Republican certainly in need of political strategy.

Yet this is an on-air title, not an on-air disclosure. When it comes to getting people to say favorable things about other people, there’s nothing like a consultant-client relationship to facilitate things. When money changes hands, journalism ethics must pay heed.

CNN last year tried a similar trick: Critics were blasting the network for failing to disclose the connections of “Crossfire” co-host Newt Gingrich to politicians on the show. CNN blasted back:

We are clarifying the policy and making it clear Newt Gingrich is not in violation. The policy: If a Crossfire co-host has made a financial contribution to a politician who appears on the program or is the focus of the program, disclosure is not required during the show since the co-host’s political support is obvious by his or her point of view expressed on the program.
Link
User avatar
PKRudeBoy
Padawan Learner
Posts: 249
Joined: 2010-01-22 07:18pm
Location: long island

Re: House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

Post by PKRudeBoy »

That last paragraph is one of the most mendacious peices of bullshit that I have ever seen. They don't have to disclose that they are a shill because it should be "obvious"! What the hell?
User avatar
Gaidin
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2646
Joined: 2004-06-19 12:27am
Contact:

Re: House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

Post by Gaidin »

All things being equal, I'm on my phone right now so I can't satisfactorily source this. But the thing I found interesting is Brat's one largely one subject(hitting immigration) campaign in a district that according to a 60% republican poll, wants reform, one wonders why he lost. Until the same poll reveals an approval/disapproval rating of 30/60. I'm thinking he won by not being Cantor, and word through the ether is he's already tripping over actual interviews. I'm afk for the evening, so I'll try to dig up those polls I found tomorrow.

Of course Boehner is still blaming everything on Obama anyway so it's not like what actually happened in Virginia 7 would effect any national debate if it got outside Virginia's border in any real sense way.
User avatar
Crown
NARF
Posts: 10615
Joined: 2002-07-11 11:45am
Location: In Transit ...

Re: House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

Post by Crown »

Gaidin wrote:All things being equal, I'm on my phone right now so I can't satisfactorily source this. But the thing I found interesting is Brat's one largely one subject(hitting immigration) campaign in a district that according to a 60% republican poll, wants reform, one wonders why he lost. Until the same poll reveals an approval/disapproval rating of 30/60. I'm thinking he won by not being Cantor, and word through the ether is he's already tripping over actual interviews. I'm afk for the evening, so I'll try to dig up those polls I found tomorrow.
I think both The Young Turks and Jon Stewart (might be wrong about Jon) did a bit where they're showing up the 'hitting immigration' meme is just that; a media meme that has no basis in reality.

Bart hit Cantor by not being Cantor. He hit crony capitalism in politics. He hit the lack of ethics by the current elect elite. He hit the fact that they do not make decisions on what is good for their electorate but for what is good for their business partners. Yes, he also hit immigration, but interestingly in another Tea Party primary challenge where the incumbent was repeatedly and consistently attacked on immigration, the Tea Partier got crushed.
Image
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
Pelranius
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3539
Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
Location: Around and about the Beltway

Re: House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

Post by Pelranius »

Gaidin wrote:All things being equal, I'm on my phone right now so I can't satisfactorily source this. But the thing I found interesting is Brat's one largely one subject(hitting immigration) campaign in a district that according to a 60% republican poll, wants reform, one wonders why he lost. Until the same poll reveals an approval/disapproval rating of 30/60. I'm thinking he won by not being Cantor, and word through the ether is he's already tripping over actual interviews. I'm afk for the evening, so I'll try to dig up those polls I found tomorrow.

Of course Boehner is still blaming everything on Obama anyway so it's not like what actually happened in Virginia 7 would effect any national debate if it got outside Virginia's border in any real sense way.
As Shep noted over on the other board, Cantor's attitude was pretty much "I'll throw money at Brat until he cries uncle". Brat pulled a Santorum, that is he had a very strong door to door grassroots effort while Cantor pissed away money in ridiculous ads like the "Brat is a liberal college professor" bullshit.
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.
User avatar
Gaidin
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2646
Joined: 2004-06-19 12:27am
Contact:

Re: House Maj. Leader Eric Cantor loses primary

Post by Gaidin »

Crown wrote: I think both The Young Turks and Jon Stewart (might be wrong about Jon) did a bit where they're showing up the 'hitting immigration' meme is just that; a media meme that has no basis in reality.

Bart hit Cantor by not being Cantor. He hit crony capitalism in politics. He hit the lack of ethics by the current elect elite. He hit the fact that they do not make decisions on what is good for their electorate but for what is good for their business partners. Yes, he also hit immigration, but interestingly in another Tea Party primary challenge where the incumbent was repeatedly and consistently attacked on immigration, the Tea Partier got crushed.
Yea, he campaigned on more than immigration locally, but it's immigration that is all anybody else knew regarding the campaign in Virginia 7, sorry about not being clear about that. So in the first night or two all you see when the press reels from the surprise of the election you see headlines of immigration being dead on arrival, etc. But then, when you look at the polling I referenced, done on June 10th, you see what I described. 20% democrat makeup in the poll. 72% support reform. Which says the press was just reeling, and it was the first question about his approval/disapproval that as far as that polling goes that could hint at what really killed him.
Post Reply