Gondolas as Mass-Transit
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- Arthur_Tuxedo
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5637
- Joined: 2002-07-23 03:28am
- Location: San Francisco, California
Re: Gondolas as Mass-Transit
Seems like my city would have been a lot better off with a few gondolas instead of the $2+ billion Central Subway project. With a downtown that gets absolutely slammed with traffic, steep hills north of downtown where bus service sucks, and major tourist areas within a mile of the financial district, this city would appear to be a perfect candidate.
"I'm so fast that last night I turned off the light switch in my hotel room and was in bed before the room was dark." - Muhammad Ali
"Dating is not supposed to be easy. It's supposed to be a heart-pounding, stomach-wrenching, gut-churning exercise in pitting your fear of rejection and public humiliation against your desire to find a mate. Enjoy." - Darth Wong
"Dating is not supposed to be easy. It's supposed to be a heart-pounding, stomach-wrenching, gut-churning exercise in pitting your fear of rejection and public humiliation against your desire to find a mate. Enjoy." - Darth Wong
Re: Gondolas as Mass-Transit
On reason it might seem that trams, busses and subways can transport a lot more people is that the indivudual cars can hold more pepople. But gondolas run in continous stream while the other options only run every X minutes.
Re: Gondolas as Mass-Transit
It also strikes me that, so long as your routes all use the same basic setup, you could adjust the number of gondolas on any given route to some extent. A route getting too few passengers could have the cabins transferred to one that is getting more, or one getting big loads could have larger cabins installed. Or you could install the lines with a few cabins, then as ridership (and revenue) increases, add more cabins. It'd be a much more adaptable system than the other options.salm wrote:On reason it might seem that trams, busses and subways can transport a lot more people is that the indivudual cars can hold more pepople. But gondolas run in continous stream while the other options only run every X minutes.
- LaCroix
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5196
- Joined: 2004-12-21 12:14pm
- Location: Sopron District, Hungary, Europe, Terra
Re: Gondolas as Mass-Transit
Especially as the gondola system works by detaching the gondola at the station, waiting for people to get in, and then reattaching to the main cable. You could change intervals on the fly, to an extent.Me2005 wrote:It also strikes me that, so long as your routes all use the same basic setup, you could adjust the number of gondolas on any given route to some extent. A route getting too few passengers could have the cabins transferred to one that is getting more, or one getting big loads could have larger cabins installed. Or you could install the lines with a few cabins, then as ridership (and revenue) increases, add more cabins. It'd be a much more adaptable system than the other options.salm wrote:On reason it might seem that trams, busses and subways can transport a lot more people is that the indivudual cars can hold more pepople. But gondolas run in continous stream while the other options only run every X minutes.
A minute's thought suggests that the very idea of this is stupid. A more detailed examination raises the possibility that it might be an answer to the question "how could the Germans win the war after the US gets involved?" - Captain Seafort, in a thread proposing a 1942 'D-Day' in Quiberon Bay
I do archery skeet. With a Trebuchet.
I do archery skeet. With a Trebuchet.
Re: Gondolas as Mass-Transit
On that note, are gondolas still safe if you overload them? Because if you use it for mass transport people are inevitably going to try to cram as many people in them as possible.Starglider wrote:Gondola lift capacity (single link) is 2000 to 6000 people/hour depending on whether you use single cable or multi (drive + support) cable. To pick a couple of local examples, light rail capacity is about 1600 (South London TramLink) to 5500 (London Docklands Light Railway core) people per hour depending on whether you use fully segregated track and advanced signals/controls. I'd note that the light rail capacity assumes standing passengers packed to capacity, whereas gondolas are usually all-seater. For comparison London deep tube lines have a capacity of approx 15,000* people/hour and London CrossRail (underground heavy rail) will have a capacity of approx 20,000 people/hour, but obviously the infrastructure cost for those is extreme.
* Officially; in practice people squash in so tightly for rush hour central segments that the actual peak capacity is probably at least 10% more.
Re: Gondolas as Mass-Transit
In a word, yes. Compared to the design load weight of the carriage and the design load of a crowd (larger then really possible, at least in UK), and the design wind loading there's still a large safety factor.
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
Re: Gondolas as Mass-Transit
I'm not even sure that'd be possible with people. You run out of volume at some point.jwl wrote:On that note, are gondolas still safe if you overload them? Because if you use it for mass transport people are inevitably going to try to cram as many people in them as possible.
Some proponents and proposals I saw recommended using the gondolas as cargo transporters when not in use for passengers (likely midday); and it'd be much easier to overload with cargo than with people. Adding an overload system like an elevator has wouldn't be unreasonable either.